journal article·2026-01-09Open access

Experimental and Computational Study of Rotational Lift Production of Insect Flapping Wing

May Hlaing Win Khin, Samuel Verboomen, Shinnosuke Obi

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

This paper investigates the rotational lift production of translating and rotating wings within a small insect’s Reynolds number range. Using the Reynolds number 1200 of a bumblebee, three wing section profiles were studied: a circular cylinder model as a reference for a blunt body for which the well-known Magnus effect will occur, a flat plate model as a reference for a sharp body for which the Kramer effect will occur, and finally, an elliptical cylinder model as a transition case. Direct force measurement and particle image velocimetry (PIV) experiments were performed to measure the lift produced and the surrounding flow velocity, and the Kutta–Joukowski theorem was applied to analyze the PIV results. The Kutta–Joukowski theorem gives the relationship between lift and circulation on a body moving at constant speed in a real fluid with some constant density. The experimental results were analyzed and verified by comparing them to the computational results. In general, there is reasonable agreement between the experimental and computational results, confirming that the Magnus effect is observed for the circular cylinder model and no Kramer effect is observed for the flat plate model. The elliptical cylinder model does not appear to be blunt enough for the Magnus effect to occur, and it is not sharp enough for the Kramer effect to occur.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, West Yangon Technological University, Yangon 114002, Myanmar

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: Applications to micro-air vehicles10.1242/jeb.202.23.3439 ↗
2. Investigation into Reynolds number effects on a biomimetic flapping wing10.1177/1756829317745319 ↗
3. Shyy, W., Aono, H., Kang, C.K., and Liu, H. (2013). An Introduction to Flapping Wing Aerodynamics, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139583916 ↗
4. Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers10.1242/jeb.174.1.45 ↗
5. Cleaver, D., Wang, Z., and Gursul, I. (2009, January 5–8). Delay of stall by small amplitude airfoil oscillations at low Reynolds numbers. Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2009-392 ↗
6. The influence of wing–wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight10.1242/jeb.00381 ↗
7. Added mass effect and an extended unsteady blade element model of insect hovering10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60044-9 ↗
8. The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight10.1242/jeb.205.8.1087 ↗
9. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight10.1126/science.284.5422.1954 ↗
10. The aerodynamics of insect flight10.1242/jeb.00663 ↗
11. The wake dynamics and flight forces of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster10.1242/jeb.199.9.2085 ↗
12. Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion10.1242/jeb.205.1.55 ↗
13. The active control of wing rotation by Drosophila10.1242/jeb.182.1.173 ↗
14. A review of the Magnus effect in aeronautics10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.07.001 ↗
15. Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: Two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments10.1242/jeb.00739 ↗
16. Bumblebee flight performance in cluttered environments: Effects of obstacle orientation, body size and acceleration10.1242/jeb.121293 ↗
17. The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight10.1242/jeb.200.21.2705 ↗
18. Lift and drag evaluation in translating and rotating non-inertial systems10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.10.009 ↗
19. The lift of a cylinder executing rotary motions in a uniform flow10.1017/S0022112093002368 ↗
20. Verboomen, S. (2018). Experimental Study of Rotational Lift Production Under Insect Flapping Wing Conditions for Different Wing Section Profiles. [Master’s Thesis, Keio University].
21. Swanson, T., and Isaac, K. (2009, January 5–8). Aerodynamics of Flapping and Plunging Wings using Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements. Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2009-1271 ↗
22. An objective definition of a vortex10.1017/S0022112004002526 ↗
23. Stalnov, O., Ben-Gida, H., Kirchhefer, A.J., Guglielmo, C.G., Kopp, G.A., Liberzon, A., and Gurka, R. (2015). On the estimation of time dependent lift of a European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) during flapping flight. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0134582 ↗
24. Noca, F. (1997). On the Evaluation of Time-Dependent Fluid-Dynamic Forces on Bluff Bodies, California Institute of Technology.
25. Thiagarajan, K.P., and Troesch, A.W. (1998, January 13–18). On the use of various contour shapes for evaluating circulation from PIV data. Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.