journal article·2026-01-08Open access

GSA-cGAN: A Geospatial-Aware Conditional Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network for Mineral Resources Interpolation

Hosang Han, Jangwon Suh

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

In the context of mineral resource exploration, spatial prediction must cope with heterogeneous, non-normal data distributions and limited sampling. While conventional geostatistics and standard machine learning provide baseline estimates, they often suffer from excessive smoothing or fail to capture continuous spatial dependencies. This study proposes a geospatially aware Wasserstein conditional Generative Adversarial Network (GSA-cGAN) to complement existing workflows for multivariate mineral interpolation. The framework augments a baseline cGAN with WGAN-GP for stable adversarial training, CoordConv to encode absolute spatial coordinates and Self-Attention to capture long-range spatial dependencies. Eight model configurations were trained on 272 samples from a mineralized zone in the Taebaek Mountains, Korea, and strictly benchmarked against Ordinary/Universal Kriging and multivariate machine learning baselines (Random Forest, XGBoost). Under the adopted experimental design, the full GSA-cGAN achieved the lowest test root mean squared error and highest coefficient of determination, demonstrating a significant performance improvement over the baselines. Furthermore, distribution analysis confirmed that the model effectively overcomes the smoothing limitations of regression-based methods, generating high-resolution 10 m × 10 m maps that preserve statistical variance, hotspot anomalies, and complex spatial patterns. The results indicate that deep generative models can serve as practical decision-support tools for identifying drilling targets and prioritizing follow-up exploration in geologically complex settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Kangwon National University, Samcheok-si 25913, Republic of Korea

R&D Team 2, Korea Mine Rehabilitation and Mineral Resources Corporation, Wonju-si 26464, Republic of Korea

Department of Green Energy Engineering, Kangwon National University, Samcheok-si 25913, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korean government · the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning(KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Building a Mineral Resources Data Platform for Critical Mineral Exploration10.32390/ksmer.2023.60.5.315 ↗
2. Guzmán, J. (1984). An Application of Financial Economics and Geostatistics to Mineral Exploration Decision Making. [Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines].
3. Geostatistical Simulations for Risk Assessment and Decision Making: The Mining Industry Perspective10.1076/ijsm.16.2.122.3399 ↗
4. Geostatistical Approaches for Resource Estimation in Mining and Exploration
5. Using Cokriging to Predict Metal Recovery Accounting for Non-Additivity and Preferential Sampling Designs10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106923 ↗
6. The Many Forms of Co-Kriging: A Diversity of Multivariate Spatial Estimators10.1007/s11004-023-10104-7 ↗
7. Direct Pattern-Based Simulation of Non-Stationary Geostatistical Models10.1007/s11004-012-9413-6 ↗
8. Bayesian Deep Learning for Spatial Interpolation in the Presence of Auxiliary Information10.1007/s11004-021-09988-0 ↗
9. Mineral Resource Prediction Based on Representation Learning10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128286 ↗
10. Ghahramani, Z., Welling, M., Cortes, C., Lawrence, N.D., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2014). Generative Adversarial Nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, Curran Associates, Inc.
11. Mirza, M., and Osindero, S. (2014). Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets. arXiv.
12. AdaptVFMs-RSCD: Advancing Remote Sensing Change Detection from Binary to Semantic with SAM and CLIP10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.09.010 ↗
13. Bittner, K., Reinartz, P., and Körner, M. (2019, January 16–17). Late or Earlier Information Fusion from Depth and Spectral Data? Large-Scale Digital Surface Model Refinement by Hybrid-cGAN. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW.2019.00188 ↗
14. Qiu, Z., Yue, L., and Liu, X. (2019). Void Filling of Digital Elevation Models with a Terrain Texture Learning Model Based on Generative Adversarial Networks. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11232829 ↗
15. Yan, L., Tang, X., and Zhang, Y. (2021). High Accuracy Interpolation of DEM Using Generative Adversarial Network. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13040676 ↗
16. Zhang, Y., and Yu, W. (2022). Comparison of DEM Super-Resolution Methods Based on Interpolation and Neural Networks. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22030745 ↗
17. Seismic Trace Interpolation Based on the Principle of Reciprocity Using a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN)10.1093/jge/gxae105 ↗
18. A Comparison of U-Net with Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks and Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks for Real Seismic Data Interpolation: Tupi Field10.33448/rsd-v13i7.46226 ↗
19. Yu, J., and Yoon, D. (2023). Crossline Reconstruction of 3D Seismic Data Using 3D cWGAN: A Comparative Study on Sleipner Seismic Survey Data. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13105999 ↗
20. Seismic Data Interpolation via Improved cGAN Network10.1088/1742-6596/2651/1/012053 ↗
21. MDA GAN: Adversarial-Learning-Based 3-D Seismic Data Interpolation and Reconstruction for Complex Missing10.1109/TGRS.2023.3249476 ↗
22. Klemmer, K., Koshiyama, A., and Flennerhag, S. (2019). Augmenting Correlation Structures in Spatial Data Using Deep Generative Models. arXiv.
23. spateGAN: Spatio-Temporal Downscaling of Rainfall Fields Using a cGAN Approach10.1029/2023EA002906 ↗
24. GANSim: Conditional Facies Simulation Using an Improved Progressive Growing of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)10.1007/s11004-021-09934-0 ↗
25. Topologically Optimal Design and Failure Prediction Using Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks10.1002/nme.6814 ↗
26. Han, H., and Suh, J. (2024). Spatial Prediction of Soil Contaminants Using a Hybrid Random Forest–Ordinary Kriging Model. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14041666 ↗
27. The Magnetic Anomaly Map of Korea
28. Gravity Anomaly in the Taebaeksan Mineralized Zone10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.4.403 ↗
29. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv.
30. Isola, P., Zhu, J.Y., Zhou, T., and Efros, A.A. (2017, January 21–26). Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.632 ↗
31. Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R. (2017). Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, Curran Associates, Inc.
32. Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., Cesa-Bianchi, N., and Garnett, R. (2018). An Intriguing Failing of Convolutional Neural Networks and the CoordConv Solution. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31, Curran Associates, Inc.
33. Zhang, H., Goodfellow, I., Metaxas, D., and Odena, A. (2018). Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv.
34. Another Look at Measure of Forecast Accuracy10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 ↗
35. Advantages of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) over the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in Assessing Average Model Performance10.3354/cr030079 ↗
36. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R, Springer.10.1007/b94608_1 ↗
37. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) or Mean Absolute Error (MAE)?—Arguments Against Avoiding RMSE in the Literature10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 ↗
38. The Coefficient of Determination R-Squared is More Informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in Regression Analysis Evaluation10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗