journal article·2025-12-25Open access

Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Cancer Complications Using Smartphone Sensor Data: A Prospective Study

Gabrielė Dargė, Gabrielė Kasputytė, Paulius Savickas, Adomas Bunevičius, Inesa Bunevičienė, Erika Korobeinikova, Domas Vaitiekus, Arturas Inčiūra, Laimonas Jaruševičius, Romas Bunevičius, Ričardas Krikštolaitis, Tomas Krilavičius, Elona Juozaitytė

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

Complications are frequent in cancer patients and contribute to adverse outcomes and higher healthcare costs, underscoring the need for earlier identification and prediction. This study evaluated the feasibility of using passively generated smartphone sensor data to explore early-warning signals of complications and symptom worsening during cancer treatment. A total of 108 patients were continuously monitored using accelerometer, GPS, and screen on/off data collected through the LAIMA application, while symptoms of depression, fatigue, and nausea were assessed every two weeks and complications were confirmed during clinic visits or emergency presentations. Smartphone data streams were aggregated into variables describing activity and sociability patterns. Machine learning models, including Decision Tree, Extreme Gradient Boosting, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Support Vector Machine, were used for complication prediction, and time-series models such as Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, Holt–Winters, TBATS, Long Short-Term Memory neural network, and General Regression Neural Network were applied to identify early behavioral changes preceding symptom reports. In this exploratory analysis, the ensemble model demonstrated high sensitivity (89%) for identifying complication events. Smartphone-derived behavioral indicators enabled earlier detection of depression, fatigue, and vomiting by about nine days in a subset of patients. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of passive smartphone sensor data as exploratory early-warning signals, warranting validation in larger cohorts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cancer survivorship and care · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Nausea and vomiting management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentų 10, Kaunas District, LT-53361 Akademija, Lithuania

Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10033, USA

Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy, Vytautas Magnus University, LT-44212 Kaunas, Lithuania

Oncology Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-45434 Kaunas, Lithuania

ProIT, LT-09312 Vilnius, Lithuania

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview10.1002/ijc.33588 ↗
2. Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: Results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S
3. Oral complications of cancer and cancer therapy
4. Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer Therapy10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.050 ↗
5. Cerebrovascular Complications in Patients with Cancer10.1097/00005792-198501000-00002 ↗
6. The Most Common Side Effects Experienced by Patients Were Receiving First Cycle of Chemotherapy
7. Selenium for alleviating the side effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery in cancer patients
8. Assessing the likelihood of severe side effects in radiotherapy10.1002/ijc.21782 ↗
9. Treatment-Related Complications of Systemic Therapy and Radiotherapy10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0086 ↗
10. Remote Oncology Care: Review of Current Technology and Future Directions
11. Key components of successful digital remote monitoring in oncology10.1038/s41591-022-01841-z ↗
12. Analyzing patient health information based on IoT sensor with AI for improving patient assistance in the future direction10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107757 ↗
13. Low-Power Wearable ECG Monitoring System for Multiple-Patient Remote Monitoring10.1109/JSEN.2016.2564995 ↗
14. Chronic patient remote monitoring through the application of big data and internet of things
15. Mohammed, J., Lung, C.H., Ocneanu, A., Thakral, A., Jones, C., and Adler, A. (2014, January 1–3). Internet of Things: Remote Patient Monitoring Using Web Services and Cloud Computing. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings), and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/iThings.2014.45 ↗
16. Benefits of remote real-time side-effect monitoring systems for patients receiving cancer treatment10.4081/oncol.2012.e7 ↗
17. Majumder, S., and Deen, M.J. (2019). Smartphone Sensors for Health Monitoring and Diagnosis. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19092164 ↗
18. Papachristou, N., Puschmann, D., Barnaghi, P., Cooper, B., Hu, X., Maguire, R., Apostolidis, K., Conley, Y.P., Hammer, M., and Katsaragakis, S. (2018). Learning from data to predict future symptoms of oncology patients. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0208808 ↗
19. Conventional Regression Analysis and Machine Learning in Prediction of Anastomotic Leakage and Pulmonary Complications after Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery10.1002/jso.26910 ↗
20. Evaluating frailty, mortality, and complications associated with metastatic spine tumor surgery using machine learning–derived body composition analysis10.3171/2022.1.SPINE211284 ↗
21. Symptom clustering in older Taiwanese children with cancer10.1188/08.ONF.273-281 ↗
22. Symptom cluster analyses based on symptom occurrence and severity ratings among pediatric oncology patients during myelosuppressive chemotherapy10.1097/NCC.0b013e31822909fd ↗
23. Sickness Behavior Clustering in Children with Cancer10.1177/1043454211409586 ↗
24. Symptom clusters in children and adolescents receiving cisplatin, doxorubicin, or ifosfamide10.1188/10.ONF.E16-E27 ↗
25. Neijenhuijs, K.I., Peeters, C.F.W., van Weert, H., Cuijpers, P., and Leeuw, I.C.-de (2021). Symptom clusters among cancer survivors: What can machine learning techniques tell us?. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 21.10.1186/s12874-021-01352-4 ↗
26. Phase III randomized controlled trial of eRAPID: eHealth intervention during chemotherapy10.1200/JCO.20.02015 ↗
27. Digital phenotyping for monitoring mental disorders: Systematic review10.2196/46778 ↗
28. Machine learning versus logistic regression for the prediction of complications after pancreatoduodenectomy10.1016/j.surg.2023.03.012 ↗
29. Predicting Surgical Complications in Adult Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Machine Learning10.14245/ns.1836248.124 ↗
30. Performance of machine learning approaches on prediction of esophageal varices for Egyptian chronic hepatitis C patients10.1016/j.imu.2019.100267 ↗
31. Development and validation of machine learning models to predict gastrointestinal leak and venous thromboembolism after weight loss surgery: An analysis of the MBSAQIP database10.1007/s00464-020-07378-x ↗
32. Application of kNN and SVM to predict the prognosis of advanced schistosomiasis10.1007/s00436-022-07583-8 ↗
33. Watson, L., Qi, S., DeIure, A., Link, C., Chmielewski, L., Hildebrand, A., Rawson, K., and Ruether, D. (2021). Using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Modelling to Forecast Symptom Complexity in an Ambulatory Oncology Clinic: Harnessing Predictive Analytics and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18168365 ↗
34. Medina, D.C., Findley, S.E., Guindo, B., and Doumbia, S. (2007). Forecasting non-stationary diarrhea, acute respiratory infection, and malaria time-series in Niono, Mali. PLoS ONE, 2.10.1371/journal.pone.0001181 ↗
35. Bhateja, V., Khin Wee, L., Lin, J.C.W., Satapathy, S.C., and Rajesh, T.M. (2022). Development of Prediction and Forecasting Model for Dengue Disease Based on the Environmental Conditions Using LSTM. Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing, Springer. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.10.1007/978-981-19-1559-8 ↗
36. Usage of Probabilistic and General Regression Neural Network for Early Detection and Prevention of Oral Cancer10.1155/2015/234191 ↗
37. Evaluation of health-related quality of life in Lithuanian brain tumor patients using the EORTC brain cancer module
38. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Off. J. Eur. Union, 4, 1–88.
39. Robert, J., and Hijmans van Etten, J. (2023, September 03). The Distance for Longitude/Latitude Data Uses Geographic Lib by C.F.F. Karney. Available online: https://rdrr.io/cran/raster/man/pointDistance.html.
40. Using Smartphones to Capture Novel Recovery Metrics After Cancer Surgery10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4702 ↗
41. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 ↗
42. Can mHealth interventions improve quality of life of cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103123 ↗
43. Digital phenotyping for mental health of college students: A clinical review
44. Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: A systematic review of methods10.1038/s41746-021-00548-8 ↗
45. Trends in Adult Cancer-Related Emergency Department Utilization: An Analysis of Data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2450 ↗
46. Patient-facing cancer mobile apps that enable patient reported outcome data to be collected: A systematic review of content, functionality, quality, and ability to integrate with electronic health records10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104931 ↗
47. Charbonneau, D.H., Hightower, S., Katz, A., Zhang, K., Abrams, J., Senfit, N., Beebe-Dimmer, J.L., Heath, E., Eaton, T., and Thompson, H.S. (2020). Smartphone apps for cancer: A content analysis of the digital health marketplace. Digit. Health, Volume 6.10.1177/2055207620905413 ↗
48. The HOPE Pilot Study: Harnessing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Biometric Data to Enhance Cancer Care10.1200/CCI.17.00149 ↗
49. Smartphone Global Positioning System (GPS) Data Enhances Recovery Assessment After Breast Cancer Surgery10.1245/s10434-020-09004-5 ↗