Developing a Regionally Adaptable CPT-SPT Correlation Using Linear Regression and Genetic Algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
Establishing a correlation between the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) is of significant importance for geotechnical engineering practice. A novel correlation between CPT-qt and SPT-N60 based on a genetic algorithm (GA) and linear regression was proposed in this study. Based on the soil behavior type index (Ic), a GA was first applied to divide the dataset into different Ic intervals. Subsequently, linear regression was performed separately for the data in each interval to establish a correlation between CPT-qt and SPT-N60. Concurrently, the Segmented Information Criterion (SIC) was introduced to perform dual-objective optimization of complexity and prediction accuracy. The results indicate that the proposed model achieved an R2 of 0.60 and an RMSE of merely 8.10. Specifically, the R2 values improved by 33% and 5% compared to the traditional models and the AI models, respectively. On the validation dataset, the proposed model achieved an R2 of 0.67 and an RMSE of 4.33, demonstrating higher accuracy compared to the traditional models. In summary, a method for investigating the CPT-SPT correlation is proposed in this study, characterized by simplicity, efficiency, and enhanced reliability. Additionally, a novel criterion (SIC) for mitigating overfitting is introduced. These two research findings can provide more reliable input parameters for SPT-based design, thereby supporting geotechnical engineering applications, and offer a valuable reference for relevant studies in other regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China
College of Information and Control Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
Funding
Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425) ↗
2. Standard Penetration Test in Engineering Geological Site Investigations–A Review
3. Correlation of SPT–CPT Data from the United Arab Emirates10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00181-3 ↗
4. (2020). Standard Test Method for Electronic Friction Cone and Piezocone Penetration Testing of Soils (Standard No. ASTM D5778-07).
5. A New Approach to the Correlation of SPT-CPT Depending on the Soil Behavior Type Index10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.106996 ↗
6. Shahien, M.M., and Albatal, A.H. (2014, January 13–14). SPT-CPT Correlations for Nile Delta Silty Sand Deposits in Egypt. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
7. SPT and CPT Correlations for Jolshiri Area of Dhaka Reclaimed by Dredged River Sediments
8. A New Approach to Constructing SPT-CPT Correlation for Sandy Soils10.1080/17499518.2022.2083177 ↗
9. Shallow Foundations10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000719 ↗
10. Static Cone to Compute Static Settlement Over Sand10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001418 ↗
11. Correlations between the CPT and the SPT for Some Brazilian Soils
12. Kara, O., and Gündüz, Z. (2010, January 8–12). Correlation between CPT and SPT in Adapazari, Turkey. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Huntington Beach, CA, USA.
13. SPT-CPT Correlation and Its Application for Liquefaction Evaluation in China10.1080/1064119X.2013.872740 ↗
14. Empirical SPT-CPT Correlation for Soils from Lahore, Pakistan10.1088/1757-899X/414/1/012015 ↗
15. A Reliable Correlation of SPT-CPT Data for Southwest of Sweden
16. A New Correlation between SPT and CPT for Various Soils
17. Hossain, B., Zahirul, M.M., and Rahman, A. (2024, January 12–14). Correlation Between SPT and CPT of Various Soil Types in Padma River at Mawa (Downstream Side) Near Padma Bridge. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology (CUET), Chattogram, Bangladesh.10.2139/ssrn.5353695 ↗
18. SPT-CPT Correlations10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:11(1449) ↗
19. Use of CPTu to Estimate Equivalent SPT N6010.1520/GTJ10286J ↗
20. (Fear) Evaluating Cyclic Liquefaction Potential Using the Cone Penetration Test10.1139/t98-017 ↗
21. Lunne, T., Powell, J.J.M., and Robertson, P.K. (2014). Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice, CRC Press.
22. Robertson, P.K. (2012, January 18–21). The James K. Mitchell Lecture: Interpretation of in-Situ Tests–Some Insights. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization–ISC, Pernambuco, Brazil.
23. SPT-CPT Correlations for Granular Soils
24. Kulhawy, F.H., and Mayne, P.W. (1990). Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design, Cornell University. Geotechnical Engineering Group.
25. Semi-Empirical Procedures for Evaluating Liquefaction Potential during Earthquakes10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023 ↗
26. An Initiative to Correlate the SPT and CPT Data for an Alluvial Deposit of Dhaka City10.1186/s40703-021-00170-3 ↗
27. A New SPT-CPT Correlation by Statistical Analysis Based on a Database from Anhui, China10.1080/17499518.2024.2379965 ↗
28. Predicting Standard Penetration Test N-Value from Cone Penetration Test Data Using Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.gsf.2016.02.003 ↗
29. A Model to Predict the Standard Penetration Test N60 Value from Cone Penetration Test Data10.1007/s11204-022-09834-3 ↗
30. The Analysis of the Correlation between SPT and CPT Based on CNN-GA and Liquefaction Discrimination Research10.32604/cmes.2023.029562 ↗
31. Use of CPT and Other Parameters for Estimating SPT-N Value Using Optimised Machine Learning Models
32. Assessment of Existing SPT–CPT Correlations Using a New Zealand Database10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002650 ↗
33. Robertson, P.K. (2025, December 24). Guide to Cone Penetration Testing for Geotechnical Engineering. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/510873365/6th-Edition-of-Guide-to-Cone-Penetration-Testing-now-available-Gregg-Drilling-LLC.
34. The Box Plot: A Simple Visual Method to Interpret Data10.7326/0003-4819-110-11-916 ↗
35. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
36. Lambora, A., Gupta, K., and Chopra, K. (2019, January 14–16). Genetic Algorithm-A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COMITCon), Faridabad, India.10.1109/COMITCon.2019.8862255 ↗
37. CPTu-SPT Correlation Analyses Based on Pairwise Data in Southwestern Taiwan10.1080/17499518.2022.2028848 ↗
38. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
39. Introduction to Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Methods: What They Are and How to Use Them
40. Refined Diebold-Mariano Test Methods for the Evaluation of Wind Power Forecasting Models10.3390/en7074185 ↗