Chronic Pain Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review and Illustrative Case Report on Genicular Artery Embolization Using Imipenem/Cilastatin
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: Chronic pain after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) represents a significant clinical issue, often unrelated to mechanical causes and resistant to standard therapies. This work combines a narrative review and a case report to explore the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying persistent post-UKA pain and to propose genicular artery embolization (GAE) with Imipenem/Cilastatin (IPM/CS) as a novel minimally invasive treatment option. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to analyze current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to chronic post-UKA pain, with emphasis on vascular and inflammatory mechanisms. Additionally, a patient with chronic lateral knee pain refractory to conservative management underwent selective GAE targeting hypervascularized genicular branches. Results: Following the procedure, the patient experienced substantial and sustained pain reduction, functional improvement, and no complications. The literature supports synovial neovascularization as a potential pain generator and confirms the safety of IPM/CS due to its transient embolic effect and preservation of normal perfusion. Conclusions: The combination of literature review and clinical evidence suggests that GAE may represent a promising therapeutic alternative for chronic post-UKA pain. Further studies are needed to confirm its efficacy, long-term outcomes, and appropriate indications within this challenging clinical setting.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments · Anesthesia and Pain Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
Institute of Biomechanics, Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), 5020 Salzburg, Austria
Mater Olbia Hospital, SS 125 Orientale Sarda, 07026 Olbia, Italy
References (96)
Show source-provided references
1. Chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty10.1302/2058-5241.3.180004 ↗
2. Knee replacement10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6 ↗
3. Beswick, A.D., Wylde, V., Gooberman-Hill, R., Blom, A., and Dieppe, P. (2012). What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review. BMJ Open, 2.10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435 ↗
4. The STAR care pathway for patients with pain at 3 months after total knee replacement: A multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00371-4 ↗
5. Chronic postoperative pain after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty10.1097/AJP.0000000000000146 ↗
6. Diagnostic algorithm for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty10.3928/01477447-20160119-06 ↗
7. Chronic, active inflammation in patients with failed total knee replacements undergoing revision surgery10.1002/jor.24398 ↗
8. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1007/s11999-010-1506-2 ↗
9. Lewold, S., Robertsson, O., Knutson, K., and Lidgren, L. (1998). Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop. Scandz, 69.10.3109/17453679808997780 ↗
10. Pandit, H., Jenkins, C., Gill, H.S., Barker, K., Dodd, C.A., and Murray, D.W. (2011). Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 uni- compartmental knee replacement: Results of 1000 cases. J. Bone Jt. Surg., 93.10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25767 ↗
11. Emerson, R.H., and Higgin, L.L. (2008). Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J. Bone Jt. Surg., 90.10.2106/JBJS.F.00739 ↗
12. Khan, O.H., Davies, H., Newman, J.H., and Weale, A.E. (2004). Radiological changes ten years after St. Georg Sled unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee, 11.10.1016/j.knee.2004.07.003 ↗
13. Weale, A.E., Murray, D.W., Crawford, R., Psychoyios, V., Bonomo, A., Howell, G., O’Connor, J., and Goodfellow, J.W. (1999). Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after ‘Oxford’ medial unicompartmental arthro-plasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten- year follow-up. J. Bone Jt. Surg., 81.10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.0810783 ↗
14. Aetiology of lateral progression of arthritis following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: A case-control study10.1007/s12306-015-0394-8 ↗
15. Synovial inflammation in osteoarthritis progression10.1038/s41584-022-00749-9 ↗
16. Fundamentals of osteoarthritis: Inflammatory mediators in osteoarthritis10.1016/j.joca.2023.06.005 ↗
17. Mechanisms and targets of angiogenesis and nerve growth in osteoarthritis10.1038/nrrheum.2012.80 ↗
18. Midterm clinical outcomes and MR imaging changes after transcatheter arterial embolization for knee osteoarthritis10.1016/j.jvir.2017.02.033 ↗
19. Genicular artery embolization for the treatment of knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis10.1016/j.jvir.2019.09.018 ↗
20. Cappucci, M., Totti, R., Bocchino, G., Comodo, R.M., Capece, G., Rinaldi, P.M., and De Santis, V. (2025). Genicular Artery Embolization with Imipenem/Cilastatin for Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis of the Knee: A Case Report. Surgeries, 6.10.3390/surgeries6010014 ↗
21. Effectiveness of Genicular Artery Embolization in Chronic Pain After Total Knee Replacement: A Pilot Study10.1016/j.jvir.2023.06.026 ↗
22. Pandit, H., Mancuso, F., Jenkins, C., Jackson, W.F.M., Price, A.J., Dodd, C.A.F., and Murray, D.W. (2017). Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progres-sion after medial unicompartmental replacement. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc., 25.10.1007/s00167-016-4075-4 ↗
23. Dyrhovden, G.S., Lygre, S.H.L., Badawy, M., Gothesen, O., and Furnes, O. (2017). Have the causes of revision for total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties changed during the past two decades?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 475.10.1007/s11999-017-5316-7 ↗
24. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: A systematic review of reasons for failure10.1007/s00264-017-3662-4 ↗
25. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1007/s11999-012-2517-y ↗
26. Why Do Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Fail Today?10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.030 ↗
27. Lateral osteophytes do not represent a contraindication to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A 15-year follow-up10.1007/s00167-016-4313-9 ↗
28. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Modes of Failure and Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty10.1055/s-0037-1601414 ↗
29. Risk factors for the incidence and progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis10.1002/1529-0131(200005)43:5<995::AID-ANR6>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
30. Surgeon, Implant, and Patient Variables May Explain Variability in Early Revision Rates Reported for Unicompartmental Arthroplasty10.2106/JBJS.L.01006 ↗
31. Biomechanical factors in osteoarthritis10.1016/j.berh.2011.11.013 ↗
32. Ehmig, J., Engel, G., Lotz, J., Lehmann, W., Taheri, S., Schilling, A.F., Seif Amir Hosseini, A., and Panahi, B. (2023). MR-Imaging in Osteoarthritis: Current Standard of Practice and Future Outlook. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13152586 ↗
33. High-resolution MRI detects cartilage swelling at the early stages of experimental osteoarthritis10.1053/joca.2001.0413 ↗
34. High-grade trochlear dysplasia increases patellofemoral joint pressure and decreases the knee extension torque, and tibial tubercle anteriorisation does not correct these effects: Biomechanical study in vitro10.1002/ksa.12570 ↗
35. Physiopathology of patello-femoral osteoarthritis: Current concepts10.1016/j.jisako.2024.06.004 ↗
36. Sava, M.P., Leica, A., Scala, I., Beckmann, J., and Hirschmann, M.T. (2023). Significant correlations between postoperative outcomes and various limb and component alignment strategies in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. J. Exp. Orthop., 10.10.1186/s40634-023-00655-3 ↗
37. Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibial behavior following unicondylar knee arthroplasty: Modified resected surface with corresponding surgical technique10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.05.007 ↗
38. Biomechanical Effects of Different Varus and Valgus Alignments in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.006 ↗
39. Li, C., Chen, M., Wang, X., Yan, S., Zhang, K., and Zeng, J.Z. (2025). Research on the biomechanical characteristics of the tibiofemoral joint before and after kinematic alignment unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Surg. Res., 20.10.1186/s13018-025-05659-6 ↗
40. Relevance of the Tibial Slope on Functional Outcomes in ACL-Deficient and ACL Intact Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.041 ↗
41. Biomechanical effect of tibial slope on the stability of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees10.1302/2046-3758.99.BJR-2020-0128.R1 ↗
42. Di Paolo, S., Grassi, A., Lucidi, G.A., Macchiarola, L., Dal Fabbro, G., and Zaffagnini, S. (2022). Biomechanics of the lateral meniscus: Evidences from narrative review. Ann. Jt., 7.10.21037/aoj-20-123 ↗
43. Angiogenesis in the synovium and at the osteochondral junction in osteoarthritis10.1016/j.joca.2007.01.020 ↗
44. Painful Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Etiology, Diagnosis and Management
45. Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is It as Good as a Primary Result?10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.023 ↗
46. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in synovial fibroblasts is induced by hypoxia and interleukin 1beta
47. Clinical utility of eco-color-power Doppler ultrasonography and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for interpretation and quantification of joint synovitis: A review
48. Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. Oxford Skeletal Infection Research and Intervention Service10.1007/s004020000174 ↗
49. Peroneal nerve dysfunction after total knee arthroplasty: Characterization and treatment10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.020 ↗
50. Unicompartmental mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty
51. Cementless medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement
52. The Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.008 ↗
53. The visual analogue scale: Its use in pain measurement10.1007/BF00541514 ↗
54. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010 ↗
55. Roos, E.M., and Lohmander, L.S. (2003). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): From joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes, 1.
56. The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: Validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035 ↗
57. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of the painful unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1016/j.knee.2015.03.007 ↗
58. Power Doppler sonography in the assessment of synovial tissue of the knee joint in rheumatoid arthritis: A preliminary experience10.1136/ard.61.10.877 ↗
59. Chronic infection of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: One-stage conversion to total knee arthroplasty10.1016/j.otsr.2015.04.006 ↗
60. Society of Unicondylar Research and Continuing Education (2012). Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast., 27, 46–50.10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.033 ↗
61. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: A Cochrane systematic review10.1136/bjsports-2015-095424 ↗
62. Unloader bracing in osteoarthritis of the knee—Is there a direct effect on the damaged cartilage?10.1016/j.knee.2022.11.003 ↗
63. Valgus bracing for knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized trials10.1002/acr.22472 ↗
64. Management of Osteoarthritis: Expert Opinion on NSAIDs10.1007/s40122-021-00260-1 ↗
65. Kidd, V.D., Strum, S.R., Strum, D.S., and Shah, J. (2019). Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for painful knee arthritis: The why and the how. JBJS Essent. Surg. Tech., 9.10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00016 ↗
66. The effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis: A systematic Review10.1097/PHM.0000000000001813 ↗
67. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis: Six-month outcomes10.1093/pm/pnx069 ↗
68. A comparison of genicular nerve treatment using either radiofrequency or analgesic block with corticosteroid for pain after a total knee arthroplasty: A double-blind, randomized clinical study10.1111/papr.12481 ↗
69. Management of uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty chronic pain and stiffness utilizing cooled radiofrequency ablation: A single institution pilot study10.1007/s00256-021-03944-z ↗
70. Shi, W., Vu, T.N., Annaswamy, T., Wu, H., Moore, B., Hatchard, N., Mears, C., and Kunselman, A.R. (2024). Effectiveness comparison of genicular nerve ablation for knee osteoarthritic versus post-total knee arthroplasty pain. Interv. Pain Med., 3.10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100390 ↗
71. An original indi-cation for BiUnicondylar knee arthroplasty: Subsequent contralat-eral unicondylar knee arthroplasty after degenerative changes of the opposite compartment10.1097/BTK.0b013e31818f8d31 ↗
72. French Society of Hip and Knee. Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties10.1007/s00264-013-1915-4 ↗
73. Eight Hundred Twenty-Five Medial Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: The First 10-Year US Multi-Center Survival Analysis10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.015 ↗
74. Physical Therapy on Postoperative Day Zero Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 394 Patients10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.010 ↗
75. Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years10.1007/s11999-009-1018-0 ↗
76. Minimum two-year outcomes of modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.044 ↗
77. Is knee function better with contemporary modular bicompartmental arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty? Short-term outcomes of a prospective matched study including 68 cases10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.019 ↗
78. What Role Does Patello-Femoral Joint Degeneration Have on Pain and Function After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Prospective Observational Cohort Study10.1016/j.arth.2023.07.004 ↗
79. Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.2106/00004623-198769090-00004 ↗
80. Multicenter study of unicompartmental knee revision. PCA, Marmor, and St Georg compared in 3,777 cases of arthrosis10.3109/17453679209154777 ↗
81. Revision of failed unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty10.1097/00003086-199302000-00030 ↗
82. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clinical and technical considerations10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90098-5 ↗
83. Revision surgery after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A study of 35 cases10.1054/arth.2000.9841 ↗
84. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1097/00003086-200111000-00036 ↗
85. Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases
86. Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: Strategy and results10.1007/s00264-008-0585-0 ↗
87. The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8–17 years follow-up study of 49 patients10.1007/s00264-009-0811-4 ↗
88. Taslakian, B., Miller, L.E., Mabud, T.S., Macaulay, W., Samuels, J., Attur, M., Alaia, E.F., Kijowski, R., Hickey, R., and Sista, A.K. (2023). Genicular artery embolization for treatment of knee osteoarthritis pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. Open, 5.10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100342 ↗
89. Genicular Artery Embolization: A Review of Essential Anatomic Considerations10.1016/j.jvir.2023.12.010 ↗
90. Nakamura, H., Yamamoto, A., Fukunaga, T., Watanabe, H., Ito, K., Higaki, A., Kanki, A., Fukukura, Y., and Tamada, T. (2024). In vitro study of the embolic characteristics of imipenem/cilastatin particles. CVIR Endovasc., 7.10.1186/s42155-024-00441-x ↗
91. Short-term results of transcatheter arterial embolization for abnormal neovessels in patients with adhesive capsulitis: A pilot study10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.014 ↗
92. Lins, L., and Carvalho, F.M. (2016). SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Med., 4.10.1177/2050312116671725 ↗
93. WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities10.1080/03009749950155562 ↗
94. Singh, J.A., Mahomed, N.N., and Hawker, G.A. (2015). The impact of arthritis on the physical and mental health of older adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2008. BMJ Open, 5.
95. Willinger, M.L., Heimroth, J., Sodhi, N., Garbarino, L.J., Gold, P.A., Rasquinha, V., Danoff, J.R., and Boraiah, S. (2021). Management of refractory pain after total joint replacement. Curr. Pain. Headache Rep., 25.10.1007/s11916-021-00956-1 ↗
96. Use of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of post total knee arthroplasty pain10.1016/j.bpa.2020.07.006 ↗