journal article·2026-01-17Open access

Detecting Escherichia coli on Conventional Food Processing Surfaces Using UV-C Fluorescence Imaging and Deep Learning

Zafar Iqbal, Thomas F. Burks, Snehit Vaddi, Pappu Kumar Yadav, Quentin Frederick, Satya Aakash Chowdary Obellaneni, Jianwei Qin, Moon Kim, Mark A. Ritenour, Jiuxu Zhang, Fartash Vasefi

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

Detecting Escherichia coli on food preparation and processing surfaces is critical for ensuring food safety and preventing foodborne illness. This study focuses on detecting E. coli contamination on common food processing surfaces using UV-C fluorescence imaging and deep learning. Four concentrations of E. coli (0, 105, 107, and 108 colony forming units (CFU)/mL) and two egg solutions (white and yolk) were applied to stainless steel and white rubber to simulate realistic contamination with organic interference. For each concentration level, 256 droplets were inoculated in 16 groups, and fluorescence videos were captured. Droplet regions were extracted from the video frames, subdivided into quadrants, and augmented to generate a robust dataset, ensuring 3–4 droplets per sample. Wavelet-based denoising further improved image quality, with Haar wavelets producing the highest Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) values, up to 51.0 dB on white rubber and 48.2 dB on stainless steel. Using this dataset, multiple deep learning (DL) models, including ConvNeXtBase, EfficientNetV2L, and five YOLO11-cls variants, were trained to classify E. coli concentration levels. Additionally, Eigen-CAM heatmaps were used to visualize model attention to bacterial fluorescence regions. Across four dataset groupings, YOLO11-cls models achieved consistently high performance, with peak test accuracies of 100% on white rubber and 99.60% on stainless steel, even in the presence of egg substances. YOLO11s-cls provided the best balance of accuracy (up to 98.88%) and inference speed (4–5 ms) whilst having a compact size (11 MB), outperforming larger models such as EfficientNetV2L. Classical machine learning models lagged significantly behind, with Random Forest reaching 89.65% accuracy and SVM only 67.62%. Overall, the results highlight the potential of combining UV-C fluorescence imaging with deep learning for rapid and reliable detection of E. coli on stainless steel and rubber conveyor belt surfaces. Additionally, this approach could support the design of effective interventions to remove E. coli from food processing environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety · Infection Control and Ventilation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

Department of Computer & Information Science & Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA

USDA/ARS Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA

Department of Horticultural Sciences, University of Florida, 2199 South Rock Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34945, USA

SafetySpect Inc., 4200 James Ray Dr., Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA

Funding

USDA ARS Cooperative Agreement

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. NCEZID (2025, June 26). National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID). NCEZID. CDC 2025, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/foodborne-outbreaks/outbreaks/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/foodborne-outbreaks/active-investigations/index.html.
2. Vaddi, S., Burks, T.F., Iqbal, Z., Yadav, P.K., Frederick, Q., Obellaneni, S.A.C., Qin, J., Kim, M., Ritenour, M.A., and Zhang, J. (2025). Detecting Escherichia coli Contamination on Plant Leaf Surfaces Using UV-C Fluorescence Imaging and Deep Learning. Plants, 14.10.3390/plants14213352 ↗
3. Classification of E. coli Colony with Generative Adversarial Networks, Discrete Wavelet Transforms and VGG1910.26502/jrci.2809082 ↗
4. Transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from Contaminated Manure and Irrigation Water to Lettuce Plant Tissue and Its Subsequent Internalization10.1128/AEM.68.1.397-400.2002 ↗
5. Long-Term Excretion of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Experimental Infection of a Sheep with O15710.1292/jvms.64.927 ↗
6. An Outbreak of Diarrhea and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome from Escherichia coli O157: H7 in Fresh-Pressed Apple Cider10.1001/jama.1993.03500170047032 ↗
7. Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Fresh-Cut Apple Tissue and Its Potential for Transmission by Fruit Flies10.1128/AEM.65.1.1-5.1999 ↗
8. Detection of Escherichia coli in Food Samples Using Culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods
9. A Comprehensive Review of Detection Methods for Escherichia coli O157:H710.1016/j.trac.2022.116646 ↗
10. A Review of Fluorescence Imaging System Supported by Excitation-Emission Matrix for Fruit and Vegetable Quality Estimation10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.111040 ↗
11. Space-Confined Nanozyme with Cascade Reaction Based on PCN-224 for Synergistic Bacterial Infection Treatment and NIR Fluorescence Imaging of Wound Bacterial Infections10.1016/j.cej.2024.150642 ↗
12. Detection of Citrus Black Spot Fungi Phyllosticta Citricarpa & Phyllosticta Capitalensis on UV-C Fluorescence Images Using YOLOv810.1016/j.atech.2024.100615 ↗
13. Cell Density and Extracellular Matrix Composition Mitigate Bacterial Biofilm Sensitivity to UV-C LED Irradiation10.1007/s00253-024-13123-4 ↗
14. Measuring the Performance of Conventional and Emerging Ultraviolet-C Light Sources for Bacterial, Fungal, and Mycotoxin Control10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110640 ↗
15. Bacterial Image Analysis Using Multi-Task Deep Learning Approaches for Clinical Microscopy10.7717/peerj-cs.2180 ↗
16. A Systematic Literature Review of Deep Learning-Based Detection and Classification Methods for Bacterial Colonies
17. Detection of Fungal Infections from Microscopic Fungal Images Using Deep Learning Techniques
18. GLOW-DL: Generalized Light-Optimized Workflow with Deep Learning for Contamination Detection Using Fluorescence Imaging in Variable Conditions10.1007/s42853-025-00262-3 ↗
19. Deep Learning in Fluorescence Imaging and Analysis10.1002/jim4.17 ↗
20. Accuracy and Precision in Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy10.1083/jcb.200903097 ↗
21. Imaging in Focus: An Introduction to Denoising Bioimages in the Era of Deep Learning10.1016/j.biocel.2021.106077 ↗
22. Hussain, D., and Hyeon Gu, Y. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Noise and Image Quality on Deep Learning Performance in DXA Images. Diagnostics, 14.10.20944/preprints202405.0765.v1 ↗
23. Fault Diagnosis of Spent Fuel Shearing Machines Based on Improved Residual Network10.1016/j.anucene.2023.110228 ↗
24. Pereira Neto, A., and Barros, F.J.B. (2025). Noise Reduction in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Adaptive Wavelet Thresholding Based on Linear Prediction Factor. Front. Neurosci., 18.10.3389/fnins.2024.1516514 ↗
25. Wavelet-Based Background and Noise Subtraction for Fluorescence Microscopy Images10.1364/BOE.413181 ↗
26. A Versatile Wavelet-Enhanced CNN-Transformer for Improved Fluorescence Microscopy Image Restoration10.1016/j.neunet.2023.11.039 ↗
27. Wavelet-Attention CNN for Image Classification10.1007/s00530-022-00889-8 ↗
28. The Wavelet-Based Denoising of Images in Fiji, with Example Applications in Structured Illumination Microscopy10.5566/ias.2432 ↗
29. Total Variation versus Wavelet-Based Methods for Image Denoising in Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy10.1002/jbio.201100137 ↗
30. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What We Know and What Is Left to Attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 ↗
31. Eigen-CAM: Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks10.1007/s42979-021-00449-3 ↗
32. Liu, G., Zhou, W., Tian, L., Chung, C.-T., Jia, J., and Ying, C. (2025). Seg-Eigen-CAM: Eigen-Value-Based Visual Explanations for Semantic Segmentation Models. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15137562 ↗
33. Liu, X., Sun, L., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., and Zhao, B. (2025). HGNet: High-Order Spatial Awareness Hypergraph and Multi-Scale Context Attention Network for Colorectal Polyp Detection. arXiv.
34. Almenwer, S., El-Sayed, H., and Sarker, M.K. (2024, January 19–21). Classification Method in Vision Transformer with Explainability in Medical Images for Lung Neoplasm Detection. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Medical Imaging and Computer-Aided Diagnosis (MICAD 2024), Manchester, UK. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 2025, 1372 LNEE.
35. RDAS-MODEL: An Efficient Model of Road Drivable Area Segmentation for Autonomous Driving10.1088/1361-6501/adc75a ↗
36. Li, D., Wang, L., and Zhang, L. (2025). SDF-YOLO: A Multi-Scale Dynamic Feature Fusion Network for Enhanced Lightweight Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. TechRxiv.10.36227/techrxiv.174970485.57443795/v1 ↗
37. Praveen, S., and Jung, Y. (2025). CBAM-STN-TPS-YOLO: Enhancing Agricultural Object Detection through Spatially Adaptive Attention Mechanisms. arXiv.
38. Jahin, A., Soudeep, S., Mridha, M.F., Member, S., Hossen, J., Dey, N., and Jakir Hossen, M. (2025). Soybean Disease Detection via Interpretable Hybrid CNN-GNN: Integrating MobileNetV2 and GraphSAGE with Cross-Modal Attention. arXiv.
39. Reduction of Escherichia Coli, as a Surrogate for Salmonella spp., on the Surface of Grapefruit during Various Packingline Processes10.1016/j.fm.2018.10.014 ↗
40. Yadav, P.K., Burks, T., Vaddi, S., Qin, J., Kim, M., Ritenour, M.A., and Vasefi, F. (2024, January 22–24). Detection of E. coli Concentration Levels Using CSI-D+ Handheld with UV-C Fluorescence Imaging and Deep Learning on Leaf Surfaces. Proceedings of the Sensing for Agriculture and Food Quality and Safety XVI, National Harbor, MD, USA.10.1117/12.3014017 ↗
41. PyWavelets: A Python Package for Wavelet Analysis10.21105/joss.01237 ↗
42. Jocher, G., and Qiu, J. (2025, May 03). Ultralytics YOLO11 2024. Available online: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics.
43. Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., and Xie, S. (2022, January 18–24). A ConvNet for the 2020s. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01167 ↗
44. EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training
45. Muhammad, M.B., and Yeasin, M. (2020, January 19–24). Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map Using Principal Components. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 2020, Glasgow, UK.10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9206626 ↗
46. Shirvalkar, R. (2025, May 05). EigenCAM for YOLO V11 Interpretability 2024. Available online: https://github.com/rigvedrs/YOLO-V11-CAM.
47. Choi, J., Rajendran, M., and Cheol Suh, Y. (2024, January 4–7). Explainable Rip Current Detection and Visualization with XAI EigenCAM. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2024, Pyeong Chang, Republic of Korea.10.23919/ICACT60172.2024.10471913 ↗
48. Simon-Johannes, B., Thomas, R., and Kerstin, T. (2024, January 25–27). Automated Colony Detection in Fluorescent Images Using U-Net Models. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 22nd World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI) 2024, Stará Lesná, Slovakia.10.1109/SAMI60510.2024.10432868 ↗
49. Deep Learning-Based Automated Approach for Classifying Bacterial Images10.31763/ijrcs.v4i2.1423 ↗