Modeling Organizational Resilience in Human-Cyber-Physical Systems (Industry 5.0) Through Collective Dynamics, Decision Scenarios and Crisis-Aware AI: A Multi-Method Simulation Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Supply chain disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic exposed structural vulnerabilities of centrally controlled manufacturing systems, motivating renewed interest in organizational resilience within the context of Industry 5.0 human–cyber–physical systems. This study investigates how organizational decision-making paradigms and crisis-aware artificial intelligence (AI) jointly influence performance, crisis response, and recovery. An agent-based modeling (ABM) framework is developed to compare centralized, distributed, and self-organized organizational structures across 650 simulation runs under a controlled supply side disruption. A crisis-aware Q-learning architecture enables AI agents to shift from efficiency-oriented to stability-oriented strategies when resource scarcity is detected. To avoid baseline-dependent bias, resilience is evaluated using an absolute, capacity-normalized metric. Results indicate that self-organized systems consistently outperform centralized and distributed structures in baseline performance, crisis throughput, and recovery speed. The integration of crisis-aware AI further increases absolute resilience by approximately 10.7% and enables substantially higher throughput during disruption compared to hierarchical control. Enhanced performance is primarily driven by adaptive coalition formation, proactive resource conservation, and rapid post-crisis recovery supported by preserved coordination structures. These findings provide quantitative support for Industry 5.0’s human-centric principles and show that decentralized decision-making augmented by context-adaptive AI offers a robust organizational design strategy for volatile manufacturing environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Entrepreneurship, Business Engineering and Management, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
National Institute for Research & Development in Informatics—ICI, 011555 Bucharest, Romania
Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, ‘Dunărea de Jos’ University of Galati, 800008 Galați, Romania
Funding
National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006 ↗
2. Breque, M., De Nul, L., and Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
3. Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.017 ↗
4. Viable supply chain model: Integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—Lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6 ↗
5. Reconfigurable supply chain: The X-network10.1080/00207543.2020.1774679 ↗
6. McKinsey & Company (2024, December 15). The Semiconductor Decade: A Trillion-Dollar Industry. McKinsey Quarterly. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/semiconductors/our-insights.
7. Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120447 ↗
8. Supply chain management for extreme conditions: Research opportunities10.1111/jscm.12255 ↗
9. Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.002 ↗
10. Human digital twin in the context of Industry 5.010.1016/j.rcim.2023.102626 ↗
11. Machine behaviour10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y ↗
12. What’s “new” about new forms of organizing?10.5465/amr.2011.0436 ↗
13. Smart manufacturing10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644 ↗
14. Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001 ↗
15. Resilience indices for sustainable supply chains: A capacity-anchored approach
16. Absolute resilience metrics as predictors of supply chain failure and bankruptcy
17. Multi-objective reinforcement learning for crisis-aware supply chain coordination
18. Adaptive confidence calibration for AI-assisted decision-making under uncertainty
19. The architecture of complexity
20. The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, opportunism, and quality10.1016/j.jom.2005.07.002 ↗
21. Stigmergy as a universal coordination mechanism I: Definition and components10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.12.002 ↗
22. Sutton, R.S., and Barto, A.G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press. [2nd ed.].
23. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 ↗
24. Resilience and stability of ecological systems10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 ↗
25. Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018 ↗
26. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability10.5751/ES-03610-150420 ↗
27. Organisational resilience: Development of a conceptual framework for organisational responses10.1080/00207543.2011.563827 ↗
28. Bucovețchi, O., Voipan, A.E., Voipan, D., and Stanciu, R.D. (2025). Redefining Organizational Resilience and Success: A Natural Language Analysis of Strategic Domains, Semantics, and AI Opportunities. Systems, 13.10.3390/systems13110999 ↗
29. Representing perceived tradeoffs in defining disaster resilience10.1016/j.dss.2010.10.001 ↗
30. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research, Prentice-Hall.
31. March, J.G., and Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations, Wiley.
32. Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, McGraw-Hill.
33. Baldwin, C.Y., and Clark, K.B. (2000). Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001 ↗
34. Holland, J.H. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity, Addison-Wesley.
35. Open-source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 ↗
36. The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments10.2307/3069401 ↗
37. Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002 ↗
38. A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.006 ↗
39. A survey on concept drift adaptation10.1145/2523813 ↗
40. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse10.1518/001872097778543886 ↗
41. Challenges of real-world reinforcement learning: Definitions, benchmarks and analysis10.1007/s10994-021-05961-4 ↗
42. Bucovetchi, O., Georgescu, A., Badea, D., and Stanciu, R.D. (2019). Agent-Based Modeling (ABM): Support for Emphasizing the Air Transport Infrastructure Dependence of Space Systems. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11195331 ↗
43. A critical guide to empirical validation of agent-based models in economics: Methodologies, procedures, and open problems10.1007/s10614-007-9104-4 ↗
44. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance10.1126/science.1106340 ↗
45. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks10.1038/30918 ↗
46. Emergence of scaling in random networks10.1126/science.286.5439.509 ↗
47. Zhang, K., Yang, Z., and Başar, T. (2021). Multi-agent reinforcement learning: A selective overview of theories and algorithms. Handbook of Reinforcement Learning and Control, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-60990-0_12 ↗
48. Thomson, R., Bisgin, H., Dancy, C., Hyder, A., and Hussain, M. (2020). Utilizing Python for agent-based modeling: The Mesa framework. Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-61255-9 ↗
49. New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.001 ↗
50. Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books.
51. Task complexity effects on between-individual learning/forgetting variability10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00070-1 ↗
52. Human factors in order picking
53. Do peers make the place?10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082 ↗
54. Groover, M.P. (2020). Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Pearson. [5th ed.].
55. Brooks, F.P. (1995). The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley.
56. Hackman, J.R. (2002). Leading Teams, Harvard Business Press.
57. A history of the span of management10.2307/257693 ↗
58. Q-Learning
59. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning10.1038/nature14236 ↗
60. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 ↗
61. The structure and function of complex networks10.1137/S003614450342480 ↗
62. Supply chain disruptions from COVID-19
63. Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727 ↗
64. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008 ↗
65. Array programming with NumPy10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 ↗
66. On the evolution of social and organizational networks
67. Complexity theory and organization science10.1287/orsc.10.3.216 ↗
68. Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 ↗
69. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system10.1177/001872675100400101 ↗
70. Building the resilient supply chain10.1108/09574090410700275 ↗
71. Foerster, J., Assael, I.A., de Freitas, N., and Whiteson, S. (2016). Learning to communicate with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc.
72. Unveiling the structure of supply networks: Case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00025-6 ↗