journal article·2026-01-27Open access

Accuracy of the Garmin Vivoactive 4 for Estimating Heart Rate, Energy Expenditure, and Step Count During Treadmill Exercise

Matteo F. de Leon, Clayton L. Camic, Rachel A. Kowal, Brittney Aldape, Brendan Lochbaum, Riley Stefan, Peter J. Chomentowski, Andrew R. Jagim, Brandon M. Male

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of a Garmin device for estimating heart rate, energy expenditure, and step count during incremental treadmill exercise. Eighteen physically active males (n = 12; mean ± SD age = 22.8 ± 4.7 years; body mass = 83.8 ± 13.4 kg) and females (n = 6; 24.2 ± 5.6 years; 65.2 ± 9.6 kg) completed an incremental treadmill test with the Garmin Vivoactive 4 and criterion methods measuring heart rate, energy expenditure, and step count. Mean absolute percent error (MAPE) and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess accuracy. Acceptable accuracy was defined as MAPE < 5% for heart rate and <10% for energy expenditure and step count. MAPE (±SD) values were 13.0 (±10.1), 19.1 (±15.0), and 4.6 (±5.3)% for heart rate, energy expenditure, and step count, respectively. The Bland–Altman regression analyses illustrated proportional bias was present for heart rate (r = 0.591, p < 0.001) and step count (r = 0.516, p = 0.028), but not energy expenditure (r = 0.351, p = 0.153). These findings indicated that the Garmin Vivoactive 4 provided acceptable accuracy for step count but unacceptable accuracy for heart rate and energy expenditure during incremental treadmill exercise.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Sports Performance and Training · Physical Activity and Health

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA

Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA

Department of Kinesiology, Elmhurst University, Elmhurst, IL 60126, USA

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 2026 ACSM Worldwide Fitness Trends: Future Directions of the Health and Fitness Industry10.1249/FIT.0000000000001110 ↗
2. Effectiveness of Wearable Trackers on Physical Activity in Healthy Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials10.2196/15576 ↗
3. Patterns of Ownership and Usage of Wearable Devices in the United States, 2020-2022: Survey Study10.2196/56504 ↗
4. (2025, December 27). Wearable Technology Market Size|Industry Report. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/wearable-technology-market.
5. Navalta, J.W., Montes, J., Bodell, N.G., Salatto, R.W., Manning, J.W., and DeBeliso, M. (2020). Concurrent Heart Rate Validity of Wearable Technology Devices during Trail Running. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0238569 ↗
6. (2025, December 27). Wearable Technology Market Size, Share, Growth, and Industry Analysis, By Type (Smart Watches, Smart Glasses, Fitness & Wellness Devices, Smart Clothing, and Others), By Application (Consumer Electronics, Healthcare, Enterprise & Industrial Applications, and Others), and Regional Forecast to 2035. Available online: https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/wearable-technology-market-119131.
7. Do Activity Monitors Increase Physical Activity in Adults with Overweight or Obesity? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1002/oby.21619 ↗
8. Rehman, R.Z.U., Chatterjee, M., Manyakov, N.V., Daans, M., Jackson, A., O’Brisky, A., Telesky, T., Smets, S., Berghmans, P.-J., and Yang, D. (2024). Assessment of Physiological Signals from Photoplethysmography Sensors Compared to an Electrocardiogram Sensor: A Validation Study in Daily Life. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24216826 ↗
9. Evaluation of the Garmin Vivofit 4 for Assessing Sleep in Youth Experiencing Sleep Disturbances10.1177/20552076241277150 ↗
10. Personalizing Energy Expenditure Estimation Using Physiological Signals Normalization during Activities of Daily Living10.1088/0967-3334/35/9/1797 ↗
11. Accuracy of Wearable Heart Rate Monitors in Cardiac Rehabilitation10.21037/cdt.2019.04.08 ↗
12. Application of Cross-Sectional Time Series Modeling for the Prediction of Energy Expenditure from Heart Rate and Accelerometry10.1152/japplphysiol.01163.2007 ↗
13. Estimating Human Energy Expenditure10.2165/00007256-200333090-00004 ↗
14. A Novel Method for Using Accelerometer Data to Predict Energy Expenditure10.1152/japplphysiol.00818.2005 ↗
15. Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Based on Photoplethysmography Signal and Its Second Derivative10.7763/IJCTE.2017.V9.1138 ↗
16. Scattering-Driven PPG Signal Model10.1364/BOE.451620 ↗
17. Hettiarachchi, I.T., Hanoun, S., Nahavandi, D., and Nahavandi, S. (2019). Validation of Polar OH1 Optical Heart Rate Sensor for Moderate and High Intensity Physical Activities. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0217288 ↗
18. Validity of Wearable Activity Monitors during Cycling and Resistance Exercise10.1249/MSS.0000000000001471 ↗
19. Accuracy of the Wearable Activity Tracker Garmin Forerunner 235 for the Assessment of Heart Rate during Rest and Activity10.1080/02640414.2018.1535563 ↗
20. Le, S., Wang, X., Zhang, T., Lei, S.M., Cheng, S., Yao, W., and Schumann, M. (2022). Validity of Three Smartwatches in Estimating Energy Expenditure during Outdoor Walking and Running. Front. Physiol., 13.10.3389/fphys.2022.995575 ↗
21. Accuracy of Smartwatches for the Remote Assessment of Exercise Capacity10.1038/s41598-024-74140-x ↗
22. Van Oost, C.N., Masci, F., Malisse, A., Schyvens, A.-M., Peters, B., Dirix, H., Ross, V., Wets, G., Neven, A., and Verbraecken, J. (2025). Accuracy of Heart Rate Measurement Under Transient States: A Validation Study of Wearables for Real-Life Monitoring. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25206319 ↗
23. Wahl, Y., Düking, P., Droszez, A., Wahl, P., and Mester, J. (2017). Criterion-Validity of Commercially Available Physical Activity Tracker to Estimate Step Count, Covered Distance and Energy Expenditure during Sports Conditions. Front. Physiol., 8.10.3389/fphys.2017.00725 ↗
24. Current State of Commercial Wearable Technology in Physical Activity Monitoring 2015-201710.70252/NJQX2719 ↗
25. Keeping Pace with Wearables: A Living Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating the Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Technologies in Health Measurement10.1007/s40279-024-02077-2 ↗
26. An Examination of How and Why Triathlon Coaches Use a Suite of Technologies in Their Practice10.1177/17479541221144129 ↗
27. Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory, Musculoskeletal, and Neuromotor Fitness in Apparently Healthy Adults: Guidance for Prescribing Exercise10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb ↗
28. The Accuracy of Fitness Watches for the Measurement of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure during Moderate Intensity Exercise
29. A Catalog of Validity Indices for Step Counting Wearable Technologies during Treadmill Walking: The CADENCE-Adults Study10.1186/s12966-022-01350-9 ↗
30. Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Devices: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148 ↗
31. Validation of Biofeedback Wearables for Photoplethysmographic Heart Rate Tracking
32. Heart Rate Processing Algorithms and Exercise Duration on Reliability and Validity Decisions in Biceps-Worn Polar Verity Sense and OH1 Wearables10.1038/s41598-023-38329-w ↗
33. Wrist-Worn and Arm-Worn Wearables for Monitoring Heart Rate During Sedentary and Light-to-Vigorous Physical Activities: Device Validation Study10.2196/67110 ↗
34. Validity of Four Consumer-Grade Optical Heart Rate Sensors for Assessing Volume and Intensity Distribution of Physical Activity10.1111/sms.14756 ↗
35. Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study10.2196/18320 ↗
36. Toward Harmonized Treadmill-Based Validation of Step-Counting Wearable Technologies: A Scoping Review10.1123/jpah.2019-0205 ↗
37. Accuracy of Apple Watch Measurements for Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: Cross-Sectional Study10.2196/11889 ↗
38. Martín-Escudero, P., Cabanas, A.M., Dotor-Castilla, M.L., Galindo-Canales, M., Miguel-Tobal, F., Fernández-Pérez, C., Fuentes-Ferrer, M., Giannetti, R., Martín-Escudero, P., and Cabanas, A.M. (2023). Are Activity Wrist-Worn Devices Accurate for Determining Heart Rate during Intense Exercise?. Bioengineering, 10.10.3390/bioengineering10020254 ↗
39. Validation of Garmin and Polar Devices for Continuous Heart Rate Monitoring During Common Training Movements in Tactical Populations10.1080/1091367X.2022.2161820 ↗
40. Navalta, J.W., Carrier, B., Blank, M., Zarei, S., Davis, D.W., Craig, M., Perez, O.R., Baca, J., Sweder, T.S., and Carballo, T. (2024). Validity and Reliability of Wearable Technology Devices during Simulated Pickleball Game Play. Sports, 12.10.3390/sports12090234 ↗
41. Chowdhury, E.A., Western, M.J., Nightingale, T.E., Peacock, O.J., and Thompson, D. (2017). Assessment of Laboratory and Daily Energy Expenditure Estimates from Consumer Multi-Sensor Physical Activity Monitors. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0171720 ↗
42. Wrist-Worn Devices for the Measurement of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure: A Validation Study for the Apple Watch 6, Polar Vantage V and Fitbit Sense10.1080/17461391.2021.2023656 ↗
43. Comparison of Four ActiGraph Accelerometers during Walking and Running10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b3af49 ↗
44. Accuracy of Wristband Activity Monitors during Ambulation and Activities10.1249/MSS.0000000000000984 ↗
45. Cabanas, A.M., Fuentes-Guajardo, M., Latorre, K., León, D., and Martín-Escudero, P. (2022). Skin Pigmentation Influence on Pulse Oximetry Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22093402 ↗