Optimal Inter-Session Intervals in Neurofeedback Training: A Randomized Trial of Retention and Individual Response Patterns in Elite Judo Athletes
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: Neurofeedback training (NFT) enhances athletic performance through alpha modulation, but optimal inter-session intervals and individual response variability remain poorly understood. Objective: This is the first randomized controlled trial to systematically compare neurofeedback periodization (2-day vs. 3-day inter-session intervals) on neurophysiological adaptations, strength performance, and retention in elite judo athletes. Methods: Thirty-one national-level judokas completed 15 alpha enhancement sessions in 2-day (n = 12), 3-day (n = 12), or control (n = 7) groups, receiving pseudo-neurofeedback with randomized, non-contingent feedback. Primary outcomes included Frontal Alpha Index changes (ΔFAI; frontal alpha power modulation ratio) and squat performance (35–100% 1RM), with secondary assessment of 48/72 h retention and response phenotypes. Results: Mean ΔFAI was modest (E15G-2d: 0.005 ± 0.205; E15G-3d: 0.052 ± 0.202), with early peak responses followed by stabilization. E15G-3d demonstrated superior retention (90.2 ± 3.4% at 72 h vs. 76.8 ± 4.1% at 48 h; p < 0.001) despite similar peaks. Both training groups showed significant strength improvements versus controls (E15G-2d: 2.37 ± 0.66 reps; E15G-3d: 2.00 ± 0.53 reps), yet neurophysiological-performance correlations were non-significant (p > 0.072), indicating strength adaptations via mechanisms independent of alpha modulation. Three response phenotypes emerged (high: 29.0%, moderate: 51.6%, low: 19.4%), representing the first empirical classification of neurofeedback responsiveness in athletes. Conclusions: Three-day intervals uniquely optimize retention through enhanced consolidation, establishing evidence-based periodization guidelines for elite athletes. The dissociation between neural and performance adaptations challenges traditional neurofeedback theory, while individual heterogeneity necessitates personalized protocols for optimal NFT periodization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies · Sports Performance and Training · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, 40-065 Katowice, Poland
Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland
Department of Laryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Gong, A., Gu, F., Nan, W., Qu, Y., Jiang, C., and Fu, Y. (2021). A review of neurofeedback training for improving sport performance from the perspective of user experience. Front. Neurosci., 15.10.3389/fnins.2021.638369 ↗
2. Closed-loop brain training: The science of neurofeedback10.1038/nrn.2016.164 ↗
3. The effect of neurofeedback training for sport performance in athletes: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.02.004 ↗
4. An investigation of the effectiveness of neurofeedback training on motor performance in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120000 ↗
5. Domingos, C., da Silva Caldeira, H., Miranda, M., Melício, F., Rosa, A.C., and Pereira, J.G. (2021). The Influence of Noise in the Neurofeedback Training Sessions in Student Athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph182413223 ↗
6. The Effect of EEG Neurofeedback Training on Sport Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1111/sms.70055 ↗
7. Interpreting EEG alpha activity10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.007 ↗
8. Endogenous control of waking brain rhythms induces neuroplasticity in humans10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07100.x ↗
9. Brain networks and α-oscillations: Structural and functional foundations of cognitive control10.1016/j.tics.2016.09.004 ↗
10. Zhou, Q., Cheng, R., Yao, L., Ye, X., and Xu, K. (2022). Neurofeedback training of alpha relative power improves the performance of motor imagery brain-computer interface. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 16.10.3389/fnhum.2022.831995 ↗
11. Strehl, U. (2014). What learning theories can teach us in designing neurofeedback treatments. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 8.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00894 ↗
12. State-dependent perceptual learning10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4039-12.2013 ↗
13. Rogala, J., Jurewicz, K., Paluch, K., Kublik, E., Cetnarski, R., and Wróbel, A. (2016). The do’s and don’ts of neurofeedback training: A review of the controlled studies using healthy adults. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 10.10.3389/fnhum.2016.00301 ↗
14. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 ↗
15. Time-dependent consolidation mechanisms of durable memory in spaced learning10.1038/s42003-025-07964-6 ↗
16. Neurofeedback learning modifies the incidence rate of alpha spindles, but not their duration and amplitude
17. “Neural efficiency” of athletes’ brain for upright standing: A high-resolution EEG study10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.02.001 ↗
18. Sanchez-Lopez, J., Fernandez, T., Silva-Pereyra, J., Martinez Mesa, J.A., and Di Russo, F. (2014). Differences in visuo-motor control in skilled vs. novice martial arts athletes during sustained and transient attention tasks: A motor-related cortical potential study. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0091112 ↗
19. Neural markers of performance states in an Olympic athlete: An EEG case study in air-pistol shooting
20. Judgment of actions in experts: A high-resolution EEG study in elite athletes10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.035 ↗
21. Brain-training for physical performance: A study of EEG-neurofeedback and alpha relaxation training in athletes10.55782/ane-2015-2047 ↗
22. Mikicin, M., Kowalczyk, M., Orzechowski, G., Dąbrowski, A., Jurewicz, K., Paluch, K., and Szczęsna, A. (2023). The effects of EEG biofeedback training on visual reaction time in judo athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.
23. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8 ↗
24. Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback enhances golf putting performance10.1123/jsep.2015-0166 ↗
25. Investigating the efficacy of neurofeedback training for expediting expertise and excellence in sport10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.005 ↗
26. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00056-3 ↗
27. Cheng, M.Y., Yu, C.L., An, X., Wang, L., Tsai, C.L., Qi, F., and Wang, K.P. (2024). Evaluating EEG neurofeedback in sport psychology: A systematic review of RCT studies for insights into mechanisms and performance improvement. Front. Psychol., 15.10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331997 ↗
28. Metaplasticity: Tuning synapses and networks for plasticity10.1038/nrn2356 ↗
29. Determining the optimal challenge point for learning motor skills in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder10.1016/j.humov.2024.103296 ↗
30. Analysis of individual differences in neurofeedback training illuminates successful self-regulation of the dopaminergic midbrain10.1038/s42003-022-03756-4 ↗
31. Corrado, S., Tosti, B., Mancone, S., Di Libero, T., Rodio, A., Andrade, A., and Diotaiuti, P. (2024). Improving mental skills in precision sports by using neurofeedback training: A narrative review. Sports, 12.10.3390/sports12030070 ↗