journal article·2025-12-19Open access

The Influence of Magnification on Measurement Accuracy

Dmytro Malakhov, Tatiana Kelemenová, Michal Kelemen

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

This article presents an experimental and statistical investigation of how optical magnification influences calibration constants, measurement results, and uncertainty in a digital optical microscope. Measurements were performed on reference gauge blocks with nominal lengths from 1.0 mm to 1.5 mm at five magnification levels (1×–5×) to quantify the effect of magnification on dimensional accuracy. A combined statistical methodology integrating non-parametric hypothesis testing and bootstrap-based uncertainty analysis was developed to evaluate data distributions and validate the use of a normal coverage factor (k = 2) for expanded uncertainty. The results showed that magnification has a statistically significant effect on the measured lengths for most standards, with the smallest combined standard uncertainty achieved at approximately 4× magnification. The uncertainty budget analysis revealed that the dominant component arises from the microscope’s declared Maximum Permissible Error (MPE), while type A and reference-standard components contribute only marginally. All expanded uncertainties remained within the declared MPE limits, confirming the reliability and traceability of the measurement process. Practical recommendations were proposed for selecting optimal magnification and for implementing calibration verification procedures at each zoom level. The presented methodology provides a validated framework for minimizing uncertainty in image-based dimensional measurements using digital optical microscopes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 9, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Gao, S., Felgner, A., and Brand, U. (2025). Metrological-Characteristics-Based Calibration of Optical Areal Surface Measuring Instruments and Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty for Surface Texture Measurements. Instruments, 9.10.3390/instruments9020011 ↗
2. Bellantone, V., Surace, R., and Fassi, I. (2024). Experimental Uncertainty Evaluation in Optical Measurements of Micro-Injection Molded Products. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 8.10.3390/jmmp8010021 ↗
3. Framework for Uncertainty Evaluation in Optical Surface Topography Measurement Using a Virtual Instrument10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117604 ↗
4. Zhou, X., Zhou, C., Zhang, T., Mou, X., Xu, J., and He, Y. (2022). High Precision Visual Dimension Measurement Method with Large Range Based on Multi-Prism and M-Array Coding. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22062081 ↗
5. Accurate Localization Microscopy by Intrinsic Aberration Calibration10.1038/s41467-021-23419-y ↗
6. Calibration Method of Microscope and Its Measurement Uncertainty
7. Development of a Microscopic Computer Aided Measurement System and Its Uncertainty10.1016/j.measurement.2008.03.013 ↗
8. Uncertainty Calculations in Optical Methods Used for Micro Flow Measurement10.1016/j.measen.2021.100155 ↗
9. Daher, R., Krejci, I., di Bella, E., and Marger, L. (2022). Evaluation of the Validity of Digital Optical Microscopy in the Assessment of Marginal Adaptation of Dental Adhesive Interfaces. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14010083 ↗
10. Improving Optical Measurement Accuracy Using Multi-Technique Nested Uncertainties
11. Line-Based Calibration of a Micro-Vision Motion Measurement System10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.12.018 ↗
12. Lane, B.M., and Whitenton, E.P. (2025, December 12). Calibration and Measurement Procedures for a High Magnification Thermal Camera, Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2016/NIST.IR.8098.pdf.10.6028/NIST.IR.8098 ↗
13. Phase Uncertainty in Digital Holographic Microscopy Measurements in the Presence of Solution Flow Conditions10.6028/jres.122.022 ↗
14. Microscope Calibration Protocol for Single-Molecule Microscopy10.1364/OE.408361 ↗
15. Measurement of Microscope Magnification10.1364/AO.3.001005 ↗
16. (2025, October 29). Measurement Uncertainty in Optical Microscopy—Measuring Diameter of Microspheres, Nanospheres, and Microparticles. Available online: www.cospheric.com.
17. Leach, R. (2011). Optical Measurement of Surface Topography, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-12012-1 ↗
18. Pawlus, P., Reizer, R., and Wieczorowski, M. (2021). Functional Importance of Surface Texture Parameters. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14185326 ↗
19. Podulka, P. (2022). Selection of Methods of Surface Texture Characterisation for Reduction of the Frequency-Based Errors in the Measurement and Data Analysis Processes. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22030791 ↗
20. Comparison of Optical and Stylus Methods for Measurement of Surface Texture10.1007/s00170-007-0953-8 ↗
21. Comparison of Surface Roughness Measurements by Stylus Profiler, AFM and Non-Contact Optical Profiler10.1016/0043-1648(95)06697-7 ↗
22. Blateyron, F. (2013). The Areal Field Parameters. Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture, Springer. Springer eBooks.10.1007/978-3-642-36458-7_2 ↗
23. A Measurement System Based on Visual Servoing and Error Correction Method Using Multiple CCD Camera Module and Structured Target for Three Dimensional Measurement
24. Surface topography investigations by fractal analysis of Spark-Eroded, electrically conductive ceramics10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61026-9 ↗
25. De Groot, P.J. (2017). The Meaning and Measure of Vertical Resolution in Optical Surface Topography Measurement. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7010054 ↗
26. Subnanometer Localization Accuracy in Widefield Optical Microscopy10.1038/s41377-018-0031-z ↗
27. Measurement-Based Estimation of Global Pupil Functions in 3D Localization Microscopy10.1364/OE.25.007945 ↗
28. The Measurement and Uncertainty of a Calibration Standard for the Scanning Electron Microscope10.6028/jres.099.015 ↗
29. Uncertainty and Dimensional Calibrations10.6028/jres.102.044 ↗
30. Whitehouse, D.J. (2004). Surfaces and Their Measurement, Elsevier.
31. Han, H. (2018). “Measurement uncertainty”. Basics of Precision Engineering, CRC Press.
32. (2022). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal—Part 700: Calibration, Adjustment and Verification of Areal Topography Measuring Instruments (Standard No. ISO 25178-700:2022).
33. (2011). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM)—Part 7: CMMs Equipped with Imaging Probing Systems (Standard No. ISO 10360-7:2011).
34. Optical Metrology for Digital Manufacturing: A Review10.1007/s00170-022-09084-5 ↗
35. Yu, J., Cheng, X., and Li, M. (2020). Error Analysis and Calibration Improvement of the Imaging Section in a Mueller Matrix Microscope. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10134422 ↗
36. Wan, X., and Tao, X. (2021). Design of a Cell Phone Lens-Based Miniature Microscope with Configurable Magnification Ratio. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11083392 ↗
37. Quantitative characterisation of surface texture10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63458-1 ↗
38. (2021). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile—Part 1: Indication of Surface Texture (Standard No. ISO 21920-1:2021).
39. Zhu, Y., Cheng, Y., Gao, H., Sun, S., Zhang, X., Xue, L., Tang, J., and Tang, Y. (2024). High-Precision Measurement of Microscales Based on Optoelectronics and Image Integration Method. Micromachines, 15.10.3390/mi15091162 ↗
40. Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Zhao, H., Ren, T., Xu, Z., and Luo, Y. (2020). The Machine Vision Measurement Module of the Modularized Flexible Precision Assembly Station for Assembly of Micro- and Meso-Sized Parts. Micromachines, 11.10.3390/mi11100918 ↗
41. Mínguez Martínez, A., Gómez Pérez, C., Pérez-Caballero, D.C., Carcedo Cerezo, L., and de Vicente y Oliva, J. (2021). Design of Industrial Standards for the Calibration of Optical Microscopes. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14010029 ↗
42. Evaluation of uncertainty in measurement for magnification error of metallographic microscope objective lens10.62051/5ybnms23 ↗
43. Tong, V., and Kingard, K.P. (2025, December 15). Uncertainties in Scanning Electron Microscopy—Dimensional Measurement Calibration and Angular Measurement with EBSD, Available online: https://eprintspublications.npl.co.uk/9959/.10.47120/npl.MAT125 ↗
44. Leach, R. (2014). Fundamental Principles of Engineering Nanometrology, Elsevier.
45. (2021). Calibration Specification for Metallurgical Microscopes (Standard No. JJF1914-2021).
46. Liu, J., and Cui, T. (2010, January 4–6). A Measurement Method on the Roundness Error Based on Computer Vision System. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Engineering, Hangzhou, China.
47. Uncertainty Evaluation of an On-Machine Chromatic Confocal Measurement System10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112995 ↗
48. Greenfield, S., and Wolf, D.E. (2013). Digital Microscopy, Academic Press.
49. Uncertainty-Based Comparison of Conventional and Surface Topography-Based Methods for Wear Volume Evaluation in Pin-On-Disc Tribological Test10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107260 ↗
50. (2025, October 29). Motorized Focus Stacking Microscope (With Display)—INSIZE Co., Ltd. Available online: https://insize.com/Index.html.
51. (2000). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs)—Part 1: Vocabulary (Standard No. ISO 10360-1:2000).
52. Scanning electron microscope dimensional metrology using a model-based library10.1002/sia.2087 ↗
53. Metrological performance of optical coordinate measuring machines under industrial conditions10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.128 ↗
54. Harding, K.G. (2013). Handbook of Optical Dimensional Metrology, CRC Press.
55. Zhao, F., Tang, H., Zou, X., and Li, X. (2025). A Review of Optical Metrology Techniques for Advanced Manufacturing Applications. Micromachines, 16.10.3390/mi16111224 ↗
56. Levene, H. (1961). Robust tests for equality of variances. Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, Stanford University Press.
57. Optical techniques for on-line measurement of surface topography10.1016/0141-6359(81)90038-6 ↗
58. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916 ↗
59. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R.J. (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman and Hall/CRC. [1st ed.].10.1201/9780429246593 ↗
60. Controlling the false discovery Rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x ↗
61. An analysis of transformations10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x ↗
62. (2008). Evaluation of Measurement Data—Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement”—Propagation of Distributions Using a Monte Carlo Method (Standard No. JCGM 101:2008).
63. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 ↗
64. The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108 ↗
65. Davison, A.C., and Hinkley, D.V. (1997). Bootstrap Methods and their Application, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802843 ↗
66. (2008). Uncertainty of Measurement—Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM); Supplement 1: Numerical Methods (Standard No. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008).
67. On-machine and in-process surface metrology for precision manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.005 ↗
68. Optical methods for dimensional metrology in production engineering10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61707-7 ↗
69. Scanning electron microscope measurement of width and shape of 10 nm patterned lines using a JMONSEL-modeled library10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.01.004 ↗
70. Research on improved edge extraction algorithm of rectangular piece10.1142/S0129183118500079 ↗
71. Integration of adaptive guided filtering, deep feature learning, and edge-detection techniques for hyperspectral image classification10.1117/1.OE.56.11.113106 ↗
72. Optical measurements as projection synthesis10.1103/PhysRevA.58.3259 ↗
73. A flexible new technique for camera calibration10.1109/34.888718 ↗
74. Pawley, J.B. (2006). Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-45524-2 ↗