journal article·2026-01-12Open access

Annoyance Penalty Model for Steady-State Broadband Noise with Varying Spectra

Antti Kuusinen, Valtteri Hongisto

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

Noise regulations often apply penalties (e.g., +5 dB) to A-weighted equivalent sound pressure levels (LAeq [dB]) to account for increased annoyance from tonal or impulsive features. Psychoacoustic evidence indicates that spectral characteristics also affect annoyance, with some spectra being substantially more disturbing than others. Yet, no established method exists for determining spectrum-based penalties from measured sound spectra. This study aimed to develop a simple, objective model for assigning penalties to steady-state broadband sounds based on spectral properties. Using experimental data comprising annoyance ratings and penalties for 23 spectrally distinct broadband sounds at three LAeq levels (32, 40, and 48 dB), we evaluated several single-number noise descriptors from the literature. Room The Noise Criterion showed the strongest association with direct annoyance ratings, while the spectral centroid (SC) and sharpness were most closely related to spectrum-based penalties. Due to its simplicity, the spectral centroid was selected for the final model: k=6.9·log10(SC)−16.3. The proposed model is expected to be applicable for broadband sounds within 32–48 dB LAeq and offers a practical approach for incorporating spectral effects into noise assessment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Psychophysics Laboratory, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Joukahaisenkatu 3–5, FI-20520 Turku, Finland

Funding

Turku University of Applied Sciences · Business Finland · Antti-Teollisuus Ltd. · Halton Marine Ltd. · Lautex Ltd. · Meyer Turku Ltd. · Piikkio Works Ltd. · Ruukki Construction Ltd. · Saint-Gobain Finland Ltd. · SBA Interior Ltd.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Hongisto, V. (2023, January 18–22). Annoyance penalties due to tonal, impulsive, and amplitude-modulated characters in sound. Proceedings of the 14th ICBEN Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Belgrade, Serbia. Available online: https://www.icben.org/2023/presenting178.pdf.
2. Annoyance of low-level tonal sounds—Factors affecting the penalty10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.017 ↗
3. Annoyance penalty of impulsive noise—The effect of impulse onset10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106539 ↗
4. Time of day noise adjustments or “penalties”10.1121/1.389000 ↗
5. Annoyance penalty due to the spectrum shape of wideband noise10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111163 ↗
6. (2016). Acoustics—Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise—Part 1: Basic Quantities and Assessment Procedures (Standard No. ISO 1996-1:2016).
7. (2022). Acoustics—Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise—Part 3: Objective Method for the Measurement of Prominence of Impulsive Sounds and for Adjustment of LAeq (Standard No. ISO/PAS 1996-3:2022).
8. Annoyance penalty of periodically amplitude-modulated wide-band sound10.1121/1.5133478 ↗
9. Sound quality of dishwashers: Annoyance perception10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108099 ↗
10. Atamer, S., and Altinsoy, M.E. (2023). Vacuum Cleaner Noise Annoyance: An Investigation of Psychoacoustic Parameters, Effect of Test Methodology, and Interaction Effect between Loudness and Sharpness. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13106136 ↗
11. Sound quality factors influencing annoyance from hovering UAV10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115651 ↗
12. Varying the spectral envelope of air-conditioning sounds to enhance indoor acoustic comfort10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.005 ↗
13. Sound quality evaluation of air-conditioner noise based on factors of the autocorrelation function10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.03.015 ↗
14. A review of sound quality in consumer products: Research trends, metrics, and sectoral insights10.1121/10.0039670 ↗
15. Subjective and objective rating of spectrally different pseudorandom noises—Implications for speech masking design10.1121/1.4913273 ↗
16. Veitch, J.A., Bradley, J.S., Legault, L.M., Norcross, S., and Svec, J.M. (2002). Masking Speech in Open-Plan Offices with Simulated Ventilation Noise: Noise Level and Spectral Composition Effects on Acoustic Satisfaction, Institute for Research in Construction.10.1037/e592652011-021 ↗
17. Room noise criteria—The state of the art in the year 200010.3397/1.3703047 ↗
18. (2008). Criteria for Evaluating Room Noise (Standard No. ANSI/ASA S12.2-2008).
19. Revised Criteria for Noise in Buildings10.1121/1.2369239 ↗
20. RC Mark II: A refined procedure for rating the noise of heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems in buildings10.3397/1.2828446 ↗
21. Balanced noise-criterion (NCB) curves10.1121/1.398243 ↗
22. Finding Connections Among Indoor Noise Criteria, Human Perception, and Worker Performance10.1121/1.2961128 ↗
23. A new approach to assessing the performance of noise indices in buildings10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00075-0 ↗
24. Fastl, H., and Zwicker, E. (2007). Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-68888-4 ↗
25. The Psychoacoustics of Sound-Quality Evaluation
26. (2017). Acoustics—Methods for Calculating Loudness—Part 1: Zwicker Method (Standard No. ISO 532-1:2017).
27. Relationship between loudness and annoyance for ten community sounds10.1016/0160-4120(90)90021-W ↗
28. Schlittenlacher, J., Hashimoto, T., Fastl, H., Namba, S., Kuwano, S., and Hatano, S. (2011, January 4–7). Loudness of pink noise and stationary technical sounds. Proceedings of the 40th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2011, INTER-NOISE 2011, Osaka, Japan.
29. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds–perception by normal hearing subjects10.1080/14992027.2017.1321790 ↗
30. Impact of geometric modifications of small axial fans on psychoacoustic metrics10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.109913 ↗
31. Psychoacoustic modelling of rotor noise
32. Exploring noise annoyance and sound quality for airborne wind energy systems: Insights from a listening experiment10.5194/wes-10-579-2025 ↗
33. Yang, C., Pang, L., Liang, J., Cao, X., Fan, Y., and Zhang, J. (2022). Experimental Investigation of Task Performance and Human Vigilance in Different Noise Environments. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122211376 ↗
34. Effects of noise frequency on performance and annoyance for women and men10.2466/pms.1981.52.2.435 ↗
35. Exposure levels, tonal components, and noise annoyance in working environments10.1016/0160-4120(95)00017-F ↗
36. Perceptual dimensions of fan noise and their relationship to indexes based on the specific loudness10.3813/AAA.919300 ↗
37. (2006). American National Standard for Rating Noise with Respect to Speech Interference (Standard No. ANSI/ASA S12.65-2006 (R2020)).
38. Revision of Noise Criteria Curves10.1121/1.1977807 ↗
39. (2014). Guidance on Sound Insulation and Noise Reduction for Buildings (Standard No. BS 8233:2014).
40. Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: A confirmatory study using synthetic tones10.1121/1.1929229 ↗
41. The Timbre Toolbox: Extracting audio descriptors from musical signals10.1121/1.3642604 ↗
42. (2005). Acoustics—Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment—Part 7: Reference Threshold of Hearing Under Free-Field and Diffuse-Field Listening Conditions (Standard No. ISO 389-7:2005).
43. (2009). Measurement Technique for the Simulation of the Auditory Sensation of Sharpness (Standard No. DIN 45692:2009-08).
44. ppcor: An R Package for a Fast Calculation to Semi-partial Correlation Coefficients
45. R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.
46. Welcome to the Tidyverse10.21105/joss.01686 ↗
47. Proposed revisions to room noise criteria10.3397/1.2827970 ↗
48. Test of proposed revisions to room noise criteria curves10.3397/1.2827967 ↗
49. Schäffer, B., Pieren, R., Schlittmeier, S.J., and Brink, M. (2018). Effects of different spectral shapes and amplitude modulation of broadband noise on annoyance reactions in a controlled listening experiment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15.10.3390/ijerph15051029 ↗