journal article·2026-02-03Open access

Modeling Inherent Aesthetics and Contextual Decisions for Personalized Color Recommendation in AIGC

Lin Li, Xinxiong Liu

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

While creative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools offer unprecedented creative power, their outputs often create a “personalization gap” by converging towards a generalized “average aesthetic” that ignores nuanced user preferences. This study addresses this challenge with a proof-of-concept computational framework to model and predict subjective color choices, aiming to make creative systems more human-centered. Our dual-track methodology attempts to decouple user preference into “inherent aesthetic profiles” and “contextual design decisions.” Through a dual-level study with 111 participants, we quantified inherent aesthetics into a vector library and trained a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) model on contextual data to predict design choices. The model achieved a predictive accuracy of 40.8%, and a grouped permutation importance analysis revealed the Product Category (Importance = 0.416) as the dominant predictor, providing evidence that design context is paramount. Crucially, a subsequent exploratory user validation study, analyzed with a linear mixed-effects model, showed our personalized recommendations were rated as significantly more satisfying (β = 1.278, p < 0.001) than those of a non-personalized baseline. This research provides a foundational framework for modeling subjective preference by distinguishing between stable traits and dynamic choices, offering a potential pathway to steer creative AI beyond generic outputs towards more personal and context-aware creative partners.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Color perception and design · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Science & Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430075, China

Funding

Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province under the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., and Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents. arXiv.
2. Art and the science of generative AI10.1126/science.adh4451 ↗
3. Manovich, L. (2018). AI Aesthetics, Strelka Press.
4. Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing
5. Yu, K., Xiao, Y., Li, M., Yu, S., Yang, Y., Guo, X., Zhang, W., and Yuan, X. (2024, January 23–28). Design for AI-Integrated design team collaboration: A strategy and exploration using Node Flow in establishing a reusable representation of knowledge in the collaborative process. Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference 2024 (DRS2024), Boston, MA, USA.10.21606/drs.2024.985 ↗
6. Turchi, T., Carta, S., Ambrosini, L., and Malizia, A. (2023, January 6–9). Human-AI co-creation: Evaluating the impact of large-scale text-to-image generative models on the creative process. Proceedings of the International Symposium on End-User Development (IS-EUD 2023), Cagliari, Italy.10.1007/978-3-031-34433-6_3 ↗
7. A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: Colour emotions for single colours10.1002/col.20010 ↗
8. Palmer, S.E., and Schloss, K.B. (2010, January 18–21). Human preference for individual colors. Proceedings of the Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XV, San Jose, CA, USA.10.1117/12.849110 ↗
9. Bridging the Semantic Gap in Computational Color Design: A Neurocognitively Validated Framework10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3648792 ↗
10. Luo, X., and Yuan, M. (2023). Special Issue on “Machine-Learning-Assisted Intelligent Processing and Optimization of Complex Systems”. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11092595 ↗
11. An ecological valence theory of human color preference10.1073/pnas.0906172107 ↗
12. Nichols, W.J. (2015). Blue Mind: The Surprising Science that Shows How Being Near, in, on, or Under Water Can Make You Happier, Healthier, More Connected, and Better at What You Do, Back Bay Books.
13. Biological components of sex differences in color preference10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022 ↗
14. Managing images in different cultures: A cross-national study of colour meanings and preferences10.1509/jimk.8.4.90.19795 ↗
15. A comparative study of color preferences in Japan, China and Indonesia, with emphasis on the preference for white10.2466/pms.1996.83.1.115 ↗
16. Are you selling the right colour? A cross-cultural review of colour as a marketing cue10.1080/13527260500247827 ↗
17. Color preferences are not universal10.1037/a0030273 ↗
18. A cross-cultural comparison of colour emotion for two-colour combinations10.1002/col.20648 ↗
19. Itten, J. (1973). The Art of Color: The Subjective Experience and Objective Rationale of Color, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
20. Tokumaru, M., Muranaka, N., and Imanishi, S. (2002, January 12–17). Color design support system considering color harmony. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.
21. Color compatibility from large image datasets
22. Effects of color on emotions10.1037/0096-3445.123.4.394 ↗
23. Affective color palettes in visualization
24. Nagamachi, M. (2010). Kansei/Affective Engineering, CRC Press.
25. Li, S. (2024). DiffStyler: Diffusion-based Localized Image Style Transfer. arXiv.
26. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems10.1109/MC.2009.263 ↗
27. Wang, T., Brovman, Y.M., and Madhvanath, S. (2021). Personalized Embedding-based e-Commerce Recommendations at eBay. arXiv.
28. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗