journal article·2025-12-24Open access

A Framework for Managing Digital Transformation Risks in Transport Systems: Linking Digital Maturity and Risk Categories

Agnieszka A. Tubis

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

Digital transformation is increasingly central to the development of transport systems, yet current research offers limited guidance on how digital maturity levels shape operational risk. Existing digital maturity models primarily support benchmarking and planning, but rarely integrate structured risk assessment. This study addresses this gap by proposing a framework that links digital maturity with the systematic identification and prioritisation of digital transformation risks. A Digital Maturity-Based Risk Assessment Framework (DMRisk-TS) is developed, classifying risks into three categories. Probability and severity are evaluated using fuzzy logic, while contextual modifiers account for the maturity gap and system coverage. The approach is demonstrated using a real tram transport system and the DMM-TRAM model. The analysis shows that risk profiles differ markedly across maturity levels. Low-maturity environments generate operational risks related to insufficient or non-integrated information. Transitioning between levels introduces implementation and data-integration risks. At high maturity levels, new systemic risks emerge, including error propagation, cyber vulnerabilities, and over-reliance on automated processes. DMRisk-TS offers a meaningful basis for understanding and managing risks in transport systems. The framework supports the prioritisation of mitigation actions, informs decisions on advancing maturity, and highlights that higher digitisation creates new classes of systemic risk.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyspianskiego Street 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Tubis, A. (2018). Operational Risk Management Method in Road Transport, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
2. Tubis, A.A. (2023). Digital Maturity Assessment Model for the Organizational and Process Dimensions. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152015122 ↗
3. Intelligent Transportation Systems for Sustainable Smart Cities10.1016/j.treng.2024.100252 ↗
4. Unsupervised Dynamic Sensor Selection for IoT-Based Predictive Maintenance of a Fleet of Public Transport Buses10.1145/3530991 ↗
5. Yang, H., and Oguchi, K. (2024). City-Level Integrated Traffic Management with User Preferences Under Connected Environment. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su162310378 ↗
6. vom Brocke, J., and Liechtenstein, V. (2014). Business Process Maturity: A Comparative Study on a Sample of Business Process Maturity Models, Springer. SpringerBr.
7. Systematic Literature Review of Industry 4.0 Maturity Model for Manufacturing and Logistics Sectors10.1016/j.promfg.2020.11.056 ↗
8. Similarities and Differences Between Digital Transformation Maturity Models: A Literature Review10.1007/978-3-031-16598-6_2 ↗
9. (2022, May 30). How COVID-19 Has Pushed Companies over the Technology Tipping Point—And Transformed Business Forever. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/how-covid-19-has-pushed-companies-over-the-technology-tipping-point-and-transformed-business-forever#/.
10. The Challenges and Opportunities in the Digitalization of Companies in a Post-COVID-19 World10.1109/EMR.2020.3013206 ↗
11. COVID-19 and Digitalization: The Great Acceleration10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011 ↗
12. A Strategic Framework for Digital Maturity of Design and Construction through a Systematic Review and Application
13. Roadmapping towards Industrial Digitalization Based on an Industry 4.0 Maturity Model for Manufacturing Enterprises10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.110 ↗
14. The Framework of Logistics 4.0 Maturity Model10.1007/978-3-319-97490-3_73 ↗
15. Facchini, F., Oleśków-Szłapka, J., Ranieri, L., and Urbinati, A. (2019). A Maturity Model for Logistics 4.0: An Empirical Analysis and a Roadmap for Future Research. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12010086 ↗
16. Industry 4.0 for Passenger Railway Companies: A Maturity Model Proposal for Technology Management
17. Durakbasa, N.M., and Gençyılmaz, M.G. (2024). Proposal of Industry 4.0 Maturity Model in the Energy Sector. Industrial Engineering in the Industry 4.0 Era, Springer. ISPR 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.10.1007/978-3-031-53991-6 ↗
18. Maturity Assessment for Industry 5.0: A Review of Existing Maturity Models10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.009 ↗
19. Zoubek, M., and Simon, M. (2021). Evaluation of the Level and Readiness of Internal Logistics for Industry 4.0 in Industrial Companies. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11136130 ↗
20. A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 ↗
21. Literature Review on Maturity Models for Digital Supply Chains10.14488/BJOPM.2021.022 ↗
22. Remane, G., Hanelt, A., Wiesboeck, F., and Kolbe, L. (2017, January 5–10). Digital Maturity in Traditional Industries– an Exploratory Analysis. Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal.
23. Logistics 4.0 Maturity Levels Assessed Based on GDM (Grey Decision Model) and Artificial Intelligence in Logistics 4.0s-Trends and Future Perspective10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.266 ↗
24. Logistics 4.0 Maturity in Service Industry: Empirical Research Results10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.192 ↗
25. Digital Maturity in Tram Systems: Model Design and Practical Application
26. A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation of the Operational Risk Factors for the State-Owned and Privately-Owned Commercial Banks in Turkey10.1080/10807039.2013.755098 ↗
27. Ryczyński, J., and Tubis, A.A. (2021). Tactical Risk Assessment Method for Resilient Fuel Supply Chains for a Military Peacekeeping Operation. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14154679 ↗