journal article·2026-01-10Open access

Stationary State Recognition of a Mobile Platform Based on 6DoF MEMS Inertial Measurement Unit

Marcin Bogucki, Waldemar Samociuk, Paweł Stączek, Mirosław Rucki, Arturas Kilikevicius, Radosław Cechowicz

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

The article presents the analytic method for real-time detection of the stationary state of a vehicle based on information retrieved from 6 DoF IMU sensor. Reliable detection of stillness is essential for the application of resetting the inertial sensor’s output bias, called Zero Velocity Update method. It is obvious that the signal from the strapped on inertial sensor differs while the vehicle is stationary or moving. Effort was then made to find a computational method that would automatically discriminate between both states with possibly small impact on the vehicle embedded controller. An algorithmic step-by-step method for building, optimizing, and implementing a diagnostic system that detects the vehicle’s stationary state was developed. The proposed method adopts the “Mahalanobis Distance” quantity widely used in industrial quality assurance systems. The method transforms (fuses) information from multiple diagnostic variables (including linear accelerations and angular velocities) into one scalar variable, expressing the degree of deviation in the robot’s current state from the stationary state. Then, the method was implemented and tested in the dead reckoning navigation system of an autonomous wheeled mobile robot. The method correctly classified nearly 93% of all stationary states of the robot and obtained only less than 0.3% wrong states.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Inertial Sensor and Navigation · Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation · Space Satellite Systems and Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Technical Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland

Department of Automation, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Casimir Pulaski Radom University, Stasieckiego 54-B1, 26-600 Radom, Poland

Institute of Mechanical Science, Faculty of Mechanics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Gnap, J., Jagelčák, J., Marienka, P., Frančák, M., Kostrzewski, M., Gnap, J., Jagelčák, J., Marienka, P., Frančák, M., and Kostrzewski, M. (2021). Application of MEMS Sensors for Evaluation of the Dynamics for Cargo Securing on Road Vehicles. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21082881 ↗
2. The Planning Process of Transport Tasks for Autonomous Vans10.1515/eng-2021-0087 ↗
3. Ondruš, J., Jančár, A., Gogola, M., Varga, P., Šarić, Ž., and Caban, J. (2024). Smartphone Sensors in Motion: Advancing Traffic Safety with Mobile Technology. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14135404 ↗
4. Fontanella, R., Accardo, D., Moriello, R.S.L., Angrisani, L., and Simone, D.D. (2018). An Innovative Strategy for Accurate Thermal Compensation of Gyro Bias in Inertial Units by Exploiting a Novel Augmented Kalman Filter. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18051457 ↗
5. Fifteen Years of Progress at Zero Velocity: A Review10.1109/JSEN.2020.3018880 ↗
6. Dynamic Calibration of Air Gauges
7. Surblys, V., Kozłowski, E., Matijošius, J., Gołda, P., Laskowska, A., and Kilikevičius, A. (2024). Accelerometer-Based Pavement Classification for Vehicle Dynamics Analysis Using Neural Networks. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142110027 ↗
8. Vehicle Wheel Positioning Innovation on a Machine for Measuring the Contact Parameters between a Tyre and the Road
9. Precision Method of Velocity Determination Based on Measurements of Car Body Deformation—Non-Linear Method for Intermediate Vehicle Class
10. Autonomous Vans—The Planning Process of Transport Tasks10.1515/eng-2020-0006 ↗
11. Safety Risk Assessment for Connected and Automated Vehicles: Integrating FTA and CM-Improved AHP10.1016/j.ress.2025.110822 ↗
12. Modernization of the Control System to Reduce a Risk of Severe Accidents during Non-Pressurized Ammonia Storage Modernizacja Układu Sterowania w Celu Redukcji Ryzyka Poważnych Awarii Bezciśnieniowego Przechowywania Amoniaku
13. Reducing the Probability of Failure in Manufacturing Equipment by Quantitative FTA Analysis
14. Bose, A., Bhat, K.N., and Kurian, T. (2014). Fundamentals of Navigation and Inertial Sensors, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
15. Noureldin, A., Karamat, T., and Georgy, J. (2013). Fundamentals of Inertial Navigation, Satellite-Based Positioning and Their Integration, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-30466-8 ↗
16. The Development of Micromachined Gyroscope Structure and Circuitry Technology10.3390/s140101394 ↗
17. Passaro, V.M.N., Cuccovillo, A., Vaiani, L., De Carlo, M., and Campanella, C.E. (2017). Gyroscope Technology and Applications: A Review in the Industrial Perspective. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17102284 ↗
18. Gill, W.A., Howard, I., Mazhar, I., and McKee, K. (2022). A Review of MEMS Vibrating Gyroscopes and Their Reliability Issues in Harsh Environments. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22197405 ↗
19. Feller, W. (2008). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Wiley. [3rd ed.].
20. Inertial Navigation Systems for Mobile Robots10.1109/70.388775 ↗
21. An Integrated MEMS Gyroscope Array with Higher Accuracy Output10.3390/s8042886 ↗
22. Signal Processing of MEMS Gyroscope Arrays to Improve Accuracy Using a 1st Order Markov for Rate Signal Modeling10.3390/s120201720 ↗
23. Bias Drift Estimation for MEMS Gyroscope Used in Inertial Navigation
24. Huddle, J.R. (1998, January 21). Trends in Inertial Systems Technology for High Accuracy AUV Navigation. Proceedings of the 1998 Workshop on Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (Cat. No. 98CH36290), Cambridge, MA, USA.
25. Mancini, A. (1981). Inertial Surveying Technology, Springer.
26. Stączek, P., Pizoń, J., Danilczuk, W., and Gola, A. (2021). A Digital Twin Approach for the Improvement of an Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR’s) Operating Environment—A Case Study. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21237830 ↗
27. Automated Guided Vehicle Mission Reliability Modelling Using a Combined Fault Tree and Petri Net Approach10.1007/s00170-017-0175-7 ↗
28. Adaptive Zero Velocity Update Based on Velocity Classification for Pedestrian Tracking10.1109/JSEN.2017.2665678 ↗
29. Stance-Phase Detection for ZUPT-Aided Foot-Mounted Pedestrian Navigation System10.1109/TMECH.2015.2430357 ↗
30. Meiling, W., Guoqiang, F., Huachao, Y., Yafeng, L., Yi, Y., and Xuan, X. (2017, January 27–28). A Loosely Coupled MEMS-SINS/GNSS Integrated System for Land Vehicle Navigation in Urban Areas. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES), Vienna, Austria.10.1109/ICVES.2017.7991909 ↗
31. Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S., and Wu, Y. (2004). Quality Engineering: The Taguchi Method. Taguchi’s Quality Engineering Handbook, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470258354 ↗
32. Taguchi, G., Taguchi, G., and Jugulum, R. (2002). The Mahalanobis-Taguchi Strategy: A Pattern Technology System, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470172247 ↗
33. On the Generalized Distance in Statistics
34. A Review and Analysis of the Mahalanobis—Taguchi System10.1198/004017002188618626 ↗
35. Yang, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, X., Cao, K., Yuan, S., and Xie, L. (2025). Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Autonomous Robots via Mahalanobis SVDD with Audio-IMU Fusion. arXiv.
36. Chinnam, R.B., Rai, B., and Singh, N. (, 2004). Tool-Condition Monitoring from Degradation Signals Using Mahalanobis–Taguchi System Analysis. Proceedings of the ASI’s 20th Annual Symposium of Robust Engineering, Novi, MI, USA.
37. Applying the Mahalanobis-Taguchi System to Vehicle Ride
38. Fault Detection and Isolation in Multiple MEMS-IMUs Configurations10.1109/TAES.2012.6237576 ↗
39. Anomaly Detection of Cooling Fan and Fault Classification of Induction Motor Using Mahalanobis–Taguchi System10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.024 ↗
40. Borowiec, M., Caban, J., Giri, A., and Syed, A.A. (2025, January 21–23). Study of Dynamics of Car Suspension Model: Dynamic Elimination of Road Surface Vibration. Proceedings of the 24th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava, Latvia.10.22616/ERDev.2025.24.TF181 ↗
41. Peng, C.-F., Ho, L.-H., Tsai, S.-B., Hsiao, Y.-C., Zhai, Y., Chen, Q., Chang, L.-C., and Shang, Z. (2017). Applying the Mahalanobis–Taguchi System to Improve Tablet PC Production Processes. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9091557 ↗
42. Murtra, A.C., and Tur, J.M.M. (2013, January 22–23). IMU and Cable Encoder Data Fusion for In-Pipe Mobile Robot Localization. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA), Woburn, MA, USA.10.1109/TePRA.2013.6556377 ↗
43. Surface Estimation of a Pedestrian Walk for Outdoor Use of Power Wheelchair Based Robot
44. A Probabilistic Feature Map-Based Localization System Using a Monocular Camera10.3390/s150921636 ↗
45. Wu, H., Chen, S., Yang, B., and Chen, K. (2016). Feedback Robust Cubature Kalman Filter for Target Tracking Using an Angle Sensor. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16050629 ↗
46. A Robust Automatic Gait Monitoring Approach Using a Single Imu for Home-Based Applications10.1142/S0219519417500774 ↗
47. Muñoz-Organero, M., and Ruiz-Blázquez, R. (2017). Detecting Steps Walking at Very Low Speeds Combining Outlier Detection, Transition Matrices and Autoencoders from Acceleration Patterns. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17102274 ↗
48. Yan, Q., Chen, J., and De Strycker, L. (2018). An Outlier Detection Method Based on Mahalanobis Distance for Source Localization. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18072186 ↗
49. Refractory High-Entropy Alloys Fabricated Using Laser Technologies: A Concrete Review10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.037 ↗
50. De Blasio, G., Quesada-Arencibia, A., García, C.R., Molina-Gil, J.M., and Caballero-Gil, C. (2017). Study on an Indoor Positioning System for Harsh Environments Based on Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Low Energy. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17061299 ↗
51. Jiang, C., and Zhang, S.-B. (2018). A Novel Adaptively-Robust Strategy Based on the Mahalanobis Distance for GPS/INS Integrated Navigation Systems. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18030695 ↗
52. Montgomery, D.C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons.
53. Indoor Mobile Robot Attitude Estimation with MEMS Gyroscope10.1051/itmconf/20171505010 ↗
54. (2025, November 26). LSM6DS3TR-C|Product—STMicroelectronics. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/mems-and-sensors/lsm6ds3tr-c.html.
55. Zero-Velocity Detection—An Algorithm Evaluation10.1109/TBME.2010.2060723 ↗
56. Quaternion-Based Strap-down Integration Method for Applications of Inertial Sensing to Gait Analysis10.1007/BF02345128 ↗
57. Machine Learning-Based Zero-Velocity Detection for Inertial Pedestrian Navigation10.1109/JSEN.2020.2999863 ↗
58. Wagstaff, B., and Kelly, J. (2018, January 24–27). LSTM-Based Zero-Velocity Detection for Robust Inertial Navigation. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), Nantes, France.10.1109/IPIN.2018.8533770 ↗
59. Deep Learning for Inertial Positioning: A Survey10.1109/TITS.2024.3381161 ↗
60. Bridging GPS Gaps in Urban Canyons: The Benefits of ZUPTs10.1002/j.2161-4296.2001.tb00246.x ↗