journal article·2025-12-28Open access

A Lightweight Traffic Sign Small Target Detection Network Suitable for Complex Environments

Zonghong Feng, Liangchang Li, Kai Xu, Yong Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

With the increasing frequency of traffic safety issues and the rapid development of autonomous driving technology, traffic sign detection is highly susceptible to adverse weather conditions such as changes in light intensity, fog, rain, snow, and partial occlusion, which places higher demands on the accurate recognition of traffic signs. This paper proposes an improved DAYOLO model based on YOLOv8n, aiming to balance detection accuracy and model complexity. First, the Bottleneck in the C2f module of the YOLOv8n backbone network is replaced with Bottleneck DAttention. Introducing DAttention allows for more effective feature extraction, thereby improving model performance. Second, an ultra-lightweight and efficient upsampler, Dysample, is introduced into the neck network to further improve performance and reduce computational overhead. Finally, a Task-Aligned Dynamic Detection Head (TADDH) is introduced. TADDH enhances task interaction through a dynamic mechanism and utilizes shared convolutional modules to reduce parameters and improve efficiency. Simultaneously, an additional Layer2 detection head is added to the model to strengthen the extraction and fusion of features at different scales, thereby improving the detection accuracy of small traffic signs. Furthermore, replacing SlideLoss with NWDLoss can better handle prediction results with more complex distributions and more accurately measure the distance between predicted and ground truth boxes in the feature space during object detection. Experimental results show that DAYOLO achieves 97.2% mAP on the SDCCVP dataset, which is 5.3 higher than the baseline model YOLOv8n; the frame rate reaches 120, which is 37.8% higher than YOLOv8; and the number of parameters is reduced by 6.2%, outperforming models such as YOLOv3, YOLOv5, YOLOv6, and YOLOv7. In addition, DAYOLO achieves 80.8 mAP on the TT100K dataset, which is 9.2% higher than the baseline model YOLOv8n. The proposed method achieves a balance between model size and detection accuracy, meets the needs of traffic sign detection, and provides new ideas and methods for future research in the field of traffic sign detection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Neural Network Applications · Fire Detection and Safety Systems · Advanced Data and IoT Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mathematics and Physics, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China

School of Sciences, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

Intelligent Perception and Control Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Yibin 644000, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Young Scholars Science Foundation of Lanzhou Jiaotong University · Foundation for Innovative Fundamental Research Group Project of Gansu Province · Sichuan Provincial Natural Science Foundation · Central Government Funds of Guiding Local Scientific and Technological Development · Chengdu Science and Technology Project · Sichuan Province Science and Technology Innovation Seedling Engineering Cultivation Project · Open Fund for Key Laboratory of Numerical Simulation of Sichuan Provincial Universities · Open Fund for State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering · Open Fund for Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Intelligent Information Processing of Fujian Education Institutions

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Houben, S., Stallkamp, J., Salmen, J., Schlipsing, M., and Igel, C. (2013, January 4–9). Detection of traffic signs in real-world images: The German Traffic Sign Detection Benchmark. Proceedings of the 2013 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/IJCNN.2013.6706807 ↗
2. An overview of traffic sign detection and classification methods10.1007/s13735-017-0129-8 ↗
3. On circular traffic sign detection and recognition10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.018 ↗
4. Fast and robust road sign detection in driver assistance systems10.1007/s10489-018-1199-x ↗
5. Traffic sign detection based on visual co-saliency in complex scenes10.1007/s10489-018-1298-8 ↗
6. A trainable system for object detection10.1023/A:1008162616689 ↗
7. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 25, Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2012/file/c399862d3b9d6b76c8436e924a68c45b-Paper.pdf.
8. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., and Malik, J. (2014, January 23–28). Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 ↗
9. Girshick, R. (2015). Fast r-cnn. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
10. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
11. Cai, Z., and Vasconcelos, N. (2018, January 18–22). Cascade r-cnn: Delving into high quality object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00644 ↗
12. Redmon, J. (July, January 26). You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
13. Yolov3: An incremental improvement
14. Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.Y., and Liao, H.Y.M. (2020). Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection. arXiv.
15. Li, C., Li, L., Jiang, H., Weng, K., Geng, Y., Li, L., Ke, Z., Li, Q., Cheng, M., and Nie, W. (2022). YOLOv6: A single-stage object detection framework for industrial applications. arXiv.
16. Wang, C.Y., Bochkovskiy, A., and Liao, H.Y.M. (2023, January 18–22). YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00721 ↗
17. Sohan, M., Sai Ram, T., Reddy, R., and Venkata, C. (2024). A review on yolov8 and its advancements. Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics, Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics, Tirunelveli, India, 27–28 June 2023, Springer.10.1007/978-981-99-7962-2_39 ↗
18. Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.Y., and Berg, A.C. (2016). Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. Computer Vision–ECCV 2016, Proceedings of the 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 11–14 October 2016, Proceedings, Part I, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
19. Deep detection network for real-life traffic sign in vehicular networks10.1016/j.comnet.2018.02.026 ↗
20. Shao, F., Wang, X., Meng, F., Zhu, J., Wang, D., and Dai, J. (2019). Improved faster R-CNN traffic sign detection based on a second region of interest and highly possible regions proposal network. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19102288 ↗
21. Traffic sign detection based on improved faster R-CNN for autonomous driving10.1007/s11227-021-04230-4 ↗
22. Real-Time Detection Method for Small Traffic Signs Based on Yolov310.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984554 ↗
23. Improved YOLOv5 network for real-time multi-scale traffic sign detection10.1007/s00521-022-08077-5 ↗
24. Kaur, R., and Singh, J. (2022, January 16–17). Local Regression Based Real-Time Traffic Sign Detection using YOLOv6. Proceedings of the 2022 4th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N), Greater Noida, India.10.1109/ICAC3N56670.2022.10074236 ↗
25. Li, S., Wang, S., and Wang, P. (2023). A small object detection algorithm for traffic signs based on improved YOLOv7. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23167145 ↗
26. Small object detection algorithm based on improved YOLOv10 for traffic sign
27. Jiang, L., and Zhan, P. (2025, January 29–31). FM-YOLOv11: A Lightweight Traffic Sign Detection Network Based on Mixed Attention. Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence, Dalian, China.10.1145/3730436.3730509 ↗
28. Detection Framework for Traffic Signs Using a Hybrid Approach10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3606754 ↗
29. Lei, M., Li, S., Wu, Y., Hu, H., Zhou, Y., Zheng, X., Ding, G., Du, S., Wu, Z., and Gao, Y. (2025). YOLOv13: Real-Time Object Detection with Hypergraph-Enhanced Adaptive Visual Perception. arXiv.
30. Sapkota, R., Cheppally, R.H., Sharda, A., and Karkee, M. (2025). Yolo26: Key architectural enhancements and performance benchmarking for real-time object detection. arXiv.
31. Akatsuka, H., and Imai, S. (1987). Road Signposts Recognition System; Technical Report, SAE Technical Paper, SAE International.10.4271/870239 ↗
32. Traffic sign detection method with multi-channel integration
33. Chen, L., Li, Q., Li, M., and Mao, Q. (2011, January 5–9). Traffic sign detection and recognition for intelligent vehicle. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Baden-Baden, Germany.10.1109/IVS.2011.5940543 ↗
34. Jeon, W.J., Sanchez, G.A.R., Lee, T., Choi, Y., Woo, B., Lim, K., and Byun, H. (2014, January 9–11). Real-time detection of speed-limit traffic signs on the real road using haar-like features and boosted cascade. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, Siem Reap, Cambodia.10.1145/2557977.2558091 ↗
35. Yakimov, P., and Fursov, V. (2015, January 20–22). Traffic signs detection and tracking using modified hough transform. Proceedings of the 2015 12th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications (ICETE), Colmar, France.10.5220/0005543200220028 ↗
36. Zaklouta, F., and Stanciulescu, B. (2011, January 20–23). Real-time traffic sign recognition using spatially weighted HOG trees. Proceedings of the 2011 15th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), Tallinn, Estonia.10.1109/ICAR.2011.6088571 ↗
37. Real-time traffic-sign recognition using tree classifiers10.1109/TITS.2012.2225618 ↗
38. Wang, C.-Y., Yeh, I.-H., and Liao, H.-Y. (2024). M. Yolov9: Learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information. Computer Vision–ECCV 2024, Proceedings of the 18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, 29 September–4 October 2024, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-72751-1_1 ↗
39. Yolov10: Real-time end-to-end object detection
40. Khanam, R., and Hussain, M. (2024). Yolov11: An overview of the key architectural enhancements. arXiv.
41. Tian, Y., Ye, Q., and Doermann, D. (2025). Yolov12: Attention-centric real-time object detectors. arXiv.
42. Xia, Z., Pan, X., Song, S., Li, L.E., and Huang, G. (2022, January 19–20). Vision transformer with deformable attention. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00475 ↗
43. Liu, W., Lu, H., Fu, H., and Cao, Z. (2023, January 1–6). Learning to upsample by learning to sample. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Paris, France.10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00554 ↗
44. Wang, J., Xu, C., Yang, W., and Yu, L. (2021). A normalized Gaussian Wasserstein distance for tiny object detection. arXiv.
45. Car, S. (2025, January 12). Self-Driving Cars Dataset. Available online: https://universe.roboflow.com/selfdriving-car-qtywx/self-driving-cars-lfjou.
46. Zhaosheng, Y., Tao, L., Tianle, Y., Chengxin, J., and Chengming, S. (2022). Rapid detection of wheat ears in orthophotos from unmanned aerial vehicles in fields based on YOLOX. Front. Plant Sci., 13.10.3389/fpls.2022.851245 ↗
47. Zhu, Z., Liang, D., Zhang, S., Huang, X., Li, B., and Hu, S. (July, January 26). Traffic-sign detection and classification in the wild. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
48. Incorporating real-time traffic and weather data to explore road accident likelihood and severity in urban arterials10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.003 ↗
49. Effectiveness of traditional augmentation methods for rebar counting using UAV imagery with Faster R-CNN and YOLOv10-based transformer architectures10.1038/s41598-025-18964-1 ↗
50. Buslaev, A., Iglovikov, V.I., Khvedchenya, E., Parinov, A., Druzhinin, M., and Kalinin, A.A. (2020). Albumentations: Fast and Flexible Image Augmentations. Information, 11.10.3390/info11020125 ↗
51. The pascal visual object classes challenge: A retrospective10.1007/s11263-014-0733-5 ↗
52. Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., and Zitnick, C.L. (2014). Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. Computer Vision–ECCV 2014, Proceedings of the 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, 6–12 September 2014, Proceedings, Part V, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 ↗
53. YOLO with adaptive frame control for real-time object detection applications10.1007/s11042-021-11480-0 ↗