journal article·2026-01-30Open access

Non-Ionising Electromagnetic Fields: Measurement of Exposure of City Dwellers in Urban Environments in Central Spain

Alonso Alonso Alonso, Ramón de la Rosa Steinz, Miguel Alonso Felipe, Javier Manuel Aguiar Pérez, María Ángeles Pérez Juárez

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

Despite existing protection limits established by different health agencies and regulatory bodies, chronic exposure to non-ionising electromagnetic field radiation (NIR) has raised concerns about its potential biological effects and its impact on human health. Exposure to NIR in urban environments is almost inevitable due to the density of devices and communication systems that emit these waves. Correctly measuring exposure levels among city residents is key to determining whether there is a relationship between these levels and potential health problems associated with NIR. Several factors, including the ubiquity of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and people’s unawareness of their exposure, make the NIR assessment challenging. This paper proposes a standardised procedure for NIR testing and measurement for frequencies from 100 kHz to 3 GHz, designed explicitly for outdoor urban environments. The measurement procedure is intended for populated urban areas, a complex environment for signal propagation. The complete procedure, techniques, and equipment used for wideband and narrowband measurements are detailed, along with their corresponding overall uncertainty budgets. The data collected by this procedure are suitable and valuable for comparative epidemiological studies due to a systematic measurement protocol and rigorous control of measurement uncertainty. The proposed measurement procedure has been tested in two cities in central Spain, with a total population of 262,000. A total of 534 measurement points have been performed. The results can be used to verify compliance with exposure limits and to demonstrate levels below the applicable regulatory limits. Furthermore, it has been possible to test the validity of the hypothesis that urban environments can be characterised by NIR exposure, which was postulated in this work based on an ITU-R-inspired simplification that classifies urban outdoor areas into representative exposure categories.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects · Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling · Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Teoría de la Señal y Comunicaciones e Ingeniería Telemática, Universidad de Valladolid, ETSI Telecomunicación, Paseo de Belén 15, 47011 Valladolid, Spain

Funding

Consejería de Sanidad of Junta de Castilla y León

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Assessment of public awareness on the effects of exposure to non-ionizing radiation sources in Tanzania
2. Is the sustainability of exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation possible?10.1016/j.medcli.2023.11.011 ↗
3. Non-Ionizing Radiation (NIR) exposure map development using GIS for Gong Badak, Terengganu, Malaysia10.1051/matecconf/201824805001 ↗
4. Silva, J.L.A., de Sousa, V.A., Rodrigues, M.E.C., Pinheiro, F.S.R., Soares da Silva, G., Mendonça, H.B., Silva, R.Q.F.H., da Silva, J.V.L., Galdino, F.E.S., and de Carvalho, V.F.C. (2023). Human exposure to non-ionizing radiation from indoor distributed antenna systems: Shopping mall measurement analysis. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23104579 ↗
5. Personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A comparative analysis of international, national, and regional guidelines10.1016/j.envres.2024.118124 ↗
6. Hansson Mild, K., Lundström, R., and Wilén, J. (2019). Non-ionizing radiation in Swedish health care—Exposure and safety aspects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16071186 ↗
7. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (1998). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys., 74, 494–522.
8. World Health Organization (WHO) (2006). Framework for Developing Health-Based EMF Standards, WHO. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241594330.
9. World Health Organization (WHO) (2006). Model Legislation for Electromagnetic Fields Protection, WHO. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241594322.
10. European Council (EC) (1999). Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz–300 GHz). Off. J. Eur. Communities, 199, 59–70.
11. European Council (EC) (1999). Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity. Off. J. Eur. Communities, 91, 10–28.
12. (2019). IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz (Standard No. ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2019).
13. (2021). Standard for Limiting Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields—100 kHz to 300 GHz (Standard No. Radiation Protection Series S-1 (Rev. 1)).
14. (1999). Radiofrequency Fields—Part 1: Maximum Exposure Levels—3 kHz to 300 GHz (Standard No. NZS 2772.1:1999).
15. Chou, C.K. (2022). Controversy in electromagnetic safety. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph192416942 ↗
16. Health risks of exposure to non-ionizing radiation—Myths or science-based evidence
17. Biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields: Two sides of a coin10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.07.009 ↗
18. Wireless technologies, non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and children: Identifying and reducing health risks
19. Galvao, B.S.M.C., Santos, G., Onusic, H., and Sant’Anna, L.F.P. (2001, January 13–17). Electromagnetic environmental measurements in specific populated areas of Brazil. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE EMC International Symposium. Symposium Record. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (Cat. No.01CH37161), Montreal, QC, Canada.
20. Trinchero, D., Tascone, R., Arnelli, C., Roggia, G., Cerato, I., Pelluti, A., Riccardi, I., and Sartor, W. (2000). Exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields in urban environments. EMC Europe 2000 Brugge, 4th European Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Brugge, Belgium, 11–15 September 2000, IEEE.
21. EM field measurements in the vicinity of an antenna park for radiation hazard purposes
22. Kollar, M., Haider, H., and Neubauer, G. (2005, January 21–24). EMF measurement tasks and frequency selective evaluation methods for RF communication facilities. Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electromagnetic Ecology, St. Petersburg, Russia.
23. (1991). Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz (Standard No. IEEE Std C95.1-1991).
24. Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) (2004). ECC Recommendation (02)04: Measuring Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation (9 kHz–300 GHz), CEPT.
25. (2002). Recommended Practice for Measurements and Computations of Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields with Respect to Human Exposure, 100 kHz–300 GHz (Standard No. IEEE Std C95.3-2002).
26. The impact of distance on commuting methods and obesity rates in urban environments: A case study of Melbourne, Australia10.1007/s41651-024-00203-2 ↗
27. International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) (2024). Recommendation ITU-T K.83: Monitoring of Electromagnetic Field Levels, ITU-T.
28. (2022). Determination of RF Field Strength, Power Density and SAR in the Vicinity of Radiocommunication Base Stations for the Purpose of Evaluating Human Exposure (Standard No. EN IEC 62232:2022).
29. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys., 118, 483–524.10.1097/HP.0000000000001210 ↗
30. International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) (2024). Recommendation ITU-T K.52: Guidance on Complying with Limits for Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, ITU-T.
31. Government of Spain (2001). Royal Decree 1066/2001 of 28 September 2001 Approving the Regulation Establishing Conditions for the Protection of the Public Domain of the Radioelectric Spectrum, Restrictions on Radioelectric Emissions and Health Protection Measures Against Radio Emissions, Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE).
32. Ministry of Science and Technology (Spain) (2002). Order CTE/23/2002 of 11 January 2002 Establishing Procedures for the Evaluation and Certification of Compliance with Radio Emissions Limits (as Amended), Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE).
33. E-field assessment errors associated with RF dosimeters for different angles of arrival10.1093/rpd/ncn275 ↗
34. Potential exposure assessment errors associated with body-worn RF dosimeters10.1002/bem.20355 ↗
35. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2007). CISPR 16-1-1 Amendment 2: Specification for Radio Disturbance and Immunity Measuring Apparatus and Methods, IEC.
36. Adaptive framework for uncertainty analysis in electromagnetic field measurements
37. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), ISO.
38. United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) (2002). LAB 34: The Expression of Uncertainty in EMC Measurements, UKAS.
39. National Measurement Accreditation Service (NAMAS) (1994). NIS 81: The Treatment of Uncertainty in EMC Measurements, National Physical Laboratory.
40. International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) (2002). Specification for Radio Disturbance and Immunity Measuring Apparatus and Methods—Part 4: Uncertainty in EMC Measurements, CISPR.
41. ITU-R (2007). Recommendation ITU-R P.1411-4: Propagation Data and Prediction Methods for the Planning of Short-Range Outdoor Radiocommunication Systems and Radio Local Area Networks in the Frequency Range 300 MHz to 100 GHz, ITU.