journal article·2026-02-02Open access

Unseen Hazard Recognition in Autonomous Driving Using Vision–Language and Sensor-Based Temporal Models

Faisal Mehmood, Sajid Ur Rehman, Asif Mehmood, Young-Jin Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

Autonomous driving (AD) systems remain vulnerable to rare, ambiguous, and out-of-label (OOL) hazards that are insufficiently represented in conventional training datasets. This work investigates perception robustness under such conditions by using the Challenge of Out-Of-Label (COOOL) benchmark dataset, which consists of 200 dashcam video sequences annotated with both common and uncommon traffic hazards. We analyze that the behavior of widely used methods in the perception of components and present a multimodal pipeline in which we integrate YOLO11x for object detection, Hough Transform for lane estimation, and GPT-4o for scene description, and for temporal modeling, we use Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. On the COOOL benchmark, YOLO11x achieves an mAP@0.5 of 54.1% on the common object categories, whereas the detection of rare and OFL hazards remains challenging, with a recall of 72.6%. Incorporating temporal risk modeling improves hazard recall to 71.8%, indicating a modest but consistent gain in recognizing uncommon events. Hough Transform shows the stable behavior in standard conditions for lane estimation, with a mean lateral deviation of 8.9 pixels in daylight scenes and 13.4 pixels under low-light conditions. The temporal anomaly detection module attains an AUROC of 0.65, reflecting the limitation but meaningful discrimination between nominal and anomalous driving situations. For interpretability, the GPT-4o scene description module generates context-aware textual explanations with an object coverage score of 0.72 and a factual consistency rate of 78%, as assessed through manual inspection. The end-to-end pipeline operates at approximately 10–12 frames per second on a single GPU, supporting near-real-time analysis and optimization. Our results confirm that state-of-the-art perception models struggle with OOL hazards and that multimodal vision–language–temporal integration provides incremental improvements in robustness and interpretability when evaluated under the standardized out-of-distribution conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of AI and Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Department of Creative Technologies, Air University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Medical Device Development Center, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation, Cheongju 28160, Chungbuk, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation (NRF) and the Ministry of Science and ICT

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Chai, Z., Nie, T., and Becker, J. (2021). Autonomous Driving Changes the Future, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-6728-5 ↗
2. Mehmood, A., Muhammad, A., Mehmood, F., and Song, W.C. (2024). Enhancing vehicle location prediction accuracy with road-aware rectification for multi-access edge computing applications. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12243980 ↗
3. Autonomous vehicles and intelligent automation: Applications, challenges, and opportunities
4. Smart city traffic management: Acoustic-based vehicle detection using stacking-based ensemble deep learning approach10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3370867 ↗
5. Mehmood, A., Mehmood, F., and Kim, J. (2025). Towards Explainable Deep Learning in Computational Neuroscience: Visual and Clinical Applications. Mathematics, 13.10.3390/math13203286 ↗
6. Mehmood, F., Rehman, S.U., and Choi, A. (2025). Vision-AQ: Explainable Multi-Modal Deep Learning for Air Pollution Classification in Smart Cities. Mathematics, 13.10.3390/math13183017 ↗
7. Madhav, A.S., and Tyagi, A.K. (2021, January 30–31). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Connecting artificial decision-making and human trust in autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computing, Communications, and Cyber-Security: IC4S 2021, Ghaziabad, India.
8. Hou, J., Liu, S., Bie, Y., Wang, H., Tan, A., Luo, L., and Chen, H. (2024). Self-eXplainable AI for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey and New Outlooks. arXiv.
9. Zhou, X., Liu, M., Zagar, B.L., Yurtsever, E., and Knoll, A.C. (2023). Vision language models in autonomous driving and intelligent transportation systems. arXiv.
10. Clinical decision support system (CDSS) for heart disease diagnosis and prediction by machine learning algorithms: A systematic literature review10.1142/S0219519423300016 ↗
11. Sural, S., and Rajkumar, R. (2024). ContextVLM: Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Context Understanding for Autonomous Driving using Vision Language Models. arXiv.10.1109/ITSC58415.2024.10920066 ↗
12. Wong, K., Wang, S., Ren, M., Liang, M., and Urtasun, R. (November, January 30). Identifying unknown instances for autonomous driving. Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning, PMLR, Osaka, Japan.
13. A review of LiDAR-based 3D object detection via deep learning Approaches towards robust connected and autonomous vehicles10.1109/TIV.2024.3415771 ↗
14. Deep Learning Frontiers in 3D Object Detection: A Comprehensive Review for Autonomous Driving10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3456893 ↗
15. Route positioning system for campus shuttle bus service using a single camera10.3390/electronics13112004 ↗
16. Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A.H., Vora, S., Liong, V.E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., and Beijbom, O. (2020, January 13–19). nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01164 ↗
17. Exploiting machine learning models for identification of heart diseases10.56979/302/2022/63 ↗
18. Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., Dotiwalla, X., Chouard, A., Patnaik, V., Tsui, P., Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Chai, Y., and Caine, B. (2020, January 13–19). Scalability in perception for autonomous driving: Waymo open dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00252 ↗
19. Huang, X., Cheng, X., Geng, Q., Cao, B., Zhou, D., Wang, P., Lin, Y., and Yang, R. (2018, January 18–22). The apolloscape dataset for autonomous driving. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPRW.2018.00141 ↗
20. An in-depth evaluation of deep learning-enabled adaptive approaches for detecting obstacles using sensor-fused data in autonomous vehicles10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108550 ↗
21. Chakravarthula, P., D’Souza, J.A., Tseng, E., Bartusek, J., and Heide, F. (2023, January 17–24). Seeing with sound: Long-range acoustic beamforming for multimodal scene understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00101 ↗
22. Greer, R. (2024). Towards Safe, Human-Centered Autonomous Driving: Real-World Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Situation Awareness and Transition Control. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of California].
23. Greer, R., Isa, J., Deo, N., Rangesh, A., and Trivedi, M.M. (2022, January 3–8). On salience-sensitive sign classification in autonomous vehicle path planning: Experimental explorations with a novel dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/WACVW54805.2022.00070 ↗
24. Comparative study of some deep learning object detection algorithms: R-CNN, fast R-CNN, faster R-CNN, SSD, and YOLO
25. Application of Uncertainty to Out-of-Distribution Detection for Autonomous Driving Perception Safety10.1109/TITS.2025.3557996 ↗
26. When language and vision meet road safety: Leveraging multimodal large language models for video-based traffic accident analysis10.1016/j.aap.2025.108077 ↗
27. Nasr Azadani, M. (2024). Driving Behavior Analysis and Prediction for Safe Autonomous Vehicles. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa].
28. Explainable AI for safe and trustworthy autonomous driving: A systematic review10.1109/TITS.2024.3474469 ↗
29. AlShami, A.K., Kalita, A., Rabinowitz, R., Lam, K., Bezbarua, R., Boult, T., and Kalita, J. (2024). COOOL: Challenge Of Out-Of-Label A Novel Benchmark for Autonomous Driving. arXiv.
30. Xie, Z., Ni, Z., Yang, W., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., and Ma, X. (2024, January 16–22). A robust online multi-camera people tracking system with geometric consistency and state-aware re-id correction. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW63382.2024.00694 ↗
31. Xuan, K.T., Nguyen, K.N., Ngo, B.H., Xuan, V.D., An, M.H., and Dinh, Q.V. (2024, January 16–22). Divide and conquer boosting for enhanced traffic safety description and analysis with large vision language model. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW63382.2024.00698 ↗
32. Why did the AI make that decision? Towards an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for autonomous driving systems10.1016/j.trc.2023.104358 ↗
33. Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., and Zitnick, C.L. (2014). Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. Computer Vision–ECCV 2014, Proceedings of the 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, 6–12 September 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 ↗