Decision Tree Models for Automated Quality Tools Selection
Source abstract
Abstract
Quality tools have a well-established place in business management. They help diagnose, analyze, and solve quality problems. In manufacturing companies, they are also used in process and product improvement projects. However, only the proper selection of quality tools can bring tangible benefits to an organization. Given their diverse content and methodologies, supporting the selection of these tools becomes a crucial issue. A literature review indicates only a few solutions in this area, implemented as decision support systems. Additionally, the challenges of Quality 4.0 and the demands of modern business reveal a research gap in automating the process of selecting quality tools. This is particularly true for less experienced company employees participating in improvement programs. Our previous research shows how machine learning using neural network models supports the development of an expert system in this area. The aim of this paper is to present the results of research conducted in which classifiers in the form of decision trees were developed. At the same time, attempts were made to demonstrate that decision tree classifiers (on an extended Excellence Toolbox dataset) can automatically recommend qualitative tools with an accuracy better than neural networks, while offering interpretable rules. The decision-tree models achieve strong classification performance, with the best tree reporting 96.75% effectiveness. In contrast, the neural network from previous studies achieved 94.87%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Data Quality and Management · Digital Transformation in Industry · Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 3 Piotrowo Street, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
Faculty of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, 30 Chodkiewicza Street, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Funding
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education · Kazimierz Wielki University
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Application of Quality Tools in a Plastic Based Production Industry to achieve the Continuous Improvement Cycle
2. Improving product quality and production yield in wood flooring manufacturing using basic quality tools10.24874/IJQR15.01-09 ↗
3. Integrated Analysis of the Performance of TQM Tools and Techniques: A Case Study in the Taiwanese Motor Industry10.1080/00207543.2012.676216 ↗
4. Quality Control Tools for Enhancing Manufacturing Performance: A Case Study
5. Hamrol, A. (2023). Quality Management and Engineering. With a Look into Reality 4.0, PWN.
6. (2015). Quality Management Systems–Requirements (Standard No. ISO 9001:2015).
7. Use of quality tools and techniques and their integration into ISO 9001: A wind power supply chain case10.1108/IJQRM-07-2018-0171 ↗
8. The use of quality management tools and techniques in ISO 9001: 2000 certified companies: The Greek case10.1108/17410400910977091 ↗
9. A new lean Six Sigma hybrid method based on the combination of PDCA and the DMAIC to improve process performance: Application to clothing SME10.35530/IT.070.05.1595 ↗
10. Breyfogle, F.W. (2003). Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions using Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons.
11. Starzyńska, B., Bryke, M., and Diakun, J. (2021). Human lean green method -a new approach toward auditing manufacturing & service companies. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su131910789 ↗
12. Wittenberger, G., and Teplická, K. (2024). The Synergy Model of Quality Tools and Methods and Its Influence on Process Performance and Improvement. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14125079 ↗
13. Classification and application of problem solving quality tools: A manufacturing case study10.1108/09544780610685458 ↗
14. The Implementation of Kaizen Principles in Manufacturing Processes: A Pathway to Continuous Improvement
15. Utilization of quality tools: Does sector and size matter?
16. Oakland, J.S. (2014). Total Quality Management and Operational Excellence: Text With Cases, Routledge.
17. The influence of TQM on sustainability performance: The mediating role of green technology innovation in manufacturing firms
18. The impact of “soft” and “hard” TQM elements on quality management results10.1108/02656710910928798 ↗
19. Lean Six Sigma, ISO 9001, and organizational performance: An integrated approach10.1080/10686967.2025.2528597 ↗
20. The Impact of Applying Kaizen on Improving Product Quality: A Case Study in the General Company for Electrical Industries10.59324/ejmeb.2025.2(5).08 ↗
21. The implementation of Lean Six Sigma approach to minimize waste at a food manufacturing industry10.1016/j.jer.2024.01.022 ↗
22. Ibrahim, A., and Kumar, G. (2025). A framework for integrating Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 for sustainable manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1–23.10.1080/00207543.2025.2571202 ↗
23. Quality Management Systems (QMSs): Exploring the Effect of Risk Factors and Developing the Risk Management Framework for QMS Effectiveness in Service Institutions10.1002/qre.70018 ↗
24. Tague, N.R. (2023). The Quality Toolbox, Quality Press.
25. The revolution lean six sigma 4.010.18517/ijaseit.8.1.4593 ↗
26. Lean-green integration and its impact on sustainability performance: A critical review10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117697 ↗
27. Abualfaraa, W., Salonitis, K., Al-Ashaab, A., and Ala’raj, M. (2020). Lean-green manufacturing practices and their link with sustainability: A critical review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12030981 ↗
28. The dimensions of lean-green 4.0 readiness a systematic literature review10.1080/09537287.2024.2348522 ↗
29. Le, H., and Duffy, G. (2023). Human-Centered Lean Six Sigma: Creating a Culture of Integrated Operational Excellence, Productivity Press.10.4324/9781003454892 ↗
30. Classification of quality tools and techniques: A quality management system approach10.1166/asl.2015.6019 ↗
31. Misztal, A., and Ratajszczak, K. (2025). Possibilities of using contemporary quality management methods and tools for the sustainable development of the organization. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17020617 ↗
32. The mediation role of innovation in the relationship between total quality management and performance of small and medium scale enterprises10.1108/IJQRM-12-2021-0427 ↗
33. Quality tools and techniques: Are they necessary for quality management?10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.018 ↗
34. Żukowska, M., Buń, P., Górski, F., and Starzyńska, B. (2019). Cyber sickness in industrial virtual reality training. Proceedings of the International Scientific-Technical Conference Manufacturing, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-18715-6_12 ↗
35. Proposing an integrated framework of seven basic and new quality management tools and techniques: A roadmap
36. A Study of Quality Tools and Techniques in the Context of Industrial Revolution 4.0 in Malaysia. What’s New?
37. Markulik, Š., Šolc, M., and Fiľo, M. (2024). Implementation of Quality Tools in Mechanical Engineering Piece Production. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020944 ↗
38. Integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into Lean Six Sigma DMAIC: A systematic review
39. A review of quality 4.0: Definitions, features, technologies, applications, and challenges10.1080/14783363.2021.1944082 ↗
40. Santos, G., Sá, J.C., Félix, M.J., Barreto, L., Carvalho, F., Doiro, M., Zgodavová, K., and Stefanović, M. (2021). New needed quality management skills for quality managers 4.0. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13116149 ↗
41. On the inclusion of sustainability and digitalisation in quality management—An overview from past to present10.1080/14783363.2020.1848422 ↗
42. Defining Quality 4.0
43. Application of quality tools and process automation in a PVC analysis laboratory10.1504/IJPQM.2025.144342 ↗
44. Quality 4.0: Results from a systematic literature review10.1108/TQM-01-2023-0018 ↗
45. The impact of digital voice of customer and product lifecycle management on Quality 4.0: Moderating role of AI in SMEs10.1108/JMTM-12-2024-0660 ↗
46. Implementation of Quality 4.0, a systematic review of approaches, root causes, and challenges10.1080/08982112.2024.2373360 ↗
47. A bibliometric analysis of Quality 4.0: Current status, trends and future research directions10.1108/IJQRM-10-2023-0322 ↗
48. Excellence toolbox: Decision support system for quality tools and techniques selection and application10.1080/14783363.2012.669557 ↗
49. Development of intelligent decision support system for selection of quality tools and techniques10.18178/ijmlc.2019.9.6.889 ↗
50. Optimizing Quality Tool Selection with Cosine Similarity for Continuous Improvement10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00236 ↗
51. Ibrahim, S.Z., Daril, M.A.M., Subari, K., Wahab, M.I.A., and Ali, K.A.M. (2022). Development of Attributes of Quality Tools and Techniques for Quality Engineering Improvement. Advanced Transdisciplinary Engineering and Technology, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-01488-8_14 ↗
52. Rational Decision for Selection of Quality Tools and Techniques using Cosine Similarity10.31580/apss.v9i1.2362 ↗
53. Supporting the Selection of Quality Tools Using Neural Networks
54. Starzyńska, B., and Rojek, I. (2025). Further Research on Neural Networks in Supporting the Selection of Quality Tools. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance, Springer Nature Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-031-99159-2_20 ↗
55. Rameshkumar, K. (2021). Effective Decision Tree Algorithm for Reality Mining, Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.