journal article·2025-12-20Open access

Ultrasound Training in the Digital Age: Insights from a Multidimensional Needs Assessment

Johannes Matthias Weimer, Florian Recker, Thomas Vieth, Samuel Kuon, Andreas Michael Weimer, Julia Weinmann Menke, Holger Buggenhagen, Julian Künzel, Maximilian Rink, Daniel Merkel, Lukas Müller, Lukas Pillong, Liv Weimer

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Digitalisation is transforming medical education, but its integration into ultrasound training remains limited. This study evaluates the needs of students and physicians regarding digitally supported ultrasound education. Materials and Methods: A multi-year cross-sectional study (2017–2022) employed two standardised questionnaires. The first assessed the perceived relevance of ultrasound in medical education, the desirability of compulsory teaching, and the integration of digital media and case-based learning. The second explored user-centred requirements for e-learning formats, including functionality, multimedia design, usability, interactivity, and financing, as well as current use of digital devices and reference materials. Data were collected using dichotomous and 7-point Likert scales (1 = high need/strong agreement, 7 = low need/weak agreement). Results: A total of 3479 responses were analysed (2821 students; 658 physicians). Both groups showed strong support for integrating ultrasound into curricula (1.3 ± 0.7) and mandatory education (1.4 ± 0.9), with students expressing significantly greater support (p < 0.001). There was broad agreement on the integration and development of digital media (1.7 ± 1.0), as well as the use of case studies (1.4 ± 0.8), with no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). Case-based learning as a stand-alone format was less favoured (3.4 ± 1.9). In the user-centred needs analysis, both groups rated features like search functions (1.4 ± 0.8), usability (1.5 ± 0.9), and learning objective checks (2.7 ± 1.6) as important. High-quality media (1.5 ± 0.9) and pathology explanations (1.6 ± 1.1) were also highly valued. Students primarily relied on digital platforms, while physicians used a more varied mix of digital platforms, guidelines, and textbooks. Conclusions: The study highlights the need for more extensive, digitally supported ultrasound training, with a focus on functionality and usability. Standardisation through structured certification processes should be considered for future implementation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound in Clinical Applications · Radiology practices and education · Social Media in Health Education

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Rudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany

Department of Medicine I and Center for Immunotherapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany

Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany

Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany

BIKUS—Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Mainz University Hospital, 55131 Mainz, Germany

Department for Otorhinolaryngology and Head- and Neck-Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, 66424 Homburg, Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. History of Ultrasound in Medicine from its birth to date (2022), on occasion of the 50 Years Anniversary of EFSUMB. A publication of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound In Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB), designed to record the historical development of medical ultrasound10.11152/mu-3757 ↗
2. A survey of barriers and facilitators to ultrasound use in low- and middle-income countries10.1038/s41598-023-30454-w ↗
3. Point-of-care ultrasound in internal medicine: A position paper by the ultrasound working group of the European federation of internal medicine10.1016/j.ejim.2019.11.016 ↗
4. The use of ultrasonography in learning clinical examination—A pilot study involving third year medical students10.11152/mu.2013.2066.143.df177 ↗
5. The State of Ultrasound Education in U.S. Medical Schools: Results of a National Survey10.1097/ACM.0000000000000414 ↗
6. Evidence-based Ultrasound Education?—A Systematic Literature Review of Undergraduate Ultrasound Training Studies
7. International consensus conference recommendations on ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students10.1186/s13089-022-00279-1 ↗
8. EFSUMB Statement on Medical Student Education in Ultrasound [long version]10.1055/s-0035-1569413 ↗
9. Looking Back on Digital Medical Education Over the Last 25 Years and Looking to the Future: Narrative Review10.2196/60312 ↗
10. Digital Teaching in Medical Education: Scientific Literature Landscape Review10.2196/32747 ↗
11. McGee, R.G., Wark, S., Mwangi, F., Drovandi, A., Alele, F., Malau-Aduli, B.S., and The, A.C. (2024). Digital learning of clinical skills and its impact on medical students’ academic performance: A systematic review. BMC Med. Educ., 24.10.1186/s12909-024-06471-2 ↗
12. Digital Training Formats in Ultrasound Diagnostics for physicians: What options are available and how can they be successfully integrated into current DEGUM certified course concepts?10.1055/a-1900-8166 ↗
13. Insights Into Modern Undergraduate Ultrasound Education: Prospective Comparison of Digital and Analog Teaching Resources in a Flipped Classroom Concept—The DIvAN Study
14. The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices10.1080/10872981.2022.2152522 ↗
15. Chandran, V.P., Balakrishnan, A., Rashid, M., Pai Kulyadi, G., Khan, S., Devi, E.S., Nair, S., and Thunga, G. (2022). Mobile applications in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0265927 ↗
16. Conception and Feasibility of a Digital Tele-Guided Abdomen, Thorax, and Thyroid Gland Ultrasound Course for Medical Students (TELUS study)
17. Weimer, J.M., Sprengart, F.M., Vieth, T., Göbel, S., Dionysopoulou, A., Krüger, R., Beer, J., Weimer, A.M., Buggenhagen, H., and Kloeckner, R. (2025). Simulator training in focus assessed transthoracic echocardiography (FATE) for undergraduate medical students: Results from the FateSim randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. Educ., 25.10.1186/s12909-024-06564-y ↗
18. Ruppert, J., Krüger, R., Göbel, S., Wolfhard, S., Lorenz, L.-A., Weimer, A.M., Kloeckner, R., Waezsada, E., Buggenhagen, H., and Weinmann-Menke, J. (2025). The effectiveness of e-learning in focused cardiac ultrasound training: A prospective controlled study. BMC Med. Educ., 25.10.1186/s12909-025-07409-y ↗
19. Student Perceptions of Instructional Ultrasound Videos as Preparation for a Practical Assessment10.1055/a-1024-4573 ↗
20. FIELD: A program for simulating ultrasound systems
21. Garcia, D. (2021, January 11–16). Make the most of MUST, an open-source Matlab UltraSound Toolbox. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Xi’an, China.10.1109/IUS52206.2021.9593605 ↗
22. The impact of E-learning in medical education10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002 ↗
23. Weimer, J., Recker, F., Krüger, R., Müller, L., Buggenhagen, H., Kurz, S., Weimer, A., Lorenz, L.-A., Kloeckner, R., and Ruppert, J. (2025). The Effectiveness of Digital vs. Analogue Teaching Resources in a Flipped Classroom for Undergraduate Focus Cardiac Ultrasound Training: A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Single-Centre Study. Educ. Sci., 15.10.3390/educsci15070810 ↗
24. Digital competencies in medical education in Switzerland: An overview of the current situation
25. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Education During a Pandemic: From Webinar to Progressive Dinner-Style Bedside Learning
26. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review10.1177/21582440241229570 ↗
27. Ladel, S., Knopf, J., and Weinberger, A. (2018). IzELA: Ein Instructional Design basiertes Evaluationstool für Lern-Apps. Digitalisierung und Bildung, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-658-18333-2 ↗
28. Preclerkship Medical Students’ Use of Third-Party Learning Resources10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45971 ↗
29. O’Doherty, D., Dromey, M., Lougheed, J., Hannigan, A., Last, J., and McGrath, D. (2018). Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education—An integrative review. BMC Med. Educ., 18.10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0 ↗
30. Regmi, K., and Jones, L. (2020). A systematic review of the factors—Enablers and barriers—Affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Med. Educ., 20.10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6 ↗
31. Müller, E., Goebel, S., and Couné, B. (2014). Bedarfsanalyse—Palliative Care Basics, Universität Freiburg, Wissenschaftliche Weiterbildung.
32. Maguire, M.C., and Bevan, N. (2003). User Requirements Analysis A Review of Supporting Methods. IFIP—The International Federation for Information Processing, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-35610-5_9 ↗
33. Lemke, C., Kirchner, K., and Brenner, B. (2017). Es ist Vorlesung und Keiner Geht Hin: Nutzerzentrierte Bedürfnisanalyse für Eine Digitale Lehr-und Lernplattform, Gesellschaft für Informatik.
34. A technique for developing suppression tests10.1177/001316445201200214 ↗
35. Continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field
36. Weimer, A.M., Berthold, R., Schamberger, C., Vieth, T., Balser, G., Berthold, S., Stein, S., Müller, L., Merkel, D., and Recker, F. (2023). Digital Transformation in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Acceptability of Blended Learning. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13203272 ↗
37. TEACHING MUST GO ON: Flexibility and advantages of peer assisted learning during the COVID-19 pandemic for undergraduate medical ultrasound education—Perspective from the “sonoBYstudents” ultrasound group
38. Student ultrasound education, current view and controversies. Role of Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality and telemedicine10.1186/s13089-024-00382-5 ↗
39. Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories10.1111/medu.13074 ↗
40. Blended learning in radiology: Is self-determined learning really more effective?10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.059 ↗
41. Offline Digital Education for Medical Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration10.2196/13165 ↗
42. Electronic Knowledge Resources and Point-of-Care Learning: A Scoping Review10.1097/ACM.0000000000002375 ↗
43. Bauer, S., Salter, A., Bennett, L., Seilhamer, R., and Chen, B. (2025, December 06). Changing Mobile Learning Practices: A Multiyear Study 2012–2016. Educ. Rev., Available online: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/4/changing-mobile-learning-practices-a-multiyear-study-2012-2016.
44. Robert, J. (2025, December 06). EDUCAUSE QuickPoll Results: Flexibility and Equity for Student Success. Educ. Rev., Available online: https://www.proquest.com/openview/766f329b2c76b4be35493cb091292c4c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=7213897#.
45. The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007 ↗
46. Niegemann, H.M. (2008). Designentscheidungen: Das DO-ID-Modell. Kompendium multimediales Lernen, Springer.
47. Bui, I., Bhattacharya, A., Wong, S.H., Singh, H.R., and Agarwal, A. (2021). Role of Three-Dimensional Visualization Modalities in Medical Education. Front. Pediatr., 9.10.3389/fped.2021.760363 ↗
48. Mayer, R. (2020). Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316941355 ↗
49. Overview and Evolution of the ADDIE Training System10.1177/1523422306292942 ↗
50. Cost-Effectiveness of Mobile App-Guided Training in Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (eFAST): A Randomized Trial10.1055/s-0043-119354 ↗
51. XKT: Toward Explainable Knowledge Tracing Model With Cognitive Learning Theories for Questions of Multiple Knowledge Concepts10.1109/TKDE.2024.3418098 ↗
52. Smooth Path Planning and Dynamic Contact Force Regulation for Robotic Ultrasound Scanning10.1109/LRA.2025.3604746 ↗