journal article·2026-01-08Open access

A Semi-Supervised Approach to Microseismic Source Localization with Masked Pre-Training and Residual Convolutional Autoencoder

Zhe Wang, Xiangbo Gong, Qiao Cheng, Zhuo Xu, Zhiyu Cao, Xiaolong Li

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

Microseismic monitoring is extensively applied in hydraulic fracturing and mineral extraction, with accurate event localization being a critical component. Recently, deep learning approaches have shown promise for microseismic event localization; however, most of these supervised methods depend on large, labeled datasets, which are costly and challenging to acquire. To mitigate this issue, we propose a semi-supervised approach based on a residual convolutional autoencoder (RCAE) for automated microseismic localization, designed to leverage limited labeled data effectively and improve source localization accuracy even with small sample sizes. Our method employs pre-training by masking and reconstructing unlabeled seismic records, while integrating residual connections within the encoder to enhance feature extraction from seismic signals. This enables high localization accuracy with minimal labeled data, resulting in significant cost savings. Experimental results indicate that our method surpasses purely supervised approaches on both a 2D salt dome model and a 3D homogeneous half-space model, validating its effectiveness in microseismic localization. Further comparisons with baseline models highlight the method’s advantages, providing an innovative solution for improving cost-efficiency in practical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Exploration and Imaging, College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China

Funding

Deep Earth Probe and Mineral Resources Exploration-National Science and Technology Major Project · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Evaluation of borehole hydraulic fracturing in coal seam using the microseismic monitoring method10.1007/s00603-020-02297-8 ↗
2. Microseismic monitoring technique and its applications at coal mines: Present status and future prospects
3. ISRM suggested method for in situ microseismic monitoring of the fracturing process in rock masses10.1007/s00603-015-0859-y ↗
4. Microseismic monitoring: Inside and out10.2118/118537-JPT ↗
5. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicentres from the arrival time only
6. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California10.1785/0120000006 ↗
7. An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155 ↗
8. Delineating complex spatiotemporal distribution of earthquake aftershocks: An improved source-scanning algorithm10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05457.x ↗
9. Lu, R., Lazaratos, S., Wang, K., Cha, Y., Chikichev, I., and Prosser, R. (2013, January 10–13). High-resolution elastic FWI for reservoir characterization. Proceedings of the 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013, London, UK.10.3997/2214-4609.20130113 ↗
10. Zurada, J.M., Marks, I., and Robinson, C.J. (1994). Computational Intelligence Imitating Life, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.. Technical Report.
11. Microseismic imaging using a source function independent full waveform inversion method10.1093/gji/ggy121 ↗
12. Microseismic event estimation and velocity analysis based on a source-focusing function10.1190/geo2018-0205.1 ↗
13. A wide depth distribution of seismic tremors along the northern Cascadia margin10.1038/nature03903 ↗
14. The source-scanning algorithm: Mapping the distribution of seismic sources in time and space10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02276.x ↗
15. Reverse time migration for microseismic sources using the geometric mean as an imaging condition10.1190/geo2015-0278.1 ↗
16. Microseismic source locations with deconvolution migration10.1093/gji/ggx518 ↗
17. Larmat, C., Montagner, J.P., Fink, M., Capdeville, Y., Tourin, A., and Clévédé, E. (2006). Time-reversal imaging of seismic sources and application to the great Sumatra earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33.10.1029/2006GL026336 ↗
18. Perol, T., Gharbi, M., and Denolle, M. (2018). Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location. Sci. Adv., 4.10.1126/sciadv.1700578 ↗
19. Attention-based LSTM-FCN for earthquake detection and location10.1093/gji/ggab401 ↗
20. A deep convolutional neural network for localization of clustered earthquakes based on multistation full waveforms10.1785/0220180320 ↗
21. van den Ende, M.P., and Ampuero, J.P. (2020). Automated seismic source characterization using deep graph neural networks. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47.10.1029/2020GL088690 ↗
22. Joint event location and velocity model update in real-time for downhole microseismic monitoring: A deep learning approach10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104965 ↗
23. Microseismic source location using deep reinforcement learning10.1109/TGRS.2022.3182991 ↗
24. Locating induced earthquakes with a network of seismic stations in Oklahoma via a deep learning method10.1038/s41598-020-58908-5 ↗
25. Data-driven microseismic event localization: An application to the Oklahoma Arkoma basin hydraulic fracturing data
26. Localizing microseismic events on field data using a U-Net-based convolutional neural network trained on synthetic data10.1190/geo2020-0868.1 ↗
27. Sheng, H., Wu, X., Si, X., Li, J., Zhang, S., and Duan, X. (2023). Seismic Foundation Model (SFM): A new generation deep learning model in geophysics. arXiv.
28. Self-attention deep image prior network for unsupervised 3-D seismic data enhancement
29. Self-Supervised Pre-Training Transformer for Seismic Data Denoising
30. Deep nonlocal regularizer: A self-supervised learning method for 3d seismic denoising10.1109/TGRS.2023.3329303 ↗
31. A fully unsupervised and highly generalized deep learning approach for random noise suppression10.1111/1365-2478.13062 ↗
32. Irregularly sampled seismic data interpolation with self-supervised learning10.1190/geo2022-0586.1 ↗
33. Self-supervised learning for efficient antialiasing seismic data interpolation10.1109/TGRS.2022.3167546 ↗
34. Regeneration-constrained self-supervised seismic data interpolation
35. Self-supervised pre-training vision transformer with masked autoencoders for building subsurface model
36. Reconstruct 3D seismic data with randomly missing traces via fast self-supervised deep learning
37. Localizing microseismic events using semi-supervised generative adversarial networks10.1109/TGRS.2022.3225415 ↗
38. SeisCLIP: A seismology foundation model pre-trained by multi-modal data for multi-purpose seismic feature extraction10.1109/TGRS.2024.3354456 ↗
39. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
40. Zhang, Y. (2017, March 23). A Better Autoencoder for Image: Convolutional Autoencoder. Available online: https://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~Tom.Gedeon/conf/ABCs2018/paper/ABCs2018_paper_58.pdf.
41. Masci, J., Meier, U., Cireşan, D., and Schmidhuber, J. (2011, January 14–17). Stacked convolutional auto-encoders for hierarchical feature extraction. Proceedings of the Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning–ICANN 2011: 21st International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Espoo, Finland. Proceedings, Part I 21.10.1007/978-3-642-21735-7_7 ↗
42. Deep convolutional autoencoders as generic feature extractors in seismological applications
43. Unsupervised clustering of seismic signals using deep convolutional autoencoders10.1109/LGRS.2019.2909218 ↗
44. Seismic data compression using deep learning10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073090 ↗
45. Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., and Manzagol, P.A. (2008, January 5–9). Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, Helsinki, Finland.10.1145/1390156.1390294 ↗
46. Unsupervised change-detection based on convolutional-autoencoder feature extraction
47. Why resnet works? residuals generalize10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2966319 ↗
48. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 11–14). Identity mappings in deep residual networks. Proceedings of the Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Proceedings, Part IV 14.