journal article·2026-02-02Open access

The Influence of Supercritical CO2 Displacement at Different Temperatures on Porosity and Permeability Evolution in Marine Unconsolidated Strata

Xiaoyang Li, Yingli Wang, Junda Chen, Shiyu Zhang, Yule Hu, Qingcheng He, Hanzhe Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

CO2 geological sequestration in marine sediment is one of the important ways to lower carbon emissions. To study the influence of CO2 sequestration on the permeability and porosity of unconsolidated strata, this paper conducted overpressure permeability, isothermal adsorption and CO2 displacement experiments. Through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology, the effects of supercritical CO2 (SCO2) at different temperatures on the permeability evolution and pore size variation of unstratified strata in marine hydrate reservoirs were studied. The experimental results show that: (1) When the pressure changed from 0 to 17.5 MPa, the permeability and porosity of the soil samples decreased sharply. The porosity dropped from 36.83% to 16.07%, and the permeability also decreased from 48.53 mD to 1.18 mD. (2) During the adsorption tests, the fitted absolute adsorption capacity of CO2 and CH4 gradually increased with pressure growth. The maximum fitted absolute adsorption capacity of CO2 was 2.45 times that of CH4. (3) Through displacement experiments, the porosity and permeability increments during SCO2 displacement were much greater than those during non-SCO2 displacement. From 30 °C to 70 °C, the increments of porosity and permeability all increased. After SCO2 displacement, the pores’ proportions (>0.1 μm) increased for all samples, with the largest growth rate reaching 34.37%. Above all, these results indicate that environmental pressure significantly affects the permeability of soil samples, and that SCO2 displacement can effectively enhance the proportion of large-sized pores, thereby further improving the permeability of unconsolidated strata.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China

Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China

Institute of Exploration Techniques, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Tianjin 300300, China

College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, China

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Tian, Y., Ren, X., Li, K., and Li, X. (2025). Carbon Dioxide Emission Forecast: A Review of Existing Models and Future Challenges. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17041471 ↗
2. Surprising stability of recent global carbon cycling enables improved fossil fuel emission verification10.1038/s41558-023-01761-x ↗
3. The impact of human and livestock respiration on CO2 emissions from 14 global cities10.1186/s13021-022-00217-7 ↗
4. Atmospheric CO2 during the Mid-Piacenzian Warm Period and the M2 glaciation10.1038/s41598-020-67154-8 ↗
5. Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies10.1038/s41558-019-0659-6 ↗
6. Unstable, super critical CO2-water displacement in fine grained porous media under geologic carbon sequestration conditions10.1038/s41598-019-47437-5 ↗
7. Storage of Carbon Dioxide in Saline Aquifers: Physicochemical Processes, Key Constraints, and Scale-Up Potential10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-093020-091447 ↗
8. Worden, R.H. (2024). Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) in Saline Aquifers versus Depleted Gas Fields. Geosciences, 14.10.3390/geosciences14060146 ↗
9. Review on CH4-CO2 replacement for CO2 sequestration and CH4/CO2 hydrate formation in porous media10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123795 ↗
10. Recent advances in carbon dioxide geological storage, experimental procedures, influencing parameter, and future outlook10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103895 ↗
11. A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.015 ↗
12. Techno-socio-economic analysis of geological carbon sequestration opportunities10.1039/D1VA00036E ↗
13. Lessons learned from 14 years of CCS operations: Sleipner, In Salah and Snohvit10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.541 ↗
14. The Sleipner storage site: Capillary flow modeling of a layered CO2 plume requires fractured shale barriers within the Utsira Formation10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.017 ↗
15. Determination of CO2 solubility in brines and produced waters of various salinities for CO2 EOR and storage applications
16. How injecting CO2 enhances marine natural gas hydrate exploitation: Review and prospect10.1016/j.rser.2025.116011 ↗
17. Takao, E. (1993). Method for Dumping and Disposing of Carbon Dioxide Gas and Apparatus Therefor. Google Patents. (5,261,490), U.S. Patent.
18. Methane exploitation by carbon dioxide from gas hydrates—Phase equilibria for CO2-CH4 mixed hydrate systemtl10.1252/jcej.29.478 ↗
19. Pandey, J.S., and von Solms, N. (2019). Hydrate stability and methane recovery from gas hydrate through CH4–CO2 replacement in different mass transfer scenarios. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12122309 ↗
20. Methane recovery from methane hydrate using pressurized CO210.1016/j.fluid.2004.10.002 ↗
21. Enhanced CH4 recovery and CO2 storage via thermal stimulation in the CH4/CO2 replacement of methane hydrate10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.047 ↗
22. Efficiency enhancements in methane recovery from natural gas hydrates using injection of CO2/N2 gas mixture simulating in-situ combustion10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.023 ↗
23. Review on carbon dioxide replacement of natural gas hydrate: Research progress and perspectives10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01292 ↗
24. The first offshore natural gas hydrate production test in South China Sea10.31035/cg2018003 ↗
25. Evaluation of CO2 storage of water alternating gas flooding using experimental and numerical simulation methods10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122489 ↗
26. Numerical Simulation Study on the Effect of Horizontal Well Reservoir Stimulation for Gas Hydrate Production10.1111/1755-6724.14930 ↗
27. Marine controlled-source electromagnetic imaging of natural gas hydrates and gas source conditions in the Shenhu area of the South China Sea
28. Ye, L., Qin, W., Qiu, J., Xie, W., Lu, F., Lu, C., Zhou, H., Liu, Y., Yang, B., and Cao, J. (2018). Data report: Molecular and isotopic compositions of the extracted gas from China’s first offshore natural gas hydrate production test in South China Sea. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11102793 ↗
29. Supercritical CO2: Properties and Technological Applications—A Review10.1007/s11630-019-1118-4 ↗
30. Response characteristics of shale permeability to cyclic loading under different gas pressures10.1038/s41598-025-08021-2 ↗
31. Unloading-induced permeability recovery in rock fractures10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.06.002 ↗
32. Mechanical Responses and Permeability Evolution in Porous Sandstones Under Cyclic Loading Conditions: Implications for Subsurface Hydrogen Storage10.1007/s00603-025-04662-x ↗
33. Adsorption affinity of different types of coal: Mean isosteric heat of adsorption10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00432 ↗
34. Carbon dioxide adsorption on shale: A comparative study of isotherm models across diverse samples and temperatures10.1051/e3sconf/202448803009 ↗
35. A Novel experimental system for accurate gas sorption and its application to various shale rocks10.1016/j.cherd.2020.10.034 ↗
36. Competitive adsorption of CH4/CO2 in shale nanopores during static and displacement process10.1016/j.ngib.2024.05.001 ↗
37. Replacement of Methane as Part of the Gas Hydrate by Carbon Dioxide in the Stratum with Negative Temperature10.1007/s10891-023-02690-4 ↗
38. CO2 flooding enhanced oil recovery evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging technique10.1016/j.energy.2020.117878 ↗
39. Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.039 ↗
40. Permeability evolution of coal subjected to triaxial compression based on in-situ nuclear magnetic resonance10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105213 ↗
41. Influence of thermodynamic and stress conditions in saline aquifers on CO2 drainage: Optimization of CO2 storage and energy recovery10.46690/ager.2025.12.01 ↗