The Effect of Gingival Color on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Patients: An In Vitro Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the accuracy and precision of five intraoral scanners (IOSs) by examining the interaction between gingival model color and linear measurement distances. Materials and Methods: Seven color-distinct models were scanned to obtain absolute deviation data from six linear distances between four reference points. Measurements were analyzed using Zeiss Inspect software v2025.3.3.4. Due to non-normal data distribution, all factors (Scanner, Model, Pair) and their interactions were assessed using Aligned Rank Transform (ART) ANOVA. Accuracy was defined as median absolute deviation, and precision as the coefficient of variation (CV%). Results: Statistical analysis identified significant differences in absolute deviation across all main factors and their three-way interactions (p < 0.001). The Medit i700 and Trios 5 demonstrated the lowest overall median deviation (0.09 mm), followed closely by Trios 3 (0.10 mm), with no statistically significant differences among them. The P5 model yielded lower deviations, while extreme colors increased variability. In terms of precision, values varied significantly based on specific interactions; the highest precision was recorded for the Shining scanner on the White model (A–C pair, CV: 7.33%), whereas the lowest precision was observed for the Sirios scanner on the Black model (A–D pair, CV: 158.10%). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, deviation values varied according to gingival color and pair distance. Gingival colors with a higher pink saturation (P5) and shorter distances yielded lower deviations, whereas extreme colors and longer distances were associated with reduced precision.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Health and Care Utilization · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin University, Mersin 33343, Turkey
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin University, Mersin 33343, Turkey
Funding
Scientific Research Projects Unit of Mersin University
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Mangano, F., Gandolfi, A., Luongo, G., and Logozzo, S. (2017). Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health, 17.10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x ↗
2. Clinical Materials Review: Impression Material Basics
3. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions
4. Alkadi, L. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Factors That Influence the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13213291 ↗
5. Influence of the cut-out-rescan procedure and rubber dam color on the trueness of intraoral scanners: A laboratory evaluation
6. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review
7. Marques, S., Ribeiro, P., Falcão, C., Lemos, B.F., Ríos-Carrasco, B., Ríos-Santos, J.V., and Herrero-Climent, M. (2021). Digital impressions in implant dentistry: A literature review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18031020 ↗
8. An In Vitro Study of Factors Influencing the Performance of Digital Intraoral Impressions Operating on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology with Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla10.1111/jopr.12457 ↗
9. In-vitro accuracy of complete arch scans of the fully dentate and the partially edentulous maxilla10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00100 ↗
10. Gkavela, G., Nørrisgaard, P.E., and Rahiotis, C. (2024). Level of Agreement Between Plaque Detection with Clinical Assessment and Assessment on Intraoral Scanner. Dent. J., 12.10.20944/preprints202408.0214.v1 ↗
11. Color Compatibility of Gingival Shade Guides and Gingiva-Colored Dental Materials with Healthy Human Gingiva10.11607/prd.3430 ↗
12. Color Range and Color Distribution of Healthy Human Gingiva: A Prospective Clinical Study10.1038/srep18498 ↗
13. Study of attached gingiva space color according to gender and age in Caucasian population10.1111/jerd.13038 ↗
14. The color of human gingiva and mucosa: Visual measurement and description of distribution10.1007/s00784-005-0006-3 ↗
15. Şen, N., and Isler, S. (2025). Influence of Gingival Color and Finish Line Location on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans for Complete-Arch Tooth Preparation. Int. J. Prosthodont., 1–16.10.11607/ijp.9420 ↗
16. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.012 ↗
17. Daikoku, E., Shimazaki, K., Fukazawa, S., Ozeki, H., Takafuji, K., Kon, K., and Kondo, H. (2025, January 24–26). The effect of the presence or absence of scanning powder on the accuracy of intraoral scanners. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japan Society of Oral Implantology, Fukuoka, Japan.
18. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients10.1016/j.jdent.2016.10.002 ↗
19. Effect of Ambient Lights on the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Optical Scanner for Face Scans: An in Vitro Study
20. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study10.1111/jopr.13633 ↗
21. Recent advances in dental optics—Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017 ↗
22. Does ambient light affect the accuracy and scanning time of intraoral scans?10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.021 ↗
23. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence10.11607/ijp.6834 ↗
24. Hecht, E. (2002). Optics, Pearson Education, Addison-Wesley.
25. Effect of tooth color on the accuracy of intraoral complete arch scanning under different light conditions using a zirconia restoration model10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.001 ↗
26. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.011 ↗
27. Influence of object translucency on the scanning accuracy of a powder-free intraoral scanner: A laboratory study10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.008 ↗
28. Scan accuracy of recently introduced wireless intraoral scanners in different fixed partial denture situations10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105558 ↗
29. Full arch accuracy of intraoral scanners with different acquisition technologies: An in vitro study10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105703 ↗
30. Jamjoom, F.Z., Aldghim, A., Aldibasi, O., and Yilmaz, B. (2024). In vitro evaluation of the impact of intraoral scanner, scanning aids, and the scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches. J. Prosthodont., 1–9.10.1111/jopr.13891 ↗
31. Nulty, A.B. (2024). An In Vivo Comparison of Trueness and Precision of Two Novel Methods for Improving Edentulous Full Arch Implant Scanning Accuracy: A Pilot Study. Dent. J., 12.10.3390/dj12110367 ↗
32. Accuracy of intraoral optical scan versus stereophotogrammetry for complete-arch digital implant impression: An in vitro study10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00251 ↗
33. Nulty, A.B. (2021). A comparison of full arch trueness and precision of nine intra-oral digital scanners and four lab digital scanners. Dent. J., 9.10.20944/preprints202105.0165.v1 ↗
34. Straumann Group (2023). Straumann Group Acquires AlliedStar, an Intraoral Scanner Provider in China, Straumann Holding AG. Available online: https://www.straumann.com/content/dam/data/media-release/en/2023/c6d0c389-f410-49a0-88e7-a1be681d5567/Straumann_Group_Media+release_AlliedStar_EN.pdf.
35. AlliedStar Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. (2025, December 07). Straumann SIRIOS—FDA GUDID Device Identifier. Available online: https://fda.report/GUDID/06973993441584.
36. (2025). Straumann SIRIOSTM—Product Information Brochure, Institut Straumann AG. Available online: https://www.straumann.com/content/dam/media-center/straumann/en/documents/brochure/product-information/490.950-en_low.pdf.
37. Effect of the Scanning Range of Scanbodies Using a Wireless Intraoral Scanner on the Reproducibility of Implant Position
38. Comparative Analysis of Intra-Oral and Lab Scanner Performance in Full-Arch Dentistry10.51847/dmkWGHdeOD ↗
39. Effects of Operator Experience and Scanning Distance on Intraoral Scanner Accuracy
40. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.008 ↗
41. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024 ↗
42. Analysis of Different Illuminance of the Room Lighting Condition on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner10.1111/jopr.13276 ↗
43. Tawfik, M.H.A., El Torky, I.R., and El Sheikh, M.M. (2024). Effect of saliva on accuracy of digital dental implant transfer using two different materials of intraoral scan bodies with different exposed lengths. BMC Oral Health, 24.10.1186/s12903-024-05199-1 ↗
44. Accuracy of intraoral scanners in different complete arch scan patterns10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.12.026 ↗
45. Explaining the Colour of Natural Healthy Gingiva10.1007/s10266-024-00906-4 ↗
46. Hernández, A.D., Martín Casado, A.M., Gómez-Polo, M., Viñuela, A.C., and Gómez-Polo, C. (2023). Degree of Standardisation in Ceramic Gingival Systems. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16206710 ↗