SparseMambaNet: A Novel Architecture Integrating Bi-Mamba and a Mixture of Experts for Efficient EEG-Based Lie Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
Traditional lie detection technologies, such as the polygraph and event-related potential (ERP)-based approaches, often face limitations in real-world applicability due to their sensitivity to psychological states and the complex, nonlinear nature of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In this study, we propose SparseMambaNet, a novel neural architecture that integrates the recently developed Bi-Mamba model with a Sparsely Activated Mixture of Experts (MoE) structure to effectively model the intricate spatio-temporal dynamics of EEG data. By leveraging the near-linear computational complexity of Mamba and the bidirectional contextual modeling of Bi-Mamba, the proposed framework efficiently processes long EEG sequences while maximizing representational power through the selective activation of expert networks tailored to diverse input characteristics. Experiments were conducted with 46 healthy subjects using a simulated criminal scenario based on the Comparison Question Technique (CQT) with monetary incentives to induce realistic psychological tension. We extracted nine statistical and neural complexity features, including Hjorth parameters, Sample Entropy, and Spectral Entropy. The results demonstrated that Sample entropy and Hjorth parameters achieved exceptional classification performance, recording F1 scores of 0.9963 and 0.9935, respectively. Statistical analyses further revealed that the post-response “answer” interval provided significantly higher discriminative power compared to the “question” interval. Furthermore, channel-level analysis identified core neural loci for deception in the frontal and fronto-central regions, specifically at channels E54 and E63. These findings suggest that SparseMambaNet offers a highly efficient and precise solution for EEG-based lie detection, providing a robust foundation for the development of personalized brain–computer interface (BCI) systems in forensic and clinical settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Deception detection and forensic psychology · Emotion and Mood Recognition · Action Observation and Synchronization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Data Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48548, Republic of Korea
Department of Computer Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · MSIT (Ministry of Science, ICT), Korea · National Police Agency and the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Cues to Deception10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 ↗
2. The Contributions of Prefrontal Cortex and Executive Control to Deception Evidence from Activation Likelihood Estimate Meta-Analyses10.1093/cercor/bhn189 ↗
3. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities, John Wiley & Sons.
4. Bhamare, A.R., Katharguppe, S., and Nancy, J.S. (2020). Deep Neural Networks for Lie Detection with Attention on Bio-Signals, IEEE.10.1109/ISCMI51676.2020.9311575 ↗
5. Science and the CQT Polygraph—A Theoretical Critique10.1007/BF02912514 ↗
6. Mental and Physical Countermeasures Reduce the Accuracy of Polygraph Tests10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.252 ↗
7. A Non-Standard Method for Estimating Accuracy of Lie Detection Techniques Demonstrated on a Self-Validating Set of Field Polygraph Examinations10.1080/1068316X.2012.656118 ↗
8. Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges10.1038/nrn3665 ↗
9. Khalil, M.A., and George, K. (2022). Using Neural Network Models for BCI Based Lie Detection. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 13th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference, UEMCON 2022, New York City, NY, USA, 26–28 October 2022, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.10.1109/UEMCON54665.2022.9965706 ↗
10. Interview Based Connectivity Analysis of EEG in Order to Detect Deception10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109517 ↗
11. Brain Fingerprinting and Lie Detection: A Study of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Patterns of Deception Using EEG Phase Synchrony Analysis10.1109/JBHI.2021.3095415 ↗
12. Baghel, N., Singh, D., Dutta, M.K., Burget, R., and Myska, V. (2020, January 7–9). Truth Identification from EEG Signal by Using Convolution Neural Network: Lie Detection. Proceedings of the 2020 43rd International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing, Milan, Italy.10.1109/TSP49548.2020.9163497 ↗
13. A New Approach for EEG Feature Extraction in P300-Based Lie Detection10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.10.001 ↗
14. Merzagora, A.C., Bunce, S., Izzetoglu, M., and Onaral, B. (2006). Wavelet Analysis for EEG Feature Extraction in Deception Detection. Proceedings of the International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York City, NY, USA, 30 August 2006, IEEE.10.1109/IEMBS.2006.4397936 ↗
15. Zabcikova, M., Koudelkova, Z., and Jasek, R. (2022). EEG-Based Lie Detection Using ERP P300 in Response to Known and Unknown Faces: An Overview. Proceedings of the Proceedings—26th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers, CSCC 2022, Chania, Crete, Greece, 19–22 July 2022, IEEE.10.1109/CSCC55931.2022.00011 ↗
16. P300 in Detecting Concealed Information and Deception: A Review10.1111/psyp.13362 ↗
17. Sample Entropy Tracks Changes in Electroencephalogram Power Spectrum with Sleep State and Aging10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181b2f1e3 ↗
18. Kumar, Y., Dewal, M.L., and Anand, R.S. (2012). Features Extraction of EEG Signals Using Approximate and Sample Entropy. Proceedings of the IEEE Student’s Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science, Bhopal, India, 1–2 March 2012, IEEE.10.1109/SCEECS.2012.6184830 ↗
19. Zhang, A., Yang, B., and Huang, L. (2008, January 28–30). Feature Extraction of EEG Signals Using Power Spectral Entropy. Proceedings of the BioMedical Engineering and Informatics: New Development and the Future—Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics, BMEI 2008, Sanya, China.10.1109/BMEI.2008.254 ↗
20. Ali, H. (2017). Al-nuaimi Higuchi Fractal Dimension of the Electroencephalogram as a Biomarker for Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 11–15 July 2017, IEEE.10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037320 ↗
21. EEG Signal Based Seizure Detection Focused on Hjorth Parameters from Tunable-Q Wavelet Sub-Bands10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103645 ↗
22. A Novel EEG Feature Extraction Method Using Hjorth Parameter10.12720/ijeee.2.2.106-110 ↗
23. Gu, A., and Dao, T. (2024, January 7–9). Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces. Proceedings of the COLM 2024 Conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
24. Shazeer, N., Mirhoseini, A., Maziarz, K., Davis, A., Le, Q., Hinton, G., and Dean, J. (2017). Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer. arXiv.
25. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, Fifth Edition10.1212/01.wnl.0000243257.85592.9a ↗
26. A Deep Learning Based Model Using RNN-LSTM for the Detection of Schizophrenia from EEG Data10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106225 ↗
27. Mohamed, Y., Anter, A.M., and Zaky, A.B. (2023). Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) to Improve EEG-Based Person Identification. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Intelligent Methods, Systems and Applications, IMSA 2023, Giza, Egypt, 15–16 July 2023, IEEE.10.1109/IMSA58542.2023.10217750 ↗
28. Khalil, M.A., Babinec, M., and George, K. (2024). LSTM Model for Brain Control Interface Based-Lie Detection. Proceedings of the Proceedings—2024 IEEE 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine, Health and Care, AIMHC 2024, Laguna Hills, CA, USA, 5–7 February 2024, IEEE.10.1109/AIMHC59811.2024.00024 ↗
29. Wan, Z., Li, M., Liu, S., Huang, J., Tan, H., and Duan, W. (2023). EEGformer: A Transformer–Based Brain Activity Classification Method Using EEG Signal. Front. Neurosci., 17.10.3389/fnins.2023.1148855 ↗
30. Classification of EEG Signals Using Transformer Based Deep Learning and Ensemble Models10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105130 ↗
31. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2023). Attention Is All You Need. arXiv.
32. Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., and Sutskever, I. (2019). Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformers. arXiv.
33. Beltagy, I., Peters, M.E., and Cohan, A. (2020). Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer. arXiv.
34. Zhu, L., Liao, B., Zhang, Q., Wang, X., Liu, W., and Wang, X. (2024). Vision Mamba: Efficient Visual Representation Learning with Bidirectional State Space Model. arXiv.
35. Gui, Y., Chen, M., Su, Y., Luo, G., and Yang, Y. (2024). EEGMamba: Bidirectional State Space Model with Mixture of Experts for EEG Multi-Task Classification. arXiv.
36. Zhou, X., Han, Y., Chen, Z., Liu, C., Ding, Y., Jia, Z., and Liu, Y. (2024). BiT-MamSleep: Bidirectional Temporal Mamba for EEG Sleep Staging. arXiv.
37. Li, B., Shen, Y., Yang, J., Wang, Y., Ren, J., Che, T., Zhang, J., and Liu, Z. (2023). Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Are Domain Generalizable Learners. arXiv.
38. Patterns and Correlates of Binge Drinking Trajectories from Early Adolescence to Young Adulthood10.1037/0278-6133.22.1.79 ↗
39. Makeig, S., Jung, T.-P., Bell, A.J., and Sejnowski, T.J. (1995). Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press.
40. ICLabel: An Automated Electroencephalographic Independent Component Classifier, Dataset, and Website10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.026 ↗
41. Validation of ICA-Based Myogenic Artifact Correction for Scalp and Source-Localized EEG10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.010 ↗
42. Vialatte, F.-B., Solé-Casals, J., and Maurice, M. (2008, January 25–28). Improving the Quality of EEG Data in Patients with Alzheimers Disease Using ICA. Proceedings of the ICONIP, Auckland, New Zealand.
43. A Theoretical Analysis of the Directed Lie Question (DLC)10.1515/ep-2015-0004 ↗
44. Proverbio, A.M., Vanutelli, M.E., and Adorni, R. (2013). Can You Catch a Liar? How Negative Emotions Affect Brain Responses When Lying or Telling the Truth. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0059383 ↗
45. Wang, Y., Ng, W.C., Ng, K.S., Yu, K., Wu, T., and Li, X. (2015). An Electroencephalography Network and Connectivity Analysis for Deception in Instructed Lying Tasks. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0116522 ↗