Deep Learning-Based Damage Detection on Composite Bridge Using Vibration Signals Under Varying Temperature Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
The dynamic characteristics of bridges are not only influenced by structural damage but also by ambient environmental variations. If environmental factors are not incorporated into the detection algorithm, they may lead to false positives or false negatives. In recent years, vibration-based damage detection methods have gained significant attention in structural health monitoring (SHM), particularly for assessing structural integrity under varying temperature conditions. This study introduces a deep-learning framework for identifying damage in composite bridges by utilizing both time-domain and frequency-domain vibration signals while explicitly accounting for temperature effects. Two deep learning models—Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—were implemented and compared. The effectiveness of the proposed damage identification approach was evaluated using an experimental dataset obtained from a composite bridge structure. Furthermore, statistical evaluation metrics—including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the ROC curve—were used to compare the damage detection performance of the two deep learning models. The results reveal that the CNN model consistently outperforms the ANN in terms of classification accuracy. Moreover, frequency-domain analysis was shown to be more effective than time-domain analysis for damage classification, and integrating temperature data with vibration signals improved the performance of all model architectures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Kangwon National University, Samcheok 25913, Republic of Korea
Department of Civil Engineering, Korea Maritime & Ocean University, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea
Department of Civil Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Education · Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Gangwon State, Republic of Korea
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Kaphle, M., Tan, A., Thambiratnam, D., and Chan, T. (2011). Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges, KTH.
2. Vibration-Based Approach for Structural Health Monitoring of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Bridge
3. Tarunpreet Singh, S.S., Prakash, C., and Dixit, S. (2022). Real-Time Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Identification Using Frequency Response Functions along with Finite Element Model Updating Technique. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22124546 ↗
4. Cai, Y., Zhang, K., Ye, Z., Liu, C., Lu, K., and Wang, L. (2021). Influence of Temperature on the Natural Vibration Characteristics of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Beam. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21124242 ↗
5. Effect of Temperature on the Modal Parameters of Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100631 ↗
6. Structural Damage Detection with Automatic Feature-Extraction through Deep Learning10.1111/mice.12313 ↗
7. Jiang, C., Zhou, Q., Lei, J., and Wang, X. (2022). A Two-Stage Structural Damage Detection Method Based on 1D-CNN and SVM. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122010394 ↗
8. Kim, S., and Mukhiddinov, M. (2023). Data Anomaly Detection for Structural Health Monitoring Based on a Convolutional Neural Network. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23208525 ↗
9. Modal Frequency Responses of Composite Bridges under Temperature and Boundary Condition Variations10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100786 ↗
10. Poudel, A., Kim, S., Cho, B.H., and Kim, J. (2024). Temperature Effects on the Natural Frequencies of Composite Girders. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14031175 ↗
11. Technology Developments in Structural Health Monitoring of Large-Scale Bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.021 ↗
12. Simulation of the Effect of Temperature Variation on Damage Detection in a Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge10.1177/1475921707081107 ↗
13. Eliminating Temperature Effect in Vibration-Based Structural Damage Detection
14. Experimental and Finite Element Investigation of Temperature Distributions in Concrete-Encased Steel Girders10.1002/stc.2042 ↗
15. Temperature-Based Structural Health Monitoring Baseline for Long-Span Bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.12.042 ↗
16. Wang, Z., and Huang, M. (2020). Temperature Effects on Vibration-Based Damage Detection of a Reinforced Concrete Slab. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10082869 ↗
17. Eliminating the Bridge Modal Variability Induced by Thermal Effects Using Localized Modeling Method10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001775 ↗
18. Deep Learning Based Anomaly Identification of Temperature Effects in Bridge Structural Health Monitoring Data10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107478 ↗
19. Classification and Regression-Based Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory Configuration for Bridge Damage Identification Using Long-Term Monitoring Vibration Data10.1177/14759217231161811 ↗
20. Bridge Damage Assessment under Traffic and Environmental Variability: A Case Study on Yonghe Cable-Stayed Bridge10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120965 ↗
21. Keshmiry, A., Hassani, S., Mousavi, M., and Dackermann, U. (2023). Effects of Environmental and Operational Conditions on Structural Health Monitoring and Non-Destructive Testing. Building, 13.10.3390/buildings13040918 ↗
22. Bridge Damage Identification under Varying Environmental and Operational Conditions Combining Deep Learning and Numerical Simulations10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110471 ↗
23. Developing Deep Neural Network for Damage Detection of Beam-like Structures Using Dynamic Response Based on FE Model and Real Healthy State10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107402 ↗
24. Deep Learning-Based Indirect Bridge Damage Identification System10.1177/14759217221087147 ↗
25. American Association of State Highway and Transportation (2007). AASHTO LRFD Bridge, Design Specifications, AASHTO.
26. Deep Learning-Based Detection of Structural Damage Using Time-Series Data10.1080/15732479.2020.1815225 ↗
27. Azad, M.M., Munyaneza, O., Jung, J., Sohn, J.W., Han, J.W., and Kim, H.S. (2024). Damage Localization and Severity Assessment in Composite Structures Using Deep Learning Based on Lamb Waves. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24248057 ↗
28. Optimal Tuning of Three Deep Learning Methods with Signal Processing and Anomaly Detection for Multi-Class Damage Detection of a Large-Scale Bridge10.1177/14759217231216694 ↗
29. A Novel Unsupervised Deep Learning Approach for Vibration-Based Damage Diagnosis Using a Multi-Head Self-Attention LSTM Autoencoder10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114410 ↗
30. Damage Detection under Varying Temperature Using Artificial Neural Networks10.1002/stc.1998 ↗
31. A Damage Detection Method Using Neural Network Optimized by Multiple Particle Collision Algorithm10.1155/2021/9998187 ↗
32. Malekian, A., and Chitsaz, N. (2021). Concepts, Procedures, and Applications of Artificial Neural Network Models in Streamflow Forecasting. Advances in Streamflow Forecasting, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-820673-7.00003-2 ↗
33. Zafar, A., Saba, N., Arshad, A., Alabrah, A., Riaz, S., Suleman, M., Zafar, S., and Nadeem, M. (2024). Convolutional Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmarking of Pooling Layer Variants. Symmetry, 16.10.3390/sym16111516 ↗
34. Fard, F. (2024). Development and Utilization of Bridge Data of the United States for Predicting Deck Condition Rating Using Random Forest, XGBoost, and Artificial Neural Network. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16020367 ↗
35. Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting
36. Uzair, M., and Jamil, N. (2020, January 5–7). Effects of Hidden Layers on the Efficiency of Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 23rd International Multitopic Conference (INMIC), Bahawalpur, Pakistan.10.1109/INMIC50486.2020.9318195 ↗
37. Adaptive Neural Network Control with Optimal Number of Hidden Nodes for Trajectory Tracking of Robot Manipulators10.1016/j.neucom.2019.03.043 ↗
38. Vibration-Based Multiclass Damage Detection and Localization Using Long Short-Term Memory Networks10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.088 ↗
39. Structural Damage Detection Using Deep Learning and FE Model Updating Techniques10.1038/s41598-023-46141-9 ↗
40. Transfer Learning for CNN-Based Damage Detection in Civil Structures with Insufficient Data
41. A Semisupervised Transfer Learning Method for Structural Damage Identification and Its Application to a Cable- Stayed Bridge10.1155/stc/6840921 ↗
42. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
43. Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C. (2015, January 6–11). Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.
44. A Deep Learning-Based Approach for Assessment of Bridge Condition through Fusion of Multi-Type Inspection Data10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107468 ↗
45. Su, Q., and Carin, L. (2017). A Probabilistic Framework for Nonlinearities in Stochastic Neural Networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30.
46. A Deep Convolutional Neural Network with New Training Methods for Bearing Fault Diagnosis under Noisy Environment and Different Working Load10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.022 ↗
47. Deep Learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
48. Multiclass Damage Identification in a Full-Scale Bridge Using Optimally-Tuned One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001003 ↗
49. Data-Driven Support Vector Machine with Optimization Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection10.1007/s12205-017-1518-5 ↗
50. Data Fusion-Based Structural Damage Detection under Varying Temperature Conditions10.1142/S0219455412500526 ↗
51. Review on the New Development of Vibration-Based Damage Identification for Civil Engineering Structures: 2010–201910.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 ↗
52. Damage Identification of Railway Bridge KW51 Conditions Using Deep—Learning—Based 1D CNN Model