Laboratory evaluation of the effect of cement concrete overlays on the existing asphalt concrete pavement with different degrees of bonding
Source abstract
Abstract
The utilisation of cement concrete overlays has been on the rise owing to the growing demand for the repair and enhancement of existing pavements, emphasising cost-effectiveness and prolonged overlay lifespan. The primary objective of this study is to ascertain the performance and scrutinise the impact of various types of separating layers on the mechanical parameters of cement concrete overlays. Upon the acquisition of requisite materials and the preliminary testing pertaining to the design of mixtures utilised in both asphalt concrete and cement concrete, three-layer samples were employed in pull-off tests and bending beam tests. These samples incorporated separating layers of different material types, namely AC60/70 neat bitumen (neat bitumen with Pen 60/70), AC85/100 neat bitumen (neat bitumen with Pen 85/100), bitumen emulsion (tack coat), polymer-modified bitumen, bituminous thin layer mixture, and a control sample without a separating layer. Subsequently, through a comparative analysis of the tensile strength and flexural strength results derived from the three-layer samples, the separating material demonstrating the highest and lowest potential for bonding was identified and compared through diverse diagrams. Furthermore, to ensure the reliability of the obtained results, a comparative analysis was conducted against the Darter and Barenberg criterion, along with average stress (mean fatigue).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Properties and Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO M6 2013. Standard specification for fine aggregate for hydraulic cement concrete.
2. AASHTO T176 2017. Standard method of test for plastic fines in graded aggregates and soils by use of the sand equivalent test.
3. AASHTO T27 2014. Standard method of test for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates.
4. AASHTO T88 2020. Standard method of test for particle size analysis of soils.
5. AASHTO T89 2013. Standard method of test for determining the liquid limit of soils.
6. AASHTO T90 2020. Standard method of test for determining the plastic limit and plasticity index of soils.
7. AASHTO T96 2022. Standard method of test for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine.
8. ACI 318-08 2008. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.
9. ACI 325.13R-06, 2006. Concrete pavement for rehabilitation. ACI Committee Report.
10. American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA) 1991. Guidelines for concrete overlays on existing asphalt pavements (whitetopping) Technical Bulletin TB-009P.
11. Arthi, S., Narasimha, V.L., and Pandurangan, K., 2015. Finite analysis of thin whitetopped pavement. IJIRSET.
12. ASTM C1583 2013. Standard test method for tensile strength of concrete surfaces and the bond strength or tensile strength of concrete repair and overlay materials by direct tension (Pull-off Method).
13. ASTM C192 2015. Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory.
14. ASTM C293 2016. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with center-point loading).
15. ASTM C39 2021. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.
16. ASTM C78 2022. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading).
17. ASTM D113 2018. Standard test method for ductility of asphalt materials.
18. Astm D1754 2010. Standard test method for effect of heat and Air on asphaltic materials (Thin-Film Oven Test).
19. ASTM D2042 2022. Standard test method for solubility of asphalt materials in trichloroethylene or toluene.
20. ASTM D2170 2010. Standard test method for kinematic viscosity of asphalts (Bitumens).
21. ASTM D36 2010. Standard test method for softening point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus).
22. ASTM D4791 2017. Standard test method for flat particles elongated particles or flat and elongated particles in coarse aggregate.
23. ASTM D5 2017. Standard test method for penetration of bituminous materials.
24. ASTM D5821 2017. Standard test method for determining the percentage of fractured particles in coarse aggregate.
25. ASTM D5976 2021. Standard specification for type I polymer modified asphalt cement for use in pavement construction.
26. ASTM D70 2013. Standard test method for density of semi-solid bituminous materials (pycnometer method).
27. ASTM D7234 2021. Standard test method for pull-Off adhesion strength of coatings on concrete using portable pull-off adhesion testers.
28. ASTM D92 2018. Standard test method for flash and fire points by Cleveland open cup tester.
29. Bahram Munik and Vanderbossche Julie M. 2014. Characterization of load transfer behavior for bonded concrete overlays on asphalt TRB annual meeting.
30. Ballarini, R., and Liao, M., 2012. Mechanistic modeling of unbonded concrete overlay pavements. University of Minnesota Department of Civil Engineering.
31. 10.1080/10298436.2014.99318310.1080/10298436.2014.993183 ↗
32. Barman M. et al. 2011. Development of design guide for thin and ultra-thin concrete overlays of existing asphalt pavements . Task 1. University of Pittsburgh.
33. BS 1881 2015 Testing concrete methods for analysis of hardened concrete.
34. CAN/CSA A23.2-14 2014 Obtaining and testing drilled cores for compressive strength testing.
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.03110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.031 ↗
36. Fick, G., et al., 2021. Guide to concrete overlays. 4th ed. Ames, IA: National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Iowa State University.
37. Gross, J., 2023. Performance history of concrete overlays in the United States. Ames, IA: National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Iowa State University.
38. Harrington, D., et al., October 2018. Guide for concrete pavement distress assessments and solutions: identification, causes, prevention, and repair. National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Iowa State University.
39. Harrington, D., and Fick, G., 2014. Guide to concrete overlays: sustainable solutions for resurfacing and rehabilitating existing pavements. 3rd ed. Ames, IA: National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Iowa State University.
40. Hossein Mustaque and Sultana Sharmin 2010. Extending asphalt pavement life using thin white topping.
41. Huang, Yang H, 2004. Pavement analysis and design. University of Kentucky, Prentice Hall.
42. Khazanovich, L., et al., February 2020. Development of an improved design procedure for unbonded concrete overlays. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh.
43. Li Zhichang 2012. Redefining the failure mode for thin and ultra-thin white topping TRB annual meeting.
44. Li Zichang Vandenbossche Julie M and Dufalla Nicole 2013. Structural model for longitudinal cracking in bonded white topping FHWA TPA-5-165.
45. Mampearachchi W.K Kosgolla J. and Tia M. 2012. Feasibility of white topping pavements for resurfacing thin asphalt pavements.10.4038/jnsfsr.v40i4.5043 ↗
46. Mu, F., and Vandenbossche, J.M., December 2011. Development of design guide for thin and ultra-thin concrete overlays of existing asphalt pavements, task 2: review and selection of structural response and performance models. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh.
47. 10.1080/10298436.2011.59693510.1080/10298436.2011.596935 ↗
48. 10.3390/su1317987610.3390/su13179876 ↗
49. 10.1080/1029843060079889510.1080/10298430600798895 ↗
50. Roesler, J., 2015. Concrete pavement overlay design. 1st ed. University of Illinois Urbana-champaign.
51. 10.1080/10298436.2011.57513410.1080/10298436.2011.575134 ↗
52. 10.1080/10298436.2016.127459810.1080/10298436.2016.1274598 ↗
53. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.866.3110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.866.31 ↗
54. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000225010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002250 ↗
55. 10.1080/10298436.2014.89333210.1080/10298436.2014.893332 ↗
56. 10.1007/978-94-007-1239-3_610.1007/978-94-007-1239-3_6 ↗
57. Vandenbossche Julie M Duffala N and Li Z 2013. A revised thin and ultra thin bonded whitetopping design procedure Transportation research record.
58. 10.1080/10298436.2016.114141010.1080/10298436.2016.1141410 ↗
59. Vandenbossche, J. M., and Sachs, S., 2013. Guidelines for bonded concrete overlays of asphalt: beginning with project selection and ending with construction. Technical note. University of Pittsburgh.
60. 10.1080/10298436.2021.187333510.1080/10298436.2021.1873335 ↗
61. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000001710.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000017 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12004510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120045 ↗