journal article·2026-02-03Open access

Bridging the Semantic Gap in BIM Interior Design: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Explainable Scene Completion

Junfu Feng, Ruidan Luo, Xuechao Li, Xiaoping Zhou, Mengmeng Wang, Jiaqi Yin, Hong Yuan

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

Building information modeling (BIM)-based interior design automation remains constrained by a semantic mismatch: engineering constraints are explicit and categorical, whereas aesthetic style is implicit, contextual, and difficult to formalize. As a result, existing systems often overfit local visual similarity or rely on rigid rules, producing recommendations that drift stylistically at the scene level or conflict with professional design logic. This paper proposes KsDesign, a neuro-symbolic framework for interpretable, retrieval-based BIM scene completion that unifies visual style perception with explicit design knowledge. Offline, KsDesign mines category-level co-occurrence and compatibility patterns from curated designer-quality interiors and encodes them as a weighted Furniture-Matching Knowledge Graph (FMKG). Online, it learns style representations exclusively from BIM-derived 2D renderings/projections of 3D family models and BIM scenes, and applies a knowledge-guided attention mechanism to weight contextual furniture cues, synthesizing a global scene-style representation for candidate ranking and retrieval. In a Top-3 (K = 3) evaluation on 10 BIM test scenes with a 20-expert consensus ground truth, KsDesign consistently outperforms single-modal baselines, achieving 86.7% precision in complex scenes and improving average precision by 23.5% (up to 40%), with a 15.5% average recall increase. These results suggest that global semantic constraints can serve as a logical regularizer, mitigating the local biases of purely visual matching and yielding configurations that are both aesthetically coherent and logically valid. We further implement in-authoring explainability within Revit, exposing KG-derived influence weights and evidence paths to support rationale inspection and immediate family insertion. Finally, the knowledge priors and traceable intermediate representations provide a robust substrate for integration with LLM-driven conversational design agents, enabling constraint-aware, verifiable generation and interactive iteration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · Design Education and Practice · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Intelligent Science and Technology, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China

Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China

Tongzhou Campus, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Capital Engineering & Research Incorporation Limited, Beijing 100176, China

Funding

Specialized Research Fund for the State Key Laboratory of Solar Activity and Space Weather

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Abanda, F.H., Balu, B., Adukpo, S.E., and Akintola, A. (2025). Decoding ISO 19650 Through Process Modelling for Information Management and Stakeholder Communication in BIM. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15030431 ↗
2. Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., and Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119287568 ↗
3. Analyzing the impact of ISO 16739-1: 2024 (Industry Foundation Classes, IFC) on data sharing and Building Information Modeling (BIM) collaboration in the construction industry
4. Applications of machine learning to BIM: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.aei.2021.101474 ↗
5. Jadidoleslami, S., and Saghatforoush, E. (2025). Unveiling diverse AI applications in BIM: A quantitative map of techniques for 10 dimensions. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., 1–19.10.1080/17452007.2025.2579741 ↗
6. Rane, N. (2023). Integrating building information modelling (BIM) and artificial intelligence (AI) for smart construction schedule, cost, quality, and safety management: Challenges and opportunities. Cost, Quality, and Safety Management: Challenges and Opportunities (September 16, 2023), SSRN.10.2139/ssrn.4616055 ↗
7. Natural-language-based intelligent retrieval engine for BIM object database10.1016/j.compind.2019.02.016 ↗
8. Molsa, M., Demian, P., and Gerges, M. (2023). BIM search engine: Effects of object relationships and information standards. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13071591 ↗
9. A survey of personalized interior design10.1111/cgf.14844 ↗
10. Style compatibility for 3D furniture models
11. De Raedt, L., Dumančić, S., Manhaeve, R., and Marra, G. (2020). From statistical relational to neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence. arXiv.10.24963/ijcai.2020/688 ↗
12. BIM product recommendation for intelligent design using style learning10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106701 ↗
13. Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, X., Su, L., and Hu, Q. (2022). BIM Style Restoration Based on Image Retrieval and Object Location Using Convolutional Neural Network. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12122047 ↗
14. Automated code compliance checking research based on BIM and knowledge graph10.1038/s41598-023-34342-1 ↗
15. Love, P.E., Matthews, J., Fang, W., Porter, S., Luo, H., and Ding, L. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence in construction: The content, context, process, outcome evaluation framework. arXiv.
16. Review of explainable graph-based recommender systems10.1145/3772273 ↗
17. Zarghami, S., Kouchaki, H., Yang, L., and Rodriguez, P.M. (2024). Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Generative Design for Construction. EC3 Conference 2024, European Council on Computing in Construction.10.35490/EC3.2024.277 ↗
18. Leimer, K., Guerrero, P., Weiss, T., and Musialski, P. (2022). Layoutenhancer: Generating good indoor layouts from imperfect data. SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3550469.3555425 ↗
19. Yang, Y., Jia, B., Zhi, P., and Huang, S. (2024, January 16–22). Physcene: Physically interactable 3d scene synthesis for embodied ai. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01539 ↗
20. Bai, T., Bai, W., Chen, D., Wu, T., Li, M., and Ma, R. (2025, January 10–17). FreeScene: Mixed Graph Diffusion for 3D Scene Synthesis from Free Prompts. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR52734.2025.00553 ↗
21. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., and Sun, J. (2015). Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 28.
22. Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation10.1145/335191.335372 ↗
23. From statistical relational to neurosymbolic artificial intelligence: A survey10.1016/j.artint.2023.104062 ↗
24. Jung, H., Park, H., and Lee, K. (2023). Enhancing recommender systems with semantic user profiling through frequent subgraph mining on knowledge graphs. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131810041 ↗
25. A review of recommender systems based on knowledge graph embedding10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123876 ↗
26. A survey of graph neural networks for social recommender systems10.1145/3661821 ↗
27. Hellin, S., Nousias, S., and Borrmann, A. (2025). Natural Language Information Retrieval from BIM Models: An LLM-Based Multi-Agent System Approach. EC3 Conference 2025, European Council on Computing in Construction.10.35490/EC3.2025.265 ↗
28. Elsaka, O., Du, C., Nousias, S., and Borrmann, A. (2025). BIM Command Recommendation Using Dynamic Graph Neural Network, International Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering.
29. Automated compliance checking (ACC) classification approach10.36680/j.itcon.2022.017 ↗
30. Digital approaches to construction compliance checking: Validating the suitability of an ecosystem approach to compliance checking10.1016/j.aei.2023.102288 ↗
31. Comparative analysis of approaches for automated compliance checking of construction data10.1016/j.aei.2024.102443 ↗
32. Gourabpasi, H., Jalaei, A.F., and Ghobadi, M. (2025). Developing an openBIM Information Delivery Specifications Framework for Operational Carbon Impact Assessment of Building Projects. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17020673 ↗
33. Extending Information Delivery Specifications for digital building permit requirements10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100560 ↗
34. Ashish, V. (2017). Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30.
35. Ao, L., and Qi, R. (2025). Early-Stage Graph Fusion with Refined Graph Neural Networks for Semantic Code Search. Appl. Sci., 16.10.3390/app16010012 ↗
36. Image neural style transfer: A review10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108723 ↗
37. Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., and Clark, J. (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. International Conference on Machine Learning, PmLR.
38. Alexey, D. (2020). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv.
39. Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jegou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., and Joulin, A. (2021, January 10–17). Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00951 ↗
40. Chiarcos, C., Gkirtzou, K., Ionov, M., Kabashi, B., Khan, F., and Truică, C.O. (2022). Modelling collocations in OntoLex-FrAC. Proceedings of Globalex Workshop on Linked Lexicography Within the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, European Language Resources Association.