journal article·2025-12-24Open access

Honey Bee Lifecycle Activity Prediction Using Non-Invasive Vibration Monitoring

Piotr Książek, Bogusław Szlachetko, Adam Roman

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

Honey bees are essential both for many global ecosystems and apicultural production. The management of bee colonies remains labour-intensive, which drives a need for automated solutions. This work presents a proof-of-concept system to monitor honey bee activity by identifying the yearly lifecycle stages exhibited by the colony. A non-invasive vibration monitoring system was developed and placed on top of brood frames in Warsaw-type beehives to collect vibration data over a full apicultural season. The recorded vibration signals were analyzed using both Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and classical machine learning approaches such as the extra trees method. Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation (RFECV) was performed to isolate the most important frequency bins for lifecycle period identification. The results demonstrate that the critical frequencies for recognizing yearly honey bee activity are concentrated below 1 kHz. The proposed machine learning models achieved a weighted accuracy score of over 95%. These findings have significant implications for future bee monitoring hardware design, indicating that sampling frequencies may be reduced to as low as 2 kHz without significantly compromising model accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Insect and Pesticide Research · Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Acoustics, Multimedia and Signal Processing, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Stanisława Wyspiańskiego St., 50-370 Wrocław, Poland

Division of Apiculture, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Norwida 25 St., 50-375 Wrocław, Poland

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. IoT and AI Systems for Enhancing Bee Colony Strength in Precision Beekeeping: A Survey and Future Research Directions
2. Szczurek, A., Maciejewska, M., and Batog, P. (2023). Monitoring System Enhancing the Potential of Urban Beekeeping. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010597 ↗
3. European beekeepers’ interest in digital monitoring technology adoption for improved beehive management10.1016/j.compag.2024.109556 ↗
4. Socio-Demographic Factors Influencing Adoption of Digital Technologies in Beekeeping
5. Turyagyenda, A., Katumba, A., Akol, R., Nsabagwa, M., and Mkiramweni, M.E. (2025). IoT and Machine Learning Techniques for Precision Beekeeping: A Review. AI, 6.10.3390/ai6020026 ↗
6. Dsouza, A., P, A., and Hegde, S. (2023). HiveLink, an IoT based Smart Bee Hive Monitoring System. arXiv.
7. Within-day variation in continuous hive weight data as a measure of honey bee colony activity10.1051/apido:2008055 ↗
8. A computer vision system to monitor the infestation level of Varroa destructor in a honeybee colony10.1016/j.compag.2019.104898 ↗
9. Hearing in honeybees: Localization of the auditory sense organ10.1007/BF00212691 ↗
10. Hearing in honeybees: The mechanical response of the bee’s antenna to near field sound10.1007/BF00192985 ↗
11. Sound and vibrational signals in the dance language of the honeybee, Apis mellifera10.1007/BF00290824 ↗
12. Honey bee workers generate low-frequency vibrations that are reliable indicators of their activity level10.1007/s00359-018-1305-x ↗
13. Measuring the frequency response of the honeybee thorax10.1088/1748-3190/ab835b ↗
14. Ramsey, M., Bencsik, M., and Newton, M.I. (2017). Long-term trends in the honeybee whooping signal’ revealed by automated detection. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0181736 ↗
15. The prediction of swarming in honeybee colonies using vibrational spectra10.1038/s41598-020-66115-5 ↗
16. Extensive Vibrational Characterisation and Long-Term Monitoring of Honeybee Dorso-Ventral Abdominal Vibration signals10.1038/s41598-018-32931-z ↗
17. Cejrowski, T., Szymański, J., Mora, H., and Gil, D. (2018). Detection of the Bee Queen Presence Using Sound Analysis. Intelligent Information and Database Systems, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-75420-8_28 ↗
18. Advancing Beekeeping: IoT and TinyML for Queen Bee Monitoring Using Audio Signals
19. Zgank, A. (2020). Bee Swarm Activity Acoustic Classification for an IoT-Based Farm Service. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20010021 ↗
20. Empirical Analysis of Honeybees Acoustics as Biosensors Signals for Swarm Prediction in Beehives10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3471895 ↗
21. Kulyukin, V., Mukherjee, S., and Amlathe, P. (2018). Toward Audio Beehive Monitoring: Deep Learning vs. Standard Machine Learning in Classifying Beehive Audio Samples. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8091573 ↗
22. Libal, U., and Biernacki, P. (2024). Non-Intrusive System for Honeybee Recognition Based on Audio Signals and Maximum Likelihood Classification by Autoencoder. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24165389 ↗
23. Platform for bee-hives monitoring based on sound analysis. A perpetual warehouse for swarm’s daily activity10.5424/sjar/2009074-1109 ↗
24. Acoustic and vibration monitoring of honeybee colonies for beekeeping-relevant aspects of presence of queen bee and swarming10.1016/j.compag.2022.107589 ↗
25. Šabić, J., Perković, T., Šolić, P., and Šerić, L. (2025). Buzzing with Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Smart Beehive Technologies. Sensors, 25.10.20944/preprints202507.2193.v1 ↗
26. Overwintering honey bees: Biology and management10.1016/j.cois.2015.05.014 ↗
27. Winston, M.L. (1991). The Biology of the Honey Bee, Harvard University Press.
28. Fundamental Frequency Extraction by Utilizing the Modified Weighted Autocorrelation Function in Noisy Speech10.1007/978-981-99-9531-8_6 ↗
29. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901 ↗
30. Ksiazek, P., and Libal, U. (2025, January 8–10). Impact of Time of Day on Spectral and Entropic Parameters of Honeybee Audio Signals. Proceedings of the 2025 Signal Processing Symposium (SPSympo), Warsaw, Poland.10.23919/SPSympo63739.2025.11123891 ↗
31. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv.
32. Extremely Randomized Trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
33. Awad, M., and Fraihat, S. (2023). Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation with Decision Tree: Feature Selection Method for Machine Learning-Based Intrusion Detection Systems. J. Sens. Actuator Netw., 12.10.3390/jsan12050067 ↗
34. Książek, P., Libal, U., and Król-Nowak, A. (2025). Spectral Components of Honey Bee Sound Signals Recorded Inside and Outside the Beehive: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach to Diurnal Pattern Recognition. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25144424 ↗
35. Amlathe, P. (2018). Standard Machine Learning Techniques in Audio Beehive Monitoring: Classification of Audio Samples with Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest and Support Vector Machine. [Master’s Thesis, Utah State University].
36. Zippenfenig, P. (2025, December 15). Open-Meteo.com Weather API. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/14582479.