Spatiotemporal Lattice-Constrained Event Linking and Automatic Labeling for Cross-Document Accident Reports
Source abstract
Abstract
Constructing reusable accident-text corpora is hindered by anonymization, heterogeneous sources, and sparse labels, which complicate cross-document event linking. We propose a spatiotemporal lattice-constrained approach that encodes administrative hierarchies and temporal granularity, defines domain-informed consistency criteria, instantiates spatial/temporal relations via a subset of RCC-8 and Allen’s interval algebra, estimates anchor weights via smoothing with monotonic projection, and fuses signals using a constrained monotonic network with explicit probability calibration. An active-learning decision rule—combining maximum probability with a probability-gap criterion—supports scalable automatic labeling, and controlled augmentation leverages instruction-tuned LLMs under lattice constraints. Experiments show competitive ranking (Hit@1 = 41.51%, Hit@5 = 77.33%) and discrimination (ROC-AUC = 87.34%), with the best F1 (62.46%). The method yields the lowest calibration errors (Brier = 0.14; ECE = 1.97%), maintains performance across sources, and exhibits the smallest F1 fluctuation across thresholds (Δ = 1.7%). In deployment-oriented analyses, it auto-labels 77.7% of cases with 97.51% accuracy among high-confidence outputs while routing 22.3% to review, where the true-positive rate is 81.46%. These findings indicate that integrating structured constraints with calibrated probabilistic fusion enables accurate, auditable, and scalable event linking for accident-corpus construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topic Modeling · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Data Quality and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electric Power Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
Shenzhen Urban Public Safety and Technology Institute, Shenzhen 518046, China
Shenzhen Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Shenzhen 518057, China
School of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Funding
Shenzhen Science and Technology Program
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Modern Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage Techniques: An Overview10.1109/TIFS.2021.3114026 ↗
2. Nothman, J., Honnibal, M., Hachey, B., and Curran, J.R. (2012, January 8–14). Event Linking: Grounding Event Reference in a News Archive. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
3. Humphreys, K., Gaizauskas, R., and Azzam, S. (1997, January 11). Event Coreference for Information Extraction. Proceedings of the Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Text, Madrid, Spain.10.3115/1598819.1598830 ↗
4. Ahn, D. (2006). The Stages of Event Extraction. Workshop on Annotating and Reasoning About Time and Events, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1629235.1629236 ↗
5. Raghunathan, K., Lee, H., Rangarajan, S., Chambers, N., Surdeanu, M., Jurafsky, D., and Manning, C.D. (2010, January 9–11). A Multi-Pass Sieve for Coreference Resolution. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge, MA, USA.
6. Lu, J., and Ng, V. (2016, January 23–28). Event Coreference Resolution with Multi-Pass Sieves. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Portorož, Slovenia.
7. Cybulska, A., and Vossen, P. (2014, January 26–31). Using a Sledgehammer to Crack a Nut? Lexical Diversity and Event Coreference Resolution. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Reykjavik, Iceland.
8. “Bag of Events” Approach to Event Coreference Resolution: Supervised Classification of Event Templates
9. Cybulska, A., and Vossen, P. (2015, January 4). Translating Granularity of Event Slots into Features for Event Coreference Resolution. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on EVENTS: Definition, Detection, Coreference, and Representation, Denver, CO, USA.10.3115/v1/W15-0801 ↗
10. Hovy, E., Mitamura, T., Verdejo, F., Araki, J., and Philpot, A. (2013, January 14). Events Are Not Simple: Identity, Non-Identity, and Quasi-Identity. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Events: Definition, Detection, Coreference, and Representation, Atlanta, GA, USA.
11. Araki, J., Hovy, E., and Mitamura, T. (2014, January 22–27). Evaluation for Partial Event Coreference. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on EVENTS: Definition, Detection, Coreference, and Representation, Baltimore, MD, USA.10.3115/v1/W14-2910 ↗
12. Chen, Z., and Ji, H. (2009, January 7). Graph-Based Event Coreference Resolution. Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing, Singapore.10.3115/1708124.1708135 ↗
13. Chen, Z., Ji, H., and Haralick, R. (2009, January 17). A Pairwise Event Coreference Model, Feature Impact and Evaluation for Event Coreference Resolution. Proceedings of the Workshop on Events in Emerging Text Types (eETTs) 2009, Borovets, Bulgaria.10.3115/1708124.1708135 ↗
14. Lee, H., Recasens, M., Chang, A., Surdeanu, M., and Jurafsky, D. (2012, January 12–14). Joint Entity and Event Coreference Resolution across Documents. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, Jeju Island, Republic of Korea.
15. Choubey, P.K., and Huang, R. (2017, January 7–11). Event Coreference Resolution by Iteratively Unfolding Inter-Dependencies among Events. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.18653/v1/D17-1226 ↗
16. A Hierarchical Distance-Dependent Bayesian Model for Event Coreference Resolution10.1162/tacl_a_00155 ↗
17. Kenyon-Dean, K., Cheung, J.C.K., and Precup, D. (2018, January 5–6). Resolving Event Coreference with Supervised Representation Learning and Clustering-Oriented Regularization. Proceedings of the Seventh Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.18653/v1/S18-2001 ↗
18. Peng, H., Song, Y., and Roth, D. (2016, January 1–5). Event Detection and Co-Reference with Minimal Supervision. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Austin, TX, USA.10.18653/v1/D16-1038 ↗
19. Barhom, S., Shwartz, V., Eirew, A., Bugert, M., Reimers, N., and Dagan, I. (August, January 28). Revisiting Joint Modeling of Cross-Document Entity and Event Coreference Resolution. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy.
20. Cremisini, A., and Finlayson, M.A. (2020, January 9). New Insights into Cross-Document Event Coreference: Systematic Comparison and a Simplified Approach. Proceedings of the First Joint Workshop on Narrative Understanding, Storylines, and Events, Online.10.18653/v1/2020.nuse-1.1 ↗
21. Allaway, E., Wang, S., and Ballesteros, M. (2021, January 7–11). Sequential Cross-Document Coreference Resolution. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Online.10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.382 ↗
22. Han, R., Peng, T., Yang, C., Wang, B., Liu, L., and Wan, X. (2023). Is Information Extraction Solved by ChatGPT? An Analysis of Performance, Evaluation Criteria, Robustness and Errors. arXiv.
23. Nath, A., Avari, S.., Chelle, A., and Krishnaswamy, N. (2024). Okay, Let’s Do This! Modeling Event Coreference with Generated Rationales and Knowledge Distillation. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.218 ↗
24. Wang, X., Zhou, W., Zu, C., Xia, H., Chen, T., Zhang, Y., Zheng, R., Ye, J., Zhang, Q., and Gui, T. (2023). InstructUIE: Multi-Task Instruction Tuning for Unified Information Extraction. arXiv.
25. Wolter, F., and Zakharyaschev, M. (2000, January 11–15). Spatio-Temporal Representation and Reasoning Based on RCC-8. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Breckenridge, CO, USA.
26. Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals10.1145/182.358434 ↗
27. Cybulska, A., and Vossen, P. (2014). Guidelines for ECB+ Annotation of Events and their Coreference, VU University Amsterdam. Technical Report.
28. Ellis, J., Getman, J., Fore, D., Kuster, N., Song, Z., Bies, A., and Strassel, S.M. (2015, January 16–17). Overview of Linguistic Resources for the TAC KBP 2015 Evaluations: Methodologies and Results. Proceedings of the TAC 2015, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
29. Chen, B., Su, J., Pan, S.J., and Tan, C.L. (2011, January 8–13). A Unified Event Coreference Resolution by Integrating Multiple Resolvers. Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
30. Lu, J., Venugopal, D., Gogate, V., and Ng, V. (2016, January 11–16). Joint Inference for Event Coreference Resolution. Proceedings of the COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, Osaka, Japan.
31. Lu, J., and Ng, V. (August, January 30). Joint Learning for Event Coreference Resolution. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
32. Bejan, C.A., and Harabagiu, S. (2010, January 11–16). Unsupervised Event Coreference Resolution with Rich Linguistic Features. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden.
33. Unsupervised Event Coreference Resolution10.1162/COLI_a_00174 ↗
34. Araki, J., and Mitamura, T. (2015, January 17–21). Joint event trigger identification and event coreference resolution with structured perceptron. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, Portugal.10.18653/v1/D15-1247 ↗
35. Upadhyay, S., Gupta, N., Christodoulopoulos, C., and Roth, D. (2016, January 11–17). Revisiting the Evaluation for Cross-Document Event Coreference. Proceedings of the COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, Osaka, Japan.
36. Joshi, M., Levy, O., Weld, D.S., and Zettlemoyer, L. (2019, January 3–7). BERT for Coreference Resolution: Baselines and Analysis. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1588 ↗
37. Spanbert: Improving Pre-Training by Representing and Predicting Spans10.1162/tacl_a_00300 ↗
38. Cattan, A., Eirew, A., Stanovsky, G., Joshi, M., and Dagan, I. (2020). Streamlining Cross-Document Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Modeling. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.453 ↗
39. Yu, X., Yin, W., and Roth, D. (2010). Paired representation learning for event and entity coreference[OL]. arXiv.
40. Zeng, Y., Jin, X., Guan, S., Guo, J., and Cheng, X. (2020, January 8–13). Event Coreference Resolution with Their Paraphrases and Argument-Aware Embeddings. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain.10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.275 ↗
41. Caciularu, A., Cohan, A., Beltagy, I., Peters, M.E., Cattan, A., and Dagan, I. (2021). CDLM: Cross-Document Language Modeling. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.225 ↗
42. Beltagy, I., Peters, M.E., and Cohan, A. (2020). Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer. arXiv.
43. Ma, Y., Cao, Y., Hong, Y., and Sun, A. (2023). Large Language Model Is Not a Good Few-Shot Information Extractor, but a Good Reranker for Hard Samples!. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.710 ↗
44. Li, J., Jia, Z., and Zheng, Z. (2023). Semi-Automatic Data Enhancement for Document-Level Relation Extraction with Distant Supervision from Large Language Models. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.334 ↗
45. Min, Q., Guo, Q., Hu, X., Huang, S., Zhang, Z., and Zhang, Y. (2024). Synergetic Event Understanding: A Collaborative Approach to Cross-Document Event Coreference Resolution with Large Language Models. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.164 ↗
46. Ding, B., Min, Q., Ma, S., Li, Y., Yang, L., and Zhang, Y. (2024). A Rationale-Centric Counterfactual Data Augmentation Method for Cross-Document Event Coreference Resolution. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.63 ↗
47. Generalizing Cross-Document Event Coreference Resolution across Multiple Corpora10.1162/coli_a_00407 ↗
48. Laplacian Smoothing and Delaunay Triangulations10.1002/cnm.1630040603 ↗
49. Yuan, Q., Cong, G., and Thalmann, N.M. (2012, January 16–20). Enhancing Naive Bayes with Various Smoothing Methods for Short Text Classification. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, Lyon, France.10.1145/2187980.2188169 ↗
50. Bayesian Isotonic Regression and Trend Analysis10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00184.x ↗
51. Isotone Optimization in R: Pool-Adjacent-Violators Algorithm (PAVA) and Active Set Methods
52. A Theory for Record Linkage10.1080/01621459.1969.10501049 ↗
53. Eirew, A., Caciularu, A., and Dagan, I. (2022). Cross-Document Event Coreference Search: Task, Dataset and Modeling. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.58 ↗
54. Wu, L., Petroni, F., Josifoski, M., Riedel, S., and Zettlemoyer, L. (2020, January 16–20). Scalable Zero-Shot Entity Linking with Dense Entity Retrieval. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Online.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.519 ↗
55. Hsu, I.-H., Xue, Z., Pochhi, N., Bansal, S., Natarajan, P., Srinivasa, J., and Peng, N. (2024). Argument-Aware Approach To Event Linking. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.758 ↗
56. Kim, T., Oh, J., Kim, N.Y., Cho, S., and Yun, S.-Y. (2021). Comparing Kullback–Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillation. arXiv.10.24963/ijcai.2021/362 ↗
57. Li, W., Du, G., Chen, L., Zhang, R., and Chen, A. (2024). A Spatial-Temporal Exploration of Coordination Failures Preceding Coal Mine Explosion Accidents in China. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17010085 ↗
58. Xie, Z., Jiang, F., Xu, J., Zhai, Z., He, J., Zheng, D., Lian, J., Hou, Z., Zhao, L., and Wang, Y. (2023). A Narrative of Urban Underground Pipeline System Disasters in China in 2021: Spatial and Temporal Distribution, Causal Analysis, and Response Strategies. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151310067 ↗