Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Based on TFPF-SU and AuFNN Methods: A Case Study of Dongchuan District, Yunnan Province
Source abstract
Abstract
Landslides are a common type of geological hazard, characterized by sudden onset, high destructiveness, and frequent occurrence, and are widely distributed in mountainous areas with complex terrain. In recent years, due to extreme weather and intensified human activities, both the frequency and intensity of landslide disasters in China have increased significantly, posing serious threats to human life, property, and socio-economic development. Although various methods for landslide susceptibility assessment have been proposed, the accuracy of existing models still needs improvement. In this context, this study takes the landslide-prone Dongchuan District of Kunming City, Yunnan Province, as a case study and proposes a coupled model that integrates an autoencoder and a feedforward neural network (AuFNN). The model uses the autoencoder to extract low-dimensional and highly discriminative feature representations, which are then used as input to the feedforward neural network to perform landslide susceptibility assessment. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model, it is compared with four commonly used models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and Feedforward Neural Network (FNN), based on performance metrics such as the ROC curve, recall, and F1 score. The results indicate that the AuFNN model provides an alternative representation learning framework and achieves performance comparable to that of established machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment, as reflected by similar AUC, accuracy, and F1 score values.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Disaster Management and Resilience · Flood Risk Assessment and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
CCCC Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China
State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Ado, M., Amitab, K., Maji, A.K., Jasinska, E., Gono, R., Leonowicz, Z., and Jasinski, M. (2022). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Literature Survey. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14133029 ↗
2. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 ↗
3. Modelling landslide susceptibility prediction: A review and construction of semi-supervised imbalanced theory10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104700 ↗
4. Uncertainties of landslide susceptibility prediction considering different landslide types10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.001 ↗
5. Assessment of landslide susceptibility along mountain highways based on different machine learning algorithms and mapping units by hybrid factors screening and sample optimization10.1016/j.gr.2022.07.013 ↗
6. A LightGBM-based landslide susceptibility model considering the uncertainty of non-landslide samples10.1080/19475705.2023.2213807 ↗
7. A Literature Review and Research Progress on Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Based on Knowledge Graphs
8. Miller, R.D., and Dobrovolny, E. (1959). Surficial Geology of Anchorage and Vicinity, Alaska.
9. Landslide susceptibility mapping and dynamic response along the Sichuan-Tibet transportation corridor using deep learning algorithms10.1016/j.catena.2022.106866 ↗
10. Nanehkaran, Y.A., Chen, B.Y., Cemiloglu, A., Chen, J.D., Anwar, S., Azarafza, M., and Derakhshani, R. (2023). Riverside Landslide Susceptibility Overview: Leveraging Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning in Accordance with the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals. Water, 15.10.3390/w15152707 ↗
11. Dias, H.C., Hölbling, D., and Grohmann, C.H. (2021). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Brazil: A Review. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11100425 ↗
12. GIS Technology in Mapping Landslide Hazard
13. A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 ↗
14. The Application of GIS-Based Logistic Regression for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Kakuda–Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010 ↗
15. Analytic hierarchy process applied to landslide susceptibility mapping of the North Branch of Argentino Lake, Argentina10.1007/s11069-020-04343-8 ↗
16. Baharvand, S., Rahnamarad, J., Soori, S., and Saadatkhah, N. (2020). Landslide susceptibility zoning in a catchment of Zagros Mountains using fuzzy logic and GIS. Environ. Earth Sci., 79.10.1007/s12665-020-08957-w ↗
17. GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A comparison between fuzzy multi-criteria and machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.004 ↗
18. Redefining landslide susceptibility under extreme rainfall events using deep learning10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.109033 ↗
19. Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.003 ↗
20. Wenchuan Co-Seismic Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Gradient Boosting Decision Trees and Random Forests Based on an Optimized Negative Sample Sampling Strategy
21. Regional Landslide Hazard Assessment and Zoning Based on the Coupled Information Value Method and Random Forest Model with Critical Monthly Average Rainfall Threshold: A Case Study of Fuling District, Chongqing
22. Landslide Susceptibility mapping using random forest and extreme gradient boosting: A case study of Fengjie, Chongqing10.1002/gj.4683 ↗
23. Nikoobakht, S., Azarafza, M., Akgün, H., and Derakhshani, R. (2022). Landslide Susceptibility Assessment by Using Convolutional Neural Network. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12125992 ↗
24. Slope Unit Delineation and Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Based on a Multi-Scale Segmentation Method
25. Modification of landslide susceptibility mapping using optimized PSO-ANN technique10.1007/s00366-018-0644-0 ↗
26. High resolution landslide susceptibility mapping using ensemble machine learning and geospatial big data10.1016/j.catena.2023.107653 ↗
27. Applications and Development Trends of Machine Learning in Intelligent Landslide Disaster Prevention and Mitigation
28. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Based on a CF-CNN-LSTM Model
29. Zeng, T., Wu, L., Peduto, D., Glade, T., Hayakawa, Y.S., and Yin, K. (2023). Ensemble learning framework for landslide susceptibility mapping: Different basic classifier and ensemble strategy. Geosci. Front., 14.10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101645 ↗
30. Yu, L., Wang, Y., and Pradhan, B. (2024). Enhancing landslide susceptibility mapping incorporating landslide typology via stacking ensemble machine learning in Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Geosci. Front., 15.10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101802 ↗
31. Li, P., Fan, J.F., Du, Y.J., Li, K., and Zhou, Y.K. (2024). A New Parameter-Free Slope Unit Division Method That Integrates Terrain Factors. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142311279 ↗
32. Arabameri, A., Pradhan, B., Rezaei, K., and Lee, C.-W. (2019). Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Statistical- and Artificial Intelligence-Based FR–RF Integrated Model and Multiresolution DEMs. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11090999 ↗
33. Landslide hazard evaluation: A review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1 ↗
34. Turner, A.K., and Schuster, R.L. (1996). Landslide types and processes. Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
35. Spatial Distribution of Near-Fault Landslides along the Litang Fault Zone, Eastern Tibetan Plateau10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109189 ↗
36. Zhang, Y., Xu, C., Shao, X., and Li, H. (2025). Dependence of Coseismic Landslide Distribution Patterns on Fault Movement. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app151910305 ↗
37. Regional Landslide Sensitivity Analysis Based on the WOE-PPMCC Model
38. Regional Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Result Validation Based on Three Different Models
39. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Based on GIS and WOE-BP Model
40. Landslide Susceptibility Modeling Uncertainty under Different Combinations of Environmental Factors and Prediction Models
41. Machine Learning Applications based on SVM Classification A Review10.48161/qaj.v1n2a50 ↗
42. Landslide Displacement Prediction Based on Smooth Prior Method–Sparrow Search Algorithm–Support Vector Machine Regression Model: A Case Study of Bazimen and Baishuihe Landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area
43. Landslide Susceptibility Analysis Based on a Coupled Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine Model
44. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
45. A Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Method Based on XGBoost Optimized by Bayesian Algorithm
46. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
47. Feed-forward neural networks10.1109/45.329294 ↗
48. 2022 Luding Earthquake Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Based on a Coupled Algorithm of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve
49. Analysis of Differences in Regional Earthquake-Induced Landslide Hazard Predictions Using Different Feature Selection Methods: A Case Study of the Wenchuan Earthquake Area
50. Chen, Z. (2023). Research on a Geological Hazard Susceptibility Assessment Model and Its Application Based on Ensemble Machine Learning. [Master’s Thesis, Lanzhou University of Technology].
51. Landslide Susceptibility Zoning of Wushan County Based on GIS and Random Forest