Point-Cloud Filtering Algorithm for Port-Environment Perception Based on 128-Line Array Single-Photon LiDAR
Source abstract
Abstract
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has been widely used in navigation and environmental perception owing to its excellent beam directivity and high spatial resolution. Among its modalities, single-photon (photon-counting) LiDAR offers higher detection sensitivity at long ranges and under weak-return conditions and has therefore attracted considerable attention. However, this high sensitivity also introduces substantial background counts into the raw measurements; without effective filtering, downstream tasks such as image reconstruction and target recognition are hindered. In this work, a 128-line single-photon LiDAR system for port-environment perception was designed, and a histogram-based statistical filtering engineering solution was proposed. The algorithm incorporates distance-based piecewise adaptive parameterization and adjacent-channel fusion while maintaining a small memory footprint and facilitating deployment. Field experiments using datasets collected in Qingdao and Shanghai demonstrated good denoising performance at ranges up to 2.4 km. In simulation experiments using synthetic data with ground truth, an F1 score of 0.9091 was achieved by RA-ACF HSF, outperforming the baseline methods DBSCAN (0.6979) and ROR (0.7500). The proposed system and method provide a practical engineering solution for maritime navigation and port-environment perception.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Advanced Neural Network Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Urban Railway Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China
Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Gazzaneo, L., Longo, F., Mirabelli, G., Pellegrino, M., and Solina, V. (2025). Towards Green and Smart Ports: A Review of Digital Twin and Hydrogen Applications in Maritime Management. Appl. Syst. Innov., 8.10.3390/asi8060165 ↗
2. Raza, M., Prokopova, H., Huseynzade, S., Azimi, S., and Lafond, S. (2022). Towards Integrated Digital-Twins: An Application Framework for Autonomous Maritime Surface Vessel Development. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.20944/preprints202209.0387.v1 ↗
3. Wang, Y., Liu, C., Liu, J., Wang, J., Liu, J., Zheng, K., and Zheng, R. (2024). A Laser-Based SLAM Algorithm of the Unmanned Surface Vehicle for Accurate Localization and Mapping in an Inland Waterway Scenario. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12122311 ↗
4. Wang, J., Xiao, T., and Liu, P. (2025). Radar Target Detection in Sea Clutter Based on Two-Stage Collaboration. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 13.10.3390/jmse13081556 ↗
5. Sea-Surface Small Target Detection Using Entropy Features with Dual-Domain Clutter Suppression10.1080/2150704X.2022.2127129 ↗
6. Lopac, N., Jurdana, I., Brnelić, A., and Krljan, T. (2022). Application of Laser Systems for Detection and Ranging in the Modern Road Transportation and Maritime Sector. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22165946 ↗
7. Alaba, S.Y., and Ball, J.E. (2022). A Survey on Deep-Learning-Based LiDAR 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. Sensors, 22.10.36227/techrxiv.20442858.v2 ↗
8. A numerical and experimental study on the obstacle collision avoidance system using a 2D LiDAR sensor for an autonomous surface vehicle10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111508 ↗
9. LiDAR topo-bathymetry for riverbed elevation assessment: A review of approaches and performance for hydrodynamic modelling of flood plains10.1002/esp.5808 ↗
10. A simple method for the enhancement of river bathymetry in LiDAR DEM10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106354 ↗
11. Pađen, I., Garcia Sanchez, C., and Ledoux, H. (2022). Towards automatic reconstruction of 3D city models tailored for urban flow simulations. Front. Built Environ., 8.10.3389/fbuil.2022.899332 ↗
12. Altuntas, C. (2023). Review of Scanning and Pixel Array-Based LiDAR Point-Cloud Measurement Techniques to Capture 3D Shape or Motion. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13116488 ↗
13. Yang, A., Cao, J., Cheng, Y., Chen, C., and Hao, Q. (2021). Three-Dimensional Laser Imaging with a Variable Scanning Spot and Scanning Trajectory. Photonics, 8.10.3390/photonics8060173 ↗
14. Tan, C., Kong, W., Huang, G., Hou, J., Jia, S., Chen, T., and Shu, R. (2022). Design and Demonstration of a Novel Long-Range Photon-Counting 3D Imaging LiDAR with 32 × 32 Transceivers. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14122851 ↗
15. Enhancing the Functionalities of Three-dimensional Imaging LiDAR: A Review
16. A Review of LiDAR sensor Technologies for Perception in Automated Driving10.54097/ajst.v3i3.2993 ↗
17. Seidaliyeva, U., Ilipbayeva, L., Utebayeva, D., Smailov, N., Matson, E.T., Tashtay, Y., Turumbetov, M., and Sabibolda, A. (2025). LiDAR Technology for UAV Detection: From Fundamentals and Operational Principles to Advanced Detection and Classification Techniques. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25092757 ↗
18. Large-FoV 3D imaging of single-photon LiDAR at up to 12 km10.1364/OL.541758 ↗
19. Development of a near-infrared single-photon 3D imaging LiDAR based on 64×64 InGaAs/InP array detector and Risley-prism scanner10.1364/OE.514159 ↗
20. Single-photon detection for long-range imaging and sensing10.1364/OPTICA.488853 ↗
21. ICESat-2 single photon laser point cloud denoising algorithm based on improved DBSCAN clustering10.1186/s40623-024-02071-y ↗
22. Liu, Q., Yang, J., Ma, Y., Yu, W., Han, Q., Zhou, Z., and Li, S. (2025). Bayesian Denoising Algorithm for Low SNR Photon-Counting Lidar Data via Probabilistic Parameter Optimization Based on Signal and Noise Distribution. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17132182 ↗
23. Ju, X., Li, Y., Ji, S., Gong, D., Liu, H., Yan, Z., Liu, X., and Niu, H. (2025). ICESat-2 Water Photon Denoising and Water Level Extraction Method Combining Elevation Difference Exponential Attenuation Model with Hough Transform. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17162885 ↗
24. Lv, X., Wang, X., Yang, X., Xie, J., Mo, F., Xu, C., and Zhang, F. (2025). A Novel Photon-Counting Laser Point Cloud Denoising Method Based on Spatial Distribution Hierarchical Clustering for Inland Lake Water Level Monitoring. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17050902 ↗
25. A new denoising method for photon-counting LiDAR data with different surface types and observation conditions10.1080/17538947.2023.2203952 ↗
26. Fu, C., Zheng, H., Wang, G., Zhou, Y., Chen, H., He, Y., Liu, J., Sun, J., and Xu, Z. (2020). Three-Dimensional Imaging via Time-Correlated Single-Photon Counting. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10061930 ↗
27. Low-complexity adaptive radius outlier removal filter based on PCA forlidar point cloud denoising10.1364/AO.416341 ↗
28. Szutor, P., and Zichar, M. (2023). Fast Radius Outlier Filter Variant for Large Point Clouds. Data, 8.10.3390/data8100149 ↗
29. Zhang, C., Wang, R., Yang, B., Yang, L., Yang, Y., Liu, F., and Xiong, K. (2025). A Direction-Adaptive DBSCAN-Based Method for Denoising ICESat-2 Photon Point Clouds in Forested Environments. Forests, 16.10.3390/f16030524 ↗
30. Wang, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Chen, F., Dang, S., and Sun, T. (2023). A Density-Based Multilevel Terrain-Adaptive Noise Removal Method for ICESat-2 Photon-Counting Data. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23249742 ↗
31. Zhang, B., Liu, Y., Dong, Z., Li, J., Chen, Y., Tang, Q., Huang, G., and Tao, J. (2024). An Optimal Denoising Method for Spaceborne Photon-Counting LiDAR Based on a Multiscale Quadtree. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16132475 ↗
32. Point cloud denoising review: From classical to deep learning-based approaches10.1016/j.gmod.2022.101140 ↗
33. Li, D., Lu, C., Chen, Z., Guan, J., Zhao, J., and Du, J. (2024). Graph Neural Networks in Point Clouds: A Survey. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16142518 ↗
34. TDNet: Transformer-based network for point cloud denoising10.1364/AO.438396 ↗
35. Research on linear array scanning lidar and photon signal processing technology based on InGaAs single-photon detector
36. The Generation Mechanism of Tracking Error During Acceleration or Deceleration Phase in Ultraprecision Motion Systems10.1109/TIE.2018.2878114 ↗
37. A hybrid SMOTE and Trans-CWGAN for data imbalance in real operational AHU AFDD: A case study of an auditorium building10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116447 ↗
38. Development of approach to an automated acquisition of static street view images using transformer architecture for analysis of Building characteristics10.1038/s41598-025-14786-3 ↗