journal article·2026-01-01Open access

Score-Based Dispatching Strategy for Twin Rubber-Tired Gantry Cranes Leveraging Spring Elasticity

Dokyung Kim, Junjae Chae

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

Yard crane (YC) operations are critical to the overall productivity of container terminals, especially as terminals move toward higher levels of automation. This study proposes a score-based dispatching strategy for twin RTGCs operating within a single yard block. The proposed logic evaluates each job using four factors—distance between crane and job, job waiting time, estimated processing time, and an elasticity term inspired by spring mechanics that reflects the tendency of each crane to stay within its preferred working zone. These factors are normalized and combined into a single score, and the corresponding weights are optimized by a genetic algorithm (GA). Jobs with lower scores are given higher priority for assignment. A discrete-event simulation model of a twin RTGC system is developed using AutoMod® to assess the performance of the proposed strategy. The score-based rule is compared with conventional dispatching policies such as First-Come-First-Served (FCFS), Nearest-First-Served (NFS), and their weighted combination under various workload scenarios. Relative to the score-based strategy without elasticity, the inclusion of the elasticity term reduces average and maximum truck turnaround time by 7.51% and 7.79%, respectively; these improvements translate into higher yard throughput and strengthen the advantage over the benchmark dispatching rules. In particular, the elasticity term effectively mitigates crane interference while maintaining a balanced spatial distribution of work between the two cranes. These findings indicate that the proposed dispatching logic provides a practical and implementable control strategy for retrofitting existing RTGC systems and integrating them into terminal operating systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Maritime Ports and Logistics · Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization · Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

KD Process Intelligence Team, Hyundai Glovis, 83-21, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04769, Republic of Korea

Logistics Major, Korea Aerospace University, 76 Hanggongdeahag-ro, Deogyang-gu, Goyang-si 10540, Republic of Korea

Jcolab Inc., 76 Hanggongdeahag-ro, Deogyang-gu, Goyang-si 10540, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. ICC (2023, July 04). 2023 Trade Report: A Fragmenting World. Available online: https://iccwbo.org/news-publications/policies-reports/icc-2023-trade-report-a-fragmenting-world/.
2. UNCTAD (2023, July 04). Review of Maritime Transport 2023. Available online: https://shop.un.org/.
3. A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals10.1007/s10696-020-09385-5 ↗
4. A Review on Yard Management in Container Terminals
5. Scheduling optimization of yard cranes with minimal energy consumption at container terminals10.1016/j.cie.2016.03.022 ↗
6. Global Industry Analysts Inc. (2023, July 08). Rubber Tired Gantry (RTG) Cranes-Global Strategic Business Report. Available online: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5304200/rubber-tired-gantry-rtg-cranes-global.
7. Korea Maritime Institute (2023, July 04). KMI International Logistics Weekly. Available online: https://www.withlogis.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=research_weekly&wr_id=544.
8. Optimal energy management of a retrofitted Rubber Tyred Gantry Crane with energy recovery capabilities10.1016/j.est.2021.103050 ↗
9. Port Technology International (2023, July 04). Automation in 2020 and Beyond. Port Technology International. Available online: https://www.porttechnology.org/news/automation-in-2020-and-beyond/.
10. Yard crane scheduling in port container terminals10.1016/j.apm.2004.09.009 ↗
11. Optimization approach for yard crane scheduling problem with uncertain parameters in container terminals
12. Covic, F. (2018). A literature review on container handling in yard blocks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-00898-7_9 ↗
13. A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals10.1016/j.ejor.2014.12.030 ↗
14. Seaside operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions10.1007/s10696-013-9178-3 ↗
15. Yard crane scheduling problem in a container terminal considering risk caused by uncertainty10.1016/j.aei.2018.11.004 ↗
16. Transport operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.023 ↗
17. Karakas, S., Kirmizi, M., and Kocaoglu, B. (2021). Correction to: Yard block assignment, internal truck operations, and berth allocation in container terminals: Introducing carbon-footprint minimisation objectives. Marit. Econ. Logist.10.1057/s41278-021-00191-w ↗
18. CO2 emission evaluation of yard tractors during loading at container terminals10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.014 ↗
19. Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.054 ↗
20. Interference aware scheduling of triple-crossover-cranes10.1007/s10951-019-00634-6 ↗
21. A state-of-the-art survey of dispatching rules for manufacturing job shop operations10.1080/00207548208947745 ↗
22. Huang, S.Y., Li, Y., and Guo, X. (2014, January 7–10). Yard crane dispatching to minimize vessel turnaround times in container terminals. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/WSC.2014.7020024 ↗
23. Guo, X., Huang, S.Y., Hsu, W.J., and Low, M.Y.H. (2008, January 7–10). Yard crane dispatching based on real time data driven simulation for container terminals. Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/WSC.2008.4736380 ↗
24. Real-time container storage location assignment at an RTG-based seaport container transshipment terminal: Problem description, control system, simulation model, and penalty scheme experimentation10.1007/s10696-013-9183-6 ↗
25. Performance Comparison of Real-Time Yard Crane Dispatching Strategies at Nontransshipment Container Terminals10.1155/2018/5401710 ↗
26. Gantry crane scheduling in intermodal rail-road container terminals10.1080/00207543.2018.1444812 ↗
27. Li, J., Yang, J., Xu, B., Yin, W., Yang, Y., Wu, J., Zhou, Y., and Shen, Y. (2022). A Flexible Scheduling for Twin Yard Cranes at Container Terminals Considering Dynamic Cut-Off Time. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10050675 ↗
28. Two Yard Crane Scheduling with Dynamic Processing Time and Interference10.1109/TITS.2017.2780256 ↗
29. Integrated scheduling optimization of AGV and double yard cranes in automated container terminals10.1016/j.trb.2023.102871 ↗
30. Container reshuffling considered space allocation problem in container terminals10.1016/j.tre.2020.101869 ↗
31. Twin-crane scheduling during seaside workload peaks with a dedicated handshake area10.1007/s10951-021-00710-w ↗
32. Oladugba, A., and Ajayi, O. (2024). An integrated solution approach for the steady-state modelling of the twin yard crane operation in automated container terminals. SSRN Electron. J.10.2139/ssrn.4905286 ↗
33. A generalized yard crane scheduling problem considering input/output point assignment and crane congestion
34. Kim, T., and Ryu, K.R. (2022). Deriving Situation-Adaptive Policy for Container Stacking in an Automated Container Terminal. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12083892 ↗
35. Optimization approaches for defining storage strategies in maritime container terminals10.1007/s00500-022-06769-7 ↗
36. Applied Materials, Inc. (2015). Applied AutoMod® 12.6.1 User’s Guide, Applied Materials, Inc.