Data Mining for Early Fault Detection in Artificial Satellites: A Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Early detection of faults in artificial satellites is crucial for the success of missions, but it is hindered by the scarcity of data on faults and the limitations of traditional monitoring methods. As an alternative, technological trends such as data mining have emerged. This study presents a literature review to provide an in-depth examination of the landscape of data mining applications for early fault detection in satellites. Following the PRISMA protocol, the available scientific corpus from seven scientific databases was reviewed, and 52 primary studies were selected from an initial set of 2726 records published between 2011 and 2024. The results indicate that this is a rapidly expanding field, with an annual growth rate of 35.72%, characterized by a significant geopolitical concentration of research and funding led by China. From a methodological point of view, unsupervised approaches (~40%) predominate, a response to the lack of labeled in-flight data. However, supervised and hybrid models demonstrate superior performance, achieving F1 scores above 97% when selected or simulated data are available. A misalignment was identified in the domain, although research clearly favors the EPS due to the availability of data. Operational statistics, however, confirm that the ADCS system is the primary cause of mission failure. It is essential to note that the limited availability of public datasets and models, with less than 15% of studies providing access, is the main obstacle to reproducibility and progress. The primary conclusion of this work is that the field is expanding, and all stakeholders must contribute to its continued growth. Key actions include establishing public benchmarks that enable transparent evaluation, exploring physics-based models that account for uncertainty to address data scarcity, and concerted efforts to bridge the transfer gap from academic satellite operations to the real world.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Satellite Communication Systems · Spacecraft Design and Technology · Space Satellite Systems and Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Facultad de Ingeniería Electrónica y Telecomunicaciones, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán 190003, Cauca, Colombia
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Tecnologías Aeroespaciales (CITAE)—Fuerza Aeroespacial Colombiana, Santiago de Cali 760001, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
Facultad de Ingeniería, Corporación Universitaria Comfacauca—Unicomfacauca, Popayán 190001, Cauca, Colombia
Escuela de Ciencias Básicas, Tecnología e Ingeniería—ECBTI, Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia—UNAD, Popayán 190001, Cauca, Colombia
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. Yairi, T., Fukushima, Y., Liew, C.F., Sakai, Y., and Yamaguchi, Y. (2021). A Data-Driven Approach to Anomaly Detection and Health Monitoring for Artificial Satellites. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-9199-0_13 ↗
2. Zhang, G., Yang, Q., Li, G., Leng, J., and Yan, M. (2021). A Satellite Incipient Fault Detection Method Based on Decomposed Kullback–Leibler Divergence. Entropy, 23.10.3390/e23091194 ↗
3. Narayana, S., Prasad, R.V., and Prabhakar, T.V. (2021). SOS: Isolated Health Monitoring System to Save Our Satellites. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3458864.3466862 ↗
4. Fault Diagnosis for Space Utilisation10.1049/joe.2018.9102 ↗
5. He, J., Cheng, Z., and Guo, B. (2022). Anomaly Detection in Satellite Telemetry Data Using a Sparse Feature-Based Method. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22176358 ↗
6. A Deep Learning Anomaly Detection Framework for Satellite Telemetry with Fake Anomalies
7. A Method for Detecting Incipient Faults in Satellites Based on Dynamic Linear Discriminant Analysis10.1155/2021/1303936 ↗
8. Schlag, L., O’meara, C., and Wickler, M. (2025, December 15). Numerical Analysis of Automated Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Satellite Telemetry. Available online: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2018-2534.
9. Cubesats: Cost-Effective Science and Technology Platforms for Emerging and Developing Nations10.1016/j.asr.2010.10.009 ↗
10. Big Data Analytics for Data-Driven Industry: A Review of Data Sources, Tools, Challenges, Solutions, and Research Directions10.1007/s10586-022-03568-5 ↗
11. Machine Learning in Telemetry Data Mining of Space Mission: Basics, Challenging and Future Directions10.1007/s10462-019-09760-1 ↗
12. Data Mining for Vehicle Telemetry10.1080/08839514.2016.1156954 ↗
13. Enhancing Environmental Decision-Making: A Systematic Review of Data Analytics Applications in Monitoring and Management10.1007/s43621-024-00510-0 ↗
14. Reutilización de software en la robótica industrial: Un mapeo sistemático10.4995/riai.2020.13335 ↗
15. Riofrío-Calderón, G., and Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S. (2022). Mediation and Online Learning: Systematic Literature Mapping (2015–2020). Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14052951 ↗
16. Systematic Literature Review on Mechanisms to Measure the Technological Maturity of the Internet of Things in Enterprises10.1016/j.iot.2024.101082 ↗
17. Methley, A.M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., and Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A Comparison Study of Specificity and Sensitivity in Three Search Tools for Qualitative Systematic Reviews. BMC Health Serv. Res., 14.10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0 ↗
18. On the Performance of Hybrid Search Strategies for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106294 ↗
19. Rovira, C., Codina, L., Guerrero-Solé, F., and Lopezosa, C. (2019). Ranking by Relevance and Citation Counts, a Comparative Study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WoS and Scopus. Future Internet, 11.10.3390/fi11090202 ↗
20. Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review10.1177/0739456X17723971 ↗
21. Analysis of the Tools to Support Systematic Literature Review in Software Engineering10.1088/1757-899X/1163/1/012013 ↗
22. Internet of Thing (IoT) Review of Review: Bibliometric Overview since Its Foundation10.1016/j.future.2023.01.016 ↗
23. Scott, M.J., Verhagen, W.J.C., Bieber, M.T., and Marzocca, P. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review of Predictive Maintenance for Defence Fixed-Wing Aircraft Sustainment and Operations. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22187070 ↗
24. Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Safety: Systematic Review and Biometric Analysis10.1007/s44196-024-00671-w ↗
25. Cook, K.L.B. (2010, January 6–13). The ITAR and You—What You Need to Know about the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO.2010.5446878 ↗
26. Survey on Security Issues of Routing and Anomaly Detection for Space Information Networks10.1038/s41598-021-01638-z ↗
27. Scientific Output and GDP: Evidence from Countries around the World
28. Sustainable Industrial Value Creation in SMEs: A Comparison between Industry 4.0 and Made in China 202510.1007/s40684-018-0056-z ↗
29. A Critical Review of SCImago Journal & Country Rank10.1093/reseval/rvu008 ↗
30. An Overview of Small Satellites in Remote Sensing*10.1080/01431160801914952 ↗
31. Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis of Satellite Power System Using Fuzzy Bayes Risk and SVM10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.049 ↗
32. Satellite Fault Diagnosis Using Support Vector Machines Based on a Hybrid Voting Mechanism10.1155/2014/582042 ↗
33. Anomaly Detection of Satellite Telemetry Based on Optimized Extreme Learning Machine10.1016/j.jsse.2019.10.005 ↗
34. Jin, W., Zhang, S., Sun, B., Jin, P., and Li, Z. (2022). An Analytical Investigation of Anomaly Detection Methods Based on Sequence to Sequence Model in Satellite Power Subsystem. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22051819 ↗
35. Imbalanced Satellite Telemetry Data Anomaly Detection Model Based on Bayesian LSTM10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.12.012 ↗
36. Fault Detection Method of Luojia1-01 Satellite Attitude Control System Based on Supervised Local Linear Embedding10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932392 ↗
37. Two Novel Outlier Detection Approaches Based on Unsupervised Possibilistic and Fuzzy Clustering10.7717/peerj-cs.1060 ↗
38. Shangguan, D., Chen, L., and Ding, J. (2020). A Digital Twin-Based Approach for the Fault Diagnosis and Health Monitoring of a Complex Satellite System. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12081307 ↗
39. The OPS-SAT Benchmark for Detecting Anomalies in Satellite Telemetry10.1038/s41597-025-05035-3 ↗
40. A Novel Asymmetric Loss Function for Deep Clustering-Based Health Monitoring and Anomaly Detection for Spacecraft Telemetry10.1007/s42486-024-00160-1 ↗
41. Fault Diagnosis for Momentum Wheels of Communication Satellite Based on Artificial Neural Network10.24018/ejai.2023.2.2.18 ↗
42. Li, Y., Lei, M., Liu, P., Wang, R., and Xu, M. (2021). A Novel Framework for Anomaly Detection for Satellite Momentum Wheel Based on Optimized SVM and Huffman-Multi-Scale Entropy. Entropy, 23.10.3390/e23081062 ↗
43. Hybrid Digital Twin for Satellite Temperature Field Perception and Attitude Control10.1016/j.aei.2024.102405 ↗
44. System-level prognostics approach for failure prediction of reaction wheel motor in satellites10.1016/j.asr.2022.11.028 ↗
45. Physics-Informed Deep Monte Carlo Quantile Regression Method for Interval Multilevel Bayesian Network-Based Satellite Circuit Board Reliability Analysis10.1016/j.apm.2023.06.024 ↗
46. Cespedes, A.J.J., Pangestu, B.H.B., Hanazawa, A., and Cho, M. (2022). Performance evaluation of machine learning methods for anomaly detection in CubeSat solar panels. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178634 ↗
47. Soft decision-making based on decision-theoretic rough set and Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model with application to the autonomous fault diagnosis of satellite power system10.1016/j.ast.2020.106108 ↗
48. Fault diagnosis of satellite power system based on unsupervised knowledge acquisition and decision-making10.1016/j.aei.2024.102768 ↗
49. Farahani, H.V., and Rahimi, A. (2021). Data-driven Fault Diagnosis for Satellite Control Moment Gyro Assembly with Multiple In-phase Faults. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10131537 ↗
50. Study on the Fault Detection Technology for Satellites In-Orbit10.1007/s42423-019-00037-x ↗
51. A Hybrid Monte Carlo Quantile EMD-LSTM Method for Satellite in-Orbit Temperature Prediction and Data Uncertainty Quantification10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124875 ↗
52. Anomaly Detection in Mixed Telemetry Data Using a Sparse Representation and Dictionary Learning10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107320 ↗
53. Automatic Detection of Ionospheric Scintillation-like GNSS Satellite Oscillator Anomaly Using a Machine-Learning Algorithm10.1002/navi.385 ↗
54. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1994). Fault-Detection, Fault-Isolation, and Recovery (FDIR) Techniques, Johnson Space Center.
55. Niro, F., Goryl, P., Dransfeld, S., Boccia, V., Gascon, F., Adams, J., Themann, B., Scifoni, S., and Doxani, G. (2021). European Space Agency (ESA) Calibration/Validation Strategy for Optical Land-Imaging Satellites and Pathway towards Interoperability. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13153003 ↗
56. Survey on Fault Detection, Isolation, and Recovery Strategies in the Space Domain
57. Tipaldi, M., Silvestrini, S., Pesce, V., and Colagrossi, A. (2023). FDIR Development Approaches in Space Systems. Modern Spacecraft Guidance, Navigation, and Control, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-90916-7.00011-1 ↗
58. Advancing Satellite Precipitation Retrievals With Data Driven Approaches: Is Black Box Model Explainable?10.1029/2020EA001423 ↗
59. Interoperability in Planetary Research for Geospatial Data Analysis10.1016/j.pss.2017.04.004 ↗
60. The ITAR Treaty and Its Implications for US Space Exploration Policy and the Commercial Space Industry
61. Hoffner, J. (2025, December 29). The Myth of “ITAR-Free.” Aerospace Security: El Segundo, CA, USA, 2020. Available online: https://aerospace.csis.org/itar-satellite-regulation/.
62. Wasserstein Distance Based Deep Adversarial Transfer Learning for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis with Unlabeled or Insufficient Labeled Data10.1016/j.neucom.2020.05.040 ↗
63. Kolcio, K., and Fesq, L. (2016, January 5–12). Model-Based off-Nominal State Isolation and Detection System for Autonomous Fault Management. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO.2016.7500793 ↗
64. Detection and Analysis of Anomalous Behavior in On-Orbit Satellites Using AI Algorithms10.48001/jofsn.2024.226-17 ↗
65. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Landscape of Measuring Technology Maturity in the Enterprise Internet of Things10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4697-4713 ↗
66. Lv, R., Chen, W., and Liu, X. (2018). A High-Dynamic-Range Switched-Capacitor Sigma-Delta ADC for Digital Micromechanical Vibration Gyroscopes. Micromachines, 9.10.3390/mi9080372 ↗
67. An Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach for Real-Time Damage Detection in Bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117971 ↗
68. Surrogate Model-Based Calibration of a Flying Earth Observation Satellite10.1016/j.asr.2023.10.043 ↗
69. Hedayati, M., Barzegar, A., and Rahimi, A. (2024). Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis of Satellites and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14209487 ↗
70. Framework for Modeling High-Impact, Low-Frequency Power Grid Events to Support Risk-Informed Decisions10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.008 ↗
71. Ileri, U., Altun, Y., and Narin, A. (2024). An Efficient Approach for Automatic Fault Classification Based on Data Balance and One-Dimensional Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14114899 ↗
72. A Comparative Study of Data-Driven and Physics-Based Gas Turbine Fault Recognition Approaches
73. A Modeling-Based Approach for Dependability Analysis of a Constellation of Satellites10.1007/s10270-024-01197-7 ↗
74. Challenges in Data-Driven Geospatial Modeling for Environmental Research and Practice10.1038/s41467-024-55240-8 ↗