A Comparative Evaluation of Greek Fig Cultivars Utilizing Instrumental Analytical Methodologies, In Silico Studies and Machine Learning Prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study provides a comprehensive comparative evaluation of three Greek fig cultivars through integrated instrumental, computational, and chemometric approaches. Fresh fig peel and flesh samples were analyzed to determine total soluble solids, total phenolic and flavonoid content, as well as antioxidant and antiradical activities, complemented by attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy for structural profiling. Significant varietal and tissue-dependent differences were observed, with fig peel exhibiting higher levels of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity compared to flesh. ATR-FTIR spectral patterns revealed the presence of characteristic functional groups associated with carbohydrates, phenolic compounds, carboxylic acids, and volatile compounds, reflecting the influence of variety, pollination requirements, and geographical origin. In parallel, to explore potential neuroprotective relevance, 30 phytochemicals reported in figs were subjected to molecular docking against human β-secretase 1 (hBACE1), a key enzyme in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis. Phenolic acids and flavonoids displayed favorable binding affinities and interaction profiles with the catalytic Asp32–Asp228 dyad and with the flap domain. A machine learning model (XGBoost) trained on known BACE1 inhibitors further classified all examined fig metabolites as active candidates. Collectively, these findings highlight Greek figs as chemically rich fruits with potential biological properties, supporting future targeted studies on their bioactive potential.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species · Chemical synthesis and alkaloids · Berberine and alkaloids research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Chemistry, Analysis & Design of Food Processes, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos, 12243 Egaleo, Greece
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos, 12243 Egaleo, Greece
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Taxonomy, Traditional Uses and Biological Activity of Ficus carica L. (Moraceae): A Review
2. Recent Insight on Nutritional Value, Active Phytochemicals, and Health-Enhancing Characteristics of Fig (Ficus craica)10.1002/fsh3.12034 ↗
3. Sandhu, A.K., Islam, M., Edirisinghe, I., and Burton-Freeman, B. (2023). Phytochemical Composition and Health Benefits of Figs (Fresh and Dried): A Review of Literature from 2000 to 2022. Nutrients, 15.10.3390/nu15112623 ↗
4. Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids of Fig Fruit (Ficus carica L.) in the Northern Mediterranean Region10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.061 ↗
5. Phytochemistry, Biological Activities, Industrial and Traditional Uses of Fig (Ficus carica): A Review10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110237 ↗
6. Shahrajabian, M.H., Sun, W., and Cheng, Q. (2021). A Review of Chemical Constituents, Traditional and Modern Pharmacology of Fig (Ficus carica L.), a Super Fruit with Medical Astonishing Characteristics. Pol. J. Agron., 22–29.
7. Khadhraoui, M., Bagues, M., Artés, F., and Ferchichi, A. (2019). Phytochemical Content, Antioxidant Potential, and Fatty Acid Composition of Dried Tunisian Fig (Ficus carica L.) Cultivars. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual., 143–150.
8. Fresh Figs (Ficus carica L.): Pomological Characteristics, Nutritional Value, and Phytochemical Properties10.17660/eJHS.2018/83.2.6 ↗
9. Effects of Physio-Chemical Changes during Fruit Development on Nutritional Quality of Fig (Ficus carica L. Var. ‘Sabz’) under Rain-Fed Condition10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.003 ↗
10. Physicochemical and Nutritional Characterization of Brebas for Fresh Consumption from Nine Fig Varieties (Ficus carica L.) Grown in Extremadura (Spain)10.1155/2017/6302109 ↗
11. Rasool, I.F.u., Aziz, A., Khalid, W., Koraqi, H., Siddiqui, S.A., AL-Farga, A., Lai, W.-F., and Ali, A. (2023). Industrial Application and Health Prospective of Fig (Ficus carica) By-Products. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28030960 ↗
12. Bioactive Compounds in Ficus Fruits, Their Bioactivities, and Associated Health Benefits: A Review10.1155/2022/6597092 ↗
13. Peel Colour and Flesh Phenolic Compounds at Ripening Stages in Pollinated Commercial Varieties of Fig (Ficus carica L.) Fruit Grown in Southern Europe10.1007/s11694-020-00796-4 ↗
14. Review on Fresh and Dried Figs: Chemical Analysis and Occurrence of Phytochemical Compounds, Antioxidant Capacity and Health Effects10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.055 ↗
15. Hssaini, L., Elfazazi, K., Razouk, R., Ouaabou, R., Hernandez, F., Hanine, H., Charafi, J., Houmanat, K., and Aboutayeb, R. (2021). Combined Effect of Cultivar and Peel Chromaticity on Figs’ Primary and Secondary Metabolites: Preliminary Study Using Biochemical and FTIR Fingerprinting Coupled to Chemometrics. Biology, 10.10.3390/biology10070573 ↗
16. Nutritional, Chemical and Bioactive Profiles of Different Parts of a Portuguese Common Fig (Ficus carica L.) Variety10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108572 ↗
17. Nutritional Composition, Bioactive Compounds, and Antioxidant Activity of Fig (Ficus carica L.) Jam Varieties: A Functional Food Perspective10.33846/hd20702 ↗
18. Bioactive Compounds (LC-PDA-Qtof-ESI-MS and UPLC-PDA-FL) and in Vitro Inhibit α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase in Leaves and Fruit from Different Varieties of Ficus carica L.10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141977 ↗
19. Consumption of Fig Fruits Grown in Oman Can Improve Memory, Anxiety, and Learning Skills in a Transgenic Mice Model of Alzheimer’s Disease10.1179/1476830514Y.0000000131 ↗
20. Essa, M.M., Subash, S., Akbar, M., Al-Adawi, S., and Guillemin, G.J. (2015). Long-Term Dietary Supplementation of Pomegranates, Figs and Dates Alleviate Neuroinflammation in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0120964 ↗
21. Nutritional Composition Health Benefits and Quality of Fresh and Dried Figs from Eastern Morocco10.1038/s41598-025-92131-4 ↗
22. Chemical Structure, Composition, Bioactive Compounds, and Pattern Recognition Techniques in Figs (Ficus carica L.) Quality and Authenticity: An Updated Review10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106863 ↗
23. Phenolic Compounds in Fresh and Dried Figs from Cilento (Italy), by Considering Breba Crop and Full Crop, in Comparison to Turkish and Greek Dried Figs10.1111/1750-3841.12505 ↗
24. Caprification Modifies Polyphenols but Not Cell Wall Concentrations in Ripe Figs10.1016/j.scienta.2013.05.037 ↗
25. Ladika, G., Strati, I.F., Tsiaka, T., Cavouras, D., and Sinanoglou, V.J. (2024). On the Assessment of Strawberries’ Shelf-Life and Quality, Based on Image Analysis, Physicochemical Methods, and Chemometrics. Foods, 13.10.3390/foods13020234 ↗
26. Christodoulou, P., Kritsi, E., Ladika, G., Tsafou, P., Tsiantas, K., Tsiaka, T., Zoumpoulakis, P., Cavouras, D., and Sinanoglou, V.J. (2025). Estimation of Tomato Quality During Storage by Means of Image Analysis, Instrumental Analytical Methods, and Statistical Approaches. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15147936 ↗
27. Christodoulou, P., Ladika, G., Tsiantas, K., Kritsi, E., Tsiaka, T., Cavouras, D., Zoumpoulakis, P., and Sinanoglou, V.J. (2024). Quality Assessment of Greenhouse-Cultivated Cucumbers (Cucumis sativus) during Storage Using Instrumental and Image Analyses. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14198676 ↗
28. Sinanoglou, V.J., Tsiaka, T., Aouant, K., Mouka, E., Ladika, G., Kritsi, E., Konteles, S.J., Ioannou, A.-G., Zoumpoulakis, P., and Strati, I.F. (2023). Quality Assessment of Banana Ripening Stages by Combining Analytical Methods and Image Analysis. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13063533 ↗
29. Herbal Distillates: A New Era of Grape Marc Distillates with Enriched Antioxidant Profile10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.162 ↗
30. Validation of Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of Total Polyphenol and Total Flavonoid Content10.5740/jaoacint.17-0066 ↗
31. Antiradical–Antimicrobial Activity and Phenolic Profile of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Juices from Different Cultivars: A Comparative Study10.1039/C4RA11795F ↗
32. Comparison of the Antioxidant and Antiradical Activity of Pomegranate (Punica Granatum L.) by Ultrasound-Assisted and Classical Extraction10.1080/00032719.2015.1038550 ↗
33. Ladika, G., Christodoulou, P., Kritsi, E., Tsiaka, T., Sotiroudis, G., Cavouras, D., and Sinanoglou, V.J. (2025). Exploring Postharvest Metabolic Shifts and NOX2 Inhibitory Potential in Strawberry Fruits and Leaves via Untargeted LC-MS/MS and Chemometric Analysis. Metabolites, 15.10.3390/metabo15050321 ↗
34. Analysis of the Relationship Between Organic Acid, Total Soluble Solids, Total Phenolic, and Total Flavonoids in Ficus carica10.1007/s10341-025-01377-9 ↗
35. Hoxha, L., Kongoli, R., and Dervishi, J. (2022). Influence of Maturity Stage on Polyphenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Fig (Ficus carica L.) Fruit in Native Albanian Varieties. Chem. Proc., 10.10.3390/IOCAG2022-12199 ↗
36. Evaluation of Quality Attributes in Fresh Fig (Ficus carica L.) Fruits
37. Correction to: Comparative Analysis and Physio-biochemical Screening of an Ex-situ Fig (Ficus carica L.) Collection10.1007/s13580-019-00186-w ↗
38. Galán, A.J., Domínguez, M.G., Pérez-López, M., Galván, A.I., Pérez-Gragera, F., and López-Corrales, M. (2025). Agronomic Performance and Fruit Quality of Fresh Fig Varieties Trained in Espaliers Under a High Planting Density. Horticulturae, 11.10.3390/horticulturae11070750 ↗
39. Evaluation of the Total Phenolic Content, Sugar, Organic Acid, Volatile Compounds and Antioxidant Capacities of Fig (Ficus carica L.) Genotypes Selected from the Mediterranean Region of Türkiye10.17221/84/2023-HORTSCI ↗
40. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Physico-Chemical Characteristics in Different Native Albanian Fig Varieties (Ficus carica L.)
41. Physicochemical Characteristics, Minerals, Phenolic Compounds, and Antioxidant Capacity in Fig Tree Fruits with Macronutrient Deficiencies10.15835/nbha48311867 ↗
42. Pereira, C., Martín, A., López-Corrales, M., de Córdoba, M.G., Galván, A.I., and Serradilla, M.J. (2020). Evaluation of the Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Different Fig Cultivars for the Fresh Fruit Market. Foods, 9.10.3390/foods9050619 ↗
43. Henriques, B.R., Neves, C.M.B., Moumni, M., Romanazzi, G., Le Bourvellec, C., Cardoso, S.M., and Wessel, D.F. (2025). A Comparative Study of Traditional Sun Drying and Hybrid Solar Drying on Quality, Safety, and Bioactive Compounds in “Pingo de Mel” Fig. Antioxidants, 14.10.3390/antiox14030362 ↗
44. Agronomical and Quality Differences of Four Fig Cultivars Grown in Brazil10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619 ↗
45. Mascellani, A., Natali, L., Cavallini, A., Mascagni, F., Caruso, G., Gucci, R., Havlik, J., and Bernardi, R. (2021). Moderate Salinity Stress Affects Expression of Main Sugar Metabolism and Transport Genes and Soluble Carbohydrate Content in Ripe Fig Fruits (Ficus carica L. Cv. Dottato). Plants, 10.10.3390/plants10091861 ↗
46. Aljane, F., Neily, M.H., and Msaddak, A. (2020). Phytochemical Characteristics and Antioxidant Activity of Several Fig (Ficus carica L.) Ecotypes. Ital. J. Food Sci., 32.
47. Phytochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Selected Fig (Ficus carica L.) Accessions from the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey10.1016/j.scienta.2011.02.023 ↗
48. The Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Figs (Ficus carica L.) Grown in the Black Sea Region10.1007/s11130-023-01089-z ↗
49. Comparative Antioxidative and Antidiabetic Activities of Ficus carica Pulp, Peel and Leaf and Their Correlation with Phytochemical Contents10.23880/OAJPR-16000197 ↗
50. Hssaini, L., Hernandez, F., Viuda-Martos, M., Charafi, J., Razouk, R., Houmanat, K., Ouaabou, R., Ennahli, S., Elothmani, D., and Hmid, I. (2021). Survey of Phenolic Acids, Flavonoids and In Vitro Antioxidant Potency Between Fig Peels and Pulps: Chemical and Chemometric Approach. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26092574 ↗
51. Relationship between Pollination and Cell Wall Properties in Common Fig Fruit10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.12.011 ↗
52. How to Read and Interpret FTIR Spectroscope of Organic Material10.17509/ijost.v4i1.15806 ↗
53. A Comparative Study of the Molecular Constituent Profile Among Brussels Sprout Leaf Layers by Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics
54. Amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s Disease: Structure, Toxicity, Distribution, Treatment, and Prospects
55. The β-Secretase BACE1 in Alzheimer’s Disease10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.001 ↗
56. Sayad, A., Najafi, S., Hussen, B.M., Abdullah, S.T., Movahedpour, A., Taheri, M., and Hajiesmaeili, M. (2022). The Emerging Roles of the β-Secretase BACE1 and the Long Non-Coding RNA BACE1-AS in Human Diseases: A Focus on Neurodegenerative Diseases and Cancer. Front. Aging Neurosci., 14.10.3389/fnagi.2022.853180 ↗
57. Asp32 and Asp228 Determine the Selective Inhibition of BACE1 as Shown by Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.08.028 ↗
58. Rational Discovery of BACE1-Selective Inhibitors as Potential Therapeutics for Alzheimer’s Disease10.1002/ddr.70169 ↗
59. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Coumarin Triazoles as Dual Inhibitors of Cholinesterases and β-Secretase10.1021/acsomega.2c07993 ↗
60. Natural Compounds with Anti-BACE1 Activity as Promising Therapeutic Drugs for Treating Alzheimer’s Disease10.1055/a-1019-9819 ↗
61. Mohamed Yusof, N.I.S., Abdullah, Z.L., Othman, N., and Mohd Fauzi, F. (2022). Structure–Activity Relationship Analysis of Flavonoids and Its Inhibitory Activity Against BACE1 Enzyme Toward a Better Therapy for Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Chem., 10.10.3389/fchem.2022.874615 ↗
62. Bioassay-Guided Isolation of BACE1 Inhibitors from Crataegus pinnatifida10.1016/j.phyplu.2023.100460 ↗
63. Bhatia, S., Singh, M., Sharma, P., Mujwar, S., Singh, V., Mishra, K.K., Singh, T.G., Singh, T., and Ahmad, S.F. (2023). Scaffold Morphing and In Silico Design of Potential BACE-1 (β-Secretase) Inhibitors: A Hope for a Newer Dawn in Anti-Alzheimer Therapeutics. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28166032 ↗
64. Advances in the Synthetic Approaches to β-Secretase (BACE-1) Inhibitors in Countering Alzheimer’s: A Comprehensive Review10.1021/acsomega.5c04467 ↗
65. Cheminformatics-Driven Prediction of BACE-1 Inhibitors: Affinity and Molecular Mechanism Exploration10.1016/j.chphi.2024.100754 ↗
66. Binding Pose Analysis of Hydroxyethylamine Based β-Secretase Inhibitors and Application Thereof to the Design and Synthesis of Novel Indeno[1,2-b]Indole Based Inhibitors10.24820/ark.5550190.p011.350 ↗
67. The Role of Tyrosine 71 in Modulating the Flap Conformations of BACE110.1002/prot.23050 ↗
68. Utilizing Structures of CYP2D6 and BACE1 Complexes to Reduce Risk of Drug–Drug Interactions with a Novel Series of Centrally Efficacious BACE1 Inhibitors10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00191 ↗
69. Design and Synthesis of β-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme (BACE1) Inhibitors with in Vivo Brain Reduction of β-Amyloid Peptides10.1021/jm3009025 ↗
70. From Kinase Inhibitors to Multitarget Ligands as Powerful Drug Leads for Alzheimer’s Disease Using Protein-Templated Synthesis10.1002/ange.202106295 ↗
71. A Review on Protein–Phenolic Interactions and Associated Changes10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.009 ↗