A Seismic Horizon Identification Method Based on scSE-VGG16-UNet++
Source abstract
Abstract
The accuracy of seismic horizon identification results significantly impacts the precision of subsequent structural interpretation and reservoir analysis, making it a critical step in seismic data interpretation. While deep learning achieves horizon identification by establishing a mapping relationship between seismic data and training labels, networks often struggle to learn effectively when faced with highly similar profile features within the same survey area, leading to issues such as discontinuities and horizon mis-ties. To fully leverage the spatial relationships between seismic horizons and enhance network feature extraction capabilities, this paper proposes a progressive methodology based on the VGG16-UNet architecture. This paper first employs data augmentation to enrich seismic profile features and then introduces the Spatial and Channel Squeeze and Excitation (scSE) attention mechanism to improve the representation of salient features, designing the scSE-VGG16-UNet architecture. Building on this foundation, the deep supervision mechanism from UNet++ is integrated to finally propose the data-augmented scSE-VGG16-UNet++ method for seismic horizon identification. Quantitatively, the baseline VGG16-UNet method achieves a Pixel Accuracy (PA) and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of only 93.01% and 46.96%, respectively. Through the synergistic effect of data augmentation, the scSE attention mechanism, and the UNet++ architecture, the final data-augmented scSE-VGG16-UNet++ method elevates these metrics to 97.70% and 79.23%. The test results on both model data and field data demonstrate that the proposed method not only achieves high-continuity horizon identification and effectively mitigates the problem of horizon mis-ties, but also exhibits robust performance in the presence of noise, indicating superior generalization ability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Seismology and Earthquake Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · class General Financial from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Problems and Countermeasures for Construction of China’s Salt Cavern Type Strategic Oil Storage
2. Aki, K., and Richards, P.G. (2002). Quantitative Seismology, University Science Books.
3. Yilmaz, Ö. (2001). Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.9781560801580 ↗
4. Harishidayat, D., Al-Shuhail, A., Randazzo, G., Lanza, S., and Muzirafuti, A. (2022). Reconstruction of Land and Marine Features by Seismic and Surface Geomorphology Techniques. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199611 ↗
5. Borgos, H.G., Skov, T., Randen, T., and Sonneland, L. (2003, January 26–31). Automated Geometry Extraction from 3D Seismic Data. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX, USA.10.1190/1.1817590 ↗
6. 3-D Seismic Attributes Using a Semblance-based Coherency Algorithm10.1190/1.1444415 ↗
7. Eigenstructure-based Coherence Computations as an Aid to 3-D Structural and Stratigraphic Mapping10.1190/1.1444651 ↗
8. Dynamic Warping of Seismic Images10.1190/geo2012-0327.1 ↗
9. Seismic Horizon Extraction with Dynamic Programming10.1190/geo2020-0039.1 ↗
10. Roberts, L.G. (1963). Machine Perception of Three-Dimensional Solids. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
11. Object Enhancement and Extraction
12. Horizon Picking in 3D Seismic Data Volumes10.1007/s00138-004-0151-8 ↗
13. The Study of Application of Edge Measuring Technique to the Detection of Phase Axis of Seismic Section
14. Auto Tracking the Sync Phase Axis of Seismic Profiles
15. Horizon Autopicking10.1190/1.1438636 ↗
16. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90 ↗
17. A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity10.1007/BF02478259 ↗
18. The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in the Brain10.1037/h0042519 ↗
19. Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
20. Self-Organized Formation of Topologically Correct Feature Maps10.1007/BF00337288 ↗
21. Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 ↗
22. Bidirectional Associative Memories10.1109/21.87054 ↗
23. Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition10.1109/5.726791 ↗
24. A Data-Model Interactive Remaining Useful Life Prediction Approach of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on PF-BiGRU-TSAM10.1109/TII.2023.3266403 ↗
25. Machine Learning for Seismic Exploration: Where Are We and How Far Are We from the Holy Grail?10.1190/geo2023-0129.1 ↗
26. Wu, X., Shi, Y., Fomel, S., and Liang, L. (2018, January 14–19). Convolutional Neural Networks for Fault Interpretation in Seismic Images. Proceedings of the SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1190/segam2018-2995341.1 ↗
27. Seismic Stratigraphy Interpretation by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Semisupervised Workflow10.1190/geo2019-0433.1 ↗
28. Waveform Embedding: Automatic Horizon Picking with Unsupervised Deep Learning10.1190/geo2019-0438.1 ↗
29. Seismic Horizon Tracking Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106709 ↗
30. Extracting Horizon Surfaces from 3D Seismic Data Using Deep Learning10.1190/geo2019-0569.1 ↗
31. Automatic Horizon Tracking Method Based on Image Semantic Segmentation
32. Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J., Xie, E., and Wang, W. (2021). Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers . Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., submitted.
33. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021, January 11–17). Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer Using Shifted Windows. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
34. Seismic Horizon Tracking Based on the TransUnet Model10.1190/geo2023-0626.1 ↗
35. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Data Augmentation for Environmental Sound Classification10.1109/LSP.2017.2657381 ↗
36. Imposing Interpretational Constraints on a Seismic Interpretation Convolutional Neural Network10.1190/geo2020-0449.1 ↗
37. Murugan, P. (2017). Feed Forward and Backward Run in Deep Convolution Neural Network. arXiv.
38. Improved U-Net Architecture with VGG-16 for Brain Tumor Segmentation10.1007/s13246-021-01019-w ↗
39. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015, January 5–9). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
40. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv.
41. Digital Selection and Analogue Amplification Coexist in a Cortex-Inspired Silicon Circuit10.1038/35016072 ↗
42. Nair, V., and Hinton, G.E. (2010, January 21–24). Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), Haifa, Israel.
43. Zhou, Z., Siddiquee, M.M.R., Tajbakhsh, N., and Liang, J. (2018). UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_1 ↗
44. Forest Mapping Using a VGG16-UNet++& Stacking Model Based on Google Earth Engine in the Urban Area10.1109/LGRS.2023.3330882 ↗
45. Jähne, B. (2005). Digital Image Processing, Springer.
46. Concurrent Spatial and Channel ‘Squeeze & Excitation’ in Fully Convolutional Networks
47. Hu, J., Shen, L., and Sun, G. (2018, January 18–23). Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
48. Kinga, D., and Adam, J.B. (2015, January 7–9). A Method for Stochastic Optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA, USA.
49. A Tutorial on the Cross-Entropy Method10.1007/s10479-005-5724-z ↗
50. Claerbout, J.F., and Green, I. (2008). Basic Earth Imaging, Citeseer.
51. A Machine-Learning Benchmark for Facies Classification10.1190/INT-2018-0249.1 ↗