journal article·2026-01-04Open access

SBMEV: A Stacking-Based Meta-Ensemble Vehicle Classification Framework for Real-World Traffic Surveillance

Preeti Pateriya, Ashutosh Trivedi, Ruchika Malhotra

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

Developing vehicle classification remains a fundamental challenge for intelligent traffic management in the Indian urban environment, where traffic exhibits high heterogeneity, density and unpredictability. In the Indian subcontinent, vehicle movement is erratic, congestion is high, and vehicle types vary significantly. Conventional global benchmarks often fail to capture these complexities, highlighting the need for a region-specific dataset. To address this gap, the present study introduced the EAHVSD dataset, a novel real-world image collection comprising 10,864 vehicle images from four distinct classes, acquired from roadside surveillance cameras at multiple viewpoints and under varying conditions. This dataset is designed to support the development of an automatic traffic counter and classifier (ATCC) system. A comprehensive evaluation of eleven state-of-the-art deep learning models, namely VGG16, VGG19, MobileNetV2, Xception, AlexNet, ResNet50, ResNet152, DenseNet121, DenseNet201, InceptionV3, and NASNetMobile, was carried out. Among these, the highest accuracy result has been achieved by VGG-16, MobileNetV2, InceptionV3, DenseNet-121, and DenseNet-201. We developed a stacking-based meta-ensemble framework to leverage the complementary strengths of its components and overcome their individual limitations. In this approach, a meta-learner classifier integrates the predictions of the best-performing models, thereby improving robustness, scalability, and real-world adaptability. The proposed ensemble model achieved an overall classification accuracy of 96.04%, a Cohen’s Kappa of 0.93, and an AUC of 0.99, consistently outperforming the individual models and existing baselines. A comparative analysis with prior studies further validates the efficacy and reliability of the stacking-based meta-ensemble method. These findings position the proposed frameworks as a robust and scalable solution for efficient vehicle classification under practical surveillance constraints, with potential applications in intelligent transportation systems and traffic management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi 110042, India

Department of Software Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi 110042, India

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Vehicle classification framework: A comparative study10.1186/1687-5281-2014-29 ↗
2. Automated vehicle detection and classification: Models, methods, and techniques10.1145/3107614 ↗
3. Convolutional neural network-based vehicle classification in adverse illuminous conditions for intelligent transportation systems10.1155/2021/6644861 ↗
4. JUIVCDv1: Development of a still-image-based dataset for Indian vehicle classification10.1007/s11042-024-18303-y ↗
5. Pandey, A.D., Kumar, B., Parida, M., Mudgal, A., Chouksey, A.K., and Mishra, R. (2025). Vehicle classification using accelerometer signals and machine-learning techniques. J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 1–29.10.1080/15472450.2025.2497507 ↗
6. BML-YOLO: Multi-scale vehicle target detection method based on feature fusion10.1007/s11760-025-04328-9 ↗
7. A model for fine-grained vehicle classification based on deep learning10.1016/j.neucom.2016.09.116 ↗
8. An integrated system for vehicle tracking and classification10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.055 ↗
9. Vehicle tracking and classification for intelligent transportation systems using YOLOv5 and modified deep SORT with HRNN10.1007/s11760-025-04379-y ↗
10. Vehicle and license plate recognition with novel dataset for toll collection10.1007/s10044-025-01443-8 ↗
11. Robust prediction method for pedestrian trajectories in occluded video scenarios10.1007/s00500-025-10664-2 ↗
12. Integrating IoT and honey badger algorithm-based ensemble learning for accurate vehicle detection and classification10.1016/j.asej.2023.102547 ↗
13. SimSANet: A simple sequential attention-aided deep neural network for vehicle make and model recognition10.1007/s00521-024-10480-z ↗
14. A novel model based on AdaBoost and deep CNN for vehicle classification10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2875525 ↗
15. A super-learner ensemble of deep networks for vehicle-type classification10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997286 ↗
16. Detection and classification of vehicles by measurement of road-pavement vibration and by means of supervised machine learning10.1080/15472450.2015.1004063 ↗
17. Using LIDAR to validate the performance of vehicle classification stations10.1080/15472450.2014.941750 ↗
18. Pateriya, P., Trivedi, A., and Malhotra, R. (2024, January 5–7). Transforming traffic management: Vehicle classification in smart transportation systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management, Angamaly, India.10.1007/978-3-031-70431-4_75 ↗
19. An ensemble broad learning scheme for semisupervised vehicle type classification10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3083508 ↗
20. An ensemble deep learning method for vehicle type classification on visual traffic surveillance sensors10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2766203 ↗
21. Improving deep ensemble vehicle classification by using selected adversarial samples10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.035 ↗
22. classification of vehicles using machine learning algorithm on the extensive dataset10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3417436 ↗
23. Ghosh, T., Gayen, S., Maity, S., Valenkova, D., and Sarkar, R. (2024, January 11–14). A feature fusion-based custom deep learning model for vehicle make and model recognition. Proceedings of the 13th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), Budva, Montenegro.10.1109/MECO62516.2024.10577930 ↗
24. Saputra, W.S.J., Puspaningrum, E.Y., Syahputra, W.F., Sari, A.P., Via, Y.V., and Idhom, M. (2022, January 19–21). Car classification based on image using transfer learning convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Information Technology International Seminar (ITIS), Surabaya, Indonesia.10.1109/ITIS57155.2022.10010073 ↗
25. Kapaliya, S., Swain, D., Kaur, H., and Satapathy, S. (2022, January 15–17). An efficient deep learning based vehicle classification system for Indian vehicles. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Energy, Signal Processing and Cyber Security (iSSSC), Gunupur, India.10.1109/iSSSC56467.2022.10051313 ↗
26. Wang, Y., Deng, Y., Zheng, Y., Chattopadhyay, P., and Wang, L. (2025). Vision transformers for image classification: A comparative survey. Technologies, 13.10.3390/technologies13010032 ↗
27. Wang, Y., Yin, Y., Li, Y., Qu, T., Guo, Z., Peng, M., Jia, S., Wang, Q., Zhang, W., and Li, F. (2024). Classification of plant leaf disease recognition based on self-supervised learning. Agronomy, 14.10.3390/agronomy14030500 ↗
28. Accurate classification for automatic vehicle-type recognition based on ensemble classifiers10.1109/TITS.2019.2906821 ↗
29. Reliable classification of vehicle types based on cascade classifier ensembles10.1109/TITS.2012.2213814 ↗
30. An ensemble learning–online semi-supervised approach for vehicle behavior recognition10.1109/TITS.2021.3095053 ↗
31. Moving vehicle detection and classification using gaussian mixture model and ensemble deep learning technique10.1155/2021/5590894 ↗
32. Real operational labeled data of air handling units from office, auditorium, and hospital buildings10.1038/s41597-025-05825-9 ↗
33. Effectiveness of traditional augmentation methods for rebar counting using UAV imagery with Faster R-CNN and YOLOv10-based transformer architectures10.1038/s41598-025-18964-1 ↗
34. Ensemble learning: A survey10.1002/widm.1249 ↗
35. Stacking-based ensemble learning method for the recognition of the preceding vehicle lane-changing manoeuvre: A naturalistic driving study on the highway10.1049/itr2.12154 ↗
36. Predicting vehicle behaviour using multi-task ensemble learning10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118716 ↗
37. Improved DAB-DETR model for irregular traffic obstacles detection in vision-based driving environment perception scenario10.1007/s10489-025-06440-2 ↗
38. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
39. Howard, A.G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., and Adam, H. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv.
40. Chollet, F. (2017, January 21–26). Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.195 ↗
41. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
42. Mascarenhas, S., and Agarwal, M. (2021, January 19–21). A comparison between VGG16, VGG19 and ResNet50 architecture frameworks for image classification. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Disruptive Technologies for Multi-Disciplinary Research and Applications (CENTCON), Bengaluru, India.10.1109/CENTCON52345.2021.9687944 ↗
43. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 21–26). Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
44. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2016, January 27–30). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
45. Transfer learning with NASNet-Mobile for Pneumonia X-ray classification10.1142/S1793557122502400 ↗
46. The relationship between recall and precision10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<12::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
47. Chicco, D., and Jurman, G. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genom., 21.10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 ↗
48. OpTunedSMOTE: A novel model for automated hyperparameter tuning of SMOTE in software defect prediction10.1177/1088467X241301390 ↗
49. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics10.1162/coli.07-034-R2 ↗
50. Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix10.3758/BF03213026 ↗
51. Soft-weighted-average ensemble vehicle detection method based on single-stage and two-stage deep learning models10.1109/TIV.2020.3010832 ↗