journal article·2025-12-24Open access

Causal Reasoning in Construction Process Scheduling

Magdalena Rogalska, Zdzisław Hejducki, Paulina Kostrzewa-Demczuk

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

This paper introduces an advanced framework for modeling and scheduling construction processes using causal inference techniques, with particular emphasis on capturing complex technological and organizational interdependencies. By integrating causal calculus and counterfactual reasoning, the study demonstrates how construction schedules can be analyzed and optimized not only through temporal relationships but also through explicit cause–effect structures. A matrix-based scheduling methodology is presented, incorporating diagonal and reverse-diagonal time couplings consistent with the Time Coupling Method (TCM). The computational procedure is detailed, including the determination of earliest and latest event times, identification of the critical path, and computation of activity floats. Based on an in-depth examination of technological and organizational constraints, eight theorems are formulated and proven, establishing the fundamental properties of a scheduling approach that embeds causal mechanisms. The findings indicate that the integration of causal inference into construction planning enables more accurate identification of factors influencing project duration, enhances synchronization of dependent activities, and minimizes conflicts and idle times. This causally informed framework strengthens decision-making by allowing practitioners to predict the consequences of modifications in project execution strategies. The developed models constitute a robust foundation for future research on leveraging causal inference algorithms and artificial intelligence to advance construction process management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling · Construction Project Management and Performance · BIM and Construction Integration

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Construction Process Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin Technical University, ul. Nadbystrzycka 40, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

Department of Engineering of Building Materials and Processes, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, pl. Grunwaldzki 11, 50-384 Wrocław, Poland

Department of Construction Organization and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kielce University of Technology, al. Tysiąclecia PP 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Pearl, J., and Mackenzie, D. (2018). The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effeck, Basic Books.
2. A review of methods and algorithms for optimizing construction scheduling10.1057/jors.2012.174 ↗
3. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, John Wiley & Sons. Available online: https://books.google.pl/books?id=xlASDgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0-v=onepage&q&f=false.
4. Project Management Institute (PMI) (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Project Management Institute.
5. Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., and Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge University Press. Available online: https://books.google.pl/books?id=RAV5P-50UjEC&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0-v=onepage&q&f=false.10.1017/CBO9781107050891 ↗
6. A new approach for project control under uncertainty. Going back to the basics10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.08.003 ↗
7. Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.].10.1017/CBO9780511803161 ↗
8. Hernán, M.A., and Robins, J.M. (2020). Causal Inference: What If, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
9. Morgan, S.L., and Winship, C. (2015). Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.].10.1017/CBO9781107587991 ↗
10. Standish Group (2020). Chaos Report 2020: Beyond Infinity, The Standish Group International.
11. McKinsey Global Institute (2017). Reinventing Construction: A Route to Higher Productivity. McKinsey & Company. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/operations/our%20insights/reinventing%20construction%20through%20a%20productivity%20revolution/mgi-reinventing-construction-a-route-to-higher-productivity-full-report.pdf.
12. A review of analytical models approaches decision support tools in project monitoring control10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.09.005 ↗
13. Earned schedule min-max approach for monitoring and control of projects with uncertain duration activities10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.016 ↗
14. Vanhoucke, M. (2013). Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling: Baseline Scheduling, Risk Analysis and Project Control, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-40438-2 ↗
15. Hoover, K. (2001). Causality in Macroeconomic, Cambridge University Press.
16. Peters, J., Janzing, D., and Schölkopf, B. (2017). Elements of Causal Inference: Foundations and Learning Algorithms, MIT Press.
17. Losee, J. (2012). Theories of Causality: From Metaphysics to Science, Transaction Publishers.
18. Mumford, S., and Anjum, R.L. (2014). Causation: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780199684434.001.0001 ↗
19. External Validity: From Do-Calculus to Transportability Across Populations10.1214/14-STS486 ↗
20. Causality in structural engineering: Discovering new knowledge by tying induction and deduction via mapping functions and explainable artificial intelligence10.1007/s43503-022-00005-9 ↗
21. Introducing causal inference in the energy-efficient building design process10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112583 ↗
22. Bayesian network based decision support for predicting and mitigating delay risk in TBM tunnel projects10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103819 ↗
23. Liu, W., Luo, X., Liang, B., and Xie, J. (2025). Causal Analysis and Prevention Strategies for Safety Risks in Prefabricated Building Construction Based on Accident Data and Complex Network Theory. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15020152 ↗
24. Applications of Bayesian networks and Petri nets in safety, reliability, and risk assessments: A review10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.009 ↗
25. Vagdatli, T., Petroutsatou, K., Panetsos, P., Barmpa, Z., and Fragkakis, N. (2023). Bayesian pre-estimation of bridge life-cycle costs. Life-Cycle of Structures and Infrastructure Systems, Imprint CRC Press. [1st ed.].10.1201/9781003323020-397 ↗
26. Zoghi, M., and Kim, S. (2020). Dynamic Modeling for Life Cycle Cost Analysis of BIM-Based Construction Waste Management. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12062483 ↗
27. Causal inference of construction safety management measures towards workers’ safety behaviors: A multidimensional perspective10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106432 ↗
28. Discovering causal models for structural, construction and defense-related engineering phenomena10.1016/j.dt.2024.04.007 ↗
29. Kostrzewa-Demczuk, P. (2024). Construction schedule versus various constraints and risks. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14010196 ↗
30. Beyond Earned Value Management: A Graphical Framework for Integrated Cost, Schedule and Risk Monitoring10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.027 ↗
31. You, L., Guo, N., Long, Z., Si, C., and Diab, A. (2024). Causal inference approach to appraise long-term effects of maintenance policy on functional performance of asphalt pavements. arXiv.
32. Pal, A., Murguia, D., and Middleton, C. (2024, January 1–3). Automatic Inference of Construction Delays Through Analysis of Weekly Progress Reports Using LLMs. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference of CIB W78, Marrakech, Morocco.
33. Float Types in Linear Schedule Analysis with Singularity Functions10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000007 ↗
34. Fewings, P., and Henjewele, C. (2019). Construction Project Managment: An Integrated Approach, CRC.10.1201/9781351122030 ↗
35. O’Brien, J.J. (1969). Scheduling Handbook, McGraw-Hill Inc.
36. New Generation of Planning Structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:2(196) ↗
37. Dynamic Programming Approach to Scheduling of Nonserial Linear Project10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1996)10:2(106) ↗
38. Afanasjev, V.A., Mrozowicz, J., and Hejducki, Z. (, 1990). Stream work organisation method taking into account diagonal couplings in determination of critical works. Proceedings of the Polish Academy of Siences Civil Enginieering Commitee and Polish Association of Building Engineers and Technicians Science Commitee 39th Conference Proceedings, Krynica, Poland.
39. Afanasev, V.A., and Afanasev, A.V. (1990). Formirowanije Kompleksnych Potokov iż Obiektnych i Orijentirowanoje Naznačenije Dopolnitielnych Odnotipnych Brygad, TNIPB.
40. Hejducki, Z., and Rogalska, M. (2021). Flow Shop Scheduling of Construction Processes Using Time Coupling Nethods, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej. Monografie.
41. The application of time coupling methods in the engineering of construction projects
42. Podolski, M. (2008). Analiza Nowych Zastosowań Teorii Szeregowania Zadań w Organizacji Robót Budowlanych. [Ph.D. Thesis, Wrocław University of Science and Technology].
43. Scheduling with the Probabilistic Coupling Method I (PTCM I)—Assuming the continuity of workof working teams
44. Scheduling with the Probabilistic Coupling Method II (PTCMII)—Assuming continuity of work on the working sectors