journal article·2026-01-14Open access

Integrated Hydro-Operational Risk Assessment (IHORA) for Sewage Treatment Facilities

Taesoo Eum, Euntaek Shin, Dong Sop Rhee, Chang Geun Song

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

Climate change has exacerbated flood risks for urban infrastructure, rendering sewage treatment facilities (STFs) particularly vulnerable due to their typical low-lying topographic placement. However, conventional flood risk assessment methodologies often rely solely on physical hazard parameters such as inundation depth, neglecting the functional interdependencies and operational criticality of individual treatment units. To address this limitation, this study proposes the Integrated Hydro-Operational Risk Assessment (IHORA) framework. The IHORA framework synthesizes 2D hydrodynamic modeling with a modified Hazard and Operability Study(HAZOP) study to systematically identify unit-specific physical failure thresholds and employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to quantify the relative operational importance of each process based on expert elicitation. The framework was applied to an underground STF under both fluvial flooding and internal structural breach scenarios. The results revealed a significant risk misalignment in traditional assessments; vital assets like electrical facilities were identified as high-risk hotspots despite moderate physical exposure, due to their high operational weight. Furthermore, Cause–Consequence Analysis (CCA) was utilized to trace cascading failure modes, bridging the gap between static risk metrics and dynamic emergency response protocols. This study demonstrates that the IHORA framework provides a robust scientific basis for prioritizing mitigation resources and enhancing the operational resilience of environmental facilities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Dam Engineering and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Safety Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea

Department of Hydro Science and Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability10.1038/s41598-020-70816-2 ↗
2. Flood risk in a range of spatial perspectives–from global to local scales10.5194/nhess-19-1319-2019 ↗
3. Sea level rise impacts on wastewater treatment systems along the US coasts10.1002/2017EF000805 ↗
4. Climate change uncertainty: Building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure10.1007/s10584-012-0494-5 ↗
5. Application of CVM method in the evaluation of flood control and water and sewage management projects
6. Olds, H.T., Corsi, S.R., Dila, D.K., Halmo, K.M., Bootsma, M.J., and McLellan, S.L. (2018). High levels of sewage contamination released from urban areas after storm events: A quantitative survey with sewage specific bacterial indicators. PLoS Med., 15.10.1371/journal.pmed.1002614 ↗
7. Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 ↗
8. Flood risk assessment in art cities: The exemplary case of Florence (Italy)10.1111/jfr3.12226 ↗
9. On the use of 1D and coupled 1D–2D modelling approaches for assessment of flood damage in urban areas10.1080/15730620802566877 ↗
10. Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D coupled (sewer/surface) hydraulic models for urban flood simulation10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037 ↗
11. Pankow, N., Krause, S., and Schaum, C. (2024). Resilience Adaptation Through Risk Analysis for Wastewater Treatment Plant Operators in the Context of the European Union Resilience Directive. Water, 16.10.3390/w16213098 ↗
12. Vulnerability of urban floods in association with the sewage system and geographical features in the Giulești–Sârbi neighborhood, Bucharest, Romania10.15551/pesd2021152018 ↗
13. Damage to wastewater treatment facilities from great flood of 199310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1997)123:1(54) ↗
14. Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: A survey of the current state of the art10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016 ↗
15. Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006 ↗
16. Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138 ↗
17. Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)10.1007/s11069-013-0639-5 ↗
18. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process
19. Urban flood vulnerability and risk mapping using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: Methodological overview and case study assessment10.3390/w6061515 ↗
20. Flood risk assessment and mapping in Abidjan district using multi-criteria analysis (AHP) model and geoinformation techniques,(cote d’ivoire)10.1186/s40677-016-0044-y ↗
21. Multi-criteria analysis framework for potential flood prone areas mapping10.1007/s11269-014-0817-6 ↗
22. GIS-based MCDM–AHP modeling for flood susceptibility mapping of arid areas, southeastern Tunisia10.1080/10106049.2019.1566405 ↗
23. Kim, Y. (2023). Development and Demonstration of Simulation Technology for Predicting Damage to Environmental Facilities During Earthquakes and Flooding, Ministry of Environment. R&D Report 1485019223.
24. Specification of wall boundary conditions and transverse velocity profile conditions in finite element modeling10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60006-6 ↗
25. Enhancing community resilience in arid regions: A smart framework for flash flood risk assessment10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110457 ↗
26. Beffa, C. (1998, January 24–26). Two-dimensional modelling of flood hazards in urban areas. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Hydroscience and Engineering, Copenhagen, Denmark.
27. Spatiotemporal flood risk assessment of underground space considering flood intensity and escape route10.1007/s11069-021-04888-2 ↗
28. Development of river water quality indices—A review10.1007/s10661-015-5050-0 ↗
29. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd ↗
30. Cronbach’s alpha
31. Tušer, I., and Oulehlová, A. (2021). Risk assessment and sustainability of wastewater treatment plant operation. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13095120 ↗
32. Analouei, R., Taheriyoun, M., and Amin, M.T. (2022). Dynamic failure risk assessment of wastewater treatment and reclamation plant: An industrial case study. Safety, 8.10.3390/safety8040079 ↗