journal article·2025-12-16Open access

A Network-Aware and Reputation-Driven Scalable Blockchain Consensus

Jiayong Chai, Jun Guo, Muhua Wei, Mo Chen, Song Luo

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 24

Abstract

Blockchain systems have been widely adopted in today’s society, with consensus algorithms serving as their core component to ensure all participants in the network agree on a specific data state. Existing consensus algorithms such as Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), and the Practical Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Algorithm (PBFT) exhibit certain limitations in terms of scalability, security, and efficiency. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a novel Network-based Reputation Consensus (NRC) algorithm. The main research contributions of this work include the following: (1) An intelligent grouping mechanism that dynamically groups nodes based on network awareness, forming consensus groups with low internal latency and high bandwidth utilization, significantly reducing intra-group communication overhead. (2) A dynamic reputation system incorporating a “diminishing returns” reward function and a “multiplicative penalty” mechanism, effectively incentivizing honest node participation while preventing power monopoly. (3) A two-phase model of “intra-group BFT consensus + global communication committee ordering” that decomposes complex global consensus into parallel intra-group processing and coordination among a small set of elite nodes, thereby drastically improving efficiency. (4) Comprehensive simulations comparing the NRC algorithm with mainstream consensus algorithms, demonstrating its superior performance in communication overhead, throughput, latency, and tolerance to malicious nodes, thereby laying the foundation for large-scale applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Distributed systems and fault tolerance · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

China Mobile Research Institute, Beijing 100032, China

College of Computer Science, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100083, China

Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

National Institute of Data Development, Beijing 100037, China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, SCIRP Open Access.
2. Buterin, V. (2025, December 11). Ethereum White Paper: A Next Generation Smart Contract & Decentralized Application Platform. Available online: https://ethereum.org/content/whitepaper/whitepaper-pdf/Ethereum_Whitepaper_-_Buterin_2014.pdf.
3. Anwar, S., Shukla, V.K., Rao, S.S., Sharma, B.K., and Sharma, P. (2019, January 20–21). Framework for financial auditing process through blockchain technology, using identity-based cryptography. Proceedings of the 2019 Sixth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT), Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.10.1109/ITT48889.2019.9075120 ↗
4. Blockchain meets IoT: An architecture for scalable access management in IoT10.1109/JIOT.2018.2812239 ↗
5. Blockchain based hybrid network architecture for the smart city10.1016/j.future.2018.04.060 ↗
6. Making big data open in edges: A resource-efficient blockchain-based approach10.1109/TPDS.2018.2871449 ↗
7. Blockchain-based on-demand computing resource trading in IoV-assisted smart city10.1109/TETC.2020.2971831 ↗
8. Blockchain for 5G: A prelude to future telecommunication10.1109/MNET.001.2000005 ↗
9. Federated learning with blockchain for autonomous vehicles: Analysis and design challenges10.1109/TCOMM.2020.2990686 ↗
10. Zheng, X.Y., Zhu, Y.X., and Si, X.M. (2019). A Survey on Challenges and Progresses in Blockchain Technologies: A Performance and Security Perspective. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9224731 ↗
11. World Economic Forum (2021). The Global Blockchain Policy Centre: Shaping the Future of Blockchain and Digital Assets, World Economic Forum.
12. Eyal, I., Gencer, A.E., Sirer, E.G., and Van Renesse, R. (2016, January 16–18). Bitcoin-NG: A Scalable Blockchain Protocol. Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
13. Vukolić, M. (2015, January 29). The Quest for Scalable Blockchain Fabric: Proof-of-Work vs. BFT Replication. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Open Problems in Network Security, Zurich, Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-39028-4_9 ↗
14. Jakobsson, M., and Juels, A. (1999). Proofs of work and bread pudding protocols. Secure Information Networks, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-35568-9_18 ↗
15. King, S., and Nadal, S. (2025, December 11). PPcoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/PPCoin%3A-Peer-to-Peer-Crypto-Currency-with-King-Nadal/0db38d32069f3341d34c35085dc009a85ba13c13.
16. Cheng, Y., Hu, X., and Zhang, J. (2019, January 24–27). An improved scheme of proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Mechanical, Control and Computer Engineering (ICMCCE), Hohhot, China.10.1109/ICMCCE48743.2019.00189 ↗
17. Delegated Proof-of-Stake White Paper (DpoS)
18. Castro, M., and Liskov, B. (1999, January 22–25). Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, New Orleans, LA, USA.
19. Gueta, G.G., Abraham, I., Grossman, S., Malkhi, D., Pinkas, B., Reiter, M., Seredinschi, D.-A., Tamir, O., and Tomescu, A. (2019, January 24–27). SBFT: A Scalable and Decentralized Trust Infrastructure. Proceedings of the 2019 49th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Portland, OR, USA.
20. Luu, L., Narayanan, V., Zheng, C., Baweja, K., Gilbert, S., and Saxena, P. (2016, January 24–28). A Secure Sharding Protocol for Open Blockchains. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Vienna, Austria.10.1145/2976749.2978389 ↗
21. Kokoris-Kogias, E., Jovanovic, P., Gasser, L., Gailly, N., Syta, E., and Ford, B. (2018, January 20–24). OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via Sharding. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/SP.2018.000-5 ↗
22. Huang, H., Zhao, Y., and Zheng, Z. (2023, January 19–21). TMPT: Reconfiguration across Blockchain Shards via Trimmed Merkle Patricia Trie. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/IWQoS57198.2023.10188757 ↗
23. Lei, K., Zhang, Q., Xu, L., and Qi, Z. (1018, January 11–13). Reputation-based byzantine fault-tolerance for consortium blockchian. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 24th Internaional Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), Singapore.10.1109/PADSW.2018.8644933 ↗
24. Tong, W., Dong, X., and Zheng, J. (2019, January 10–13). Trust-pbft: A peertrust-based practical byzantine consensus algorithm. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA), Daegu, Republic of Korea.10.1109/NaNA.2019.00066 ↗
25. T-PBFT: An eigentrust-based practical byzantinefault tolerance consensus algorithm10.23919/JCC.2019.12.008 ↗
26. Caldarola, F., d’Atri, G., and Zanardo, E. (2022). Neural FairnessBlockchain Protocol Using an EllipticCurves Lottery. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10173040 ↗