The effect of traffic data source on deterioration rates of heavy-duty flexible pavements
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of traffic data source (estimated vs. actual) on predicted progression rates of roughness and rutting for heavy-duty flexible pavements of rural freeways. Progression rates are predicted using calibrated HDM-4 models. The assessment is performed in terms of variations in maintenance intervention timing associated with the variations in progression rates. Time series pavement condition data (covering 3–5 years) have been collected for 7 sections of rural freeways for use in calibrating HDM-4 deterioration models. They range in length from 10 to 60.8 km and cover different traffic volumes, climate zones and subgrade soil types. For these sections, estimated annual average daily traffic (AADT), growth factors and assumed loading have been extracted from relevant database. Only six segments of these sections have Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) sites so relevant actual AADT, growth factors and axle load distributions have been extracted from WIM reports. The results of running the calibrated HDM-4 deterioration models using different traffic data show that actual traffic data from WIM sites result in higher rates of deterioration to that of estimated data for four sites, resulting in earlier intervention timing and higher present value agency cost. The other two sites have lower rates with actual data due to lower traffic loading than estimated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Hydrology and Drought Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology , Melbourne, Australia
Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure, Swinburne University of Technology , Melbourne, Australia
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Brown D. · 2010
2. Donald, G. , 2003. Benefits of composite pavements. Australia: ARRB Transport Research, SMEC International.
3. Foley G.D. · 1999
4. Gillespie T. · 1993
5. Huang Y. · 2004
6. Hunt P.D. · 6th international conference in managing pavements · 2004
7. Jameson J. · Guide to pavement technology part 5: pavement evaluation and treatment design · 2009
8. Kordi N.E. · Malaysian University transportation research forum and conferences · 2010 · 421
9. Mann A. · The identification of road sections in Victoria displaying roughness caused by expansive soils · 2003
10. Martin T. · 2006
11. Moffatt M. · Guide to asset management: part 5B: roughness · 2007
12. Morosiuk G. · HDM-4 modeling road deterioration and works effects, Vol. 6 · 2004
13. NHVR · National heavy vehicle regulater, higher mass limits (HML) · 2014
14. Paterson W.D. · 1987
15. Siripun K. · Proceedings of the 6th Australasian congress on applied mechanics · 2010
16. 10.2307/21073910.2307/210739 ↗
17. Van Wijk A. · 4th international conference on managing pavements · 1998
18. VICROADS · Selection and design of pavements and surfacing · 2013
19. Youdale G. · Guide to pavement technology: part 4: pavement materials · 2007
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:1(47)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:1(47) ↗