Ballistic Performance of an FRP Helmet-Head System
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to make an assessment on the performance of an FRP helmet-head system subjected to ballistic impact. Firstly, an FE model for human head is developed in which it mainly consists of scalp, skull, meanings, cerebrospinal fluid, brain tissue, falx, tentorium, face and neck. Constitutive models for each component of the head are determined and, in particular, strain rate effects of the compact bone of skull and the hyperelastic property of scalp are taken into account for the first time. Secondly, an FE model for Kevlar fibre reinforced phenolic helmet are constructed based on PASGT helmet. Recently developed dynamic constitutive models for metals and FRP laminates are employed for FMJ bullet and the KFRP helmet, respectively in the present study. Finally, both the head and helmet models are validated against available test data. Furthermore, effects of padding system (strap-netting and OA foam), impact position (top, front, lateral and rear), and projectile type (FSP and FMJ) on the ballistic performance of the helmet-head system have been systematically investigated with special attention being paid to the severity of head injury. It is found that the performance of the helmet with OA foam is advantageous over that of the helmet with strap-netting in head injury prevention; that the most harmful impact positions are different for helmets with different liner systems. It is also found that a lower velocity (358m/s) FMJ bullet pose more threats to head injury than a higher velocity (610m/s) FSP for the PASGT helmet-head system.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, et al. The burden of disease and mortality by condition: data, methods and results for 2001. In: Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, et al., editors. Global burden of disease and risk factors. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 45–240.
2. Kang HS, Willinger R, Diaw BM, et al. Validation of a 3D anatomic human head model and replication of head impact in motorcycle accident by finite element modeling. SAE Trans 1997;3849–58.10.4271/973339 ↗
3. Horgan TJ, Gilchrist MD. The creation of three-dimensional finite element models for simulating head impact biomechanics. Int J Crashworthiness. 2003;8(4):353–66.10.1533/ijcr.2003.0243 ↗
4. Kleiven S, Hardy W. Correlation of an FE model of the Human Head with Experiments on localized Motion of the Brain—Consequences for Injury Prediction. Proc Stapp Car Crash J. 2002.
5. Yang B, Tse KM, Chen N, et al. Development of a finite element head model for the study of impact head injury. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014: 408278.10.1155/2014/408278 ↗
6. Ganpule S, Alai A, Plougonven E, et al. Mechanics of blast loading on the head models in the study of traumatic brain injury using experimental and computational approaches. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2013;12(3):511–31.10.1007/s10237-012-0421-8 ↗
7. Kleiven S. Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure. Int J Crashworthiness. 2006;11(1):65–79.10.1533/ijcr.2005.0384 ↗
8. Raposio E, Nordström R, Santi P. Undermining of the scalp: quantitative effects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(5):1218–22.10.1097/00006534-199804010-00007 ↗
9. Wood JL. Dynamic response of human cranial bone. J Biomech. 1971;4(1):1–12.10.1016/0021-9290(71)90010-8 ↗
10. Got C, Patel A, Fayon A, et al. Results of experimental head impacts on cadavers: the various data obtained and their relations to some measured physical parameters Report. SAE Technical Paper; 1978.10.4271/780887 ↗
11. Willinger R, Baumgartner D. Human head tolerance limits to specific injury mechanisms. Int J Crashworthiness. 2003;8(6):605–17.10.1533/ijcr.2003.0264 ↗
12. Kleiven S. Biomechanics and thresholds for MTBI in humans. Proceedings of the MTBI Pre-Congress Symp, Lisbon, Portugal, 2008.
13. Ward C, Chan M, Nahum A. Intracranial pressure—a brain injury criterion. SAE Trans. 1980: 3867–80.10.4271/801304 ↗
14. Yang J, Dai J. Simulation-based assessment of rear effect to ballistic helmet impact. Comput-Aided Design Appl. 2010;7(1):59–73.10.3722/cadaps.2010.59-73 ↗
15. Baumgartner D, Willinger R. Finite element modelling of human head injuries caused by ballistic projectiles. Revue Européenne des Eléments. 2005;14(4–5):559–76.
16. Post A, Hoshizaki B, Gilchrist MD. Finite element analysis of the effect of loading curve shape on brain injury predictors. J Biomech. 2012;45(4):679–83.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.005 ↗
17. Jazi MS, Rezaei A, Karami G, et al. A computational study of influence of helmet padding materials on the human brain under ballistic impacts. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2014;17(12):1368–82.10.1080/10255842.2012.748755 ↗
18. Connor TA, Clark JM, Jayamohan J, et al. Do equestrian helmets prevent concussion? A retrospective analysis of head injuries and helmet damage from real-world equestrian accidents. Sports Med Open. 2019;5(1):19.10.1186/s40798-019-0193-0 ↗
19. Aare M, Kleiven S. Evaluation of head response to ballistic helmet impacts using the finite element method. Int J Impact Eng. 2007;34(3):596–608.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.001 ↗
20. Tse KM, Tan LB, Yang B, et al. Effect of helmet liner systems and impact directions on severity of head injuries sustained in ballistic impacts: a finite element (FE) study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017;55(4):641–62.10.1007/s11517-016-1536-3 ↗
21. Palta E, Fang H, Weggel DC. Finite element analysis of the Advanced Combat Helmet under various ballistic impacts. Int J Impact Eng. 2018;112:125–43.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.010 ↗
22. Xin SH. Numerical study on the penetration resistance of fibre reinforced plastic laminates. USTC; 2015.
23. Payan Y, Ohayon J. Biomechanics of living organs: hyperelastic constitutive laws for finite element modeling. World Bank Publications; 2017.
24. Xin SH, Wen HM. A progressive damage model for fiber reinforced plastic composites subjected to impact loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2015;75:40–52.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.07.014 ↗
25. Melvin J, Robbins D, Roberts V. The mechanical behaviour of the diploe of the human skull in compression. Proceedings of the Proc of the 11th Midwestern Mechanics Conference; 1984.
26. Zhou Z, Li X, Kleiven S. Fluid–structure interaction simulation of the brain–skull interface for acute subdural haematoma prediction. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2019;18(1):155–73.10.1007/s10237-018-1074-z ↗
27. Schiavone P, Chassat F, Boudou T, et al. In vivo measurement of human brain elasticity using a light aspiration device. Med Image Anal. 2009;13(4):673–8.10.1016/j.media.2009.04.001 ↗
28. Nahum AM, Smith R, Ward CC. Intracranial pressure dynamics during head impact Report. SAE Technical Paper;1977.10.4271/770922 ↗
29. Asgharpour Z, Baumgartner D, Willinger R, et al. The validation and application of a finite element human head model for frontal skull fracture analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;33:16–23.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.02.010 ↗
30. Tham CY, Tan VBC, Lee HP. Ballistic impact of a KEVLAR® helmet: experiment and simulations. Int J Impact Eng. 2008;35(5):304–18.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.03.008 ↗
31. Van Hoof J, Cronin D, Worswick M, et al. Numerical head and composite helmet models to predict blunt trauma. Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Ballistics, Interlaken, Switzerland, May, 2001.
32. Tan LB, Tse KM, Lee HP, et al. Performance of an advanced combat helmet with different interior cushioning systems in ballistic impact: experiments and finite element simulations. Int J Impact Eng. 2012;50:99–112.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.003 ↗
33. Standard N I J. 0106.01,(December 1981). Ballistic helmets National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC: 20531.
34. Zhou L, Wen HM. A new dynamic plasticity and failure model for metals. Metals. 2019;9(8):905.10.3390/met9080905 ↗
35. Peroni L, Scapin M, Fichera C, et al. Mechanical properties at high strain-rate of lead core and brass jacket of a NATO 7.62 mm ball bullet. Proceedings of the EPJ Web of Conferences, 2012. EDP Sciences.10.1051/epjconf/20122601060 ↗
36. Børvik T, Dey S, Clausen AH. Perforation resistance of five different high-strength steel plates subjected to small-arms projectiles. Int J Impact Eng. 2009;36(7):948–64.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.12.003 ↗
37. Zhou L, Wen HM. A new approach for the failure of metallic materials. Chin J High Pressure Phys. 2019;33(1): 014103.
38. Tang W, Zhang R. Introduction to theory and computation of equation of state. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2008.