Data-driven generative adversarial network and machine learning hybrid framework for predicting rutting depth in recycled asphalt shingle pavements
Source abstract
Abstract
Excessive rutting is a leading cause of premature asphalt pavement deterioration, resulting in reduced service life and safety. Consequently, growing interest in sustainable materials has driven research into recycled asphalt shingles (RAS), which contain a highly viscous binder that boosts rutting resistance and lowers costs by reducing binder demand and minimising shingle waste. However, limited and costly testing has restricted research, emphasising the need for machine learning (ML) models to predict the rutting depth (RD) in RAS-asphalt mixtures. Yet, progress in ML deployment has been hampered by scarce and imbalanced data, limiting prediciton reliability. Therefore, this study adopts conditional tabular generative adversarial networks to address data scarcity and produce a balanced dataset for training advanced ML models. This process enhanced the generalisation and effectiveness of the models trained on synthetic data; the XGB model achieved an R² of 0.9872 and a MAPE of 7.49%. Moreover, feature importance analysis indicated that the number of passes, mixture gradation, and bitumen content are the significant factors influencing RD inRAS-asphalt mixtures. This work shows the successful combination of synthetic data and advanced ML models to promote sustainable infrastructure. It also develops a user interface for estimating the RD, offering stakeholders an efficient and rapid alternative to costly experiments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University
College of Engineering, University of Guelph
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14336910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143369 ↗
2. 10.1007/s41062-025-02450-810.1007/s41062-025-02450-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.07310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.073 ↗
4. Albayati, A. H. (2023). A review of rutting in asphalt concrete pavement. Open Engineering, 13, 20220463.10.1515/eng-2022-0463 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10437810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104378 ↗
6. 10.1080/15376494.2023.221966910.1080/15376494.2023.2219669 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2014.92741010.1080/14680629.2014.927410 ↗
8. Amin, S., & Ajakaiye, M. (2020). Machine learning algorithms for rutting modelling of bituminous pavements in west midlands. Conference19th Annual International Conference on Highways and Airport Pavement Engineering, Asphalt Technology and Infrastructure.
9. Antoniou A. Storkey A. & Edwards H. (2017). Data augmentation generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04340.
10. Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., & Bottou, L. (2017). Wasserstein generative adversarial networks, International conference on machine learning, 214–223. PMLR.
11. 10.1016/j.dajour.2022.10007110.1016/j.dajour.2022.100071 ↗
12. Baus, R., & Stires, N. (2010). Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide implementation. University of South Carolina. Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
13. 10.1016/j.cviu.2021.10332910.1016/j.cviu.2021.103329 ↗
14. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
15. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017). Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781315139470 ↗
16. Brock, J., Collins, R., & Lynn, C. (2003). Performance related testing with the asphalt pavement analyzer, technical paper T-137. Pavement Technologies. Inc. Conyers, GA, USA.
17. Brown, E., & Bassett, C. E. (1990). Effects of maximum aggregate size on rutting potential and other properties of asphalt-aggregate mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 1259, 107–119.
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.066 ↗
19. Button, J. W., Perdomo, D., & Lytton, R. L. (1990). Influence of aggregate on rutting in asphalt concrete pavements. Transportation research record.
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.027 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.080 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0318610.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03186 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13572610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135726 ↗
24. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 785–794.
25. 10.3390/app1408317710.3390/app14083177 ↗
26. Cong, L., & Yang, J. (2010). Control standard for rut depth based on simulation of vehicle-pavement system dynamics. Engineering Mechanics, 27, 191–195.
27. Cooper, S. B., JR (2015). Sustainable Materials for Pavement Infrastructure: Design and Performance of Asphalt Mixtures Containing Recycled Asphalt Shingles. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.
28. 10.1023/A:102262741141110.1023/A:1022627411411 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12996610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129966 ↗
30. 10.1109/TITS.2022.314926810.1109/TITS.2022.3149268 ↗
31. Esteban C. Hyland S. L. & RÄTSCH G. (2017). Real-valued (medical) time series generation with recurrent conditional gans. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02633.
32. 10.3390/en1301013010.3390/en13010130 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:1(15)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:1(15) ↗
34. Foreman, J. K. (2008). Effect of voids in the mineral aggregate on laboratory rutting behavior of asphalt mixtures. University of Arkansas.
35. Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics. 1189–1232.
36. Ganti S. & Strouse T. JR. (2021). Production of fuel oil from waste asphalt roof shingles in a sustainable manner
37. 10.1061/41167(398)6110.1061/41167(398)61 ↗
38. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27.
39. 10.1145/342262210.1145/3422622 ↗
40. Grzybowski, K. F. (1993). Recycled asphalt roofing Materials--A multi-functional, low cost hot-mix asphalt pavement additive. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1193, 159–159.
41. 10.1080/10298436.2021.191082510.1080/10298436.2021.1910825 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.31410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.314 ↗
43. 10.1080/02533839.2014.95324210.1080/02533839.2014.953242 ↗
44. Hanson, D. I., Foo, K. Y., & Lynn, T. A. (1997). Evaluation of roofing shingles in HMA. National center for asphalt technology, 68.
45. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.25810.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.258 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.13410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.134 ↗
47. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Taylor, J. (2023). Linear regression, An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in python. Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-38747-0 ↗
48. 10.1007/s42947-021-00032-210.1007/s42947-021-00032-2 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10941810.1016/j.jobe.2024.109418 ↗
50. 10.1002/suco.20220034410.1002/suco.202200344 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.12027610.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120276 ↗
52. 10.3390/ma1514486610.3390/ma15144866 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.07.00110.1016/j.neunet.2019.07.001 ↗
54. Liang Z. (2025). Efficient Representations for High-Cardinality Categorical Variables in Machine Learning. arXiv preprintarXiv:2501.05646.10.1109/AMLDS63918.2025.11159409 ↗
55. Light, A. (2025). A Statistical Investigation of the Parameters Influencing Rutting and Cracking Performance in Asphalt Mixtures.
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13151510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131515 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13090310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130903 ↗
58. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12987210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129872 ↗
60. 10.1080/14680629.2021.188616010.1080/14680629.2021.1886160 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12054310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120543 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11735010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117350 ↗
63. Mallick, R. B., Teto, M. R., & Mogawer, W. S. (2000). Evaluation of use of manufactured waste asphalt shingles in hot mix asphalt.
64. 10.1177/036119811878113710.1177/0361198118781137 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11408310.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114083 ↗
66. 10.3390/ma1321475710.3390/ma13214757 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.10565210.1016/j.engappai.2022.105652 ↗
68. Maupin, G. (2010). Investigation of the use of tear-off shingles in asphalt concrete. Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC).
69. Mirza, M., & Osindero, S. (2014). Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784.
70. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.303706310.1109/ACCESS.2020.3037063 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.037 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13111610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131116 ↗
73. Okuda, T., Suzuki, K., & Kohtake, N. (2017). Proposal and evaluation of prediction of pavement rutting depth by recurrent neural network, 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (Vol. 2017, pp. 1053–1054). IEEE.
74. 10.3141/2371-1210.3141/2371-12 ↗
75. 10.3390/ma1701004610.3390/ma17010046 ↗
76. 10.3390/lubricants1309039110.3390/lubricants13090391 ↗
77. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000058310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000583 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11540610.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115406 ↗
79. 10.3390/infrastructures304005810.3390/infrastructures3040058 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12358510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123585 ↗
81. Saleh, E., Tarawneh, A., Dwairi, H., & Alhamaydeh, M. (2022). Guide to non-destructive concrete strength assessment:Homogeneity tests and sampling plans. Journal of Building Engineering, 49, 104047.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104047 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.08.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.08.005 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.11410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.114 ↗
84. 10.3141/2205-0710.3141/2205-07 ↗
85. Shrestha, N., Shehata, M., Easa, S., Senior, S., Rogers, C., & Essex, R. (2008). Use of processed tear-off roof shingles to improve performance of roadbase materials. Annual conference of the Transportation Association of Canada. https://conf.tac-atc.ca/english/resourcecentre/readingroom/conference/conf2008/docs/f1/Shrestha.pdf.
86. 10.1016/j.csite.2024.10412410.1016/j.csite.2024.104124 ↗
87. 10.3141/1629-2310.3141/1629-23 ↗
88. Victory, W. (2022). A review on the utilization of waste material in asphalt pavements. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 27279–27282.10.1007/s11356-021-18245-0 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.asoc.2024.11135310.1016/j.asoc.2024.111353 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.00410.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.004 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10779610.1016/j.engappai.2023.107796 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.11047110.1016/j.jobe.2024.110471 ↗
93. 10.1520/JTE2013027110.1520/JTE20130271 ↗
94. Williams, S. G., & King, J. D. (2013). Recycled asphalt shingles in asphalt pavements. Transportation Research.
95. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000135710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001357 ↗
96. Xu L. & Veeramachaneni K. (2018). Synthesizing tabular data using generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.11264.
97. Xu, L., Skoularidou, M., Cuesta-Infante, A., & Veeramachaneni, K. (2019). Modeling tabular data using conditional gan. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32.
98. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.09510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.095 ↗
99. Yaro, N. S. A., Sutanto, M. H., Baloo, L., Habib, N. Z., Usman, A., Yousafzai, A. K., Ahmad, A., Birniwa, A. H., Jagaba, A. H., & Noor, A. (2023). A comprehensive overview of the utilization of recycled waste materials and technologies in asphalt pavements: towards environmental and sustainable low-carbon roads. Processes, 11, 2095.10.3390/pr11072095 ↗
100. 10.3141/2446-0110.3141/2446-01 ↗