journal article·2025-12-23Open access

Comprehensive Modeling of CO2 Sequestration in Syderiai Deep Saline Aquifer: Insights into Leakage, Geo-Mechanical Changes, and Geo-Chemical Impacts

Shankar Lal Dangi, Shruti Malik, Ravi Sharma, Mayur Pal

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study on the feasibility and implications of a CO2 injection simulation in the Syderiai deep saline aquifer of Lithuania, focusing on leakage, geo-mechanical aspects, and geo-chemical aspects. The Syderiai aquifer, characterized by its sandstone formation covered by shaly rocks, is considered a potential site for CO2 geological storage in Lithuania. Using 3D mechanistic models developed in T-navigator software, we conducted extensive simulations to analyze CO2 storage behavior and associated impacts. The leakage study examines various scenarios to assess the impact of fracture permeability, layer-wise heterogeneity, and fracture position on CO2 injection and leakage volumes. Results indicate that while fracture permeability influences CO2 migration dynamics, its impact on both free and dissolved CO2 leakage volumes is minimal, highlighting that leakage behavior is more dependent on the presence of fractures than their permeability. Geo-mechanical analysis reveals the effects of CO2 injection on the bulk modulus and shear modulus of sandstone and shale formations, highlighting changes in compaction and cementation. The geo-chemical study was performed using TOUGHREACT software V4.13-OMP to investigate the distribution of pH, porosity change, and free CO2 over 1000-years following 10-year CO2 injection. Results demonstrate the acidifying effect of CO2 injection and its implications for the caprock–reservoir interface over time. The findings offer valuable perspectives on the feasibility and consequences of CO2 geological storage in the Syderiai deep saline aquifer, highlighting the importance of incorporating leakage, geo-mechanical aspects, and geo-chemical aspects for implementing efficient CO2 storage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Geological Modeling and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mathematical Modeling, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51368 Kaunas, Lithuania

Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, India

Funding

Lithuanian Research Council

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. BP (2022). BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2022, [71st ed.].
2. Lan, X., Tans, P., and Thoning, K.W. (2025). Trends in Globally-Averaged CO2 Determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory Measurements, Version Thursday, 13-Nov-2025 16:04:26 MST.
3. (2023, July 10). Global Carbon Project. Global Carbon Budget. Available online: https://globalcarbonbudget.org/carbonbudget/.
4. Pal, M., Karaliūtė, V., and Malik, S. (2023). Exploring the potential of carbon capture, utilization, and storage in Baltic Sea region countries: A review of CCUS patents from 2000 to 2022. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11020605 ↗
5. Chadwick, A., Arts, R., Bernstone, C., May, F., Thibeau, S., and Zweigel, P. (2008). Best Practice for the CO2 Storage in Saline Aquifers—Observations and Guidelines from the SACS and CO2STORE Projects, British Geological Survey.
6. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG) (2009). CCS Site Characterization Criteria, IEA GHG.
7. Dangi, S.L., Malik, S., Makauskas, P., Karliute, V., Sharma, R., and Pal, M. (2023, January 15–16). Assessment of CO2 leakage using mechanistic modelling approach for CO2 injection in deep saline aquifer of Lithuanian basin in presence of fault and fractures. Proceedings of the Baltic Carbon Forum, Riga, Latvia.10.21595/bcf.2023.23619 ↗
8. An approach for assessment of CO2 leakage using mechanistic modelling: CO2 injection in deep saline aquifer of Lithuanian basin in presence of fault and fractures
9. A coupled reservoir-geomechanical simulation study of CO2 storage in a nearly depleted natural gas reservoir10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.082 ↗
10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2005). Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Cambridge University Press.
11. (2024, March 05). European Union’s CCS Directive. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/31/oj.
12. Potential CO2 leakage from geological storage sites: Advances and challenges10.1680/jenge.18.00041 ↗
13. Geomechanical challenges during geological CO2 storage: A review10.1016/j.cej.2022.140968 ↗
14. A study of caprock hydromechanical changes associated with CO2-injection into a brine formation10.1007/s00254-001-0499-2 ↗
15. Hawkes, C.D., McLellan, P.J., Zimmer, U., and Bachu, S. (2024, January 14–16). Geomechanical factors affecting geological storage of CO2 in depleted oil and gas reservoirs: Risks and mechanisms. Proceedings of the ARMA North America Rock Mechanics Symposium, Houston, TX, USA.
16. Geomechanical factors affecting geological storage of CO2 in depleted oil and gas reservoirs10.2118/05-10-05 ↗
17. Coupled reservoir–geomechanical analysis of the potential for tensile and shear failure associated with CO2 injection in multilayered reservoir–caprock systems10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.04.006 ↗
18. Sharma, R., Dangi, S.L., Nagarkoti, N., Malik, S., Pandey, P., and Pal, M. (2023, January 11–15). Caprock and Associate Geomechanical Risks in Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) Implementation: A Study on Loose and Packed Sandstone Grain. Proceedings of the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting (AGU), San Francisco, CA, USA.
19. Dangi, S.L., Malik, S., Sharma, R., and Pal, M. (2023, January 3–5). Geomechanical Implications of CO2 Sequestration in Saline Aquifers. Proceedings of the 14th Biennial International Conference (SPG 2023), Kochi, India.
20. Geochemical and solute transport modelling for CO2 storage, what to expect from it?10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.011 ↗
21. Geochemical evaluation of CO2 injection into storage reservoirs based on case-studies in the Netherlands10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.438 ↗
22. Long-term Assessment of Geochemical Reactivity of CO2 Storage in Highly Saline Aquifers: Application to Ketzin, In Salah and Snøhvit storage sites10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.10.022 ↗
23. Leakage risk assessment of a CO2 storage site: A review10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103849 ↗
24. Nordbotten, J.M., Celia, M.A., and Bachu, S. (2004). Analytical solutions for leakage rates through abandoned wells. Water Resour. Res., 40.10.1029/2003WR002997 ↗
25. Semianalytical solution for CO2 leakage through an abandoned well10.1021/es035338i ↗
26. Model for CO2 leakage including multiple geological layers and multiple leaky wells10.1021/es801135v ↗
27. Diffusive leakage of brine from aquifers during CO2 geological storage10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.10.029 ↗
28. The role of natural fractures of finite double-porosity aquifers on diffusive leakage of brine during geological storage of CO210.1016/j.ijggc.2018.08.007 ↗
29. Ganguli, S.S., Sen, S., and Kumar, M. (2017, January 17). Geomechanical analysis for feasible CO2 storage in an Indian mature oil field. Proceedings of the 12th Biennial International Conference & Exposition (SPG), Jaipur, India.
30. 3D geomechanical modelling for CO2 geologic storage in the Dogger carbonates of the Paris Basin10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.10.004 ↗
31. Fault reactivation during CO2 sequestration: Effects of well orientation on seismicity and leakage10.1002/ghg.1511 ↗
32. Geomechanical assessment of a large-scale CO2 storage and insights from uncertainty analysis10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211596 ↗
33. Geomechanical effects of CO2 storage in depleted gas reservoirs in the Netherlands: Inferences from feasibility studies and comparison with aquifer storage10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.07.003 ↗
34. The effect of CO2 on the mechanical properties of the Captain Sandstone: Geological storage of CO2 at the Goldeneye field (UK)10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.016 ↗
35. Analytical solutions for two-phase subsurface flow to a leaky fault considering vertical flow effects and fault properties10.1002/2013WR014628 ↗
36. Effects of fault-zone architecture on earthquake magnitude and gas leakage related to CO2 injection in a multi-layered sedimentary system10.1002/ghg.1403 ↗
37. Fault activation and induced seismicity in geologic carbon storage—Lessons learned from recent modeling studies10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.09.001 ↗
38. Possibilities for geological storage and mineral trapping of industrial CO2 emissions in the Baltic region10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.046 ↗
39. The Baltic basin: Structure, properties of reservoir rocks, and capacity for geological storage of CO210.3176/earth.2009.4.04 ↗
40. Šliaupa, S., and Šliaupiene, R. (2021, January 15). Prospects of Geological Storage of CO2 in Lithuania. Proceedings of the Baltic Carbon Forum, Online.
41. Assessing the Geological Storage Potential of CO2 in Baltic Basin: A Case Study of Lithuanian Hydrocarbon and Deep Saline Reservoirs10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104097 ↗
42. Malik, S., Makauskas, P., Sharma, R., and Pal, M. (2024). Evaluating Petrophysical Properties Using Digital Rock Physics Analysis: A CO2 Storage Feasibility Study of Lithuanian Reservoirs. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142310826 ↗
43. Prospects for CO2 geological storage in deep saline aquifers of Lithuania and adjacent territories
44. (2024, March 02). TOUGHREACT V4.13-OMP, TOUGH 2024, Academic License provided by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Available online: https://tough.lbl.gov/software/toughreact_v4-13-omp/.
45. T-navigator version 23.3 (2023). Rock Flow Dynamics, Rock Flow Dynamics, Inc.. Available online: https://rfdyn.com/.
46. Tecplot (2023). Tecplot 360 EX R2, Tecplot, Inc.
47. An efficient workflow for meshing large scale discrete fracture networks for solving subsurface flow problems10.1080/10916466.2022.2033768 ↗
48. Control-volume distributed multi-point flux approximation coupled with a lower-dimensional fracture model10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.047 ↗
49. Haselton, M.T. (2013, January 11–13). Exploiting the ROZ in Lithuanian. Proceedings of the 19th Annual CO2 Flooding Conference, Midland, TX, USA.
50. Ignas, V., and Rimas, G. (2024, January 3–4). Minijos Nafta and its experience in CO2 injection. Proceedings of the Baltic Carbon Forum, Vilnius, Lithuania.
51. Rasteniene, V., and Puronas, V. (2005). Geothermal Atlas of Lithuania, World Geothermal Congress.
52. Pore-volume compressibility of consolidated, friable, and unconsolidated reservoir rocks under hydrostatic loading10.2118/3835-PA ↗
53. Tiab, D., and Donaldson, E.C. (2016). Effect of Stress on Reservoir Rock Properties. Petrophysics, Gulf Professional Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-12-803188-9.00009-7 ↗
54. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J. (1988). The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Analysis in Porous Media, Cambridge University Press.