Predicting Concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, CO, VOC, and NOx on the Urban Scale Using Machine Learning-Based Surrogate Models
Source abstract
Abstract
This work addresses the issue of estimating air pollution maps for urban areas. Spatially dense maps of air pollution can be calculated using physical models, such as ADMS-Urban; however, due to the high computational cost of such models, maps are verified with low temporal resolution (such as monthly or yearly averages). We investigate the feasibility of using machine learning models to predict air pollution maps based on historical data and current measurements from a limited number of monitoring stations. The models are trained on spatially dense pollution maps generated by physical models, along with corresponding measurements from monitoring stations and selected meteorological data. We evaluate the performance of the models using real-world data from a central district in Wrocław, Poland, considering various pollutants such as PM2.5, PM10, CO, VOC, and NOx, presented on spatially dense pollution maps with ca. 2×105 points with a 10 × 10 m grid. The results demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively predict air pollution maps with high spatial resolution and a fast inference time, making it suitable for generating pollution maps with significantly higher temporal resolution (e.g., hourly) compared to physical models. We also experimentally demonstrated that PM10, CO, and VOC pollution models can be built based on measurements from PM2.5 monitoring stations only with similar, and in the case of CO, higher, accuracy than using measurements from PM10, CO, and VOC monitoring stations, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LEMITOR Ochrona Środowiska Sp. z o.o., 51-162 Wrocław, Poland
Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. High-resolution urban air pollution mapping10.1126/science.adq3678 ↗
2. Intra-urban variability of the intake fraction from multiple emission sources10.1016/j.apr.2018.05.003 ↗
3. Intake Fraction Variability Between Air Pollution Emission Sources Inside an Urban Area10.1111/risa.12221 ↗
4. Global estimates of daily ambient fine particulate matter concentrations and unequal spatiotemporal distribution of population exposure: A machine learning modelling study10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00008-6 ↗
5. Piracha, A., and Chaudhary, M.T. (2022). Urban Air Pollution, Urban Heat Island and Human Health: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14159234 ↗
6. Yi, P.-Y. (2025). A Review on PM2.5 Sources, Mass Prediction, and Association Analysis: Research Opportunities and Challenges. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17031101 ↗
7. Variations and sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in urban region: Insights from measurements on a tall tower10.5194/acp-22-10567-2022 ↗
8. A comprehensive review of the development of land use regression approaches for modeling spatiotemporal variations of ambient air pollution: A perspective from 2011 to 202310.1016/j.envint.2024.108430 ↗
9. Using a land use regression model with machine learning to estimate ground level PM2.510.1016/j.envpol.2021.116846 ↗
10. Li, X., Guo, X., Chen, J., and Yi, C. (2025). Visualization Study on Trends and Hotspots in the Field of Urban Air Pollution in Metropolitan Areas and Megacities: A Bibliometric Analysis via Science Mapping. Atmosphere, 16.10.3390/atmos16040430 ↗
11. Application of k-means and hierarchi- cal clustering techniques for analysis of air pollution: A review (1980–2019)10.1016/j.apr.2019.09.009 ↗
12. Air pollution prediction using machine learning techniques—An approach to replace existing monitoring stations with virtual monitoring stations10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119987 ↗
13. Spatial estimation of urban air pollution with the use of artificial neural network models10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.058 ↗
14. Computational deep air quality prediction techniques: A systematic review10.1007/s10462-023-10570-9 ↗
15. Deep learning for air pollutant concentration prediction: A review10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119347 ↗
16. Meta-modeling of adms-urban by dimension reduction and emulation10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.009 ↗
17. Application of ADMS-Urban for an area with a high contribution of residential heating emissions—Model verification and sensitivity study for PM2.510.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168011 ↗
18. Jauvion, G., Cassard, T., Quennehen, B., and Lissmyr, D. (2020). Deepplume: Very high resolution real-time air quality mapping. arXiv.
19. Air control toolbox (ACT_v1. 0): A machine learning flexible surrogate model to explore mitigation scenarios in air quality forecasts10.5194/gmd-15-1441-2022 ↗
20. Machine learning-based surrogate modeling for urban water networks: Review and future research directions10.1029/2021WR031808 ↗
21. Efficient surrogate modeling methods for large-scale earth system models based on machine-learning techniques10.5194/gmd-12-1791-2019 ↗
22. Géron, A. (2018). Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems, O’Reilly Media.
23. Principal component analysis10.1002/wics.101 ↗
24. Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 ↗
25. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., and Liu, T.-Y. (2017, January 4–9). Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
26. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python
27. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
28. Prediction of PM2.5 concentrations at the locations of monitoring sites measuring PM10 and NOx, using generalized additive models and machine learning methods: A case study in London10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117757 ↗