Adsorption of Copper (II) from Real Textile Wastewater Using Natural and Waste Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Heavy metals are major toxic anthropogenic contaminants released into the environment mainly through wastewater discharges. Adsorption is one of the most effective and widely applied methods for their removal from aqueous systems. However, although activated carbon is commonly used, its high cost and limited regenerability motivate the search for cheaper and more environmentally friendly alternatives. In this study, selected natural and waste-derived materials were evaluated for Cu2+ removal from both model solutions and atypical textile wastewater. Coffee grounds, chestnut seeds, acorns, potato peels, eggshells, marine shells, and poultry bones were tested and compared with commercial activated carbon. Their structural and functional properties were characterised using specific surface area measurements, optical microscopy, SEM-EDS, and FTIR analyses. Two adsorption isotherm models (Langmuir and Freundlich) were used to analyse the experimental data for the selected adsorbents, and model parameters were determined by linear regression. Based on model solution tests, two materials showed the highest Cu2+ sorption potential: coarse poultry bones (97.0% at 24 h) and fine cockle shells (96.2% at 24 h). When applied to real textile wastewater, the bone-derived material achieved the highest Cu2+ removal efficiency (79.4%). Although this efficiency is lower than typical values obtained in laboratory solutions, it demonstrates the feasibility of waste-derived materials as low-cost adsorbents and suggests that further optimisation could further improve their performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Phosphorus and nutrient management · Fluoride Effects and Removal
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Lukasiewicz Research Network–Lodz Institute of Technology, 19/27 Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie Street, 90-570 Lodz, Poland
Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz Univeristy of Technology, 213 Wolczanska Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
Funding
“FU2N—Fund for the Improvement of Young Scientists’ Skills” programme
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Nanotechnology: An Emerging Future Trend in Wastewater Treatment with Its Innovative Products and Processes
2. New Generation Nanomaterials for Water Desalination: A Review10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.041 ↗
3. Adsorption of Dyes Using Custard Apple and Wood Apple Waste: A Review10.1016/j.jics.2023.100948 ↗
4. Główny Urząd Statystyczny/Obszary Tematyczne/Środowisko (2025, September 29). Energia/Środowisko/Zielone Płuca Polski w 2021 Roku, Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/srodowisko-energia/srodowisko/ochrona-srodowiska-2022,1,23.html.
5. Effectiveness of Dyeing Wastewater Treatment
6. Romanowska-Duda, Z. (2025, September 29). Heavy Metals as Specific Pollutants of the Aquatic Environment. Uniwersytet Łódzk, Faculty of Biological Environmental Protection. Available online: https://www.proakademia.eu/gfx/baza_wiedzy/32/metale_ciezkie_jako_specyficzne_zanieczyszczenia_srodowiska_wodnego.pdf.
7. Novel Biofiltration Methods for the Treatment of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.101 ↗
8. Microbial and Plant Derived Biomass for Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.006 ↗
9. A Review of Potentially Low-Cost Sorbents for Heavy Metals10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00475-8 ↗
10. The Toxic Effects of Heavy Metals on Plants, Animals and Humans
11. Effects of Heavy Metals on Variation in Bacterial Communities in Farmland Soil of Tailing Dam Collapse Area10.1038/s41598-025-93244-6 ↗
12. Heavy Metals in the Environment and Their Impact on Human Health
13. World Health Organization (WHO) (2024). Human Health Effects of Benzene, Arsenic, Cadmium, Nickel, Lead and Mercury, World Health Organization.
14. Assessment of Heavy Metals Associated Health Risk to Humans from Biota in Thane Creek, India10.1007/s44274-025-00208-8 ↗
15. Heavy Metal Polluted Water: Effects and Sustainable Treatment Solutions Using Bio-Adsorbents Aligned with the SDGs10.1007/s43621-025-00895-6 ↗
16. Sources of Copper Ions and Selected Methods for Their Removal from Wastewater Originating from the Production of Printed Circuit Boards
17. Efficient Copper Adsorption from Wastewater Using Silica Nanoparticles Derived from Incinerated Coconut Shell Ash10.1007/s12668-024-01523-9 ↗
18. Efficient Adsorption of Lead and Copper from Water by Modification of Sand Filter with a Green Plant-Based Adsorbent: Adsorption Kinetics and Regeneration10.1016/j.envres.2024.119529 ↗
19. Heavy Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment: Efficient and Low-Cost Removal Approaches to Eliminate Their Toxicity: A Review10.1039/D3RA00723E ↗
20. Herman, S., Lipiński, P., Ogórek, M., Starzyński, R., Grzmil, P., Bednarz, A., and Lenartowicz, M. (2020). Molecular Regulation of Copper Homeostasis in the Male Gonad during the Process of Spermatogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21239053 ↗
21. Risks and Benefits of Copper in Light of New Insights of Copper Homeostasis10.1016/j.jtemb.2010.11.004 ↗
22. Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper10.1007/s00267-019-01234-y ↗
23. Liu, Y., Wang, H., Cui, Y., and Chen, N. (2023). Removal of Copper Ions from Wastewater: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.10.3390/ijerph20053885 ↗
24. Role of Nanomaterials as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Ion Removal from Waste Water: A Review10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101038 ↗
25. Copper Contaminated Wastewater—An Evaluation of Bioremedial Options10.1177/1420326X16669397 ↗
26. Removal of Sulfate and Heavy Metals by Sulfate Reducing Bacteria in Short-Term Bench Scale Upflow Anaerobic Packed Bed Reactor Runs10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00165-9 ↗
27. Removal of Heavy Metals from Water Using Polyvinylamine by Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration and Flocculation10.1016/j.seppur.2015.12.008 ↗
28. Polythyleneimine-Modified Original Positive Charged Nanofiltration Membrane: Removal of Heavy Metal Ions and Dyes10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.083 ↗
29. How to Fabricate a Negatively Charged NF Membrane for Heavy Metal Removal via the Interfacial Polymerization between PIP and TMC?10.1016/j.desal.2020.114499 ↗
30. Tang, S., Jiao, Y., Yan, F., Qin, Q., Qin, S., Ma, X., Li, J., and Cui, Z. (2022). Construction of Hollow Fiber Nanofiltration Separation Layer with Bridging Network Structure by Polymer-Anchored Co-Deposition for High-Concentration Heavy Metal Ion Removal. SSRN Electron. J.10.2139/ssrn.4105378 ↗
31. Recent Advances on Cellulose-Based Nanofiltration Membranes and Their Applications in Drinking Water Purification: A Review10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130171 ↗
32. Removal of Cu(II) Ions from Contaminated Waters Using a Conducting Microfiltration Membrane10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.06.038 ↗
33. Nanofiltration Membranes Review: Recent Advances and Future Prospects10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043 ↗
34. Removal of Copper from Industrial Effluent Using a Spiral Wound Module—Film Theory and Hydrodynamic Approach10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.348 ↗
35. Research Progress on Heavy Metal Wastewater Treatment in the Integrated Circuit Industry: From Pollution Control to Resource Utilization10.1016/j.seppur.2025.134033 ↗
36. Zakaria, R.M., Hassan, I., El-Abd, M.Z., and El-Tawil, Y.A. (2009, January 12–15). Lactic Acid Removal from Wastewater by Using Different Types of Activated Clay. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Water Technology Conference (IWTC), Hurghada, Egypt.
37. Exploring the Efficiency of Chemically Activated Palm Frond Carbon in Heavy Metal Adsorption a Modeling Approach10.1038/s41598-025-89047-4 ↗
38. Remediation of Wastewater Containing Heavy Metals Using Raw and Modified Diatomite10.1016/j.cej.2003.11.029 ↗
39. A Review on Conventional and Novel Materials towards Heavy Metal Adsorption in Wastewater Treatment Application10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126589 ↗
40. Accepted Manuscript Effect of Pyrolysis Condition on the Adsorption Mechanism of Lead, Cadmium and Copper on Tobacco Stem Biochar10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.268 ↗
41. Fu, Q., Xu, X., Miao, R., Wang, M., Zhou, H., He, L., and Guan, Q. (2022). Mn-Embedded Porous Rubber Seed Shell Biochar for Enhanced Removal of Copper Ions and Its Ingeniously Re-Functionalizing. SSRN Electron. J.10.2139/ssrn.4013482 ↗
42. liang Adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) onto Natural Kaolinite Clay10.1016/j.desal.2009.11.005 ↗
43. Utilization of Industrial Waste Lithium-Silicon-Powder for the Fabrication of Novel Nap Zeolite for Aqueous Cu(II) Removal10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121822 ↗
44. Effect of Different Production Methods on Physicochemical Properties and Adsorption Capacities of Biochar from Sewage Sludge and Kitchen Waste: Mechanism and Correlation Analysis10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132690 ↗
45. Removal of Pb (II), Zn (II), Cu (II) and Cd (II) from Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption onto Olive Branches Activated Carbon: Equilibrium and Thermodynamic Studies
46. Leather Solid Waste Derived Activated Carbon as a Potential Material for Various Applications: A Review10.1016/j.jaap.2023.106249 ↗
47. Afolabi, F.O., and Musonge, P. (2023). Synthesis, Characterization, and Biosorption of Cu2+ and Pb2+ Ions from an Aqueous Solution Using Biochar Derived from Orange Peels. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28207050 ↗
48. Potato Peels as Solid Waste for the Removal of Heavy Metal Copper(II) from Waste Water/Industrial Effluent10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.11.013 ↗
49. On the Removal Efficiency of Copper Ions in Wastewater Using Calcined Waste Eggshells as Natural Adsorbents10.1038/s41598-023-27682-5 ↗
50. Heavy Metal Removal Using Plant Origin Biomass and Agricultural Waste-Derived Biomass from Aqueous Media: A Review10.1007/s41101-023-00177-0 ↗
51. Removal of Copper (Ii) from Aqueous Solution by Biosorption onto Powder of Jerusalem Artichoke
52. Adsorptive Removal of Cu(II) from Aqueous Solution and Industrial Effluent Using Natural/Agricultural Wastes10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.060 ↗
53. Remediation of Heavy Metals Using Selected Agricultural Waste: Sunflower Husk and Durian Leaves10.1088/1757-899X/557/1/012080 ↗
54. Apple Peels as a Potential Adsorbent for Removal of Cu and Cr from Wastewater10.2166/aqua.2023.216 ↗
55. Pectin-Rich Fruit Wastes as Biosorbents for Heavy Metal Removal: Equilibrium and Kinetics10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.060 ↗
56. Intensified Removal of Copper from Waste Water Using Activated Watermelon Based Biosorbent in the Presence of Ultrasound10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.11.016 ↗
57. Metal Ion Free Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Rind as Adsorbent for the Removal of Lead and Copper Ions from Aqueous Solution10.1080/19443994.2015.1072064 ↗
58. Production of Surfactant-Modified Banana Peel Biosorbents Applied to Treatment and Decolorization of Effluents10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132650 ↗
59. Characterization of Adsorptive Capacity and Investigation of Mechanism of Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ Adsorption on Mango Peel Waste from Constituted Metal Solution and Genuine Electroplating Effluent10.1080/01496390903182305 ↗
60. Xanthate Modified Apple Pomace as an Adsorbent for Removal of Cd (II), Ni (II) and Pb (II), and Its Application to Real Industrial Wastewater10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.10.015 ↗
61. Adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) by Succinic Anhydride-Modified Apple Pomace10.1016/j.bej.2023.109136 ↗
62. Adsorption Studies of Hazardous Malachite Green onto Treated Ginger Waste10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.12.016 ↗
63. Removal of Heavy Metals by Waste Tea Leaves from Aqueous Solution10.1002/elsc.200420066 ↗
64. Modeling of Biosorption of Cu(II) by Alkali-Modified Spent Tea Leaves Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)10.1007/s13201-014-0180-z ↗
65. Cișmașu, M., Modrogan, C., Orbuleț, O.D., Bosomoiu, M., Răileanu, M., and Dăncilă, A.M. (2025). Bone Meal as a Sustainable Amendment for Zinc Retention in Polluted Soils: Adsorption Mechanisms, Characterization, and Germination Response. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17178027 ↗
66. Comparison of the Experimental Results with the Langmuir and Freundlich Models for Copper Removal on Limestone Adsorbent10.1007/s13201-019-1061-2 ↗
67. Wang, M., Chen, T., Yan, B., Li, L., Xu, D., and Xiao, X. (2018). Characterization of the Adsorption of Cu (II) from Aqueous Solutions onto Pyrolytic Sludge-Derived Adsorbents. Water, 10.10.3390/w10121816 ↗
68. Wang, S., Li, J., Hu, K., and Bao, X. (2022, January 25–27). Study on Adsorption Model and Influencing Factors of Heavy Metal Cu2+ Adsorbed by Magnetic Filler Biofilm. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovative Solutions in Hydropower Engineering and Civil Engineering, Hangzhou, China.
69. Eggshell as an Adsorbent for Removing Dyes and Metallic Ions in Aqueous Solutions10.1016/j.clce.2022.100023 ↗
70. Bran, E.P., Patriciu, O.-I., Grosu, L., Alexa, I.-C., Bălănucă, B., Nicoară, A.-I., and Fînaru, A.-L. (2025). The Influence of Different Parameters for the Removal of Pb and Zn Ions on Unmodified Waste Eggshells. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18122794 ↗
71. Performance of Eggshells Powder as an Adsorbent for Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium and Cadmium from Wastewater10.1007/s42452-020-03866-w ↗
72. Removal of Eriochrome Black T (EBT) and Its Pb(II)-, Cu(II)-, and Zn(II)-Based Metal Complexes from Aqueous Solutions Using Spent Coffee Grounds: Part A—Characterization and Adsorption Isotherms
73. Natural Fibers from Vietnam Coffee Grounds as a Potential Reinforcement for Biocomposite Materials10.54644/jte.2024.1746 ↗
74. Effective Removal of Cu (II) Ions from Aqueous Solutions Using Low-Cost, Eco-Friendly Natural and Modified Potato Peels10.1007/s10661-025-13762-8 ↗
75. Bone Strength During Growth: Influence of Growth Rate on Cortical Porosity and Mineralization10.1007/s00223-002-2124-0 ↗
76. Correlation between Microstructure and Failure Mechanism of Hyriopsis Cumingii Shell Structure10.1007/s42235-019-0102-8 ↗
77. Optimum Conditions for Preparation of Bio-Calcium from Blood Cockle and Golden Apple Snail Shells and Characterization10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2019.45.010 ↗
78. Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers10.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
79. Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity10.1351/pac198557040603 ↗
80. Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report)10.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
81. Rouquerol, F., Rouquerol, J., and Sing, K.S.W. (1999). Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids: Principles, Methodology, and Applications, Academic Press.
82. Insights into the Modeling of Adsorption Isotherm Systems10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 ↗
83. Arsenic Removal from Water/Wastewater Using Adsorbents—A Critical Review10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 ↗
84. The Adsorption-Desorption-Regeneration Pathway to a Circular Economy: The Role of Waste-Derived Adsorbents on Chromium Removal10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132996 ↗
85. Serban, G.V., Iancu, V.I., Dinu, C., Tenea, A., Vasilache, N., Cristea, I., Niculescu, M., Ionescu, I., and Chiriac, F.L. (2023). Removal Efficiency and Adsorption Kinetics of Methyl Orange from Wastewater by Commercial Activated Carbon. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151712939 ↗
86. Yang, Z., Chai, Y., Zeng, L., Gao, Z., Zhang, J., and Ji, H. (2019). Efficient Removal of Copper Ion from Wastewater Using a Stable Chitosan Gel Material. Molecules, 24.10.3390/molecules24234205 ↗
87. Shemy, M.H., Mohamed, R.A., Abdel-Khalek, A.A., Alqhtani, H.A., Al Zoubi, W., and Abukhadra, M.R. (2025). Engineering High-Performance CTAB-Functionalized Magnesium Silicate Nano-Adsorbent for Efficient Removal of Cd2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ from Single-Metal Aqueous Solutions. Front. Chem., 13.10.3389/fchem.2025.1583305 ↗
88. Agarwal, A., Agarwal, M., Agrawal, N.K., and Saxena, M. (2012). Adsorption of Copper from Aqueous Solution Using Eggshell Powder. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 71–77.
89. Batch and Fixed-Bed Column Studies for the Biosorption of Cu(II) and Pb(II) by Raw and Treated Date Palm Leaves and Orange Peel10.30955/gnj.002294 ↗
90. Marković, M., Gorgievski, M., Štrbac, N., Grekulović, V., Božinović, K., Zdravković, M., and Vuković, M. (2023). Raw Eggshell as an Adsorbent for Copper Ions Biosorption—Equilibrium, Kinetic, Thermodynamic and Process Optimization Studies. Metals, 13.10.3390/met13020206 ↗
91. Design and Optimization of Cu(II) Adsorption Conditions from Aqueous Solutions by Low-Cost Adsorbent Pumice with Response Surface Methodology10.15244/pjoes/40270 ↗
92. Nyairo, W., Njewa, J.B., and Shikuku, V.O. (2025). Adsorption of Heavy Metals onto Food Wastes: A Review. Front. Environ. Chem., 6.10.3389/fenvc.2025.1526366 ↗
93. Production of Activated Carbon from Spent Coffee Grounds (SCG) for Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Synthetic Wastewater Solutions10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121682 ↗
94. Biochar Derived from the Spent Coffee Ground for Ammonium Adsorption from Aqueous Solution10.1016/j.cscee.2021.100141 ↗
95. Activated Carbon from Spent Coffee Grounds as an Adsorbent for Treatment of Water Contaminated by Aniline Yellow Dye10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111953 ↗
96. Removal of Antibiotics from Aqueous Solutions: Insights of Competitive Adsorption onto Ni-Impregnated Biochar of Spent Coffee Grounds10.1007/s13201-024-02238-8 ↗
97. Comprehensive Functionality Analysis of Spent Coffee Grounds Activated Using a Microwave-Assisted Method10.1080/01932691.2023.2278495 ↗
98. Novel Electrochemical Method to Activate Biochar Derived from Spent Coffee Grounds for Enhanced Adsorption of Lead (Pb)10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163891 ↗
99. New Use for Spent Coffee Ground as an Adsorbent for Tetracycline Removal in Water10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.150 ↗
100. Efficient Removal of Cr(VI) by Spent Coffee Grounds: Molecular Adsorption and Reduction Mechanism10.1007/s11814-021-1045-4 ↗