journal article·2025-12-23Open access

Proposed Simplified Seismic Design for Energy Storage Facilities: Underground Structures

Su-Won Son, Jae-Won Lee, Jae-Kwang Ahn, Cheolwoo Park

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

The rapid growth of the hydrogen industry, driven by global decarbonization efforts, has intensified the need for safe and large-capacity storage systems. Although hydrogen is one of the most abundant elements on Earth, its storage remains technically challenging due to its chemical reactivity and stringent containment requirements. Previous research has primarily emphasized the material-level behavior of polymer liners, composites, and metal alloys because chemical compatibility plays a critical role in aboveground high-pressure tanks. However, for underground storage systems, long-term structural stability is governed not only by material performance but also by the geo-mechanical behavior of deep rock masses. This study proposes a seismic design approach for Lined Rock Caverns (LRCs), a deep underground storage concept capable of sustaining high internal pressure. The method incorporates ground-induced deformation and evaluates the additional influence of internal pressure on lining behavior. Numerical analyses demonstrate that internal pressure has a significant stabilizing effect on the structural response by reducing ovalization and suppressing nonlinear deformation mechanisms. The results highlight that internal pressure is not a secondary load but a key design parameter that must be integrated into the seismic evaluation of LRC-based hydrogen storage facilities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Architectural Engineering and Civil Engineering, Kyungil University, 50 Gamasil-gil, Hayang-eup, Gyeongsan-si 38428, Republic of Korea

Department of Fire & Emergency Management, Kangwon National University, 346 Hwangjo-gil, Dogye-eup, Samcheok-si 25949, Republic of Korea

Department of Civil Engineering, Kangwon National University, 346 Jungang-ro, Samcheok-si 25913, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Gangwon State

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, IPCC.
2. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2022). Global Hydrogen Review 2022, IEA.
3. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2023). Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach, IEA.
4. Sustainable hydrogen generation and storage—A review10.1039/D3RA04148D ↗
5. Perna, A., Minutillo, M., Di Micco, S., and Jannelli, E. (2022). Design and costs analysis of hydrogen refuelling stations based on different hydrogen sources and plant configurations. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15020541 ↗
6. Rock mass response for lined rock caverns subjected to high internal gas pressure10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.03.006 ↗
7. Underground hydrogen storage: The techno-economic perspective10.12688/openreseurope.16974.1 ↗
8. Lined rock caverns: A hydrogen storage solution10.1016/j.est.2024.110927 ↗
9. Calabrese, M., Portarapillo, M., Di Nardo, A., Venezia, V., Turco, M., Luciani, G., and Di Benedetto, A. (2024). Hydrogen safety challenges: A comprehensive review on production, storage, transport, utilization, and CFD-based consequence and risk assessment. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17061350 ↗
10. (2002). Design and Construction of Large, Welded, Low-Pressure Storage Tanks (Standard No. API Standard 620).
11. (2010). Tank Systems for Refrigerated Liquefied Gas Storage (Standard No. API Standard 625).
12. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) (2023). NFPA 2: Hydrogen Technologies Code, 2023 Edition, NFPA.
13. Dagdag, O., and Kim, H. (2025). Recent advances in the hydrogen gas barrier performance of polymer liners and composites for type IV hydrogen storage tanks: Fabrication, properties, and molecular modeling. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17091231 ↗
14. Thangarasu, S., and Oh, T.H. (2022). Impact of polymers on magnesium-based hydrogen storage systems. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14132608 ↗
15. Liu, S., and Zhang, D. (2024). Study on long-term stability of lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17235908 ↗
16. Wang, J.N. (1993). Seismic Design of Tunnels: A Simple State of the Art Design Approach, Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc.
17. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7 ↗
18. Nikolaos, P.C., Marios, F., and Dimitris, K. (2023). A review of pumped hydro storage systems. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16114516 ↗
19. Jankowski, M., Pałac, A., Sornek, K., Goryl, W., Żołądek, M., Homa, M., and Filipowicz, M. (2024). Status and development perspectives of compressed air energy storage (CAES) technologies—A literature review. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17092064 ↗
20. Elliot, J., Brown, J., Mlilo, N., and Bowtell, L. (2025). Global trends in community energy storage: A comprehensive analysis. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17051975 ↗
21. LNG technology: The weathering in above-ground storage tanks10.1021/ie404128d ↗
22. LPG storage tank accidents: Initiating events, causes, scenarios, and consequences10.1007/s11668-021-01174-y ↗
23. Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051 ↗
24. Safety distance of ground and underground petrochemical installations10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104355 ↗
25. Review of underground hydrogen storage: Concepts and challenges10.46690/ager.2023.02.05 ↗
26. Ahad, M.T., Bhuiyan, M.M.H., Sakib, A.N., Corral, A.B., and Siddique, Z. (2023). Overview of challenges for the future of hydrogen. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16206680 ↗
27. Hydrogen embrittlement as a conspicuous material challenge10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00624 ↗
28. A technical investigation on tools and concepts for sustainable management of the subsurface in The Netherland10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.114 ↗
29. Underground storage of hydrogen in lined rock caverns: Key components and embrittlement issues10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.342 ↗
30. Technical potential of salt caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.161 ↗
31. Małachowska, A., Łukasik, N., Mioduska, J., and Gębicki, J. (2022). Hydrogen storage in geological formations—Potential of salt caverns. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15145038 ↗
32. Microbial side effects of underground hydrogen storage10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.058 ↗
33. Methanogenic conversion of hydrogen to methane in reservoir rocks10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.065 ↗
34. Toward a Fundamental Understanding of Geological Hydrogen Storage10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04380 ↗
35. Qian, X., You, S., Wang, R., Yue, Y., Liao, Q., Dai, J., Tian, S., and Liu, X. (2025). Underground hydrogen storage in salt caverns. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17135900 ↗
36. Sofregaz, U., and Gustafsväg, C. (1999). Commercial Potential of Natural Gas Storage in Lined Rock Caverns, US DOE.
37. Rock engineering in underground compressed air energy storage
38. Underground hydrogen storage: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.138 ↗
39. Marchiori, L., Albuquerque, A., Pais, L.A., Boscov, M.E.G., and Cavaleiro, V. (2025). Geoenvironmental engineered structures for water protection. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17051850 ↗
40. Louie, M.S., and Ehrhart, B.D. (2024). Regulations, Codes, and Standards Review for Underground Hydrogen Storage, Sandia National Laboratories.10.2172/2369636 ↗
41. OSHA (2023, June 02). 29 CFR 1910.103—Hydrogen, Available online: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.103.
42. OSHA (2024, April 18). 29 CFR 1910.119—Process Safety Management, Available online: https://www.ecfr.gov/.
43. (2022). Design and Operation of Solution-Mined Salt Caverns (Standard No. API RP 1170).
44. (2022). Functional Integrity of Natural Gas Storage (Standard No. API RP 1171).
45. European Industrial Gases Association (EIGA) (2019). Safety in Storage, Handling and Distribution of Liquid Hydrogen, EIGA. Doc 06/19.
46. Significant changes from ASCE 7-05 to ASCE 7-10, Part 1: Seismic design provisions10.15554/pcij.01012014.60.82 ↗
47. Bisch, P. (2016). Introduction: Seismic design and Eurocode 8. Seismic Design of Buildings to Eurocode 8, CRC Press.10.1201/9781315368221-2 ↗
48. Recent advances in ASME pressure vessel codes10.1115/1.3263361 ↗
49. (2018). Low-Pressure Storage Tanks (Standard No. API Standard 650).
50. ACI Committee (2001). Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures (ACI 350-01), ACI.
51. (2005). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (Standard No. ACI 318-05).
52. Mechanical responses of lined rock caverns under temperature and air pressure10.1007/s00603-014-0570-4 ↗
53. Effects of cushion gas pressure and operating parameters on hydrogen storage capacity in LRC10.1016/j.renene.2024.121317 ↗
54. ASME (2023). Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Div. I., ASME.
55. (2017). Transportable Gas Cylinders—Compatibility of Cylinder and Valve Materials with Gas Contents—Part 4. (Standard No. ISO 11114-4).
56. European Industrial Gases Association (EIGA) (2014). Hydrogen Pipeline Systems, EIGA. Doc 121/14.
57. (2021). Standard Specification for Carbon Steel Pressure Vessel Plates (Standard No. ASTM A516/A516M-21).
58. (2020). Standard Specification for Pressure Vessel Plates, Heat-Treated Carbon-Manganese-Silicon Steel (Standard No. ASTM A537/A537M-20).
59. Korea Concrete Institute (2024). Design Code for Shear and Torsion of Concrete Structures (KDS 14 20 22).
60. Seismic response of tunnel–soil–surface structure interaction10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.015 ↗
61. Earthquake-induced ground displacements10.1002/eqe.4290160704 ↗
62. Evaluation of seismic performance of operating road tunnels10.9711/KTAJ.2013.15.2.069 ↗
63. Hashash, Y.M.A., Musgrove, M.I., Harmon, J.A., Ilhan, O., Groholski, D.R., Phillips, C.A., and Park, D. (2017). DEEPSOIL 7.0 User Manual, Univ. of Illinois.
64. Möller, S.C. (2006). Tunnel Induced Settlements and Structural Forces in Linings. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Stuttgart].