journal article·2025-12-30Open access

Agent-Based Decentralized Manufacturing Execution System via Employment Network Collaboration

Moonsoo Shin

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

High variability in multi-product manufacturing environments and rapidly changing customer demands make decentralized coordination of work-in-process (WIP) and production resources increasingly important. However, the intrinsic rigidity of conventional centralized and monolithic manufacturing execution systems (MESs) renders them unsuitable for such highly dynamic environments. To address this limitation, this study proposes an agent-based distributed, decentralized MES architecture. The manufacturing execution process is realized through collaboration among constituent agents based on an employment network (EmNet). Specifically, three types of agents are introduced: WIPAgents (representing WIPs), PAgents (representing processing resources), and MHAgents (representing material-handling resources). Collaboration among agents (e.g., collaborator discovery, partner selection, and data sharing/exchange) is facilitated by a data-space-based collaboration platform which was introduced in our prior work. To validate the proposed architecture, we built a digital-twin-based simulation testbed and conducted simulation experiments. The experimental results confirm the validity and operational feasibility of the proposed architecture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanbat National University, 125, Dongseo-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34158, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Ministry of SMEs and Startups in 2025

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Cyber–physical integration for moving digital factories forward towards smart manufacturing: A survey10.1007/s00170-018-2001-2 ↗
2. Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives10.1007/s11465-018-0499-5 ↗
3. Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison10.1016/j.eng.2019.01.014 ↗
4. Digital twin-based sustainable intelligent manufacturing: A review10.1007/s40436-020-00302-5 ↗
5. Perspective on holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA becomes ARTI10.1016/j.compind.2020.103226 ↗
6. Development of manufacturing execution systems in accordance with Industry 4.0 requirements: A review of standard- and ontology-based methodologies and tools10.1016/j.compind.2020.103300 ↗
7. Zwolińska, B., Tubis, A.A., Chamier-Gliszczyński, N., and Kostrzewski, M. (2020). Personalization of the MES system to the needs of highly variable production. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20226484 ↗
8. Boccella, A.R., Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Murino, T., and Riedel, R. (2020). Evaluating centralized and heterarchical control of smart manufacturing systems in the era of Industry 4.0. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10030755 ↗
9. Applications of agent-based systems in intelligent manufacturing: An updated review10.1016/j.aei.2006.05.004 ↗
10. Smart agents in industrial cyber–physical systems10.1109/JPROC.2016.2521931 ↗
11. CASOA: An architecture for agent-based manufacturing system in the context of Industry 4.010.1109/ACCESS.2017.2758160 ↗
12. The model-based product agent: A control-oriented architecture for intelligent products in multi-agent manufacturing systems10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.03.009 ↗
13. A holonic approach for manufacturing execution system design: An industrial application10.1016/j.engappai.2008.01.007 ↗
14. Event-driven multi-agent ubiquitous manufacturing execution platform for shop floor work-in-progress management10.1080/00207543.2012.693644 ↗
15. Cooperative control in production and logistics10.1016/j.arcontrol.2015.03.001 ↗
16. Agent-based manufacturing execution systems for short-series production scheduling10.1016/j.compind.2016.07.009 ↗
17. Vyskočil, J., Douda, P., Novák, P., and Wally, B. (2023). A digital twin-based distributed manufacturing execution system for Industry 4.0 with AI-powered on-the-fly replanning capabilities. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15076251 ↗
18. Agent-based distributed manufacturing control: A state-of-the-art survey10.1016/j.engappai.2008.09.005 ↗
19. Novas, J.M., Van Belle, J., Saint Germain, B., and Valckenaers, P. (2013). A collaborative framework between a scheduling system and a holonic manufacturing execution system. Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi Agent Manufacturing and Robotics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-35852-4_1 ↗
20. Agent-based manufacturing—Review and expert evaluation10.1007/s00170-023-11517-8 ↗
21. Dynamic self-organization in holonic multi-agent manufacturing systems: The ADACOR evolution10.1016/j.compind.2014.10.011 ↗
22. ADACOR: A holonic architecture for agile and adaptive manufacturing control10.1016/j.compind.2005.05.005 ↗
23. Enterprise integration and interoperability in manufacturing systems: Trends and issues10.1016/j.compind.2007.12.010 ↗
24. Cyber–physical systems for open-knowledge-driven manufacturing execution systems10.1109/JPROC.2015.2509498 ↗
25. Employment contract-based self-organizing mechanism for production resources
26. Development of collaboration model for data space-based open collaboration platform in continuous process industries10.3390/su17010126 ↗
27. Agent-based modeling and simulation of an autonomic manufacturing execution system10.1016/j.compind.2011.10.005 ↗
28. Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA10.1016/S0166-3615(98)00102-X ↗
29. Development and applications of holonic manufacturing systems: A survey10.1007/s10845-005-5516-y ↗
30. Schedule execution in autonomic manufacturing execution systems10.1016/j.jmsy.2007.12.003 ↗
31. Warnecke, H.-J. (1993). The Fractal Company: A Revolution in Corporate Culture, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-78124-7 ↗
32. Agent-based fractal architecture and modelling for developing distributed manufacturing systems10.1080/0020754031000149275 ↗
33. r-FrMS: A relation-driven fractal organisation for distributed manufacturing systems10.1080/00207540802036240 ↗
34. Ueda, K. (1992). A concept for bionic manufacturing systems based on DNA-type information. Human Aspects in Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-444-89465-6.50078-8 ↗
35. Comparison of the bionic, fractal and holonic manufacturing system concepts10.1080/095119296131670 ↗
36. The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver10.1109/TC.1980.1675516 ↗
37. A survey of factory control algorithms that can be implemented in a multi-agent heterarchy: Dispatching, scheduling, and pull10.1016/S0278-6125(98)80077-0 ↗
38. Dynamic restructuring process for self-reconfiguration in the fractal manufacturing system10.1080/00207540500465659 ↗
39. Parunak, H.V.D. (1999). Industrial and practical applications of distributed artificial intelligence. Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press.
40. A multi-agent-based dynamic scheduling of flexible manufacturing systems10.1007/s40171-019-00214-9 ↗
41. Holonic assembly system with Plug and Produce10.1016/S0166-3615(01)00111-7 ↗
42. Agent-based resource model for relation-driven fractal organization
43. Employment contract-based management model of production resources on relation-driven fractal organization
44. Nagel, L., and Lycklama, D. (2024, October 28). Design Principles for Data Spaces. Available online: https://design-principles-for-data-spaces.org/.
45. Gaia-X European Association for Data and Cloud AISBL (2024, October 28). GAIA-X Architecture Document, 22.04 Release. Available online: https://gaia-x.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Gaia-x-Architecture-Document-22.04-Release.pdf.
46. Schöppenthau, F., Patzer, F., Schnebel, B., Watson, K., Baryschnikov, N., Obst, B., Chauhan, Y., Kaever, D., Usländer, T., and Kulkarni, P. (2023). Building a digital manufacturing as a service ecosystem for Catena-X. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23177396 ↗
47. Symbiotic evolution of digital twin systems and dataspaces10.3390/automation3030020 ↗
48. MESA International (2025, November 20). History of the MESA Models. Available online: https://mesa.org/topics-resources/mesa-model/history-of-the-mesa-models/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
49. International Society of Automation (ISA) (2025, November 20). ANSI/ISA-95.00.03-2013 (IEC 62264-3 Modified), Enterprise-Control System Integration—Part 3: Activity Models of Manufacturing Operations Management. Available online: https://www.isa.org/products/ansi-isa-95-00-03-2013-enterprise-control-system-i.