journal article·2026-01-31Open access

UAS-Based Photogrammetric Assessment of Geomorphological Changes Along the Lilas River (Evia Island, Central Greece) After the August 2020 Flood

Nafsika Ioanna Spyrou, Spyridon Mavroulis, Emmanuel Vassilakis, Emmanouil Andreadakis, Michalis Diakakis, Panagiotis Stamatakopoulos, Evelina Kotsi, Aliki Konsolaki, Issaak Parcharidis, Efthymios Lekkas

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

Geomorphological change is a fundamental consequence of high-magnitude flood events, as extreme hydraulic forcing can rapidly reshape river channels, redistribute sediment, and alter floodplain connectivity. This study applies multi-temporal UAS-based Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry to quantify flood-induced geomorphological changes along two representative reaches of the Lilas River (Evia Island, Central Greece) affected by the extreme August 2020 flash flood. High-resolution aerial surveys were conducted prior to the event (June 2018) and shortly after the flood (September 2020), producing Digital Surface Models (DSMs) and orthomosaics with a ground sampling distance of ~2.5 cm. Differential DSM analysis reveals pronounced spatial heterogeneity in erosion and deposition, with net erosional lowering locally exceeding 7 m and depositional aggradation reaching up to ~5 m after accounting for vegetation effects. Channel widening was the dominant response, with cross-sectional widths increasing by a factor of three to nine at selected locations, driven primarily by lateral bank erosion. The results highlight the strong interaction between extreme hydrological forcing, loose alluvial sediments, vegetation removal, and human interventions such as roads and engineered terraces. The study demonstrates how repeatable UAS–SfM workflows can provide quantitative evidence to support post-flood assessment, guide infrastructure adaptation, and inform river restoration and flood risk management in Mediterranean catchments prone to extreme events.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Soil erosion and sediment transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Dynamic, Tectonic, Applied Geology, Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece

Department of Geography and Climatology, Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece

Department of Geography, Harokopio University, 17676 Kallithea, Greece

References (92)

Show source-provided references
1. Phillips, J.D. (2021). Landscape Evolution: Landforms, Ecosystems, and Soils, Elsevier. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351351374_Landscape_Evolution_Landforms_Ecosystems_and_Soils.
2. Landslide activity monitoring with the help of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W4-215-2015 ↗
3. Erosion, transportation, and sedimentation performed by the atmosphere10.1086/606957 ↗
4. Kociuba, W., and Janicki, G. (2018). Effect of meteorological patterns on the intensity of streambank erosion in a proglacial gravel-bed river (Spitsbergen). Water, 10.10.3390/w10030320 ↗
5. Effect of gravity on the erosion of model samples10.1134/S1064229315070078 ↗
6. Szabó, J. (2010). Anthropogenic geomorphology: Subject and system. Anthropogenic Geomorphology: A Guide to Man-Made Landforms, Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-3058-0 ↗
7. Abrupt geological changes: Causes, effects, and public issues10.1016/j.quaint.2006.01.011 ↗
8. Ice-marginal lakes associated with enhanced recession of the Greenland Ice Sheet10.1016/j.gloplacha.2021.103503 ↗
9. Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00219-2 ↗
10. Anthropogenic land use and land cover changes—A review on its environmental consequences and climate change10.1007/s12524-022-01569-w ↗
11. Remote sensing and GIS for natural hazards assessment and disaster risk management
12. ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021 ↗
13. Coastal cliff geometry derived from structure-from-motion photogrammetry at Stara Baška, Krk Island, Croatia10.1007/s00367-014-0380-4 ↗
14. Monitoring river morphology & bank erosion using UAV imagery—A case study of the river Buëch, Hautes-Alpes, France
15. Topographic structure from motion: A new development in photogrammetric measurement10.1002/esp.3366 ↗
16. Carrivick, J.L., Smith, M.W., and Quincey, D.J. (2016). Structure from Motion in the Geosciences, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118895818 ↗
17. Psomiadis, E., Charizopoulos, N., Efthimiou, N., Soulis, K.X., and Charalampopoulos, I. (2020). Earth observation and GIS-based analysis for landslide susceptibility and risk assessment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9090552 ↗
18. Sediment–water flows in mountain streams: Recognition and classification based on field evidence10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107413 ↗
19. A dynamic, network scale sediment (dis) connectivity model to reconstruct historical sediment transfer and river reach sediment budgets10.1029/2021WR030784 ↗
20. Evolution of abandoned channels: Insights on controlling factors in a multi-pressure river system10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.036 ↗
21. Remote sensing of river corridors: A review of current trends and future directions10.1002/rra.3479 ↗
22. More than one million barriers fragment Europe’s rivers10.1038/s41586-020-3005-2 ↗
23. Evaluating short-term morphological changes in a gravel-bed braided river using terrestrial laser scanner10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.07.007 ↗
24. Regional hydromorphological characterization with continuous and automated remote sensing analysis based on VHR imagery and low-resolution LiDAR data10.1002/esp.4092 ↗
25. Pashova, L., and Rao, B.S. (2024). Photogrammetry. Advances in Geospatial Technologies for Natural Resource Management, CRC Press. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003035404-2/photogrammetry-lyubka-pashova-sadasiva-rao.10.1201/9781003035404-2 ↗
26. Gomez, C. (2022). Point Cloud Technologies for Geomorphologists, Springer. Textbooks in Earth Sciences, Geography and Environment.10.1007/978-3-031-10975-1 ↗
27. Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.006 ↗
28. Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry10.1002/esp.3613 ↗
29. Investigating the geomorphological potential of freely available and accessible structure-from-motion photogrammetry using a smartphone10.1002/esp.3648 ↗
30. Liu, X., Lian, X., Yang, W., Wang, F., Han, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2022). Accuracy assessment of a UAV direct georeferencing method and impact of the configuration of ground control points. Drones, 6.10.3390/drones6020030 ↗
31. Optimization of ground control point (GCP) configuration for Unmanned Aircraft System (UAV) survey using structure from motion (SFM)10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W12-167-2019 ↗
32. National Statistical Service of Greece (NSSG) (2025, December 16). Population and Housing Census 2021. Available online: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.41/2000/files/Greece/Presentation%20of%20the%20census%202001.pdf.
33. Floods in Greece, a statistical and spatial approach10.1007/s11069-012-0090-z ↗
34. The August 9, 2020 Evia (Central Greece) Flood
35. Spyrou, N.I., Diakakis, M., Mavroulis, S., Deligiannakis, G., Andreadakis, E., Filis, C., Kotsi, E., Antoniadis, Z., Melaki, M., and Gogou, M. (2025). Integrating Ground and UAV Mapping for GIS-Based Application of the Flash Flood Impact Severity Scale (FFISS) for the 2009 and 2020 Evia (Greece) Flash Floods. Appl. Sci., 15.10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13306 ↗
36. Geological and hydrometeorological hazards and related disasters amid COVID-19 pandemic in Greece: Post-disaster trends and factors affecting the COVID-19 evolution in affected areas10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105236 ↗
37. The Use of Stream Power as an Indicator of Channel Sensitivity to Erosion and Deposition Processes10.1002/rra.2717 ↗
38. Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.021 ↗
39. Nesbit, P.R., and Hugenholtz, C.H. (2019). Enhancing UAV–SFM 3D model accuracy in high-relief landscapes by incorporating oblique images. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11030239 ↗
40. (2025, December 21). Pix4D. Available online: https://www.pix4d.com/.
41. Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for high-resolution reconstruction of topography: The structure from motion approach on coastal environments10.3390/rs5126880 ↗
42. Gonçalves, J., and Henriques, R. (2015). UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.02.009 ↗
43. Taddia, Y., Stecchi, F., and Pellegrinelli, A. (2020). Coastal mapping using DJI Phantom 4 RTK in post-processing kinematic mode. Drones, 4.10.3390/drones4020009 ↗
44. Correia, C.A., Andrade, F.A., Sivertsen, A., Guedes, I.P., Pinto, M.F., Manhães, A.G., and Haddad, D.B. (2022). Comprehensive direct georeferencing of aerial images for unmanned aerial systems applications. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22020604 ↗
45. Konsolaki, A., Karantanellis, E., Vassilakis, E., Kotsi, E., and Lekkas, E. (2024). Multitemporal Monitoring for Cliff Failure Potential Using Close-Range Remote Sensing Techniques at Navagio Beach, Greece. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16234610 ↗
46. Oniga, V.E., Breaban, A.I., and Statescu, F. (2018). Determining the optimum number of ground control points for obtaining high precision results based on UAS images. Proceedings, 2.10.3390/ecrs-2-05165 ↗
47. UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x ↗
48. Panagiotopoulou, S., Erkeki, A., Grigorakakis, P., and Vassilakis, E. (2022, January 10–16). The use of UAS imagery equipped with multispectral camera for Precision Agriculture applications. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Data Science for GNSS Remote Sensing, Potsdam, Germany.
49. Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography10.1177/0309133315615805 ↗
50. Agisoft LLC (2025, December 21). Agisoft Metashape User Manual. Available online: https://www.agisoft.com/downloads/user-manuals.
51. Seifert, E., Seifert, S., Vogt, H., Drew, D., van Aardt, J., Kunneke, A., and Seifert, T. (2019). Influence of Drone Altitude, Image Overlap, and Optical Sensor Resolution on Multi-View Reconstruction of Forest Images. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11101252 ↗
52. 3-D uncertainty-based topographic change detection with structure-from-motion photogrammetry: Precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys10.1002/esp.4125 ↗
53. Tonkin, T.N., and Midgley, N.G. (2016). Ground-control networks for image based surface reconstruction: An investigation of optimum survey designs using UAV derived imagery and structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Remote Sens., 8.10.3390/rs8090786 ↗
54. The interpretation of structure from motion
55. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94 ↗
56. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis10.1109/TPAMI.2009.161 ↗
57. A comparison and evaluation of multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms
58. Automated co-registration and calibration in SfM photogrammetry for landslide change detection10.1002/esp.4502 ↗
59. Assessment of UAV-photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation of ground control points
60. Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation ground control points number using unmanned aerial vehicle10.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.002 ↗
61. An evaluation of the effectiveness of low-cost UAVs and structure from motion for geomorphic change detection10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.009 ↗
62. Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground-based image networks10.1002/esp.3609 ↗
63. Bank erosion in agricultural drainage networks: New challenges from structure-from-motion photogrammetry for post-event analysis10.1002/esp.3767 ↗
64. Estimation of erosion and deposition volumes in a large, gravel-bed, braided river using synoptic remote sensing10.1002/esp.483 ↗
65. Monitoring and modelling morphological change in a braided gravel-bed river using high resolution GPS-based survey10.1002/1096-9837(200008)25:9<973::AID-ESP111>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
66. Lekkas, E., Lozios, S., Vassilakis, E., Skourtsos, E., Kranis, H., Soukis, K., Diakakis, M., Antoniou, V., Mavroulis, S., and Filis, C. (2021). Design of Immediate Risk Reduction Actions in the Post-Disaster Phase of the Flood Events of August 9, 2020. Evia, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Applied Research Program.
67. Andronopoulos, V., Rozos, D., Kynigalaki, M., Koukis, G., Tzitziras, A., Pogiatzi, E., and Apostolidis, E. (1993). Engineering Geological Map of Greece, Scale 1:500,000, Geological Map Publication Office, Directorate of Geology and Geological Mapping, Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration.
68. A methodological framework for hydromorphological assessment, analysis and monitoring (IDRAIM) aimed at promoting integrated river management10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.010 ↗
69. State of the art in high density image matching10.1111/phor.12063 ↗
70. The topographic data source of digital terrain models as a key element in the accuracy of hydraulic flood modelling10.1002/esp.1278 ↗
71. Geomorphic effectiveness of check dams in a debris-flow catchment using multi-temporal topographic surveys10.1016/j.catena.2018.11.004 ↗
72. Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: Improved sediment budgets10.1002/esp.1886 ↗
73. Fluvial and aquatic applications of Structure from Motion photogrammetry and unmanned aerial vehicle/drone technology10.1002/wat2.1328 ↗
74. Remotely sensed rivers in the Anthropocene: State of the art and prospects10.1002/esp.4787 ↗
75. Hyperspatial remote sensing of channel reach morphology and hydraulic fish habitat using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): A first assessment in the context of river research and management10.1002/rra.2743 ↗
76. Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry–merits, limits and developments10.5194/esurf-4-359-2016 ↗
77. Cao, L., Liu, H., Fu, X., Zhang, Z., Shen, X., and Ruan, H. (2019). Comparison of UAV LiDAR and digital aerial photogrammery point clouds for estimating forest structural attributes in subtropical planted forests. Forests, 10.10.3390/f10020145 ↗
78. River channel adjustments in Southern Italy over the past 150 years and implications for channel recovery10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.008 ↗
79. Modeling river bed morphology, roughness, and surface sedimentology using high resolution terrestrial laser scanning10.1029/2012WR012223 ↗
80. Patterns and controls of sediment production, transfer and yield in the Illgraben10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.11.029 ↗
81. Hyperscale terrain modelling of braided rivers: Fusing mobile terrestrial laser scanning and optical bathymetric mapping10.1002/esp.3437 ↗
82. Step by step error assessment in braided river sediment budget using airborne LiDAR data10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.02.014 ↗
83. Guidelines on the use of structure-from-motion photogrammetry in geomorphic research10.1002/esp.4637 ↗
84. Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: How far have we got?10.1002/hyp.9374 ↗
85. Gkiatas, G.T., Koutalakis, P.D., Kasapidis, I.K., Iakovoglou, V., and Zaimes, G.N. (2022). Monitoring and Quantifying the Fluvio-Geomorphological Changes in a Torrent Channel Using Images from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Hydrology, 9.10.3390/hydrology9100184 ↗
86. Akay, S.S., Özcan, O., Şanlı, F.B., Görüm, T., Şen, Ö.L., and Bayram, B. (2020). UAV-based evaluation of morphological changes induced by extreme rainfall events in meandering rivers. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0241293 ↗
87. UAS-based remote sensing of fluvial change following an extreme flood event10.1002/esp.3728 ↗
88. Inferring channel incision in gravel-bed rivers: Integrating LiDAR data, historical aerial photographs and drone-based SfM topo-bathymetry10.1002/esp.5840 ↗
89. Detection and Mapping of the Geomorphic Effects of Flooding Using UAV Photogrammetry10.1007/s00024-018-1874-1 ↗
90. Schumann, G.J.-P., Muhlhausen, J., and Andreadis, K.M. (2019). Rapid Mapping of Small-Scale River-Floodplain Environments Using UAV SfM Supports Classical Theory. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11080982 ↗
91. Quantification and visualization of flood-induced morphological changes in meander structures by UAV-based monitoring
92. Monitoring of avulsion channel evolution and river morphology changes using UAV photogrammetry: Case study of the gravel bed Ondava River in Outer Western Carpathians10.1111/area.12508 ↗