Privacy-Preserving User Profiling Using MLP-Based Data Generalization
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapid growth in Internet-based services has increased the demand for user data to enable personalized and adaptive digital experiences. These services typically require users to disclose various types of personal information, which are organized into user profiles and used to tailor content, recommendations, and accessibility settings. However, achieving an effective balance between personalization accuracy and user data protection remains a persistent and complex challenge. Excessive data disclosure raises the risk of re-identification and privacy breaches, while excessive anonymization can significantly diminish personalization and overall service quality. In this paper, we address this trade-off by proposing a context-aware learning-based data generalization framework that preserves user privacy while maintaining the functional usefulness of personal data. We first conduct a systematic classification of user data commonly collected into five main categories: demographic, location, accessibility, preference, and behavior data. To generalize these data categories dynamically and adaptively, we use a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model that learns patterns across heterogeneous data types. Unlike traditional rule-based generalization techniques, the MLP-based approach captures nonlinear relationships, adapts to heterogeneous data distributions, and scales efficiently with large datasets. The proposed MLP-based generalization method reduces the granularity of personal data, preserving privacy without significantly compromising information usefulness. Experimental results show that the proposed method reduces the risk of re-identification to approximately 35%, compared to non-anonymized data, where the re-identification risk is about 80–90%. These findings highlight the potential of learning-based data generalization as a strategy for privacy-preserving personalization in modern Internet services. They also show how the proposed generalization method can be applied in practice to transform user data while maintaining both utility and confidentiality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Data Quality and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 1000 Zagreb, Croatia
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. A decision-support framework for data anonymization with application to machine learning processes10.1016/j.ins.2022.09.004 ↗
2. Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices10.1145/3479428 ↗
3. A Comprehensive Review of Cryptographic Techniques in Federated Learning for Secure Data Sharing and Applications10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3593953 ↗
4. Smith, J., Williams, D., and Brown, E. (2024). Scalable Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Real-Time Machine Learning Applications. arXiv.
5. Barbaria, S., Jemai, A., Ceylan, H.I., Muntean, R.I., Dergaa, I., and Rahmouni, H.B. (2025). Advancing Compliance with HIPAA and GDPR in Healthcare: A Blockchain-Based Strategy for Secure Data Exchange in Clinical Research Involving Private Health Information. Healthcare, 13.10.3390/healthcare13202594 ↗
6. k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy10.1142/S0218488502001648 ↗
7. L-diversity10.1145/1217299.1217302 ↗
8. Li, N., Li, T., and Venkatasubramanian, S. (2007, January 11–15). t-Closeness: Privacy beyond k-Anonymity and l-Diversity. Proceedings of the ICDE 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/ICDE.2007.367856 ↗
9. Jiang, N., Zhai, Y., Wang, Y., Yin, X., Yang, S., and Xu, P. (2024). Location Privacy Protection for the Internet of Things with Edge Computing Based on Clustering K-Anonymity. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24186153 ↗
10. Singh, J., and Banerjee, R. (2019, January 27–29). A Study on Single and Multi-layer Perceptron Neural Network. Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), Erode, India.10.1109/ICCMC.2019.8819775 ↗
11. Kingma, D.P., and Welling, M. (2014). Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. arXiv.
12. Ma, C., Tschiatschek, S., Turner, R., Miguel Hernandez-Lobato, J., and Zhang, C. (2020). VAEM: A Deep Generative Model for Hetero-ge-neous Mixed Type Data. arXiv.
13. Slave to the algorithm? Why a ‘right to n explanation’ is probably not the remedy you are looking for
14. Choudhury, O., Gkoulalas-Divanis, A., Salonidis, T., Sylla, I., Park, Y., Hsu, G., and Das, A. (2020). Anonymizing Data for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning. arXiv.
15. Maraj, D., and Vuković, M. (2024, January 26–28). Anonymization-Based Method for Privacy-Preservation of Users in Internet Services. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), Split, Croatia.10.23919/SoftCOM62040.2024.10721634 ↗
16. Vuković, M., Kordić, M., and Jevtić, D. (June, January 30). Clustering approach for user location data privacy in telecommunication services. Proceedings of the 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microe-lectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia.
17. Blinder: End-to-end Privacy Protection in Sensing Systems via Personalized Federated Learning10.1145/3582555 ↗
18. Feutry, C., Piantanida, P., Bengio, Y., and Duhamel, P. (2018). Learning Anonymized Representations with Adversarial Neural Networks. arXiv.
19. Anonymizing Sensor Data on the Edge: A Representation Learning and Transformation Approach10.1145/3485820 ↗
20. Aufschläger, R., Folz, J., März, E., Guggumos, J., Heigl, M., Buchner, B., and Schramm, M. (2023). Anonymization Procedures for Tabular Data: An Explanatory Technical and Legal Synthesis. Information, 14.10.3390/info14090487 ↗
21. An Innovative K-Anonymity Privacy-Preserving Algorithm to Improve Data Availability in the Context of Big Data
22. Przybyła-Kasperek, M., and Marfo, K.F. (2024). A multi-layer perceptron neural network for varied conditional attributes in tabular dispersed data. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0311041 ↗
23. Privacy and utility preserving sensor-data transformations10.1016/j.pmcj.2020.101132 ↗
24. AI-Driven Anonymization: Protecting Personal Data Privacy While Leveraging Machine Learning10.54254/2755-2721/71/2024MA0053 ↗
25. Wightman, P., Sanmartin-Mendoza, P., and Salazar, A. (2024, January 21–23). Evaluation of Geocoding Algorithms for Generalization-based Location Privacy. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM), Barranquilla, Colombia.10.1109/COLCOM62950.2024.10720289 ↗
26. Hristov, E., Petrova-Antonova, P., De Paoli, F., Krasteva, I., Ciavotta, M., and Avogadro, R. (2024, January 21–23). Geospatial Data Enrichment through Address Geocoding: Challenges and Solutions. Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Siena, Italy.
27. Smayan, A. (2025, October 15). Netflix Userbase Datase. Kaggle, 2023. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/smayanj/netflix-users-database.
28. Evenden, E., and Gilmore Pontius, G. (2021). Encoding a Categorical Independent Variable for Input to TerrSet’s Multi-Layer Perceptron. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inform., 10.10.3390/ijgi10100686 ↗
29. Torres, N., and Olivares, P. (2024). De-Anonymizing Users across Rating Datasets via Record Linkage and Quasi-Identifier Attacks. Data, 9.10.3390/data9060075 ↗
30. Practical and ready-to-use methodology to assess the reidentification risk in anonymized datasets10.1038/s41598-025-04907-3 ↗
31. Measuring Re-identification Risk10.1145/3589294 ↗