journal article·2025-11-30Open access

Data-Driven Settlement Prediction for Pavements on Tunis Soft Clay Improved with Deep Soil Mixing: Artificial Intelligence and Response Surface Approaches

Abderrahim Meguellati, Seifeddine Tabchouche, Yasser Altowaijri, Yazeed A. Alsharedah, Abdelghani Merdas, Abdellah Douadi

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

This study investigates the prediction of immediate settlement (Uz) in soft clay improved with Deep Soil Mixing (DSM) columns under heavy aircraft loading. Two key design parameters were considered: column spacing (2.25 m to 3.75 m) and column length (6 m to 20 m), with both rectangular and triangular arrangements analyzed. The datasets obtained from numerical simulations were modeled using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), with model calibration and validation performed through k-fold cross-validation. The statistical analysis revealed that both approaches achieved excellent predictive capability, with R2 values exceeding 0.999. For the rectangular arrangement, RSM yielded slightly lower errors (RMSE = 0.0636 cm, MAE = 0.0553 cm) compared to ANN (RMSE = 0.0828 cm, MAE = 0.0682 cm), suggesting that a second-order polynomial approximation can effectively describe the settlement response in this configuration. Conversely, for the triangular arrangement, ANN clearly outperformed RSM, reducing RMSE from 0.0725 cm to 0.0265 cm and MAE from 0.0615 cm to 0.0111 cm, thereby capturing the nonlinear stress redistribution associated with isotropic column layouts more effectively. Observed–predicted plots confirmed the high predictive accuracy of both methods, with ANN showing superior generalization in triangular grids. Overall, the findings highlight that RSM remains a robust and computationally efficient tool for rectangular layouts with relatively linear responses. In contrast, ANN provides enhanced accuracy for triangular configurations where nonlinear interactions dominate, making it particularly suitable for DSM design optimization in airport pavement foundations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering Research Laboratory of Setif (LRGCS), Department of Civil Engineering, Setif 1 University-Ferhat Abbas, Setif 19000, Algeria

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. A review on consolidation theories and its application10.1080/19386362.2017.1390899 ↗
2. Stiffness and strength development of the soft clay stabilized by the one-part geopolymer under one-dimensional compressive loading10.1016/j.sandf.2021.06.001 ↗
3. Schaefer, V.R., Mitchell, J.K., Berg, R.R., Filz, G.M., and Douglas, S.C. (2012). Ground improvement in the 21st century: A comprehensive web-based information system. Geotechnical Engineering State of the Art and Practice: Keynote Lectures from GeoCongress 2012, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/9780784412138.0011 ↗
4. Han, J. (2015). Principles and Practice of Ground Improvement, John Wiley & Sons.
5. Addressing some current challenges in ground improvement10.1680/grim.12.00030 ↗
6. Terashi, M. (2003). The state of practice in deep mixing methods. Grouting and Ground Treatment, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/40663(2003)2 ↗
7. Kitazume, M., and Terashi, M. (2013). The Deep Mixing Method, CRC Press.10.1201/b13873 ↗
8. Bruce, D.A. (2001). An Introduction to the Deep Mixing Methods as Used in Geotechnical Applications, Volume III: The Verification and Properties of Treated Ground, National Academy of Sciences.
9. State of the art in deep mixing technology: Part I. Basic concepts and overview10.1680/gi.1998.020204 ↗
10. Experimental study of Tunis soft soil improved by deep mixing column10.1007/s10706-016-0151-2 ↗
11. Shen, S.-L., Miura, N., Han, J., and Koga, H. (2003). Evaluation of property changes in surrounding clays due to installation of deep mixing columns. Grouting and Ground Treatment, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/40663(2003)35 ↗
12. Laboratory-scale soil mixing of a contaminated site
13. Field tests, modification, and application of deep soil mixing method in soft clay10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000746 ↗
14. The design of vibro replacement
15. Bruce, M.E.C., Berg, R.R., Filz, G.M., Terashi, M., Yang, D.S., Collin, J.G., and Geotechnica, S. (2013). Federal Highway Administration Design Manual: Deep Mixing for Embankment and Foundation Support, Federal Highway Administration, Offices of Research & Development.
16. Packing fraction effect on dynamic creep deformation of granular materials10.1007/s11440-024-02459-w ↗
17. Parameters affecting the lateral movements of compound deep cement mixing walls by numerical simulations and parametric analyses10.1007/s11440-015-0417-5 ↗
18. Revisiting the effect of foundation embedment on elastic settlement: A new approach10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.08.002 ↗
19. Analytical modeling for nonlinear seismic metasurfaces of saturated porous media10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110666 ↗
20. Laboratory tests of an eccentrically loaded strip footing above single underlying void10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113211 ↗
21. Load-settlement response of a footing over buried conduit in a sloping terrain: A numerical experiment-based artificial intelligent approach10.1007/s00500-021-06628-x ↗
22. Montgomery, D.C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons.
23. Feasibility of PSO-ANN model for predicting surface settlement caused by tunneling10.1007/s00366-016-0447-0 ↗
24. Multi-channel fusion prediction of TBM tunneling thrust based on multimodal decomposition and reconstruction10.1016/j.tust.2025.107061 ↗
25. Diffusion evolution rules of grouting slurry in mining-induced cracks in overlying strata10.1007/s00603-025-04445-4 ↗
26. Chaoshang, S., Chaoyang, S., Zhiming, Z., Haixiao, L., Zhenhua, L., Feng, D., Zhengzheng, C., Pengtao, L., and Lin, L. (2025). Overburden failure characteristics and fracture evolution rule under repeated mining with multiple key strata control. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-14068-y ↗
27. Generalized strength prediction equation for cement stabilized clayey soils10.1016/j.clay.2022.106761 ↗
28. Strength behavior and microscopic mechanisms of geopolymer-stabilized waste clays considering clay mineralogy10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146877 ↗
29. Bearing capacity of foundation on soil reinforced by deep mixing columns10.1080/17486025.2020.1755458 ↗
30. Topolnicki, M. (2016, January 25–26). General overview and advances in Deep Soil Mixing. Proceedings of the XXIV Geotechnical Conference of Torino Design, Construction and Controls of Soil Improvement Systems, Torino, Italy.
31. Machine learning techniques for predictive modelling in geotechnical engineering: A succinct review10.1007/s44290-025-00224-w ↗
32. Reliable prediction of bored pile load-settlement response using machine learning and Monte Carlo simulations10.1007/s10706-025-03397-4 ↗
33. Study of the behavior of Tunis soft clay10.1007/s41062-016-0031-x ↗
34. Challenges and improvement solutions for Tunis’ soft clay
35. Alsharedah, Y.A. (2022). Behavior of Hybrid and Monopile Foundation Systems for OWT: Centrifuge Testing and Numerical Modelling. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)].
36. Stiffness and strength parameters for hardening soil model of soft and stiff Bangkok clays10.1016/j.sandf.2012.07.009 ↗
37. Numerical simulation with hardening soil model parameters of marine clay obtained from conventional tests10.1007/s42452-020-04115-w ↗
38. Analysis of rigid pavement subjected to aircraft load using finite element technique
39. Karatağ, H., Firat, S., and Işik, N.S. (2017, January 15–17). Evaluation of flexible highway embankment under repetitive wheel loading using finite element analysis. Proceedings of the International Sustainable Buildings Symposium, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.10.1007/978-3-319-63709-9_54 ↗
40. Finite Element Method (FEM) of Rigid Pavement Laid on Soft Soil Stabilized with Soil Cement Column10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.845.83 ↗
41. Abdullah, G.M. (2023). Performance of enhanced problematic soils in roads pavement structure: Numerical simulation and laboratory study. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15032595 ↗
42. Static analysis of rigid pavement runway under the influence of aircraft loading by finite element technique
43. Rabaiotti, C., Amstad, M., and Schnyder, M. (2013). Pavement rehabilitation of runway 14/32 at Zürich International Airport: Service life prediction based on updated incremental damage approach. Airfield and Highway Pavement 2013: Sustainable and Efficient Pavements, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/9780784413005.049 ↗
44. Fischer, S., Kurhan, D., Kurhan, M., and Tiutkin, O. (2025). The Role of Domain Size and Boundary Conditions in Mathematical Modeling of Railway Tracks. Appl. Mech., 6.10.3390/applmech6030072 ↗
45. Marak, B.K., and Singh, B. (2024, January 7–9). Effect of Induced Lateral Displacement on Vertically Loaded Large Piled-Raft Response in Sandy Soil. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development (ICCESD 2024), Khulna, Bangladesh.10.2991/978-94-6463-478-5_9 ↗
46. Arslan, E., Akmaz, E., Çakır, U.F., Öztürk, Ö., Pir, H., Acartürk, S., Akça, N.Ç., Karakuş, Y., and Sert, S. (2025). Finite Element Modeling with Sensitivity and Parameter Variation Analysis of a Deep Excavation: From a Case Study. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15050658 ↗
47. Korkiala-Tanttu, L. (2008). Calculation Method for Permanent Deformation of Unbound Pavement Materials, VTT.
48. Finite element modelling of flexible pavements on soft soil subgrades10.1016/j.matdes.2005.12.006 ↗
49. Bearing capacity of composite ground with soil-cement columns under earth fills: Physical and numerical modeling10.1016/j.sandf.2019.12.004 ↗
50. Airbus (2023, January 22). Aircraft Characteristics—Airport and Maintenance Planning. Available online: https://aircraft.airbus.com/sites/g/files/jlcbta126/files/2024-11/AC_A340-500_600_1124.pdf.
51. Experimental optimization of low-carbon cellular foam geopolymers incorporating crushed stone sand and flax fiber using central composite design10.1007/s40996-024-01692-3 ↗
52. Modeling and optimizing the durability of self-compacting mortars incorporating cement kiln dust and glass powder: A box-behnken design study10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145282 ↗
53. Kaya, M., Yıldırım, Z.B., Köksal, F., Beycioğlu, A., and Kasprzyk, I. (2021). Evaluation and multi-objective optimization of lightweight mortars parameters at elevated temperature via Box–Behnken optimization approach. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14237405 ↗
54. Mazouz, B., Belkadi, A.A., Bakri, M., Boufarh, R., Mansouri, T., Dridi, M., and Douadi, A. (2025). Model testing and response surface investigation of eccentric loading on closely spaced strip footings. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-25348-y ↗
55. Comparison of artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) prediction in compressive strength of recycled concrete aggregates10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.119 ↗
56. Response of saturated and nearly saturated porous media: Different formulations and their applicability10.1002/nag.739 ↗
57. Role of fly ash on strength and microstructure development in blended cement stabilized silty clay10.3208/sandf.49.85 ↗
58. Antioxidant depletion from five geomembranes of same resin but of different thicknesses immersed in leachate10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.08.001 ↗
59. Prediction of end-bearing capacity of rock-socketed shafts considering rock quality designation (RQD)10.1139/T10-016 ↗
60. Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.001 ↗
61. Zhang, L. (2005). Automatic Digital Surface Model (DSM) Generation from Linear Array Images, ETH Zurich.
62. A novel LOD rendering method with multi-level structure keeping mesh simplification and fast texture alignment for realistic 3D models10.1109/TGRS.2024.3457796 ↗
63. LiDAR Point Clouds to 3D Urban Models: A Review10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2781132 ↗