journal article·2026-02-02Open access

An Improved Map Information Collection Tool Using 360° Panoramic Images for Indoor Navigation Systems

Kadek Suarjuna Batubulan, Nobuo Funabiki, I Nyoman Darma Kotama, Komang Candra Brata, Anak Agung Surya Pradhana

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

At present, pedestrian navigation systems using smartphones have become common in daily activities. For their ubiquitous, accurate, and reliable services, map information collection is essential for constructing comprehensive spatial databases. Previously, we have developed a map information collection tool to extract building information using Google Maps, optical character recognition (OCR), geolocation, and web scraping with smartphones. However, indoor navigation often suffers from inaccurate localization due to degraded GPS signals inside buildings and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) estimation errors, causing position errors and confusing augmented reality (AR) guidance. In this paper, we present an improved map information collection tool to address this problem. It captures 360° panoramic images to build 3D models, apply photogrammetry-based mesh reconstruction to correct geometry, and georeference point clouds to refine latitude–longitude coordinates. For evaluations, experiments in various indoor scenarios were conducted. The results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively mitigates positional errors with an average drift correction of 3.15 m, calculated via the Haversine formula. Geometric validation using point cloud analysis showed high registration accuracy, which translated to a 100% task completion rate and an average navigation time of 124.5 s among participants. Furthermore, usability testing using the System Usability Scale (SUS) yielded an average score of 96.5, categorizing the user interface as ’Best Imaginable’. These quantitative findings substantiate that the integration of 360° imaging and photogrammetric correction significantly enhances navigation reliability and user satisfaction compared with previous sensor fusion approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications · Spatial Cognition and Navigation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan

Department of Informatics Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Ma, S., Wang, P., and Lee, H. (2024). An Enhanced Hidden Markov Model for Map-Matching in Pedestrian Navigation. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13091685 ↗
2. Recent Advances in Pedestrian Navigation Activity Recognition: A Review10.1109/JSEN.2022.3153610 ↗
3. Asrat, K.T., and Cho, H.J. (2024). A Comprehensive Survey on High-Definition Map Generation and Maintenance. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 13.10.3390/ijgi13070232 ↗
4. Enhancing spatial accuracy of OpenStreetMap data: A geometric approach
5. Kango, V., Eraqi, H.M., and Moustafa, M. (2024, January 7–12). High Precision Map Conflation of Fleet Sourced Traffic Signs. Proceedings of the IGARSS 2024—2024 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Athens, Greece.10.1109/IGARSS53475.2024.10642165 ↗
6. Chaure, A.S., Santosh Malloli, R., Malave, M.S., Basagonda Vhananavar, S., and Borse, S. (2024, January 23–24). Enhancing Navigation Systems: A Comprehensive Survey with Proposed Innovations for Improved User Experience. Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), Pune, India.10.1109/ICCUBEA61740.2024.10775158 ↗
7. Batubulan, K.S., Funabiki, N., Brata, K.C., Kotama, I.N.D., Kyaw, H.H.S., and Hidayati, S.C. (2025). A Map Information Collection Tool for a Pedestrian Navigation System Using Smartphone. Information, 16.10.3390/info16070588 ↗
8. Brata, K.C., Funabiki, N., Panduman, Y.Y.F., and Fajrianti, E.D. (2024). An Enhancement of Outdoor Location-Based Augmented Reality Anchor Precision through VSLAM and Google Street View. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24041161 ↗
9. Brata, K.C., Funabiki, N., Riyantoko, P.A., Panduman, Y.Y.F., and Mentari, M. (2024). Performance Investigations of VSLAM and Google Street View Integration in Outdoor Location-Based Augmented Reality under Various Lighting Conditions. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13152930 ↗
10. Brata, K.C., Funabiki, N., Panduman, Y.Y.F., Mentari, M., Syaifudin, Y.W., and Rahmadani, A.A. (2025). A Proposal of In Situ Authoring Tool with Visual-Inertial Sensor Fusion for Outdoor Location-Based Augmented Reality. Electronics, 14.10.3390/electronics14020342 ↗
11. Fajrianti, E.D., Funabiki, N., Sukaridhoto, S., Panduman, Y.Y.F., Dezheng, K., Shihao, F., and Surya Pradhana, A.A. (2023). INSUS: Indoor Navigation System Using Unity and Smartphone for User Ambulation Assistance. Information, 14.10.3390/info14070359 ↗
12. A User Location Reset Method through Object Recognition in Indoor Navigation System Using Unity and a Smartphone (INSUS)10.3390/network4030014 ↗
13. Lu, M., Arikawa, M., Oba, K., Ishikawa, K., Jin, Y., Utsumi, T., and Sato, R. (2024). Indoor AR Navigation Framework Based on Geofencing and Image-Tracking with Accumulated Error Correction. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14104262 ↗
14. Petrič, T., Ude, A., and Žlajpah, L. (2023). Understanding Why SLAM Algorithms Fail in Modern Indoor Environments. Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-32606-6 ↗
15. HoloSLAM: A novel approach to virtual landmark-based SLAM for indoor environments10.1007/s40747-024-01367-6 ↗
16. Schoovaerts, M., Li, R., Niu, K., and Poorten, E.V. (2022, January 13–15). Quantitative Assessment of Calibration Motion Profiles in Robotic-assisted Ultrasound System. Proceedings of the 2022 International Symposium on Medical Robotics (ISMR), Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/ISMR48347.2022.9807524 ↗
17. Assessing Precision and Dependability of Reconstructed Three-Dimensional Modeling for Vehicles at Crash Scenes using Unmanned Aircraft System10.11113/jagst.v3n2.76 ↗
18. Kotama, I.N.D., Funabiki, N., Panduman, Y.Y.F., Brata, K.C., Pradhana, A.A.S., and Desnanjaya, I.G.M.N. (2025). Implementation of Sensor Input Setup Assistance Service Using Generative AI for SEMAR IoT Application Server Platform. Information, 16.10.3390/info16020108 ↗
19. Wang, W., Wu, R., Dong, Y., and Jiang, H. (2025). Research on Indoor 3D Semantic Mapping Based on ORB-SLAM2 and Multi-Object Tracking. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152010881 ↗
20. Tsiamitros, N., Mahapatra, T., Passalidis, I., Kailashnath, K., and Pipelidis, G. (2023). Pedestrian Flow Identification and Occupancy Prediction for Indoor Areas. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23094301 ↗
21. Wan, Q., Yu, Y., Chen, R., and Chen, L. (2022). Map-Assisted 3D Indoor Localization Using Crowd-Sensing-Based Trajectory Data and Error Ellipse-Enhanced Fusion. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14184636 ↗
22. Investigating the Accuracy of a 360° Camera for 3D Modeling in Confined Spaces: 360° Panorama vs 25-Rig Compared to TLS
23. Yang, Z., Zhao, K., Yang, S., Xiong, Y., Zhang, C., Deng, L., and Zhang, D. (2025). Research on a Density-Based Clustering Method for Eliminating Inter-Frame Feature Mismatches in Visual SLAM Under Dynamic Scenes. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25030622 ↗
24. Vacca, G., and Vecchi, E. (2025). Integrated Geomatic Approaches for the 3D Documentation and Analysis of the Church of Saint Andrew in Orani, Sardinia. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17193376 ↗
25. Liu, H., Yuan, Y., Yin, X., and Su, L. (2025). Spatial/Spectral-Frequency Adaptive Network for Hyperspectral Image Reconstruction in CASSI. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17193382 ↗
26. Zhu, Q., Li, H., Sun, H., Xia, T., Wang, X., and Han, Z. (2025). 3DV-Unet: Eddy-Resolving Reconstruction of Three-Dimensional Upper-Ocean Physical Fields from Satellite Observations. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17193394 ↗
27. Voxel Structure-Based Mesh Reconstruction From a 3D Point Cloud10.1109/TMM.2021.3073265 ↗
28. Tresnawati, D., Mulyani, A., Nugraha, C., Fitriani, L., Lestari, N., and Nugraha, D. (2024, January 4–5). An Augmented Reality Technology in Indoor Navigation for Smart Museum Using Bluetooth Low Energy Communication. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), Bandung, Indonesia.10.1109/ICISS62896.2024.10751467 ↗
29. Bash, E.A., Wecker, L., Rahman, M.M., Dow, C.F., McDermid, G., Samavati, F.F., Whitehead, K., Moorman, B.J., Medrzycka, D., and Copland, L. (2023). A Multi-Resolution Approach to Point Cloud Registration without Control Points. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15041161 ↗
30. Kong, X. (2021). Identifying Geomorphological Changes of Coastal Cliffs through Point Cloud Registration from UAV Images. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13163152 ↗
31. A Brief Overview of the Current State, Challenging Issues and Future Directions of Point Cloud Registration
32. Elghayesh, A., and Mekawey, H. (2025, January 12–13). MSA University Campus Indoor Navigation and positioning System Using Augmented Reality. Proceedings of the 2025 Intelligent Methods, Systems, and Applications (IMSA), Giza, Egypt.10.1109/IMSA65733.2025.11167115 ↗
33. B, K., Sankar, S., R, S., and Ranjani, J. (2024, January 8–9). AR GuideX: Indoor Wayfinder. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Power, Energy, Control and Transmission Systems (ICPECTS), Chennai, India.10.1109/ICPECTS62210.2024.10780164 ↗
34. Messi, L., Spegni, F., Vaccarini, M., Corneli, A., and Binni, L. (2024, January 12–14). Infrastructure-Free Localization System for Augmented Reality Registration in Indoor Environments: A First Accuracy Assessment. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment (MetroLivEnv), Chania, Greece.10.1109/MetroLivEnv60384.2024.10615455 ↗
35. In-camera IMU angular data for orthophoto projection in underwater photogrammetry10.1016/j.ophoto.2022.100027 ↗
36. Fast Rolling Shutter Correction in the Wild10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3284847 ↗
37. Insta360 (2026, January 10). Insta360 X5 8K 360º Action Camera. Available online: https://www.insta360.com/product/insta360-x5.
38. Cupix Inc (2025, January 31). CupixVista: AI-Powered 3D Digital Twin Platform. Available online: https://www.cupixvista.com/.
39. Visual Computing Lab-ISTI-CNR (2025, January 31). MeshLab. Open Source Mesh Processing Tool. Available online: https://www.meshlab.net/.
40. Girardeau-Montaut, D. (CloudCompare, 2025). CloudCompare, Version 2.14 (Alpha).
41. Google Developers (2025, January 31). ARCore: Google’s Platform for Building Augmented Reality Experiences. Available online: https://developers.google.com/ar?hl=id.
42. User Experience and Multimodal Usability for Navigation Systems
43. Harwati, T.S., Nendya, M.B., Dendy Senapartha, I.K., Lukito, Y., Tjahjono, F.N., and Jovan, K.I. (2024, January 12–13). Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality Indoor Navigation: A System Usability Scale Approach. Proceedings of the 2024 2nd International Conference on Technology Innovation and Its Applications (ICTIIA), Medan, Indonesia.10.1109/ICTIIA61827.2024.10761358 ↗
44. MUL-VR: Multi-UAV Collaborative Layered Visual Perception and Transmission for Virtual Reality10.1109/TWC.2024.3524275 ↗